No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Evaluating the Use of E-Learning in Indian Emergency Medicine Residency Programs During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A National Cross-Sectional Survey
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 September 2023
Abstract
Objective:
The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has necessitated e-learning strategies in academic emergency medicine (EM) programs. A study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic to understand e-learning in the Indian EM context.
Methods:
After IEC/IRB approval, we conducted a multicenter national survey validated by experts and underwent multiple reviews by the research team. The final survey was converted into Google Forms for dissemination via email to National Medical Commission (NMC) approved EM residency program as of 2020–2021. Data were exported into Excel format and analyzed.
Results:
Residents and faculty comprised 41.5% and 58.5% of 94 respondents. The COVID-19 pandemic’s second wave in India significantly impacted response rates. Internet connectivity was cited as a significant barrier to e-learning, while flexible timings and better engagement were facilitators identified by the survey. The attitude among residents and faculty toward e-learning was also evaluated.
Conclusion:
This survey reveals a significant positive shift in medical education from conventional teaching strategies toward e-learning, specifically during the pandemic. It also shows the need for all stakeholders (learners/educators) to better understand e-learning and adapt to its requirements. We need more data on the efficacy of e-learning compared to traditional methods. Until then, innovative hybrid/blended strategies would be the way forward.
- Type
- Original Research
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health
References
India COVID: Coronavirus Statistics. Worldometer. Accessed December 26, 2021. https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries
Google Scholar
Vaona, A, Banzi, R, Kwag, KH, et al. E-learning for health professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;1(1):CD011736. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011736.pub2
Google ScholarPubMed
Mallin, M, Schlein, S, Doctor, S, et al. A survey of the current utilization of asynchronous education among emergency medicine residents in the United States. Acad Med. 2014;89(4):598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bozkurt, A, Sharma, RC. Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to coronavirus pandemic. Asian J Distance Educ. 2020;15(1):i-vi.Google Scholar
Jorge, M, Lüders, S, Malunga, G, Neuhann, F. E-learning for medical education in sub-Saharan Africa and low-resource settings. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(1):e12449.Google Scholar
Ozuah, PO. Undergraduate medical education: thoughts on future challenges. BMC Med Educ. 2002;2(1):1-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seluakumaran, K, Jusof, FF, Ismail, R, Husain, R. Integrating an open-source course management system (Moodle) into the teaching of a first-year medical physiology course: a case study. Adv Physiol Educ. 2011;35(4):369-377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaikwad, N, Tankhiwale, S. Interactive e-learning module in pharmacology: a pilot project at a rural medical college in India. Perspect Med Educ. 2014;3(1):15-30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lall, P, Rees, R, Law, GCY, et al. Influences on the implementation of mobile learning for medical and nursing education: qualitative systematic review by the digital health education collaboration. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(2):e12895.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Triola, MM, Huwendiek, S, Levinson, AJ, Cook, DA. New directions in e-learning research in health professions education: report of two symposia. Med Teach. 2012;34(1):e15-e20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, DA, West, CP. Conducting systematic reviews in medical education: a stepwise approach. Med Educ. 2012;46(10):943-952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frehywot, S, Vovides, Y, Talib, Z, et al. E-learning in medical education in resource constrained low-and middle-income countries. Hum Resour Health. 2013;11(1):1-15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, TP, Bailey, CJ, Guptill, M, et al. The flipped classroom: a modality for mixed asynchronous and synchronous learning in a residency program. West J Emerg Med. 2014;15(7):938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashton, A, Bhati, R. The use of an asynchronous learning network for senior house officers in emergency medicine. Emerg Med J. 2007;24(6):427-428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toohey, SL, Wray, A, Wiechmann, W, et al. Ten tips for engaging the millennial learner and moving an emergency medicine residency curriculum into the 21st century. West J Emerg Med. 2016;17(3):337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pilli, O. LMS vs. SNS: can social networking sites act as a learning management systems. Am Int J Contemp Res. 2014;4(5):90-97.Google Scholar
Sutterlin, J. Learning is social with Zoom video conferencing in your classroom. eLearn. 2018;2018(12): Article 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baig, M, Gazzaz, ZJ, Farouq, M. Blended learning: the impact of blackboard formative assessment on the final marks and students’ perception of its effectiveness. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(3):327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLaughlin, M, Brame, D. The best video conferencing software for 2020. PCMag Com. Published 2020. Accessed March 23, 2022. https://uk.pcmag.co m/cloud-services/9067/the-best-video-conferencing-software-for-2020
Google Scholar
Sutherland, S, Jalali, A. Social media as an open-learning resource in medical education: current perspectives. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017;8:369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, DA, Steinert, Y. Online learning for faculty development: a review of the literature. Med Teach. 2013;35(11):930-937.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamari, J, Koivisto, J, Sarsa, H. Does gamification work?—a literature review of empirical studies on gamification. IEEE. 2014:3025-3034.Google Scholar
McBrien, JL, Cheng, R, Jones, P. Virtual spaces: employing a synchronous online classroom to facilitate student engagement in online learning. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn. 2009;10(3). doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.605
Google Scholar
Muir, S, Tirlea, L, Elphinstone, B, Huynh, M. Promoting classroom engagement through the use of an online student response system: a mixed methods analysis. J Stat Educ. 2020;28(1):25-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandwani, S, Singh, N, Singh, G. Attitude of faculty towards online teaching and learning in relation to certain variables: a study during coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in India. Libr Philos Pract. Published online 2021:1-13.Google Scholar
Cook, DA. The value of online learning and MRI: finding a niche for expensive technologies. Med Teach. 2014;36(11):965-972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalchiem-Dekel, O, Schwalk, AJ, Patel, NM, et al. COVID-19 impact on interventional pulmonology training. Semantic Scholar. Published online April 13, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southworth, E, COVID, Gleason SH. 19: a cause for pause in undergraduate medical education and catalyst for innovation. HEC Forum. 2021;33:125-142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, AK, Nousiainen, MT, Campisi, P, et al. Training disrupted: practical tips for supporting competency-based medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Med Teach. 2020;42(7):756-761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krishnan S et al. supplementary material 1
File
910.1 KB
Krishnan S et al. supplementary material 2
File
32.4 KB