Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T00:58:42.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

More than meets the eye – and less: Comments on The Internationalists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2018

ANDREAS FOLLESDAL
ANDREAS FOLLESDAL*
Affiliation:
Pluricourts, Faculty of Law, University of Oslo, PO Box 6706, St. Olavs plass, 0130 Oslo, Norway
*
*Email: andreas.follesdal@jus.uio.no
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

These comments address three themes concerning Oona A Hathaway’s and Scott J Shapiro’s The Internationalists (Hathaway and Shapiro 2017), a great contribution to scholarship about international relations, international law and international legal theory. I first explore further some game theoretical themes, how the Peace Pact arguably contributed to avoid war by creating institutions – such as international courts – that helped stabilise an assurance game among states by providing trustworthy information and commitments, in turn influencing practices and beliefs concerning mutual non-aggression. Second, I suggest that the authors should not claim more than that the Peace Pact was one cause of the massive shift in reduced warfare. Further arguments are needed to show that this treaty was the trigger that ‘began a cascade’. Third, I suggest that the lessons for the future are limited, as we explore how to preserve and improve on the New World Order of the Pact, rather than backsliding into the Old World Order.

Keywords

assurance gameinternationalistsPeace Pactwarworld order
Type
Special Articles
Information
Global Constitutionalism , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , November 2018 , pp. 330 - 341
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bellamy, Richard. 2007. Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, Richard. 2014. ‘‘The Democratic Legitimacy of International Human Rights Conventions: Political Constitutionalism and the European Convention on Human Rights.” European Journal of International Law 25(4):1019–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1995. ‘‘Rationalist Explanations for War.” International Organization 49(3):379–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Follesdal, Andreas. 2004. ‘‘Political Consumerism as Chance and Challenge.” In Politics, Products and Markets: Exploring Political Consumerism Past and Present, edited by Micheletti, Michele, Follesdal, Andreas and Stolle, Dietlind, 3–20. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.Google Scholar
Follesdal, Andreas. 2015a. ‘‘Machiavelli at 500: From Cynic to Vigilant Supporter of International Law.” Ratio Juris 28(2):242–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Follesdal, Andreas. 2015b. ‘‘Social Primary Goods.” In The Cambridge Rawls Lexicon, edited by Mandle, Jon and Reidy, David, 643–7. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack L. and Posner, Eric A.. 2005. The Limits of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T. 2008. ‘‘International Tribunals: A Rational Choice Analysis.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 157:171–235.Google Scholar
Hathaway, Oona A. and Shapiro, Scott J.. 2017. The Internationalists: How a Radical Plan to Outlaw War Remade the World. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. and Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2005. ‘‘Why States Create International Tribunals: A Response to Professors Posner and Yoo.” California Law Review 93:1–58.Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E. 1979. ‘‘Symbolic Protest and Calculated Silence.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 9(1):83–102.Google Scholar
Howse, Robert. 2007. ‘‘The Concept of Odious Debt in Public International Law.” UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development) Discussion Paper No. UNCTAD/OSG/DP/2007/4.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1988. ‘‘Realism, Game Theory, and Cooperation.” World Politics 40(3):317–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1796 (1970). ‘‘Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch.” In Kant’s Political Writings, edited by Reiss, Hans, 93–130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1797 (1964). The Metaphysical Principles of Virtue: Part II of the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by Ellington, James. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S.. 2001. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition (3rd edn). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolo. 1513 (original edn) (1977). The Prince. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. 1994. ‘‘The False Promise of International Institutions.” International Security 19(3):5–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1835 (1963). ‘‘Review of Segwick’s Discourse.” In Collected Works, edited by Robson, John M., 52.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1948. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York, NY: Knopf.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2000. ‘‘Democracy: Electoral and Contestatory.” In Designing Democratic Institutions, edited by Shapiro, Ian and Macedo, Stephen, 104–44. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas W. 2005. ‘‘World Poverty and Human Rights.” Ethics and International Affairs 19(1):1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Eric and Yoo, John. 2005. ‘‘Judicial Independence in International Tribunals.” California Law Review 93(1):1–74.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999. ‘‘Social Unity and Primary Goods.” In Collected Papers, edited by Freeman, Samuel, 359–87. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 2008. Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sack, Alexander Nahun. 1927. Les effets de transformations des États sur leurs dettes publiques et autres obligations financières (The Effects of State Transformations on their Public Debts and other Financial Obligations). Paris: Recueil Sirey.Google Scholar
Schuman, Robert. 1950. ‘‘Declaration of May 9.” Available at <https://www.robert-schuman.eu/en/declaration-of-9-may-1950>..>Google Scholar
Skinner, Quintin. 1978a. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Volume One: The Renaissance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quintin. 1978b. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Volume Two: The Age of Reformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quintin. 1984. ‘‘The Idea of Negative Liberty: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives.” In Philosophy in History: Essays on the Historiography of Philosophy, edited by Rorty, Richard, Skinner, Quintin and Schneewind, Jerome B., 204–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quintin. 1998. Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wenar, Leif. 2016. Blood Oil: Tyrants, Violence and the Rules That Run the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar