Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T17:03:39.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Basic income: How to help women and reduce gender disparity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2021

Caitlin M. Lapine ,
Aditi Rabindra Sachdev  and
Sakshi Vaghani
Caitlin M. Lapine*
Affiliation:
Touro College
Aditi Rabindra Sachdev
Affiliation:
PepsiCo Inc.
Sakshi Vaghani
Affiliation:
University of California San Diego
*
*Corresponding author. Email: clapine1@pride.hofstra.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , December 2021 , pp. 593 - 596
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alstott, A. (2001). Good for women. In Cohen, J. & Rogers, J. (Eds.), What’s wrong with a freelunch? Beacon Press. 186–188.Google Scholar
Ando, J. (2015). Social norms, gender identity, and high-earning wives’ housework behavior in Japan: An identity economics framework. Japanese Political Economy, 41(1–2), 36–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2329194X.2015.1105675 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratberg, E., Dahl, S., & Risa, A. E. (2002). “The double burden”: Do combinations of career and family obligations increase sickness absence among women? European Sociological Review, 18(2), 233–249.10.1093/esr/18.2.233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1991). Explaining sex differences in social behavior: Ameta-analytic perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(3), 306–315.10.1177/0146167291173011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgarte, J. M. (2006, November 2–4). Good for women? Advantages and risks of a basic income from a gender perspective [Paper presentation] The 11th Basic Income Earth Network Congress, Cape Town.Google Scholar
Huffmeier, J., & Zacher, H. (2021). The basic income: Initiating the needed discussion in industrial, work, and organizational psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 14(4), 531–562.Google Scholar
Jung, S., Choe, C., & Oaxaca, R. L. (2016). Gender wage gaps and risky vs. secure employment: An experimental analysis. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) Discussion Papers, No. 10132.Google Scholar
Madgavkar, A., White, O., Krishnan, M., Mahajan, D., & Azcue, X. (2020). COVID-19 and gender equality: Countering the regressive effects. McKinsey Global Institute.Google Scholar
McKinsey & Company (March, 2021). Seven charts that show COVID-19’s impact on women’s employment. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inclusion/seven-charts-that-show-covid-19s-impact-on-womens-employment# Google Scholar
Schober, P., & Scott, J. (2012). Maternal employment and gender role attitudes: Dissonance among British men and women in the transition to parenthood. Work, Employment and Society, 26(3), 514–530.10.1177/0950017012438577CrossRefGoogle Scholar