Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T04:34:34.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Host Factors in Whirlpool-Associated Pseudomonas aeruginosa Skin Disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Steven L. Solomon
Steven L. Solomon*
Affiliation:
Hospital Infections Program, Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia
*
Hospital Infections Program, 1-5044, Centers for Disease Control, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30333
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa folliculitis is the most common recognizable infectious disease occurring after use of whirlpools and hot tubs. The factors that affect the host's susceptibility to whirlpool-related infection are the anatomic and physiologic defenses of normal skin, the microecology of the skin surface, factors intrinsic to the individual host, and behavioral factors. The structural components of the skin maintain an environment at the skin surface that makes human skin an inhospitable habitat for microflora. However, natural and experimental models of P. aeruginosa skin infection suggest that immersion in whirlpools may negate many of the body's normal host defenses, especially the very low humidity at the skin surface. Transient colonization of skin with P. aeruginosa may lead to elaboration of toxins in vivo, resulting in the characteristic dermatitis.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 6 , Issue 10 , October 1985 , pp. 402 - 406
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Salmen, P, Dwyer, DM, Vorse, H, et al: Whirlpool-associated Pseudomonas aeruginosa urinary tract infections. JAMA 1983;250:2025–2026.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Rose, HD, Franson, TR, Sheth, NK, et al: Pseudomonas pneumonia associated with use of a home whirlpool spa. JAMA 1983;250:2027–2029.Google Scholar
3. Centers for Disease Control: Otitis due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa serotype 0:10 associated with a mobile redwood hot tub system—North Carolina. MMWR 1982;31:511–542.Google Scholar
4. Jones, EE, Remis, RS, Tait, KA, et al: An outbreak of Pontiac Fever related to whirlpool use—Michigan, 1982. JAMA 1985;253:535–539.Google Scholar
5. Centers for Disease Control: Skin rash associated with whirlpool exposure—Minnesota. MMWR 1975;24:166–171.Google Scholar
6. McCausland, WJ, Cox, PJ: Pseudomonas infection traced to a motel whirlpool. Journal of Environmental Health 1975;37:455–459.Google Scholar
7. Washburn, J, Jacobson, JA, Marston, E, et al: Pseudomonas aeruginosa rash associated with a whirlpool. JAMA 1976;235:2205–2207.Google Scholar
8. Sausker, WK, Asling, JL, Fitzpatrick, JE. et al: Pseudomnnas folliculitis acquired from a health-spa whirlpool. JMAM 1978;239:2362–2365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. CDC: Rash associated with use of whirlpools.—Maine. MMWR 1979;28:182–186.Google Scholar
10. Silverman, AR, Nieland, ML: Hot tub dermatitis: A familial outbreak of Pseudomonas folliculitis. Journal of the Academy of Dermatology 1983;8:153–156.Google Scholar
11. Khabbaz, RK, McKinley, TW, Goodman, RA, et al: Pseudomonas aeruginosa serotype 0:9. New cause of whirlpool-associated dermatitis. Am J Med 1983;74:73–77.Google Scholar
12. Gustafson, TL, Band, JD, Hutcheson, RH Jr et al: Pseudomonas folliculitis: An outbreak and review. Rev Infect Dis 1983;5:1–8.Google Scholar
13. Blank, III: The skin as an organ of protection against the external environment, in Fitzpatrick, TB, Eisen, AZ, Wolff, K, et al (eds). Dermatology in General Medicine. ed 2. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1979, pp. 102–106.Google Scholar
14. Brenthnach, AS, Wolff, K: Structure and development of skin, in Fitzpatrick, TB, Eisen, AZ, Wolff, K (eds). Dermatology in General Medicine, ed 2. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1979, pp. 41–69.Google Scholar
15. Noble, WC, Somerville, DA: Microbiology of Human Skin. London, WB Saunders, 1974.Google Scholar
16. Marples, MJ: The Ecology of the Human Skin. Springfield, Illinois, Charles C. Thomas, 1965.Google Scholar
17. Robertshaw, D: Apocrine sweat glands, in Fitzpatrick, TB, Eisen, AZ, Wolff, K (eds). Dermatology in General Medicine. ed 2. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1979, pp. 118–121.Google Scholar
18. Aly, R, Maibach, HI, Shinefield, HR: Correlation of human in vivo and in vitro cutaneous antimicrobial factors. J Infect Dis 1975;131:579–583.Google Scholar
19. Rebell, G, Pillsbury, DM, Phalle, M deS, et al: Factors affecting the rapid disappearance of bacteria placed on the normal skin. J Invest Dermatol 1950;14:247–264.Google Scholar
20. Noble, WC: Microbial Skin Disease: Its Epidemiology. London, Edward Arnold, 1983.Google Scholar
21. Marples, RR: The effect of hydration on the bacterial flora of the skin, in Maibach, HI, Hildick-Smith, G (eds). Skin Bacteria and Their Role in Infection. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1965, pp 33–42.Google Scholar
22. Kligman, AM: The bacteriology of normal skin, in Maibach, HI, Hildick-Smith, G. (eds). Skin Bacteria and Their Role in Infection. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1965, pp 13–32.Google Scholar
23. Selwyn, S: Microbial interactions and antibiosis, in Maibach, HI, Aly, R (eds). Shin Microbiology, Relevance to Clinical Infections. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1981, pp 63–76.Google Scholar
24. Aly, R, Maibach, HI: Factors controlling skin bacterial flora, in Maibach, HI, Aly, R (eds). Skin Microbiology, Relevance to Clinical Infections. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1981, pp 29–39.Google Scholar
25. Ulrich, JA: Dynamics of bacterial skin populations, in Maibach, HI, Hildick-Smith, G (eds). Skin Bacteria and Their Role in infecton. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1965, pp 219–231.Google Scholar
26. Holt, RJ: Aerobic bacterial counts on human skin after bathing. J Med Microbiol 1971;4:319–327.Google Scholar
27. Leyden, JJ, McGinley, KJ, Mills, OH: Pseudomonas aeruginosa gram-negative folliculitis. Arch Dermatol 1979;115:1203–1204.Google Scholar
28. Aly, R, Shinefield, HR, Maibach, III, et al: Bacterial adherence to nasal mucosal cells. Infect Immun 1977;17:546–549.Google Scholar
29. Zaky, D, Bentley, DW, Lowy, K, et al: Malignant external otitis: A severe form of otitis in diabetic patients. Am J Med 1976;61:298–302.Google Scholar
30. Rabin, ER, Graher, CD, Vogel, EH, et al: Fatal Pseudomonas infection in burned patients. A clinical, bacteriologic and anatomic study. N Engl J Med 1961;265:1226–1231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Pruitt, BA Jr: Infections caused by Pseudomonas species in patients with burns and in other surgical patients. J Infect Dis 1974;1305:58–513.Google Scholar
32. Schimpff, SC, Greene, WH, Young, VM, et al: Significance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the patient with leukemia or lymphoma. J Infect Dis 1974;1305:524–531.Google Scholar
33. Flick, MR, Clulf, LF: Pseudomonas bacteremia. Review of 108 cases. Am J Med 1976;60:501–508.Google Scholar
34. Wilson, LA, Julian, AJ, Ahearn, DG: The survival and growth ol microorganisms in mascara during use. Am J Ophthalmol 1975;79:596–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35. Hall, JH, Callaway, JL, Tindall, JP, et al: Pseudomonas aeruginosa in dermatology. Arch Dermatol 1968;97:312–321.Google Scholar
36. Hoffman, MA, Finberg, L: Pseudomonas infectious in infants associated with bigh-humidity environments. J Pediatr 1955;40:626–630.Google Scholar
37. Alcock, SR: Acute otitis externa in divers working in the North Sea: A microbiological survey of seven saturation divers. J Hyg 1977;78:395–409.Google Scholar
38. Duncan, WC, McBride, ME, Knox, JM: Experimental production of cutaneous bacterial infections in human. Antimiciob Agents Chemother 1970;1:137–139.Google Scholar
39. Duncan, WC, Mc Bride, ME, Knox, JM: Experimental production of infections in humans. J Invest Dermatol 1970;54:319–323.Google Scholar
40. Singh, G: Pseudomonas infections of skin: An experimental study. Int J Dermatol 1974;13:90–93.Google Scholar
41. Baird, RM, Awad, ZA, Shooter, RA, et al: Contaminated medicaments in use in a hospital loi disease of the skin. J Hyg 1980;84:103.Google Scholar
42. Noble, WC, Savin, JA: Steroid cream contaminated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Lancet 1966:1:347–349.Google Scholar
43. Hojka-Tomoka, MT, Marples, RR, Kligman, AM: Pseudomonas infection in superhydrated skin. Arch Dermatol 1973;107:723–727.Google Scholar
44. Aly, R, Shirley, C, Cunico, B, et al: Effect of prolonged occlusion on the microbial flora, pH, carbon dioxide and transepidermal water loss on human skin. J Invest Dermatol 1978;171:178–182.Google Scholar
45. Leyden, JJ, Stewart, R, Klugman, AM: Experimental inoculation of Pseudomonas aentginosa and Pseudomonas cepacia on human skin. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1980;31:19–28.Google Scholar
46. Liu, PV: Extracellular toxins of Pseudomonas aeruginosa . J Infect Dis 1974;1305:591–598.Google ScholarPubMed
47. Suskind, RR, Ishihara, M: The effect of wetting on cutaneous vulnerability. Arch Environ Health 1965;11:529–537.Google Scholar