Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T05:35:07.836Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recovery efficiency of two glove-sampling methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2021

Amanda K. Lyons Open the ORCID record for Amanda K. Lyons [Opens in a new window] ,
Laura J. Rose  and
Judith Noble-Wang Open the ORCID record for Judith Noble-Wang [Opens in a new window]
Amanda K. Lyons*
Affiliation:
Division of Healthcare Quality and Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Laura J. Rose
Affiliation:
Division of Healthcare Quality and Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Judith Noble-Wang
Affiliation:
Division of Healthcare Quality and Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
*
Author for correspondence: Amanda Lyons, E-mail: gvd4@cdc.gov
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two methods to sample pathogens from gloved hands were compared: direct imprint onto agar and a sponge-wipe method. The sponge method was significantly better at recovering Clostridiodes difficile spores, and no difference was observed between the methods at 101 inoculum for carbapenemase-producing KPC+ Klebsiella pneumoniae, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and Acinetobacter baumannii.

Type
Concise Communication
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , March 2022 , pp. 390 - 392
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Guerrero, DM, Nerandzic, MM, Jury, LA, Jinno, S, Chang, S, Donskey, CJ. Acquisition of spores on gloved hands after contact with the skin of patients with Clostridium difficile infection and with environmental surfaces in their rooms. Am J Infect Control 2012;40:556–558.Google ScholarPubMed
Takoi, H, Fujita, K, Hyodo, H, et al. Acinetobacter baumannii can be transferred from contaminated nitrile examination gloves to polypropylene plastic surfaces. Am J Infect Control 2019;47:1171–1175.Google ScholarPubMed
WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care: a summary. World Health Organization website. https://www.who.int/gpsc/information_centre/hand-hygiene-summary/en/. Published 2009. Accessed February 10, 2021.Google Scholar
Robinson, GL, Otieno, L, Johnson, JK, et al. Comparison of two glove-sampling methods to discriminate between study arms of a hand hygiene and glove-use study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:884–885.Google Scholar
Hasan, JA, Japal, KM, Christensen, ER, Samalot-Freire, LC. In vitro production of Clostridium difficile spores for use in the efficacy evaluation of disinfectants: a precollaborative investigation. J AOAC Int 2011;94:259–272.Google ScholarPubMed
Girou, E, Chai, SH, Oppein, F, et al. Misuse of gloves: the foundation for poor compliance with hand hygiene and potential for microbial transmission? J Hosp Infect 2004;57:162–169.Google ScholarPubMed
Kahar Bador, M, Rai, V, Yusof, MY, Kwong, WK, Assadian, O. Evaluation of the efficacy of antibacterial medical gloves in the ICU setting. J Hosp Infect 2015;90:248–252.Google ScholarPubMed
Standard test method for evaluation of the effectiveness of health care personnel or consumer handwash formulation. E1174-13. 2013, ASTM International website. http://materialstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/E1174-13.pdf. Accessed February 10, 2021.Google Scholar
Kpadeh-Rogers, Z, Robinson, GL, Alserehi, H, et al., Effect of glove decontamination on bacterial contamination of healthcare personnel hands. Clin Infect Dis 2019;69 suppl 3:S224–S227.Google Scholar
Harris, J. Artificial test soil helped improve recovery rate of health care pathogens. Infectious Disease Advisor. 2016. https://www.infectiousdiseaseadvisor.com/home/meetings/asm-2016/artificial-test-soil-helped-improve-recovery-rate-of-health-care-pathogens/. Published June 18, 2016. Accessed February 16, 2021.Google Scholar