Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T10:35:56.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessing the risk of venous thromboembolism in psychiatric in-patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

N. Ellis
Affiliation:
Cardiff University School of Medicine, Medical School, Cardiff, United Kingdom
M. Quraishy
Affiliation:
Cardiff University School of Medicine, Medical School, Cardiff, United Kingdom
C.M. Grubb
Affiliation:
Cardiff University School of Medicine, Medical School, Cardiff, United Kingdom
S. Fitch
Affiliation:
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, General Adult Psychiatry, Cardiff, United Kingdom
J. Harrison
Affiliation:
Cardiff University School of Medicine, MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Cardiff, United Kingdom

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a potentially fatal condition. Hospital-associated VTE leads to more than 25,000 deaths per year in the UK. Therefore identification of at-risk patients is crucial. Psychiatric in-patients have unique factors which may affect their risk of VTE (antipsychotic prescription, restraint) however there are currently no UK guidelines which specifically address VTE risk in this population.

Objectives

We assessed VTE risk among psychiatric inpatients in Cardiff and Vale university health board, Wales, UK, and whether proformas currently provided for VTE risk assessment were being completed.

Methods

All acute adult in-patient and old age psychiatric wards were assessed by a team of medical students and a junior doctor over three days. We used the UK department of health VTE risk assessment tool which was adapted to include factors specific for psychiatric patients. We also assessed if there were concerns about prescribing VTE prophylaxis (compression stockings or anticoagulants), because of a history of self-harm or ligature use.

Results

Of the 145 patients included, 0% had a completed VTE risk assessment form. We found 38.6% to be at an increased risk of VTE and there were concerns about prescribing VTE prophylaxis in 31% of patients.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that VTE risk assessment is not being carried out on psychiatric wards. Staff education is needed to improve awareness of VTE. Specific guidance for this population is needed due to the presence of unique risk factors in psychiatric in-patients and concerns regarding VTE prophylaxis.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
e-Poster Viewing: Others
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2017
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.