Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-06-02T01:04:00.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Time Trends in the Utilization of Cardiac Catheterization Procedures in Italy, 1983–1993

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Carlo Favaretti  and
Aldo Mariotto
Carlo Favaretti
Affiliation:
Centre of Technology Assessment and Quality Improvement
Aldo Mariotto
Affiliation:
Centre of Technology Assessment and Quality Improvement
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The use of cardiac catheterization procedures and the number of hemodynamic laboratories in Italy increased steadily from 1983 through 1993, sometimes with no planning or modern technology assessment. It is recommended that in the future funds be assigned to improve underused laboratories rather than to build new facilities.

Type
Research Note
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , Summer 1996 , pp. 518 - 523
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Adams, D. F., & Abrams, H. L.Complications of coronary arteriography: A follow-up report. Cardiovascular Radiology, 1979, 2, 89–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Bourassa, M. G.Distribution des laboratories de cathétérisme cardiaque au Québec. Rapport soumis au conseil d'evaluation des technologies de la santé. Montreal (Québec), 09 15, 1989.Google Scholar
3.Bourassa, M. G., & Noble, J.Complication rate of coronary arteriography. Circulation, 1976, 53, 106–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Bressan, M., Stritoni, P., Razzolini, R., et al. La coronarografia in una popolazione definita: Studio pilota nei residenti a Padova. Cardiologia, 1993, 38, 225–29.Google Scholar
5.Chassin, M. R., Kosecoff, J., Solomon, D. H., & Brook, R. H.How coronary angiography is used: Clinical determinants of appropriateness. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1987, 258, 2543–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Collins-Nakai, R. L., Huysmans, H. A., & Scully, H. E.Task Force 5: Access to cardiovascular care: An international comparison. 23rd Bethesda Conference, Access to Cardiovascular Care, November 21 –22, 1991. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1992, 19, 1477–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Comitato Interministeriale per la Programmazione Economica. Assegnazione di somme alle regioni e province autonome interessate a valere sull'accantonamento del Fondo sanitario nazionale 1991 — Parte corrente e conto capitale. Deliberazione 31 gennaio 1992. G. U. della Repubblica Italiana Serie generale n. 5, 4–3 1992, 23–24.Google Scholar
8.Davis, K., Kennedy, J. W., Kemp, H. G., et al. Complications of coronary arteriography from the collaborative study of coronary artery surgery (CASS). Circulation, 1979, 59, 1105–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Favaretti, C., Mariotto, A., Stritoni, P., et al. Coronary angiography, PTCA, and CABG in a defined population: A pilot study on residents in Padua (Italy). In Proceedings of the 7th Annual Meeting of the International Society of Technology Assessment in Health Care. Helsinki, Finland, 06 23–26, 1991, 70.Google Scholar
10.Favaretti, C., Mariotto, A., Stritoni, P., et al. Use ed indicazioni all'angiografia coronarica, angioplastica e by-pass coronarici in una popolazione definita. L'Ospedale, 1993, 4–5, 79–84.Google Scholar
11.Favaretti, C., Stritoni, P., Mariotto, A., et al. La distribuzione e l'attività dei laboratori di emodinamica in Italia. Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia, 1994, 24, 477–82.Google Scholar
12.Fisher, M. L.Safety in numbers? American Journal of Cardiology, 1983, 52, 898–901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Friesinger, G. C., Adams, D. F., Bourassa, M. G., et al. Inter-Society Commission for Heart Disease Resources. Optimal resources for examination of the heart and lungs: Cardiac catheterization and radiographic facilities. Circulation, 1983, 68(A), 889–930.Google ScholarPubMed
14.Hansing, C. E.The risk and cost of coronary angiography. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1979, 242, 731–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Judkins, M. P., Abrams, H. L., Bristow, J. D., et al. Report of the Inter-Society Commission for Heart Disease Resources. Optimal resources for examination of the chest and cardiovascular system: A hospital planning and resource guideline: Radiologic facilities for conventional x-ray examination of the heart and the lungs. Circulation, 1976, 53(A), 1–37.Google Scholar
16.McGregor, M., & Pelletier, G.Planning of specialized health facilities: Size vs. cost and effectiveness in heart surgery. New England Journal of Medicine, 1978, 299, 179–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Menotti, A.Trends in CHD in Italy. International Journal of Epidemiology, 1989, 18, 125–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Pepine, C. J., Allen, H. D., Bashore, T. M., et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for cardiac catheterization laboratories. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Ad Hoc Task Force on Cardiac Catheterization. Circulation, 1991, 84, 2213–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Piscione, F.Registro nazionale GISE dei cateterismi cardiaci. Attività dei laboratori di emodinamica italiani anni 1992/1993. Notiziario di Emodinamica, 1994, 1, 5.Google Scholar
20.Ross, J., Brandenburg, R. O., Dinsmore, R. E., et al. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on assessment of diagnostic and therapeutic cardiovascular procedures (Subcommittee on coronary angiography). Circulation, 1987, 76(A), 963–77.Google Scholar
21.Selzer, A., Anderson, W. L., & March, H. W.Indications for coronary arteriography: Risks vs. benefits. California Medicine, 1971, 115, 1–6.Google ScholarPubMed
22.Stritoni, P.Attività degli anni 1983 e 1984 dei Laboratori di Emodinamica aderenti al registro nazionale dei cateterismi cardiaci. Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia, 1986, 16, 370.Google Scholar
23.Stritoni, P.Registro nazionale GISE dei cateterismi cardiaci. Attività dei laboratori di emodinamica italiani nel 1985 e nel 1986. Notiziario di Emodinamica, 1988, 1, 4.Google Scholar
24.Stritoni, P.Registro nazionale GISE dei cateterismi cardiaci. Attività dei laboratori di emodinamica italiani nel 1987. Notiziario di Emodinamica, 1989, 3, 4.Google Scholar
25.Stritoni, P.Registro nazionale GISE dei cateterismi cardiaci. Attività dei laboratori di emodinamica italiani nel 1988 e 1989. Notiziario di Emodinamica, 1991, 1, 1.Google Scholar
26.Stritoni, P.Registro nazionale GISE dei cateterismi cardiaci. Attività dei laboratori di emodinamica italiani nel 1990. Notiziario di Emodinamica, 1991, 2, 4.Google Scholar
27.Stritoni, P.Registro nazionale GISE dei cateterismi cardiaci. Attività dei laboratori di emodinamica italiani nel 1991. Notiziario di Emodinamica, 1993, 1, 1.Google Scholar