Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T05:40:38.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CDC Definitions of Nosocomial Surgical Site Infections, 1992: A Modification of CDC Definitions of Surgical Wound Infections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Teresa C. Horan ,
Robert P. Gaynes ,
William J. Martone ,
William R. Jarvis  and
T. Grace Emori
Teresa C. Horan*
Affiliation:
Hospital Infections Program, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia
Robert P. Gaynes
Affiliation:
Hospital Infections Program, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia
William J. Martone
Affiliation:
Hospital Infections Program, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia
William R. Jarvis
Affiliation:
Hospital Infections Program, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia
T. Grace Emori
Affiliation:
Hospital Infections Program, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia
*
Hospital Infections Program, Mailstop A07, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30333
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1988, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) published definitions of nosocomial infections However, because of journalistic style and space constraints, these definitions lacked some of the detail provided to National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System hospitals in the NNIS Manual (unpublished). After the NNIS System hospitals had had considerable experience with the definitions and in response to a request for review by The Surgical Wound Infection Task Force, a group composed of members of The Society for Hospital Epidemiology of America, the Association for Practitioners in Infection Control, the Surgical Infection Society, and the CDC, we slightly modified the definition of surgical wound infection and changed the name to surgical site infection (SSI).

Type
Report From the CDC
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 13 , Issue 10 , October 1992 , pp. 606 - 608
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Gamer, JS, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG, Horan, TC, Hughes, JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control. 1988;16:128–140.Google Scholar
2. The Society for Hospital Epidemiology of America, the Association for Practitioners in Infection Control, the Centers for Disease Control, the Surgical Infection Society. Consensus paper on the surveillance of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992;13:599–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Altemeier, WA, Burke, JF, Pruitt, BA, Sandusky, WR, eds. Manual on Control of Infections in Surgical Rztients. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: J.B. Lippincott Co.; 1984.Google Scholar
4. Emori, TG, Culver, DH, Horan, TC, et al. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System: description of surveillance methodology. Am J Infect Control. 1991;19:19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Culver, DH. Horan, TC, Gaynes, RI? et al. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. Am JMed. 1991;91(suppl 3B):152S–157S.Google ScholarPubMed
6. Nosocomial infection rates for interhospital comparison: limitations and possible solutions. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1991;12:609–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar