Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T03:34:14.452Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taming the Dragon: How Industrial–Organizational Psychologists Can Break Barriers to “Green” Business

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Emily B. Craddock ,
Ann H. Huffman  and
Jaime B. Henning
Emily B. Craddock*
Affiliation:
Northern Arizona University
Ann H. Huffman
Affiliation:
Northern Arizona University
Jaime B. Henning
Affiliation:
Eastern Kentucky University
*
E-mail: ebc28@nau.edu, Address: Department of Psychology, Northern Arizona University, Box 15106, Flagstaff, AZ 86001
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 484 - 487
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 665–683. Google Scholar
Aronson, E., & O’Leary, M. (1982). The relative effectiveness of models and prompts on energy conservation: A field experiment in a shower room. Journal of Environmental Systems, 12, 219–224. Google Scholar
Blanchard, K., Zigarmi, P., & Zigarmi, D. (1985). Leadership and the one minute manager: Increasing effectiveness through situational leadership. New York, NY: William Morrow and Company. Google Scholar
Brookes, L. (1990). The greenhouse effect: The fallacies in the energy efficiency solution. Energy Policy, 18, 199–201. DOI: 10.1016/0301-4215(90)90145-TGoogle Scholar
Cash, D., Clark, W., Alcock, F., Dickson, N., Eckley, N., & Jager, J. (2010). Salience, credibility, legitimacy, and boundaries: Linking research, assessment and decision making. John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Faculty Research Working Papers Series, RWP02-046.Google Scholar
Center for Research on Environmental Decisions. (2009). The psychology of climate change communication: A guide for scientists, journalists, educators, political aides, and the interested public. New York, NY: Columbia University.Google Scholar
Cialdini, R. B. (2003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 105–109. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8721.01242Google Scholar
Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015–1026. Google Scholar
Diekmann, A., & Preisendorfer, P. (1992). Personliches umweltverhalten: Diskrepanzen zwischen anspruch und wirklichkeit [Personal environmental issues: Discrepancy between expectations and reality]. Kolner Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie, 44, 226–251. Google Scholar
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140. DOI: 10.1177/001872675400700202Google Scholar
Fujii, S., & Garling, T. (2003). Development of script-based travel mode choice after forced change. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, 6, 117–124. DOI: 10.1016/S1369-8478(03)00019-6Google Scholar
Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, 66, 290–302. DOI: 10.1037/a0023566Google Scholar
Heath, Y., & Gifford, R. (2006). Free-market ideology and environmental degradation: The case of belief in global climate change. Environment and Behavior, 38, 48–71. DOI: 10.1177/0013916505277998Google Scholar
Khazzoom, D. J. (1980). Economic implications of mandated efficiency standards for household appliances. The Energy Journal, 1, 21–40. Google Scholar
Ones, D. S., & Dilchert, S. (2012). Environmental sustainability at work: A call to action. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 444–466.Google Scholar
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24, 403–441.Google Scholar
Schiffman, L. G., Kanuk, L. L., & Das, M. (2006). Consumer behaviour. Toronto, Ontario: Pearson Education. Google Scholar
Takeuchi, R., Yun, S., & Wong, K. F. E. (2011). Social influence of a coworker: A test of the effect of employee and coworker exchange ideologies on employees' exchange qualities. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 226–237. DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.02.004Google Scholar