Lung cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, and early diagnosis is essential for patient survival. Epigenetics is an innovative discipline that provides biomarkers to aid in early diagnosis, patient risk classification, or outcome prediction. Each type of tumor may present specific patterns of gene methylation, the analysis of which may be useful as a diagnostic tool. The aim of this study was to conduct an early assessment of novel in vitro diagnostic (IVD) tests based on the identification of DNA hypermethylation epigenetic signatures developed for the early detection of lung cancer.

We identified this technology through the Early Awareness and Alert System “SINTESIS-new technologies” of the Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias - Instituto de Salud Carlos III. A literature search of PubMed, the Trip Medical Database, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted. Studies published up to November 2019 were reviewed.

Three tests were identified. Epi proLung® analyzes the hypermethylation status of SHOX2/PTGER4 genes in blood samples using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and showed good discrimination capacity with respect to healthy controls (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.91) and patients with non-malignant lung diseases (AUC = 0.86). The Epi proLung BL Reflex Assay® for determining the hypermethylation state of the SHOX2 gene in bronchoalveolar lavage samples by PCR had modest sensitivity (69%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 64–75) and high specificity (96%, 95% CI: 97–100). A test in development for determining the hypermethylation state of BCAT1/CDO1/TRIM58/ZNF177 genes in aspirated or bronchoalveolar lavage samples by pyrosequencing yielded a sensitivity of 85 percent and a specificity of 81 percent, with an AUC of 0.91 at the optimal cutoff point.

The evidence for the three tests showed promising results in terms of diagnostic validity. However, although personalized medicine is becoming increasingly widespread in the field of cancer diagnosis, more studies are needed to evaluate the clinical utility of these diagnostic tests, either as a complementary or a screening test, and the economic impact of their use.