Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T14:11:42.638Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discontinuation of Respiratory Isolation for Possible Tuberculosis: Do Two Negative Sputum Smear Results Suffice?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Charles S. Bryan ,
Deborah J. Rapp  and
Cynthia A. Brown
Charles S. Bryan*
Affiliation:
Palmetto Richland Memorial Hospitaland the, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, South Carolina
Deborah J. Rapp
Affiliation:
Palmetto Richland Memorial Hospitaland the, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, South Carolina
Cynthia A. Brown
Affiliation:
Palmetto Richland Memorial Hospitaland the, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, South Carolina
*
Two Medical Park, Suite 502, Columbia, SC 29203 (cbryan@gw.mp.sc.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Analysis of acid-fast bacillus smear results at a hospital with a mod-erate incidence of tuberculosis confirms recent recommendations that 2 negative smear results suffice for discontinuation of respiratory isolation. Use of polymerase chain reaction analysis further increases the confidence with which the diagnosis of active tuberculosis likely to be transmitted to others can be excluded.

Type
Concise Communications
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 27 , Issue 5 , May 2006 , pp. 515 - 516
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Stelfox, HT, Bates, DW, Redelmeier, DA. Safety of patients isolated for infection control. JAMA 2003; 290:1899–1905.Google Scholar
2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Thoracic Society. Diagnostic standards and classification of tuberculosis in adults and children. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 2000; 16:1376–1395.Google Scholar
3.Levy, H, Feldman, C, Sacho, H, van der Meulen, H, Kallenbach, J, Koornhof, H. A reevaluation of sputum microscopy in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Chest 1989; 95:1193–1197.Google Scholar
4.Mathew, P, Kuo, YH, Vazirani, B, Eng, RHK, Weinstein, MP. Are three sputum acid-fast bacillus smears necessary for discontinuing tuberculosis isolation? J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40:3482–3484.Google Scholar
5.Crampin, AC, Floyd, S, Mwaungulu, F, et al. Comparison of two versus three smears in identifying culture-positive tuberculosis patients in a rural African setting with high HIV prevalence. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2001; 5:994–999.Google Scholar
6.Leonard, MK, Osterholt, D, Kourbatova, EV, Del Rio, C, Wang, W, Blumberg, HM. How many sputum specimens are necessary to diagnose pulmonary tuberculosis? Am J Infect Control 2005; 33:58–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Bryan, CS. The hospital tuberculosis registry: an aid to infection control. Am J Infect Control 1983; 11:57–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Cox, JN, Brenner, ER, Bryan, CS. Changing patterns of mycobacterial disease at a teaching community hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994; 15:513–515.Google Scholar
9.Bryan, CS, Brenner, ER. Utility of the hospital tuberculosis registry. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994; 15:536–539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Drug-susceptible tuberculosis outbreak in a state correctional facility housing HIV-infected inmates: South Carolina, 1999-2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Weekly Rep 2000; 49:1041–1044.Google Scholar