Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-31T22:46:01.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TOWARD A CONTINGENCY MODEL FOR HOSPITAL-BASED HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: EVIDENCE FROM ADHOPHTA PROJECT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2018

Americo Cicchetti ,
Valentina Iacopino ,
Silvia Coretti ,
Alessandra Fiore ,
Marco Marchetti ,
Laura Sampietro-Colom ,
Kristian Kidholm ,
Jean-Blaise Wasserfallen Open the ORCID record for Jean-Blaise Wasserfallen [Opens in a new window] ,
Rabia Kahveci  and
Esa Halmesmäki
...Show all authors
Americo Cicchetti
Affiliation:
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Faculty of Economics and Graduate School of Health Economics and Management
Valentina Iacopino
Affiliation:
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Faculty of Economics and Graduate School of Health Economics and Managementvalentina.iacopino@unicatt.it
Silvia Coretti
Affiliation:
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Faculty of Economics and Graduate School of Health Economics and Management
Alessandra Fiore
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Health Economics and Management, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
Marco Marchetti
Affiliation:
National Center for Health Technology Assessment, National Institute of Health
Laura Sampietro-Colom
Affiliation:
Hospital-Based HTA Unit, Innovation and Research Directorate, Hospital Clinic Barcelona
Kristian Kidholm
Affiliation:
Department of Quality and Research/HTA, Odense University Hospital
Jean-Blaise Wasserfallen
Affiliation:
Lausanne University Hospital
Rabia Kahveci
Affiliation:
Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital
Esa Halmesmäki
Affiliation:
Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusima
Magdalene Rosenmöller
Affiliation:
IESE Business School
Claudia Wild
Affiliation:
Ludwig-Boltzman Institute for HTA
Raul-Allan Kivet
Affiliation:
Tartu University Clinics
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: Hospital-based health technology assessment (HB-HTA) is becoming increasingly relevant because of its role in managing the introduction and withdrawal of health technologies. The organizational arrangement in which HB-HTA activities are conducted depends on several contextual factors, although the dominant models have several similarities. The aims of this study were to explore, describe, interpret, and explain seven cases of the application of HB-HTA logic and to propose a classification for HB-HTA organizational models which may be beneficial for policy makers and HTA professionals.

Methods: The study was part of the AdHopHTA Project, granted under the European 7th Framework Research Programme. A case study methodology was applied to analyze seven HB-HTA initiatives in seven countries, with collection of qualitative and quantitative data. Cross-case analysis was performed within the framework of contingent organizational theory.

Results: Evidence showed that some organizational or “structural” variables, namely the level of procedure formalization/structuration and the level of integration with other HTA bodies at the national, regional, and provincial levels, predominantly shape the HB-HTA approach, determining a contingency model of HB-HTA. Crossing the two variables, four options have emerged: integrated specialized HTA unit, stand-alone HTA unit, integrated-essential HTA, independent group unit.

Conclusions: No one-best-way approach can be used for HTA at the hospital level. Rather, the characteristics of HTA models depend on many contextual factors. Such conceptualization may aid the diffusion of HB-HTA to inform managerial decision making and clinical practice.

Keywords

Technology assessmentBiomedical [N03.880]Organizations [N03.540]Hospitals [N02.278.421]Organizational case studies [N03.349.380.710]
Type
Policy
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , 2018 , pp. 205 - 211
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Sampietro-Colom, L, Lach, K, Cicchetti, A, et al. The AdHopHTA handbook: a handbook of hospital-based health technology assessment (HB-HTA). Public deliverable; The AdHopHTA Project (FP7/2007-13 grant agreement nr 305018), 2015. http://www.adhophta.eu/sites/files/adhophta/media/adhophta_handbook_website.pdf (accessed March 1, 2018).Google Scholar
2. Cicchetti, A, Fontana, Maccarini M, the NI-HTA Collaborative Group. Hospital-based health technology assessment: Analysis of 5 case studies within the Italian Network of Health Technology Assessment (NI-HTA). Tendenze Nuove. 1/2006.Google Scholar
3. Sampietro-Colom, L, Martin, J. Hospital-based health technology assessment. The next frontier for health technology assessment. New York: Springer; 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Lafortune, L, Farand, L, Mondou, I, Sicotte, C, Battista, R. Assessing the performance of health technology assessment organizations: A framework. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24:76-86.Google Scholar
5. Martelli, G, La Torre, G, Di Ghionno, E, et al. Health technology assessment agencies: An international overview of organizational aspects. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007;23:414-424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Cicchetti, A, Marchetti, M, Dibidino, R, Corio, M. Hospital-based health technology assessment world-wide survey. HTAi Hospital-Based Health Technology Assessment Interest Group, 2008. www.htai.org (accessed September 2016).Google Scholar
7. Gagnon, MP, Desmartis, M, Poder, T, Witteman, W. Effects and repercussions of local/hospital-based health technology assessment (HTA): A systematic review. Syst Rev. 2014;28:129.Google Scholar
8. Centre for Healthcare Management Studies and Research (Cerismas) (2013). HTA in the Italian Health Care Organizations (in Italian). Final report 2013.Google Scholar
9. Italian Federation of Healthcare Organizations (FIASO). L'evoluzione dell'HTA a livello aziendale. Final report. Rome: FIASO; 2013. Available at: https://www.fiaso.it/Pubblicazioni/L-evoluzione-dell-HTA-a-livello-aziendale. Accessed March 19, 2018.Google Scholar
10. Daft, R. Organization theory and design. 12th ed. South-Western: Cengage Learning Publishers; 2016.Google Scholar
11. Kidholm, K, Ølholm, AM, Birk-Olsen, M, et al. Hospital managers’ need for information in decision-making: An interview study in nine European countries. Health Policy. 2015;119:1424-1432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Halmesmäki, E, Pasternack, I, Roine, R. Hospital-based health technology assessment (HTA) in Finland: A case study on collaboration between hospitals and the national HTA unit. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016;5:14-25.Google Scholar
13. Sampietro-Colom, L, Lach, K, Pasternack, I, et al. Guiding principles for good practices in hospital-based health technology assessment units. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015;31:457-465.Google Scholar
14. EFQM public and voluntary sector excellence model. Brussels: European Foundation for Quality Management; 2003.Google Scholar
15. Yin, RK. Case study research. Design and methods. 3rd ed. Applied Social Research Methods Series. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers; 2003.Google Scholar
16. Mathison, S. Encyclopedia of evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Cicchetti, A, Marchetti, M, Iacopino, V, D'Amico, G, Sampietro-Colom, L. Organizational models of hospital based HTA: Empirical evidence from Adhophta European Project. Value Health. 2015:18:A560-A561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Cicchetti et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Cicchetti et al. supplementary material(File)
File 20.9 KB