Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T08:41:59.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attitudes Toward the Police in Prolonged Emergencies: Findings from the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Israel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2024

Gali Perry Open the ORCID record for Gali Perry [Opens in a new window] ,
Tal Jonathan-Zamir Open the ORCID record for Tal Jonathan-Zamir [Opens in a new window]  and
Roni Factor Open the ORCID record for Roni Factor [Opens in a new window]
Gali Perry*
Affiliation:
Institute of Criminology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
Tal Jonathan-Zamir
Affiliation:
Institute of Criminology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
Roni Factor
Affiliation:
Institute of Criminology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
*
Corresponding author: Gali Perry; Email: gali.perry@mail.huji.ac.il
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Emergencies, such as natural disasters, wars and terrorist attacks, are known to have important effects on police–community relations and, specifically, on public attitudes toward the police. At the same time, little is known about what happens to public sentiments over time in prolonged emergencies. Similarly, it is unclear if different types of attitudes follow a similar trajectory or if they “behave” differently. The present study examines general and pandemic-specific attitudes toward the police over the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Israel, using data from a community panel survey (n = 535) carried out in its first three peaks. We found a statistically significant deterioration in all types of attitudes in the first six months of the study, followed by stabilization in general attitudes. Interestingly, some emergency-specific attitudes followed a different path and demonstrated consistent deterioration throughout the study period. These findings contribute to our theoretical understanding of police–community relations in emergencies and bear practical implications for policing emergencies.

Abstracto

Abstracto

Se sabe que las emergencias, como los desastres naturales, las guerras y los ataques terroristas, tienen efectos importantes en las relaciones entre la policía y la comunidad y, específicamente, en las actitudes del público hacia la policía. Al mismo tiempo, se sabe poco sobre lo que sucede con el sentimiento público a lo largo del tiempo en emergencias prolongadas. De manera similar, no está claro si diferentes tipos de actitudes siguen una trayectoria similar o si se “comportan” de manera diferente. El presente estudio examina las actitudes generales y específicas de la pandemia hacia la policía durante el primer año de la pandemia de COVID-19 en Israel, utilizando datos de una encuesta de panel comunitario (n = 535) realizada en sus primeros tres picos. Encontramos un deterioro estadísticamente significativo en todo tipo de actitudes en los primeros seis meses del estudio, seguido de una estabilización en las actitudes generales. Curiosamente, algunas actitudes específicas ante emergencias siguieron un camino diferente y demostraron un deterioro constante durante todo el período del estudio. Estos hallazgos contribuyen a nuestra comprensión teórica de las relaciones entre la policía y la comunidad en emergencias y tienen implicaciones prácticas para la vigilancia policial en emergencias.

Abstrait

Abstrait

On sait que les situations d’urgence, telles que les catastrophes naturelles, les guerres et les attaques terroristes, ont des effets importants sur les relations entre la police et la communauté et, en particulier, sur l’attitude du public à l’égard de la police. Dans le même temps, on sait peu de choses sur l’évolution de l’opinion publique au fil du temps lors de situations d’urgence prolongées. De même, il n’est pas clair si différents types d’attitudes suivent une trajectoire similaire ou s’ils « se comportent » différemment. La présente étude examine les attitudes générales et spécifiques à la pandémie à l’égard de la police au cours de la première année de la pandémie de COVID-19 en Israël, en utilisant les données d’une enquête par panel communautaire (n = 535) réalisée au cours de ses trois premiers pics. Nous constatons une détérioration statistiquement significative de tous les types d’attitudes au cours des six premiers mois de l'étude, suivie d’une stabilisation des attitudes générales. Il est intéressant de noter que certaines attitudes spécifiques aux situations d’urgence ont suivi un chemin différent et ont démontré une détérioration constante tout au long de la période d’étude. Ces résultats contribuent à notre compréhension théorique des relations entre la police et la communauté dans les situations d’urgence et ont des implications pratiques pour le maintien de l’ordre dans les situations d’urgence.

抽象的

抽象的

众所周知，自然灾害、战争和恐怖袭击等紧急情况会对警察与社区的关系，特别是公众对警察的态度产生重要影响。 与此同时，人们对长期紧急情况下公众情绪的变化知之甚少。 同样，目前还不清楚不同类型的态度是否遵循相似的轨迹，或者它们的“行为”是否不同。 本研究使用在前三个高峰期进行的社区小组调查 (N = 535) 的数据，探讨了以色列 COVID-19 大流行第一年对警察的总体态度和特定大流行态度。 我们发现，在研究的前六个月中，所有类型的态度都出现了统计上显着的恶化，随后总体态度趋于稳定。 有趣的是，一些针对紧急情况的态度遵循了不同的路径，并在整个研究期间表现出持续恶化。 这些发现有助于我们对紧急情况下警察与社区关系的理论理解，并对警务紧急情况具有实际意义。

خلاصة

خلاصة

من المعروف أن حالات الطوارئ، مثل الكوارث الطبيعية والحروب والهجمات الإرهابية، لها تأثيرات مهمة على العلاقات بين الشرطة والمجتمع، وعلى وجه التحديد، على المواقف العامة تجاه الشرطة. وفي الوقت نفسه، لا يُعرف سوى القليل عما يحدث للمشاعر العامة مع مرور الوقت في حالات الطوارئ الطويلة الأمد. وبالمثل، من غير الواضح ما إذا كانت أنواع المواقف المختلفة تتبع مسارًا مشابهًا أم أنها “تتصرف” بشكل مختلف. تبحث هذه الدراسة في المواقف العامة والخاصة بالوباء تجاه الشرطة خلال السنة الأولى لجائحة كوفيد-19 في إسرائيل، باستخدام بيانات من استطلاع رأي مجتمعي (العدد = 535) تم إجراؤه في القمم الثلاث الأولى. ونجد تدهوراً ذا دلالة إحصائية في جميع أنواع الاتجاهات في الأشهر الستة الأولى من الدراسة، يليه استقرار في الاتجاهات العامة. ومن المثير للاهتمام أن بعض المواقف الخاصة بحالات الطوارئ اتبعت مسارًا مختلفًا وأظهرت تدهورًا مستمرًا طوال فترة الدراسة. تساهم هذه النتائج في فهمنا النظري للعلاقات بين الشرطة والمجتمع في حالات الطوارئ وتحمل آثارًا عملية على حالات الطوارئ الشرطية.

Keywords

COVID-19policingemergenciespublic attitudespolice–community relationsCOVID-19vigilanciaemergenciasactitudes públicasrelaciones entre la policía y la comunidadCOVID-19maintien de l’ordresituations d’urgenceattitudes du publicrelations police–communautéCOVID-19警务紧急情况公众态度警察与社区关系كوفيد-19الشرطةحالات الطوارئالمواقف العامةالعلاقات بين الشرطة
Type
Article
Information
International Annals of Criminology , First View , pp. 1 - 27
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© International Society of Criminology, 2024

INTRODUCTION

Managing emergencies and disasters, both manmade (wars, terrorism) and natural (floods, earthquakes), has become an important part of the police mission. While police agencies have traditionally taken on the role of first responders, recent natural disasters caused by climate change and the COVID-19 pandemic have demonstrated just how central this task is to policing (Kyprianides et al. Reference Kyprianides, Bradford, Beale, Savigar-Shaw, Stott and Radburn2022; Laufs and Waseem Reference Laufs and Waseem2020; Mutongwizo, Blaustein, and Shearing Reference Mutongwizo, Blaustein and Shearing2022). Among the various implications of this role, such as adding a burden on limited resources and officer fatigue (see Drew and Martin Reference Drew and Martin2020; Edwards and Kotera Reference Edwards and Kotera2021; Shjarback and Magny Reference Shjarback and Magny2021), the literature on policing emergencies suggests that the situation itself, as well as the police conduct during and about the crisis, will likely have an impact on police–community relations, and specifically public attitudes towards the police (Bonkiewicz and Ruback Reference Bonkiewicz and Ruback2012; Jonathan Reference Jonathan2010; Jonathan-Zamir, Weisburd, and Hasisi Reference Jonathan-Zamir, Weisburd, Hasisi, Jonathan-Zamir, Weisburd and Hasisi2014).

A large body of research suggests that emergencies may both strengthen and weaken public sentiments of the police. Severe threats have been found to bring about a temporary, short-term wave of support for the national leader and, by extension, to other public institutions, including the police, a phenomenon known as the “rally ’round the flag effect” (Mueller Reference Mueller1970, Reference Mueller1973). The police’s focus on handling emergencies may also strengthen their public image, portraying them as heroic, highly relevant and attentive to immediate public concerns (Bonkiewicz and Ruback Reference Bonkiewicz and Ruback2012). At the same time, the support generated by the rally effect is temporary by nature. Moreover, the potential costs of policing the crisis, such as adopting a “warrior” rather than “service-provider” policing style and being perceived by the public (rightfully or not) as paying little attention to other policing duties, may become more significant over time (Jonathan-Zamir et al. Reference Jonathan-Zamir, Weisburd, Hasisi, Jonathan-Zamir, Weisburd and Hasisi2014; Laufs and Waseem Reference Laufs and Waseem2020), thus undermining public support. The drop in support may be even stronger if the emergency regulations and/or the way they are enforced are perceived as violating privacy, freedom or citizen rights (Aborisade Reference Aborisade2021).

However, despite the rich work on police–community relations in emergencies, at least two important gaps still need to be addressed. First, we know little about fluctuations in public attitudes towards the police throughout prolonged emergencies, that is, emergencies that do not amount to a single, isolated event but persist over a relatively long period. Such emergencies require the police and the public to adapt to a new reality – a “new normal”. Second, it is unclear if all types of attitudes toward the police follow a similar trajectory over time (i.e. a rise in favourable views at the early stages of the crisis followed by a drop over time, as suggested by the rally effect) or if different types of attitudes “behave” differently. Given the hypothesized effects of police conduct during and in relation to the emergency on public sentiments, we are particularly interested in whether general evaluations of the police and specific attitudes concerned with policing the emergency follow different paths.

In the present study, we address these questions using a longitudinal panel survey that measured public attitudes toward the police over the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Israel. Previous analyses revealed general support for the police at the first peak of the pandemic in Israel (Perry and Jonathan-Zamir Reference Perry and Jonathan-Zamir2020), followed by a drop in support (Perry, Jonathan-Zamir, and Factor Reference Perry, Jonathan-Zamir and Factor2022). In the present study, we take advantage of all three survey waves, measuring public attitudes towards the police at all three peaks of the pandemic in Israel, to examine the trends in specific v. general perceptions of the police over time. We begin by reviewing the literature on policing emergencies while focusing on police–community relations in such situations, their expression as public sentiments, and the factors expected to influence public attitudes toward the police in emergencies. We then discuss the COVID-19 pandemic as a prolonged emergency and review the growing body of work on public attitudes towards the police, specifically in the context of the pandemic. Next, we describe the study context – the first year of the pandemic in Israel and the role of the Israel Police (I.P.) in the national attempts to control the spread of the virus. The survey instrument, main variables, sampling and analyses are presented next, followed by the study findings. We conclude by discussing the fluctuations in public sentiments that we identified, their potential root causes, and the more general implications of our study for theory, policy and practice.

Emergencies and Public Attitudes Toward the Police

The police play a critical role in crises and emergencies (Deflem and Sutphin Reference Deflem and Sutphin2009; Punch and Markham Reference Punch and Markham2000; Rojek and Smith Reference Rojek and Smith2007; Varano et al. 2010). While the government often makes broad strategic decisions on handling the situation, police officers will communicate (and enforce) these decisions (Bonkiewicz and Ruback Reference Bonkiewicz and Ruback2012). The police are called to address public concerns and ensure citizens’ safety while enforcing compliance with emergency regulations, such as evacuations, stay-at-home orders and travel restrictions (Deflem and Sutphin Reference Deflem and Sutphin2009). Accordingly, police workload may rise significantly in volume and intensity (Bonkiewicz and Ruback Reference Bonkiewicz and Ruback2010). Moreover, the police may be required to adjust to changes in crime: some forms of street crime, such as pickpocketing or traffic violations, may decrease, while other forms of crime may rise (Hodgkinson et al. Reference Hodgkinson, Andresen, Frank and Pringle2022; Prelog Reference Prelog2016). For example, violent conflicts between citizens, car theft and store raids may increase during mass evacuations (Leitner and Helbich Reference Leitner and Helbich2011), while domestic violence may rise during long periods of financial crises and stay-at-home orders (Gearhart et al. Reference Gearhart, Perez-Patron, Hammond, Goldberg, Klein and Horney2018).

How do emergencies and the various changes they bring about to policing have an impact on public sentiments of the police? Before we address this question, a few words about the importance of public views of the police more generally are in order. Public attitudes towards the police have long been a major area of interest for police researchers, practitioners and policymakers in democratic societies (e.g. President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing 2015), due to their normative importance and practical implications. On the theoretical–philosophical level, because the source of police authority and powers is the public, not some dictator or divine spirit, it is only right to expect the police to exercise their authority in a way that leads to public trust (Jackson et al. Reference Jackson, Bradford, Stanko and Hohl2012b; Lentz and Chaires Reference Lentz and Chaires2007). On the pragmatic level, favourable views of the police, and particularly “police legitimacy”, Footnote 1 are critical to police success because they increase the likelihood of cooperation with the police, compliance with their requests, support for police empowerment, and ultimately law obedience (Mazerolle et al. Reference Mazerolle, Bennett, Davis, Sargeant and Manning2013; Sunshine and Tyler Reference Sunshine and Tyler2003; Tyler Reference Tyler2004, Reference Tyler2009). Negative attitudes toward the police – and particularly weak legitimacy – may have detrimental effects, including civil unrest, violent protests and rioting (President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing 2015; Sherman Reference Sherman2023; Weisburd and Majmundar Reference Weisburd and Majmundar2018).

In turn, the immense body of work on police legitimacy developed by Tom Tyler (e.g. Tyler Reference Tyler2004, Reference Tyler2009) and many others (e.g. Bradford, Jackson, and Stanko Reference Bradford, Jackson and Stanko2009; Gau et al. 2012; Hinds and Murphy Reference Hinds and Murphy2007; Reisig and Lloyd Reference Reisig and Lloyd2009; Sunshine and Tyler Reference Sunshine and Tyler2003) identifies two additional types of important attitudes, which presumably lead to police legitimacy. Research demonstrates that people judge the legitimacy of the police based on both the what – the outcomes the police deliver (or “police effectiveness”) and on the how – the fairness of the processes by which the police exercise their authority (or “procedural justice”). Of the two, procedural justice is typically found to be more closely tied to legitimacy (for reviews, see Jackson et al. Reference Jackson, Bradford, Hough, Myhill, Quinton and Tyler2012a; Mazerolle et al. Reference Mazerolle, Bennett, Davis, Sargeant and Manning2013; Nagin and Telep Reference Nagin and Telep2017, Reference Nagin and Telep2020; Tyler, Mentovich, and Satyavada Reference Tyler, Mentovich and Satyavada2014; Weisburd and Majmundar Reference Weisburd and Majmundar2018). As detailed below, these types of attitudes inspired many of the items in our survey.

What Makes an Impact on Public Attitudes Toward the Police in Emergencies?

It has been argued that in situations of crisis or threat, public views of the police are likely to be influenced by the emergency itself and by the perceived police conduct in response to the emergency. As noted earlier, at the outbreak of a crisis, when the situation is characterized by uncertainty and fear, citizens tend to unite against the common “enemy” and support their leader – a phenomenon known as the “rally ’round the flag effect” (Mueller Reference Mueller1970, Reference Mueller1973; Stein Reference Stein1976; Tajfel Reference Tajfel1974, Reference Tajfel1978). As government representatives, the police may benefit from this wave of support (Jonathan Reference Jonathan2010; Kelling and Moore Reference Kelling and Moore1988; LaFree and Adamczyk Reference LaFree and Adamczyk2017). However, the rally effect is short lived (Brody and Shapiro Reference Brody and Shapiro1989; Mueller Reference Mueller1970, Reference Mueller1973; Parker Reference Parker1995). Over time, citizens may become habituated to the threat, thus weakening the initial boost in support (Baum Reference Baum2002; Jonathan Reference Jonathan2010).

In terms of the effects of (perceived) police action and conduct, in emergencies, the police often place the threat at the centre of their attention and dedicate considerable resources to it. Thus, they may initially be viewed as highly relevant, competent and attentive to immediate public concerns (Bonkiewicz and Ruback Reference Bonkiewicz and Ruback2012). However, over time, citizens may feel that the resources invested in addressing the immediate threat undermine police effectiveness in other “classic” responsibilities, such as maintenance of order and crime control. Citizens may also feel that the nature of policing has changed from providing a service and viewing citizens as “customers” to controlling the public and treating citizens as suspects (Bayley and Weisburd Reference Bayley, Weisburd, Weisburd, Feucht, Hakimi, Mock and Perry2011; Jonathan-Zamir, Weisburd, and Hasisi Reference Jonathan-Zamir, Weisburd, Hasisi, Jonathan-Zamir, Weisburd and Hasisi2015). Finally, the enforcement of unfamiliar, unpleasant emergency regulations (Grace Reference Grace2020; McCarthy et al. Reference McCarthy, Murphy, Sargeant and Williamson2021), as well as the often-intrusive means by which such regulations are enforced (Kennison and Loumansky Reference Kennison and Loumansky2007; McCulloch Reference McCulloch2004), may increase negative encounters with citizens, which may, in turn, undermine support for the police. Thus, both types of influences – the social–psychological effects of the crisis and police conduct in response to the situation – suggest a trend whereby support for the police is expected to rise during the early stages of the crisis but subsequently drop.

Indeed, numerous studies provide empirical support for this expected trend. Putnam (Reference Putnam2002) found higher levels of trust in the police six weeks after the terror attacks of 11 September 2001, compared to trust before the attack. Trust returned to pre-attack levels six months after the attack. Dinesen and Jæger (Reference Dinesen and Jæger2013) analysed six waves of a survey conducted in Spain both before and after the 11 March 2004 terrorist attack in Madrid. They found a significant rise in the share of participants who expressed trust in the police immediately after the attack, followed by a drop that began a week after. Attitudes appeared to stabilize seven months after the attack. Thomassen, Strype, and Egge (Reference Thomassen, Strype and Egge2014) analysed four waves of a survey conducted in the year following the terror attack that took place on 22 July 2011 in Oslo, Norway. To compare citizens’ trust in the police to pre-attack levels, the researchers included several questions from the Citizen Survey commissioned by the Police Directorate in 2010 and the 2011 European Social Survey. They found that trust in the police was relatively stable in the three years preceding the attack, with a small yet statistically significant rise five weeks after. Trust returned to pre-attack levels 18 weeks after the attack and remained stable in subsequent survey waves. They also found significant improvement in evaluations of police effectiveness and procedural justice immediately after the attack but no substantial change in citizens’ sense of moral alignment with the police. Wollebæk et al. (Reference Wollebæk, Enjolras, Steen-Johnsen and Ødegård2012) also found a significant rise in trust in the police shortly after the same terror attack. Other examples include a surge in support for the police during the initial stages of the Second World War in the United Kingdom (UK) (Todman Reference Todman2020) and in Israel during the “Second Intifada” (Jonathan Reference Jonathan2010).

Thus, while the general trend of a short-term rise in support for the police in emergencies has been discussed and received much empirical support, most studies have focused on a single-event emergency (such as a specific terrorist attack) and compared citizens’ attitudes before and after the event. Moreover, most of these studies did not differentiate between different types of attitudes toward the police, and particularly not between general evaluations and emergency-specific views. We found this last question particularly important given the expected effects of police action and conduct in an emergency, and in light of the literature suggesting that general and specific attitudes toward the police are inherently different. The core distinction between general and particular attitudes is rooted in social psychology research (e.g. Kruglanski et al. Reference Kruglanski, Jasko, Chernikova, Milyavsky, Babush, Baldner and Pierro2015). Studies in this area have shown that general, broad views (such as liking something) tend to be more robust and stable than specific attitudes (such as wanting the same thing), while the latter were found to be better predictors of particular behaviours (Ajzen Reference Ajzen, Kuhl and Beckmann1985, Reference Ajzen, Deaux and Snyder2012; Fishbein and Ajzen Reference Fishbein and Ajzen1975, Reference Fishbein and Ajzen2010).

In the context of public attitudes toward the police, researchers have often distinguished between broad, general views of the police (e.g. how procedurally fair the police are on the whole) and evaluations of police conduct in a specific encounter (e.g. how procedurally fair police officers were in a particular encounter) (e.g. Bradford et al. Reference Bradford, Jackson and Stanko2009; Mazzerole et al. Reference Mazerolle, Bennett, Davis, Sargeant and Manning2013). For example, in a notable study, Skogan (Reference Skogan2006) found that a negative experience with the police in a specific encounter (as subjectively perceived) had a strong and negative effect on broad views of the police, while a positive experience had only a small, positive impact. In terms of stability, Brandl et al. (Reference Brandl, Frank, Worden and Bynum1994) found that global attitudes towards the police were more stable than views concerning a specific encounter, and Nivette, Eisner, and Ribeaud (Reference Nivette, Eisner and Ribeaud2020) identified relative stability in general views of the police (police legitimacy and legal cynicism) from adolescence to early adulthood. These studies emphasize the importance of distinguishing between general and specific attitudes toward the police and suggest that specific attitudes are likely to be less stable than general views, making them more sensitive to the effects of crises.

The COVID-19 Pandemic as the Study Context

The COVID-19 pandemic provides a unique opportunity to examine our research questions. First, it is a global emergency, one of few in modern history (Guterres Reference Guterres2020). As such, it presented police agencies across Western democracies with similar challenges, which suggests that lessons learned in one agency may be highly relevant to others (Shaw Reference Shaw2021). Second, the COVID-19 pandemic is a prolonged crisis (rather than a single-event emergency) and thus enables longitudinal assessments of public attitudes toward the police over relatively long periods while the state of emergency is still ongoing. In this section, we elaborate on the COVID-19 pandemic, the changes it brought to policing, and what has already been learned about its effects on public attitudes toward the police.

Since its outbreak in January 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has had an unprecedented effect on law enforcement agencies worldwide (e.g. Clements and Aitkenhead Reference Clements and Aitkenhead2020; Kyprianides et al. Reference Kyprianides, Bradford, Beale, Savigar-Shaw, Stott and Radburn2022; Maskály, Ivković, and Neyroud Reference Maskály, Ivković and Neyroud2021; Nix, Ivanov, and Pickett Reference Nix, Ivanov and Pickett2021; for a detailed review of the changes to policing during COVID-19, see Lum, Maupin, and Stoltz Reference Lum, Maupin and Stoltz2020a, b; Perry and Jonathan-Zamir Reference Perry and Jonathan-Zamir2020). This effect was expressed, first and foremost, in changes to the mission and tasks of the police, whereby police agencies were forced to dedicate considerable resources to pandemic-related duties and enforce emergency regulations (Farrow Reference Farrow2020; Goldenfein, Green, and Viljoen Reference Goldenfein, Green and Viljoen2020; Kitchin Reference Kitchin2020; Mazerolle and Ransley Reference Mazerolle and Ransley2021). The nature of interactions between officers and citizens also changed – they were now influenced by the need for social distancing and protective gear, such as face masks and sometimes even hazard suits (Lum et al. Reference Lum, Maupin and Stoltz2020b). In terms of public attitudes toward the police during COVID-19, as detailed below, a growing body of research suggests that, overall, they followed the expected trajectory: a rise in favourable views at the early stages of the crisis, followed by a drop in support as the pandemic progressed (Chamberlain Reference Chamberlain2020; Janković and Cvetković Reference Janković and Cvetković2020).

Several studies conducted during the early stages of the pandemic describe initial high levels of support for the police (Chamberlain Reference Chamberlain2020; Janković and Cvetković Reference Janković and Cvetković2020; Murphy et al. Reference Murphy, Williamson, Sargeant and McCarthy2020; Sibley et al. Reference Sibley, Greaves, Satherley, Wilson, Overall, Lee, Milojev, Bulbulia, Osborne, Milfont and Houkamau2020). For example, in New Zealand, Sibley et al. (Reference Sibley, Greaves, Satherley, Wilson, Overall, Lee, Milojev, Bulbulia, Osborne, Milfont and Houkamau2020) compared public attitudes towards the police before and during the first lockdown using a panel survey. They found a significant rise in trust in the police and the government during the first lockdown, which they attribute to the rally effect. Similarly, a survey conducted during the first lockdown in Teesside, UK (Chamberlain Reference Chamberlain2020) found favourable views of police performance in handling the pandemic: 60% of the respondents agreed that the police were “doing a good job” in handling the pandemic, and the large majority was comfortable with the police using various enforcement measures related to the lockdown (asking people to provide a valid reason for being out [81%]; issuing fines for breaching the lockdown [86%]; arresting people who refused to return home [76%]). In Serbia, Janković and Cvetković (Reference Janković and Cvetković2020) conducted an online survey using snowball sampling during March and April 2020, four weeks after the state of emergency was declared. They found strong support for the police: 61.9% of the respondents agreed that the police did their job well and that they had full confidence in the police; 62.6% thought that police officers play the most significant role in combating the coronavirus (second only to health workers); and 69.3% agreed that the police were prepared for the emergency response caused by the pandemic. Studies from Australia (Murphy et al. Reference Murphy, Williamson, Sargeant and McCarthy2020) and the UK (Stripe Reference Stripe2020) show similar findings. As mentioned above, the first wave of our online survey, conducted in Israel during the first peak of the pandemic, showed a similar, general support for the police (Perry and Jonathan-Zamir Reference Perry and Jonathan-Zamir2020).

Concerning the more advanced stages of the pandemic, as expected, studies show less favourable attitudes toward the police over time (Adepeju and Jimoh Reference Adepeju and Jimoh2021; Clements Reference Clements2020; Kimhi et al. Reference Kimhi, Eshel, Marciano and Adini2020; Shaw Reference Shaw2021). For example, in Australia, Williamson et al. (Reference Williamson, Murphy, Sargeant and McCarthy2022) found that the longer participants spent in lockdown, the less accepting they were of the COVID-19 restrictions and the less they felt obligated to obey authorities. In the UK, Adepeju and Jimoh (Reference Adepeju and Jimoh2021) found more negative publicly available tweets about police conduct throughout the second and the third lockdowns. Still in the UK, Clements (Reference Clements2020) and Shaw (Reference Shaw2021) conducted three waves of an online survey and found that while participants generally supported police conduct during the pandemic, this support eroded over time. For example, in January 2021, only 27% of the participants agreed with the statement “I fully support the approach taken by the police”, compared to 36% in late April 2020 and 42% in early April 2020 (see Clements and Aitkenhead Reference Clements and Aitkenhead2020). In Israel, the drop in support was prominent in the third peak of the pandemic (Perry et al. Reference Perry, Jonathan-Zamir and Factor2022). Similarly, Kimhi et al. (Reference Kimhi, Eshel, Marciano and Adini2020) conducted a two-wave online survey examining levels of distress, resilience and subjective wellbeing, and found that average levels of trust in the police dropped from 3.45 in May to 2.85 in July 2020.

These findings are important because they show that in the sense of public attitudes toward the police – the COVID-19 pandemic appears to be similar to the general trend identified in other types of emergencies. However, like most published work in this area, the studies reviewed above do not address potential variation in the trajectories followed by different types of attitudes, particularly general v. pandemic-specific evaluations of the police. As ongoing emergencies become more prevalent, understanding the dynamics of police–community relations in such situations is of great theoretical and practical importance (Murphy et al. Reference Murphy, McCarthy, Sargeant and Williamson2022). If police agencies can pinpoint the more “fragile” attitudes, that is, the views that are more readily or severely undermined in emergencies, they may be able to do something about it, thus maintaining public support when it is most needed.

METHOD

Study Setting: The COVID-19 Pandemic in Israel

Following the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, a national state of emergency was first declared in Israel on 15 March 2020 (State of Israel Ministry of Health 2021). Since then, three peaks in detected cases led to three lockdowns: 8 April 2020–4 May 2020; 25 September 2020–17 October 2020; 27 December 2020–7 February 2021 (Israel Ministry of Health 2021). Footnote 2 Similar to most Western democracies, lockdowns in Israel entailed stay-at-home orders, strict limitations on the distance and purpose of travel from home, closure of schools and businesses defined as “non-essential”, restrictions on gatherings and international travel, and the requirement to wear face masks in public (Government of Israel 2020). As in other countries, such measures had been rarely or never applied before in Israel (Shany Reference Shany2020b).

Like most police agencies in Western democracies, I.P. officers were required to enforce a constantly changing list of emergency regulations and frequently explain these regulations to citizens (Shaw Reference Shaw2021). They enforced social distancing, the obligation to wear face masks in public and lockdowns by issuing warnings and fines (Maskály et al. Reference Maskály, Ivković and Neyroud2021). Officers were required to interact with citizens while wearing protective gear and maintaining physical distance (Lum et al. Reference Lum, Maupin and Stoltz2020a, b). Finally, I.P. officers were required to handle pandemic-related protests and demonstrations (Shany Reference Shany2020a), similar to those in the United States, UK and Europe (Metcalfe and Pickett Reference Metcalfe and Pickett2021). Thus, we consider the COVID-19 pandemic in Israel a useful setting for examining the questions at the heart of the present study.

Sampling and Participants

We carried out a three-wave online survey using “Midgam Project Web Panel”, an online platform based in Israel and frequently used by social scientists (e.g. Gubler, Halperin, and Hirschberger Reference Gubler, Halperin and Hirschberger2015; Schori-Eyal et al. Reference Schori-Eyal, Tagar, Saguy and Halperin2015). Participants were sampled by “Midgam” out of approximately 91,000 registered panellists, using stratified sampling by quotas of gender and age based on data from the Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS). Footnote 3 Invitations were sent to all “Midgam” panellists who meet the inclusion criteria defined by the researchers, and the option to participate remained open until the quotas had been met.

The first wave of data collection took place in the days preceding the first lockdown (6–8 April 2020). A total of 1798 questionnaires were completed in this wave, of which we excluded 223 that had been filled out within five minutes or less, which, in our judgement, indicated inattentiveness (Curran Reference Curran2016). This left us with a final wave 1 sample of 1575. Wave 2 was conducted near the initiation of the second lockdown (16–17 September 2020). All respondents who provided valid questionnaires in wave 1 were invited to participate in wave 2 (up to the quota of 800, which was set due to budget constraints). Of those, 166 were excluded due to inattentiveness (final wave 2 sample: 616). Wave 3 was again administered soon after the initiation of the third lockdown (31 December 2020–14 January 2021). All 1575 respondents who provided valid questionnaires in wave 1 were again contacted and invited to participate. Of the 1085 who agreed, 101 were excluded due to inattentiveness (final wave 3 sample: 984). For the present analysis, we took advantage of the 535 participants who had completed a valid questionnaire at all three time points. The sociodemographic characteristics of this sample and the characteristics of the population (obtained from the Israeli CBS in 2020) are detailed in Table 1.

Table 1. Sample Characteristics

a Obtained from the Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS) in 2020. “Non-Ultra-Orthodox” was self-defined in the study, but defined by the type of secondary school attended by the respondent in the CBS data.

As seen from Table 1, our sample closely mirrors the population from which it was drawn in terms of gender and country of origin. At the same time, it is somewhat older on average and includes a slightly larger proportion of married and separated/divorced individuals. This may be due to using a sample of registered panellists, which, as already noted, was dictated by limited opportunities for data collection during the lockdowns. We return to this point in our discussion section below.

The Survey Instrument

The questionnaire included 64 items, which inquired about participants’ attitudes towards the police (both general and specifically in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic), personal experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic and sociodemographic characteristics. Most items were in the form of statements, which respondents were asked to rank on a scale ranging from 1 (“strongly disagree”) to 5 (“strongly agree”). Items measuring public attitudes towards the police were based on previous surveys in Israel (e.g. Jonathan and Weisburd Reference Jonathan and Weisburd2010; Perry, Jonathan-Zamir, and Weisburd Reference Perry, Jonathan-Zamir and Weisburd2017) and elsewhere (e.g. Gau Reference Gau2011; Sunshine and Tyler Reference Sunshine and Tyler2003). Questions concerning expectations from the police during the COVID-19 pandemic were based on previous studies on policing emergencies (Jonathan and Weisburd Reference Jonathan and Weisburd2010). In the third wave, several questions were added to measure assessments of how the Israeli government has been handling the pandemic, broad concerns about the potential effects of the pandemic on society, and personal hardships during the pandemic.

In line with our research questions, in the present analysis, we focus on the 13 survey items that (1) appeared in all three survey waves and (2) assessed respondents’ attitudes toward the police, both generally and specifically in the context of the pandemic. Based on the literature reviewed above on public attitudes toward the police in the context of emergencies, as well as on the large body of work on police legitimacy (e.g. Tyler Reference Tyler2004, Reference Tyler2009), each of the 13 survey items reflects one of five themes that emerged as central in these bodies of work. These themes also guide the presentation of our findings below:

(1) Pandemic-related expectations from the police: whether or not the police should focus on enforcing the emergency regulations, how police officers should treat violations of these regulations, and whether or not this enforcement was necessary to ensure compliance with the regulations;

(2) General and pandemic-related evaluations of police effectiveness: how effective are the police in handling crime, “regular” policing tasks, and tasks specifically related to the pandemic;

(3) General fairness and trust in the police: to what extent do citizens trust in the police, generally in the context of policing the pandemic, whether or not police officers are dishonest, and whether they treat citizens fairly;

(4) Pandemic-related fairness and trust in the police: to what extent do citizens trust in the police, specifically in the context of policing the pandemic, whether or not police officers are dishonest, and whether they treat citizens fairly; and finally

(5) Perceived costs of policing the pandemic, such whether or not focusing on the pandemic has undermined other police missions or their relationship with the community.

A list of all survey items is available in Appendix 1.

Analytic Strategy

For each of the 13 survey items, we compared the mean score across the three time points using repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc paired-samples t tests. These mean scores are presented in graphs (the asterisks represent the significance level of the t tests). Full reporting of the repeated-measures ANOVA and post hoc t tests are available in Appendices 1 and 2. Survey items are presented by theme and are numbered for convenience.

FINDINGS

Pandemic-Related Expectations from the Police

Figure 1 reports participants’ expectations from the police about the pandemic. As can be seen from Figure 1, expectations have significantly changed over the nine months following the first peak of the pandemic in one of two main paths. Compared to April 2020, in September 2020, participants’ support for police focusing on enforcing the emergency regulations (question 1; Q1) significantly weakened, and this drop continued into the second period of the study (September–December 2020). Reflecting a similar perspective, between April and September 2020, we found a significant rise in participants’ level of support for treating violators of emergency regulations with forgiveness (Q2). At the same time, unlike Q1, attitudes stabilized between September and December 2020. Notably, when asked whether most citizens would comply with the emergency regulations even without enforcement (Q3), we found a significant drop in this view between April and September 2020, followed by stabilization between September and December 2020. Thus, it appears that the drop in the desire for forceful, unforgiving enforcement of the emergency regulations is not because such enforcement is deemed unnecessary.

Figure 1. Pandemic-related expectations from the police.

*** p < 0.001. Only statistically significant results are reported in the parentheses.

Perceived Police Effectiveness During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Figure 2 reports both general and pandemic-specific assessments of police effectiveness. As can be seen from Figure 2, views related to effectiveness in policing the pandemic show a sharp deterioration throughout the first and second period of the study (Q4), while views of general police performance (Q5, Q6) moderately weakened between April and September 2020, but showed no statistically significant difference between September and December 2020.

Figure 2. General and pandemic-related evaluations of police effectiveness.

*** p < 0.001. Only statistically significant results are reported in the parentheses.

Perceived Fairness and Trust in the Police During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Figures 3 and 4 report participants’ views regarding police fairness and their levels of trust in the police. As can be seen from these figures, participants’ responses to most items – both pandemic-specific and general – show a significant deterioration in the first period of the study (April–September 2020), followed by stabilization in the second (September–December 2020). These include broad assessments of police fairness (Q8), general trust in the police (Q9) and trust in officers to behave with integrity when enforcing the emergency regulations (Q10). The survey item “Police conduct during the coronavirus crisis strengthened my trust in the police” (Q11) showed a consistent drop in support throughout the study period. The only survey item that showed no significant changes over time is Q7 (“Police officers are often dishonest”).

Figure 3. General fairness and trust in the police.

*** p < 0.001. Only statistically significant results are reported in the parentheses.

Figure 4. Pandemic-specific fairness and trust in the police.

*** p < 0.001. Only statistically significant results are reported in the parentheses.

Perceived Costs of Policing the Pandemic

In Q12 and Q13, participants were asked about their views of the costs of policing the COVID-19 pandemic: Did it come at the expense of other police responsibilities (Q12), and did it undermine the police–community relationship (Q13)? Following the prevailing trend, while both costs were perceived to be significantly higher in September than in April 2020, no statistically significant change occurred between September and December 2020 (Figure 5).

Figure 5. Perceived costs of policing the pandemic.

*** p < 0.001. Only statistically significant results are reported in the parentheses.

DISCUSSION

The present study addressed a notable gap in the literature on police–community relations in emergencies: What happens to general v. emergency-specific attitudes toward the police throughout prolonged emergencies? We examined the attitudes of Majority community members in Israel during the first year of a global, ongoing crisis – the COVID-19 pandemic. By comparing public attitudes across the three peaks of the pandemic (April, September and December 2020), we were able to shed light on fluctuations in citizens’ views of the police, both general and emergency-specific, throughout a prolonged emergency.

In line with the literature on policing emergencies, as well as previous studies on public attitudes towards the police during COVID-19, we found relatively high levels of support for the police at the first peak of the pandemic, followed by a significant drop in all types of evaluations between the first and second peaks. We also identified stabilization in most views between the second and third peaks, while some evaluations, specifically concerned with policing the pandemic, continued to deteriorate throughout the study period.

How can these findings be explained, and what can they tell us more generally about police–community relations in emergencies? First, the favourable views during the first peak of the pandemic and the significant deterioration in most attitudes as the pandemic progressed are not surprising and are in line with the vast literature on the “rally ’round the flag” effect reviewed earlier (Mueller Reference Mueller1970, Reference Mueller1973; Stein Reference Stein1976; Tajfel Reference Tajfel1974, Reference Tajfel1978). We did not have pre-pandemic data (our first measurement was at the first peak of the pandemic), but according to the rally effect and previous research on attitudes toward the police in emergencies (e.g. Jonathan Reference Jonathan2010), the views measured in April 2020 are, in all likelihood, more favourable than pre-pandemic evaluations. Accordingly, we expect that the drop in general evaluations between April 2020 and September 2020 reflects the “natural course” of attitudes toward the government and its representatives in emergencies, and the stabilization between September 2020 and December 2020 indicates that these views had returned to their baseline, pre-pandemic level.

At the same time, a less expected finding is that not all attitudes toward the police behave the same. While general evaluations of the police followed the expected path of the rally effect, some views related specifically to policing the emergency appear also to be influenced by other factors. They were irrelevant before the pandemic, very favourable at the first lockdown (more so than parallel, general evaluations), but then began to deteriorate, with no end in sight. Notably, all types of attitudes deteriorated between April 2020 and September 2020; it was only between September 2020 and December 2020 that the different trajectories emerged. This highlights the importance of studying police–community relations for relatively long periods during ongoing emergencies, as we have done here.

Why did evaluations of pandemic policing continue to deteriorate? We suspect that over time, as the crisis prolonged, the emergency regulations and how the police enforced them undermined support for the police in this context (Deflem and Sutphin Reference Deflem and Sutphin2009). At the outbreak of a crisis, fear of the unknown threat and its potential implications may be enough to justify strict enforcement of new, intrusive emergency regulations (Goldenfein et al. Reference Goldenfein, Green and Viljoen2020). However, as the state of emergency becomes prolonged, citizens may become accustomed to the threat, less fearful and exhausted by the regulations, and thus less willing to accept the restrictions, particularly how they are enforced (Sekalala et al. Reference Sekalala, Forman, Habibi and Meier2020).

In terms of implications for policy and practice, our findings first suggest that neither the favourable sentiment of the police at the outbreak of the emergency nor the significant drop in support over time can be fully attributed to police conduct. During prolonged emergencies, police agencies can be expected to enjoy an initial boost in public support but, at the same time, should prepare for a deterioration that will soon follow. Thus, the police should not congratulate themselves too much during the early stages of emergencies when public support is on the rise, nor should they be expected to take full responsibility when support weakens over time. Both trends are, to a large degree, the result of greater forces beyond police control. By being aware and prepared for these trends, the police may not only avoid spending unnecessary time and resources questioning what they have done wrong amid a crisis but may also be able to focus on strengthening their relationship with the public when support is low.

At the same time, while this may be true for general attitudes, the drop in evaluations specifically related to policing the emergency may not be inevitable. As the state of emergency continues and the crisis becomes the “new normal”, it may well be that what the police do, and particularly how they do it (De Cremer and Tyler Reference De Cremer and Tyler2007; Jackson and Sunshine Reference Jackson and Sunshine2007; Sunshine and Tyler Reference Sunshine and Tyler2003), has important implications in terms of public evaluations of emergency policing. Specific aspects of policing the emergency, such as paying attention to enforcing the emergency regulations at the expense of other responsibilities, may be key areas where the police could strive to do things differently or communicate differently to stop the deterioration in support.

Before concluding, the limitations of our study should be acknowledged. First, our data are based on a sample of registered panellists, and, indeed, as noted earlier, our sample is somewhat older than the population from which it was drawn. At the same time, we should note that support for the police was found to be positively correlated with age (Tyler Reference Tyler2005; Tyler and Wakslak 2004). Thus, a younger sample, on average, would have probably shown an even stronger drop in support over time. Second, data collection was limited to Israel and focused on the attitudes of Majority community members over nine months during the first year of the pandemic. Fluctuations in attitudes may prove to be different in other countries, over longer periods, for minorities, or in different types of crises (e.g. health, natural disasters and security crises, such as terror attacks and wars). Indeed, prior research suggests that the experiences of minority communities with the police during COVID-19 may have been different from those of majority community members (Kajeepeta et al. Reference Kajeepeta, Bruzelius, Ho and Prins2022; Njoku, Ahmed, and Bolaji Reference Njoku, Ahmed and Bolaji2021). We thus encourage the replication of our analysis in various contexts and communities. Ideally, future studies should include pre-crisis attitudes, which would allow for a better understanding of what happens to public sentiments of the police while policing an emergency, in both the short and long term.

CONCLUSIONS

During prolonged emergencies, general attitudes toward the police appear to follow the well-known “rally ’round the flag” effect, whereby support is relatively high at the early stages of the crisis but subsequently drops and eventually stabilizes. At the same time, attitudes concerned with policing the emergency do not necessarily follow this trajectory. Similar to general attitudes toward the police, they tend to be favourable at the early stages of the crisis and subsequently deteriorate, but the deterioration in specific attitudes does not stabilize quickly. Specific concerns about policing of the crisis tend to drop for longer periods, perhaps for as long as the state of emergency continues. In this sense, general attitudes toward the police show more stability than situation-specific attitudes. Thus, in prolonged emergencies, police agencies may encourage more favourable sentiments by focusing not on their broad image but on how they handle the specific emergency. By showing fairness and effectiveness in handling the crisis, they may halt the long-lasting deterioration in public sentiments and improve public support in the context of the challenging emergency.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Aharon Barak Center for Interdisciplinary Legal Research, Faculty of Law, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Appendix 1. Repeated-Measures Analysis of Variancea

Appendix 2. Post Hoc t Tests

Gali Perry is a lecturer at the Institute of Criminology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel. Her research interests include the policing of political extremism, political violence, terrorism and longitudinal research designs.

Tal Jonathan-Zamir is an associate professor at the Institute of Criminology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel. Her research focuses on policing, particularly police–community relations, police legitimacy and procedural justice, police/public attitudes and evidence-based policing.

Roni Factor is an associate professor at the Institute of Criminology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel. His research interests include social mechanisms of high-risk and delinquent behaviours, traffic violations, road traffic crashes, and relationships between law enforcement institutions and the community, with particular attention to disparities across ethnic and racial groups.

Footnotes

1 There is no single definition of “police legitimacy”, but a frequently used one is “The belief that the police are entitled to call upon the public to follow the law and help combat crime and that members of the public must engage in cooperative behaviors” (Tyler Reference Tyler2004, 86–7).

2 The fourth and fifth waves occurred in June 2021 and January 2022. However, due to more general changes in policy, these waves did not lead to lockdowns.

3 Due to lockdown restrictions dictating online data collection, and despite our effort to include a valid sample of minorities in Israel, our sample was non-representative of minority groups (such as ultra-orthodox Jews and Israeli Arabs). Therefore, the analysis only includes the majority-group members.

a Shapiro–Wilk tests did not show evidence of non-normality (p > 0.05). When sphericity was violated (ϵ > 0.75), Huyn–Feldt-corrected results were reported (e.g. Field Reference Field2013; Howell Reference Howell2002).

a Confidence intervals were adjusted to account for the multiple comparisons. *** p < 0.001 (e.g. Bender and Lange Reference Bender and Lange2001).

References

Aborisade, R. A. 2021. “Accounts of Unlawful Use of Force and Misconduct of the Nigerian Police in the Enforcement of COVID-19 Measures.” Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology 36:450–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adepeju, M. and Jimoh, F.. 2021. “An Analytical Framework for Measuring Inequality in the Public Opinion on Policing – Assessing the Impacts of COVID-19 Pandemic Using Twitter Data.” Journal of Geographic Information System 13(2):122–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajzen, I. 1985. “From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior.” Pp. 11–39 in Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior, edited by Kuhl, J. and Beckmann, J.. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajzen, I. 2012. “Attitudes and Persuasion.” Pp. 367–93 in The Oxford Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology, edited by Deaux, K. and Snyder, M.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baum, M. A. 2002. “The Constituent Foundations of the Rally-Round-The-Flag Phenomenon.” International Studies Quarterly 46(2):263–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayley, D. H. and Weisburd, D. L.. 2011. “Cops and Spooks: The Role of the Police in Counterterrorism.” Pp. 81–99 in To Protect and to Serve: Policing in an Age of Terrorism, edited by Weisburd, D., Feucht, T. E., Hakimi, I., Mock, L. F., and Perry, S.. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Bender, R. and Lange, S.. 2001. “Adjusting for Multiple Testing – When and How?” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 54(4):343–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonkiewicz, L. and Ruback, R. B.. 2010. “Policing Iowa’s Katrina: Law Enforcement Response in Flood Disasters.” Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 4(4):373–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonkiewicz, L. and Ruback, R. B.. 2012. “The Role of the Police in Evacuations: Responding to the Social Impact of a Disaster.” Police Quarterly 15(2):137–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, B., Jackson, J., and Stanko, E. A.. 2009. “Contact and Confidence: Revisiting the Impact of Public Encounters with the Police.” Policing and Society 19(1):20–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandl, S. G., Frank, J., Worden, R. E., and Bynum, T. S.. 1994. “Global and Specific Attitudes Toward the Police: Disentangling the Relationship.” Justice Quarterly 11(1):119–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, R. A. and Shapiro, C. R.. 1989. “A Reconsideration of the Rally Phenomenon in Public Opinion.” Political Behavior Annual 2:77–102.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, M. 2020. Policing Covid19: Public Experiences and Perceptions during the Lockdown. Teesside University, July 2020, retrieved 30 January 2024 (https://research.tees.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/16985990/ChamberlainReportJuly2020_1.pdf).Google Scholar
Clements, J. 2020. “Policing the COVID-19 Lockdown – What the Public Thinks.” Crest, 8 April 2020, retrieved 30 January 2024 (https://www.crestadvisory.com/post/policing-the-covid-19-lockdown-what-the-public-thinks).Google Scholar
Clements, J. and Aitkenhead, E.. 2020. “Policing the Long Crisis: An Appraisal of the Police Response to Covid-19.” The Police Foundation, 22 December 2020, retrieved 30 January 2024 (https://www.police-foundation.org.uk/2020/12/long-read-policing-the-long-crisis-an-appraisal-of-the-police-response-to-covid-19/).Google Scholar
Curran, P. G. 2016. “Methods for the Detection of Carelessly Invalid Responses in Survey Data.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 66:4–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cremer, D. and Tyler, T. R.. 2007. “The Effects of Trust in Authority and Procedural Fairness on Cooperation.” Journal of Applied Psychology 92(3):639–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deflem, M. and Sutphin, S.. 2009. “Policing Katrina: Managing Law Enforcement in New Orleans.” Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 3(1):41–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinesen, P. T. and Jæger, M. M.. 2013. “The Effect of Terror on Institutional Trust: New Evidence from the 3/11 Madrid Terrorist Attack.” Political Psychology 34(6):917–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, J. M. and Martin, S.. 2020. “Mental Health and Well-Being of Police in a Health Pandemic: Critical Issues for Police Leaders in a Post-COVID-19 Environment.” Journal of Community Safety and Well-Being 5(2):31–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. M. and Kotera, Y.. 2021. “Mental Health in the U.K. Police Force: A Qualitative Investigation into the Stigma with Mental Illness.” International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 19(4):1116–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrow, K. 2020. “Policing the Pandemic in the U.K. Using the Principles of Procedural Justice.” Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 14(3):587–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, A. 2013. Discovering Statistics with IBM SPSS. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I.. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I.. 2010. Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Gau, J. M.. 2011. “The Convergent and Discriminant Validity of Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy: An Empirical Test of Core Theoretical Propositions.” Journal of Criminal Justice 39(6):489–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gau, J. M., Corsaro, N., Stewart, E. A. and Brunson, R. K.. 2012. “Examining Macro-Level Impacts on Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy.” Journal of Criminal Justice 40(4):333–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gearhart, S., Perez-Patron, M., Hammond, T. A., Goldberg, D. W., Klein, A., and Horney, J. A.. 2018. “The Impact of Natural Disasters on Domestic Violence: An Analysis of Reports of Simple Assault in Florida (1999–2007).” Violence and Gender 5(2):87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldenfein, J., Green, B., and Viljoen, S.. 2020. “Privacy Versus Health is a False Trade-Off.” Jacobin, 17 April 2020, retrieved 30 January 2024 (https://jacobin.com/2020/04/privacy-health-surveillance-coronavirus-pandemic-technology).Google Scholar
Government of Israel. 2020. New Coronavirus Emergency Regulations (in Hebrew) (https://www.nevo.co.il/general/CoronaUpdates.aspx).Google Scholar
Grace, S. 2020. “Policing Social Distancing: Gaining and Maintaining Compliance in the Age of Coronavirus.” Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 14(4):1034–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gubler, J. R., Halperin, E., and Hirschberger, G.. 2015. “Humanizing the Outgroup in Contexts of Protracted Intergroup Conflict.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 2(1):36–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guterres, A.. 2020. “We Are All in This Together: Human Rights and COVID-19 Response and Recovery.” United Nations, 23 April 2020. Retrieved 14 February 2024 (https://www.un.org/en/un-coronavirus-communications-team/we-are-all-together-human-rights-and-covid-19-response-and).Google Scholar
Hinds, L. and Murphy, K.. 2007. “Public Satisfaction with Police: Using Procedural Justice to Improve Police Legitimacy.” Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 40(1):27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgkinson, T., Andresen, M. A., Frank, R., and Pringle, D.. 2022. “Crime Down in the Paris of the Prairies: Spatial Effects of Covid-19 and Crime During Lockdown in Saskatoon, Canada.” Journal of Criminal Justice 78:101881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, D. C. 2002. Statistical Methods for Psychology, 5th ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. B., Bradford, B., Hough, M., Myhill, A., Quinton, P. and Tyler, T. R.. 2012a. “Why Do People Comply with the Law? Legitimacy and the Influence of Legal Institutions.” British Journal of Criminology 52(6):1051–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Stanko, B., and Hohl, K.. 2012b. Just Authority? Trust in the Police in England and Wales. London: Willan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. and Sunshine, J.. 2007. “Public Confidence in Policing: A Neo-Durkheimian Perspective.” British Journal of Criminology 47(2):214–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janković, B. and Cvetković, V. M.. 2020. “Public Perception of Police Behaviors in the Disaster COVID-19 – The Case of Serbia.” Policing: An International Journal 43(6):979–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonathan, T. 2010. “Police Involvement in Counterterrorism and Public Attitudes Towards the Police in Israel – 1998–2007.” British Journal of Criminology 50(4):748–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonathan, T. and Weisburd, D.. 2010. “How Do Majority Communities View the Potential Costs of Policing Terrorism? Findings from a Community Survey in Israel.” Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 4(2):169–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonathan-Zamir, T., Weisburd, D., and Hasisi, B.. 2014. “Police Involvement in Counterterrorism and Public Attitudes Toward the Police.” Pp. 53–77 in Policing Terrorism, Crime Control, and Police–Community Relations, edited by Jonathan-Zamir, T., Weisburd, D., and Hasisi, B.. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonathan-Zamir, T., Weisburd, D., and Hasisi, B.. 2015. “Editors Introduction.” Pp. 1–9 in Policing in Israel: Studying Crime Control, Community and Counterterrorism, edited by Jonathan-Zamir, T., Weisburd, D., and Hasisi, B.. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kajeepeta, S., Bruzelius, E., Ho, J. Z., and Prins, S. J.. 2022. “Policing the Pandemic: Estimating Spatial and Racialized Inequities in New York City Police Enforcement of COVID-19 Mandates.” Critical Public Health 32(1):56–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelling, G. L. and Moore, M. H.. 1988. The Evolving Strategy of Policing, Perspectives on Policing. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Kennison, P. and Loumansky, A.. 2007. “Shoot to Kill – Understanding Police Use Of Force In Combatting Suicide Terrorism.” Crime, Law and Social Change 47(3):151–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimhi, S., Eshel, Y., Marciano, H., and Adini, B.. 2020. “A Renewed Outbreak of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Longitudinal Study of Distress, Resilience, and Subjective Well-Being.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(21):7743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitchin, R. 2020. “Civil Liberties or Public Health, or Civil Liberties and Public Health? Using Surveillance Technologies to Tackle the Spread of COVID-19.” Space and Polity 24(3):362–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruglanski, A. W., Jasko, K., Chernikova, M., Milyavsky, M., Babush, M., Baldner, C., and Pierro, A.. 2015. “The Rocky Road from Attitudes to Behaviors: Charting the Goal Systemic Course of Actions.” Psychological Review 122(4):598–620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyprianides, A., Bradford, B., Beale, M., Savigar-Shaw, L., Stott, C., and Radburn, M.. 2022. “Policing the COVID-19 Pandemic: Police Officer Well-Being and Commitment to Democratic Modes of Policing.” Policing and Society 32(4):504–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaFree, G. and Adamczyk, A.. 2017. “The Impact of the Boston Marathon Bombings on Public Willingness to Cooperate with Police.” Justice Quarterly 34(3):459–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufs, J. and Waseem, Z.. 2020. “Policing in Pandemics: A Systematic Review and Best Practices for Police Response to COVID-19.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 51:101812.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leitner, M. and Helbich, M.. 2011. “The Impact of Hurricanes on Crime: A Spatio-Temporal Analysis in Houston, Texas.” Cartography and Geographic Information Science 38(2):213–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lentz, S. A. and Chaires, R. H.. 2007. “The Invention of Peel’s Principles: A Study Of Policing ‘Textbook’ History.” Journal of Criminal Justice 35(1):69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lum, C., Maupin, C., and Stoltz, M.. 2020a. The Impact of COVID-19 on Law Enforcement Agencies (Wave 1). Washington, DC: International Association of Chiefs of Police and the Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy, George Mason University.Google Scholar
Lum, C., Maupin, C., and Stoltz, M.. 2020b. The Impact of COVID-19 on Law Enforcement Agencies (Wave 2). Washington, DC: International Association of Chiefs of Police and the Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy, George Mason University.Google Scholar
Maskály, J., Ivković, S. K., and Neyroud, P.. 2021. “A Comparative Study of Police Organizational Changes During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Responding to a Public Health Crisis or Something Else?” Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 15(4):2372–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Davis, J., Sargeant, E., and Manning, M.. 2013. “Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy: A Systematic Review of the Research Evidence.” Journal of Experimental Criminology 9(3):245–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazerolle, L. and Ransley, J.. 2021. “Policing Health Regulations in Democratic Societies: A Focus on COVID-19 Challenges and Opportunities in Australia.” International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 45(3):315–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, M., Murphy, K., Sargeant, E., and Williamson, H.. 2021. “Policing COVID-19 Physical Distancing Measures: Managing Defiance and Fostering Compliance Among Individuals Least Likely to Comply.” Policing and Society 31(5):601–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCulloch, J. 2004. “Defending the Homeland: Domestic Intelligence, Law Enforcement, and Security; The Enemy Within: Intelligence Gathering, Law Enforcement, and Civil Liberties in the Wake of September 11.” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 37(1):155–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalfe, C. and Pickett, J.. 2021. “Public Fear of Protesters and Support for Protest Policing: An Experimental Study.” Working Paper, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, J. E. 1970. “Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson.” American Political Science Review 64(1):18–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, J. E. 1973. War, Presidents, and Public Opinion. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Murphy, K., McCarthy, M., Sargeant, E., and Williamson, H.. 2022. “COVID-19 Conspiracies, Trust in Authorities, and Duty to Comply with Social Distancing Restrictions.” International Criminology 2(1):44–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, K., Williamson, H., Sargeant, E., and McCarthy, M.. 2020. “Why People Comply with Covid-19 Social Distancing Restrictions: Self-Interest or Duty?” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 53(4):477–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutongwizo, T., Blaustein, J., and Shearing, C.. 2022. “Resilience Policing and Climate Change: Adaptive Responses to Hydrological Emergencies.” CrimRxiv, 11 May 2022, retrieved 29 January 2024 (https://doi.org/10.21428/cb6ab371.fb7dfcd0).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagin, D. S. and Telep, C. W.. 2017. “Procedural Justice and Legal Compliance.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 13:5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagin, D. S. and Telep, C. W.. 2020. “Procedural Justice and Legal Compliance: A Revisionist Perspective.” Criminology and Public Policy 19(3):761–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nivette, A., Eisner, M., and Ribeaud, D.. 2020. “Evaluating the Shared and Unique Predictors of Legal Cynicism and Police Legitimacy from Adolescence into Early Adulthood.” Criminology 58(1):70–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nix, J., Ivanov, S., and Pickett, J. T.. 2021. “What Does the Public Want Police to Do During Pandemics? A National Experiment.” Criminology and Public Policy 20(3):545–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Njoku, A., Ahmed, Y., and Bolaji, B.. 2021. “Police Brutality Against Blacks in the United States and Ensuing Protests: Implications for Social Distancing and Black Health During COVID-19.” Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment 31(1–4):262–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, S. L. 1995. “Towards Understanding ‘Rally’ Effects: Public Opinion in the Persian Gulf War.” Public Opinion Quarterly 59(4):526–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, G. and Jonathan-Zamir, T.. 2020. “Expectations, Effectiveness, Trust, and Cooperation: Public Attitudes Towards the Israel Police During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 14(4):1073–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, G., Jonathan-Zamir, T., and Factor, R.. 2022. “The Long-Term Effects of Policing the COVID-19 Pandemic: Public Attitudes Toward the Police in the ‘New Normal’.” Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 16(1):167–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, G., Jonathan-Zamir, T., and Weisburd, D.. 2017. “The Effect of Paramilitary Protest Policing on Protestors’ Trust in the Police: The Case of the ‘Occupy Israel’ Movement.” Law and Society Review 51(3):602–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prelog, A. J. 2016. “Modeling the Relationship Between Natural Disasters and Crime in the United States.” Natural Hazards Review 17(1), retrieved 30 January 2024 (https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.00001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. 2015. Final Report of the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
Punch, M. and Markham, G.. 2000. “Policing Disasters: The British Experience.” International Journal of Police Science and Management 3(1):40–54.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. 2002. “Bowling Together.” The American Prospect 13(3):20–2.Google Scholar
Reisig, M. D. and Lloyd, C.. 2009. “Procedural Justice, Police Legitimacy, and Helping the Police Fight Crime: Results from a Survey of Jamaican Adolescents.” Police Quarterly 12(1):42–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rojek, J. and Smith, M. R.. 2007. “Law Enforcement Lessons Learned from Hurricane Katrina.” Review of Policy Research 24(6):589–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schori-Eyal, N., Tagar, M. R., Saguy, T., and Halperin, E.. 2015. “The Benefits of Group-Based Pride: Pride Can Motivate Guilt in Intergroup Conflicts Among High Glorifiers.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 61:79–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sekalala, S., Forman, L., Habibi, R., and Meier, B. M.. 2020. “Health and Human Rights Are Inextricably Linked in the COVID-19 Response.” BMJ Global Health 5(9):e003359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shany, Y. 2020a. “Protesting Under COVID-19.” The Israel Democracy Institute (in Hebrew), 27 July 2020, retrieved 30 January 2024 (https://www.idi.org.il/articles/32084).Google Scholar
Shany, Y. 2020b. “The COVID-19 Has Violated Our Civil Rights.” The Israel Democracy Institute (in Hebrew), 13 December 2020, retrieved 30 January 2024 (https://www.idi.org.il/articles/33107).Google Scholar
Shaw, D. 2021. “Policing the Covid Lockdown – What the Public Thinks Nine Months On.” Crest, 22 January 2021, retrieved 30 January 2024 (https://www.crestadvisory.com/post/policing-the-covid-lockdown-what-the-public-thinks-nine-months-on).Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W. 2023. “Three Tiers for Evidence-Based Policing: Targeting ‘Minimalist’ Policing with a Risk-Adjusted Disparity Index.” Pp. 19–43 in The Future of Evidence-Based Policing, edited by D. Weisburd, T. Jonathan-Zamir, G. Perry, and B. Hasisi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shjarback, J. and Magny, O.. 2021. “Cops and COVID: An Examination of California Officers’ Perceptions and Experiences While Policing During a Pandemic.” Policing: An International Journal 45(1):59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibley, C. G., Greaves, L. M., Satherley, N., Wilson, M. S., Overall, N. C., Lee, C. H., Milojev, P., Bulbulia, J., Osborne, D., Milfont, T. L., and Houkamau, C. A.. 2020. “Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Nationwide Lockdown on Trust, Attitudes Toward Government, and Well-Being.” American Psychologist 75(5):618–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skogan, W. G. 2006. “Asymmetry in the Impact of Encounters with Police.” Policing and Society 16(2):99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
State of Israel Ministry of Health. 2021. “Coronavirus.” Retrieved 14 February 2024 (https://www.gov.il/en/Departments/Topics/corona-main-sub).Google Scholar
Stein, A. A. 1976. “Conflict and Cohesion: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 20(1):143–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stripe, N. 2020. Impact of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic on Crime and People’s Perceptions of Crime During the April and May 2020 National Lockdown. London: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
Sunshine, J. and Tyler, T. R.. 2003. “The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing.” Law and Society Review 37(3):513–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H. 1974. “Social Identity and Intergroup Behaviour.” Social Science Information 13(2):65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H. E. 1978. Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Thomassen, G., Strype, J., and Egge, M.. 2014. “Trust No Matter What? Citizens’ Perception of the Police One Year After the Terror Attacks in Norway.” Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 8(1):79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todman, D. 2020. Britain’s War: A New World, 1942–1947. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R. 2004. “Enhancing Police Legitimacy.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 593:84–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. R. 2005. “Policing in Black and White: Ethnic Group Differences in Trust and Confidence in the Police.” Police Quarterly 8(3):322–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. R. 2009. “Legitimacy and Criminal Justice: The Benefits of Self-Regulation.” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 7:307–59.Google Scholar
Tyler, T., Mentovich, A., and Satyavada, S.. 2014. “What Motivates Adherence to Medical Recommendations? The Procedural Justice Approach to Gaining Deference in the Medical Arena.” Regulation and Governance 8(3):350–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. R. and Wakslak, C. J.. 2004. “Profiling and Police Legitimacy: Procedural Justice, Attributions of Motive, and Acceptance of Police Authority.” Criminology 42(2):253–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varano, S. P., Schafer, J. A., Cancino, J. M., Decker, S. H., and Greene, J. R.. 2010. “A Tale of Three Cities: Crime and Displacement After Hurricane Katrina.” Journal of Criminal Justice 38(1):42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisburd, D. and Majmundar, M. K. (editors). 2018. Proactive Policing: Effects on Crime and Communities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, H., Murphy, K., Sargeant, E., and McCarthy, M.. 2022. “The Role of Bounded Authority Concerns Shaping Citizens’ Duty to Obey Authorities During COVID-19.” Policing: An International Journal 45(2):169–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollebæk, D., Enjolras, B., Steen-Johnsen, K., and Ødegård, G.. 2012. “After Utøya: How a High-Trust Society Reacts to Terror – Trust and Civic Engagement in the Aftermath of July 22.” P.S.: Political Science and Politics 45(1):32–7.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Sample Characteristics

Figure 1

Figure 1. Pandemic-related expectations from the police.*** p < 0.001. Only statistically significant results are reported in the parentheses.

Figure 2

Figure 2. General and pandemic-related evaluations of police effectiveness.*** p < 0.001. Only statistically significant results are reported in the parentheses.

Figure 3

Figure 3. General fairness and trust in the police.*** p < 0.001. Only statistically significant results are reported in the parentheses.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Pandemic-specific fairness and trust in the police.*** p < 0.001. Only statistically significant results are reported in the parentheses.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Perceived costs of policing the pandemic.*** p < 0.001. Only statistically significant results are reported in the parentheses.

Figure 6

a

Figure 7

a