Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T04:56:03.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Categories, diversity, and relevance of memory strategies reported by community-dwelling seniors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2017

Marie-Michèle Haché
Affiliation:
Centre for Research and Expertise in Social Gerontology (CREGÉS), CIUSSS West-Central Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Maxime Lussier
Affiliation:
School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Manon Parisien
Affiliation:
Centre for Research and Expertise in Social Gerontology (CREGÉS), CIUSSS West-Central Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Francis Langlois
Affiliation:
Research Center on Aging, CIUSSS de l'Estrie–CHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
Nathalie Bier*
Affiliation:
School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Nathalie Bier, Associate Professor, School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, P.O. Box 6128, Station Centre-ville, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada. Phone: +1-514-343-6564; Fax: +1-514-343-2105. Email: nathalie.bier@umontreal.ca.

Abstract

Background:

Memory strategies help seniors remember information that is essential for the performance of their daily activities and contribute to their independence in the context of declining memory skills. This study aimed to analyze the categories, the diversity, and relevance of memory strategies known by seniors, and to identify individual characteristics that correlated with these variables.

Methods:

The sample consisted of 294 participants aged 60 and over who decided to take part in a cognitive vitality promotion program. An adapted version of the memory situation questionnaire (Troyer, 2001) was administered to identify the memory strategies that seniors would use in five daily life situations. A scoring grid, also adapted from the questionnaire's original version (Troyer, 2001), was used to quantify the relevance of the strategies that were reported by participants.

Results:

All participants mentioned at least once that they would use a strategy from the physical category of memory strategies. Out of a possible range of 26 strategies, participants answered an average of 6.14 (SD = 1.7) different answers across the five situations. Based on expert consensus, 67.7% of the mentioned memory strategies were relevant. Diversity and relevance were significantly higher when trying to remember appointments, things to bring or phone numbers (p ≤ 0.05). The level of education, cognitive skills, and participation in leisure activities were related to diversity and relevance of reported strategies.

Conclusions:

Seniors know various and relevant memory strategies to perform daily activities. The advantages of integrating strategies that they already know in cognitive health promotion programs should be considered in further studies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albert, M. S., Heller, H. S. and Milberg, W. (1988). Changes in naming ability with age. Psychology and Aging, 3, 173.Google Scholar
Bäckman, L. et al. (1997). Brain activation in young and older adults during implicit and explicit retrieval. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 378391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. and Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 8, 4789.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A., Kopelman, M. and Wilson, B. (2004). The Essential Handbook of Memory Disorders for Clinicians. Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley and sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Badham, S. P., Hay, M., Foxon, N., Kaur, K. and Maylor, E. A. (2016). When does prior knowledge disproportionately benefit older adults' memory? Neuropsychology, Development, and Cognition. Section B Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 23, 338365. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2015.1099607 Google Scholar
Bier, N., Lorthios-Guilledroit, A., Nour, K., Parisien, M., Ellemberg, D. and Laforest, S. (2015). Jog your mind: methodology and challenges of conducting evaluative research in partnership with community organizations. International Psychogeriatrics, 27, 7994. doi:10.1017/S1041610214001306 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birren, J. E. et al. (2013). Handbook of Mental Health and Aging. Millbrae, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Boron, J. B., Rogers, W. A. and Fisk, A. D. (2013). Everyday memory strategies for medication adherence. Geriatric Nursing, 34, 395401. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2013.05.010 Google Scholar
Brehmer, Y. et al. (2008). Comparing memory skill maintenance across the life span: preservation in adults, increase in children. Psychology and Aging, 23, 227238. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.23.2.227 Google Scholar
Brooks, J. O., Friedman, L. and Yesavage, J. A. (2003). Use of an external mnemonic to augment the efficacy of an internal mnemonic in older adults. International Psychogeriatrics, 15, 5967.Google Scholar
Cabeza, R. (2001). Cognitive neuroscience of aging: contributions of functional neuroimaging. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42, 277286. doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.00237 Google Scholar
Camirand, J., and Fournier, C. (2012). Vieillir en santé au Québec: portrait de la santé des aînés vivant à domicile en 2009–2010. Enquête sur la santé dans les collectivités canadiennes. http://www.stat.gouv.qc.ca/statistiques/sante/bulletins/zoom-sante-201202.pdf; last accessed 21 September 2017.Google Scholar
Castel, A. D. (2007). The adaptive and strategic use of memory by older adults: evaluative processing and value-directed remembering. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 48, 225270. doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(07)48006-9 Google Scholar
Chauvel, G., Maquestiaux, F., Didierjean, A., Joubert, S., Dieudonne, B. and Verny, M. (2011). Utilisation des processus mnésiques non déclaratifs et automatiques dans l'apprentissage moteur: comment atténuer les effets du vieillissement. Geriatrie et Psychologie & Neuropsychiatrie du Vieillissement, 9, 455463.Google Scholar
Clément, J., Nassif, R., Léger, J. and Marchan, F. (1997). Mise au point et contribution à la validation d'une version française brève de la geriatric depression scale de Yesavage. L'encéphale, 23, 9199.Google Scholar
Coyette, F., Arno, P., Leclerq, M., Seron, X., Van der Linden, M. and Grégoire, J. (1999). Questionnaire d'Auto-évaluation de l'Attention (QAA). Unpublished document, Centre de Revalidation Neuropsychologique des Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium.Google Scholar
Daveluy, C., Pica, L., Audet, N., Courtemanche, R., Lapointe, F. and Côté, L. (1998). Enquête Sociale et de Santé – Cahier Technique et Méthodologique: Documentation Générale (Vol. 1). Québec: Institut de la statistique du Québec.Google Scholar
Delis, D., Kramer, J., Kaplan, E., Thompkins, B. and Ober, A. (1987). CVLT, California Verbal Learning Test (Adult Version): Manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Devolder, P. A. and Pressley, M. (1992). Causal attributions and strategy use in relation to memory performance differences in younger and older adults. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 629642.Google Scholar
Dirette, D. P. (2015). A comparison of self-generated versus taught internal strategies for working memory. NeuroRehabilitation, 36, 187194. doi: 10.3233/nre-151206 Google Scholar
Dixon, R. A., Hultsch, D. F. and Hertzog, C. (1987). The Metamemory in Adulthood (MIA) questionnaire. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 24, 671688.Google Scholar
Elliott, R. (2003). Executive functions and their disorders: Imaging in clinical neuroscience. British Medical Bulletin, 65, 4959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. D. (1996). Straightforward Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.Google Scholar
Flavell, J. H. and Wellman, H. M. (1977). Metamemory. Cognitive Perspectives on the Development of Memory. Hillsdale, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Ford, A. B., Haug, M. R., Stange, K. C., Gaines, A. D., Noelker, L. S. and Jones, P. K. (2000). Sustained personal autonomy: a measure of successful aging. Journal of Aging and Health, 12, 470489. doi: 10.1177/089826430001200402 Google Scholar
Fort, I., Adoul, L., Holl, D., Kaddour, J. and Gana, K. (2004). Psychometric properties of the French version of the multifactorial memory questionnaire for adults and the elderly. Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue Canadienne du Vieillissement, 23, 347357.Google Scholar
Glisky, E. L. and Glisky, M. L. (2008). Memory rehabilitation in older adults. In Stuss, D. T., Winocur, G. and Robertson, I. H. (eds.), Cognitive Neurorehabilitation: Evidence and Application, 2nd edn. (pp. 541561). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamami, A., Serbun, S. J. and Gutchess, A. H. (2011). Self-referencing enhances memory specificity with age. Psychology and Aging, 26, 636646. doi: 10.1037/a0022626 Google Scholar
Hertzog, C., Lovden, M., Lindenberger, U. and Schmiedek, F. (2017). Age differences in coupling of intraindividual variability in mnemonic strategies and practice-related associative recall improvements. Psychology and Aging. doi: 10.1037/pag0000177 Google Scholar
Hess, T. M., Auman, C., Colcombe, S. J. and Rahhal, T. A. (2003). The impact of stereotype threat on age differences in memory performance. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58, P3–11.Google Scholar
Hultsch, D., Hertzog, C. and Dixon, R. (1987). Age differences in metamemory: resolving the inconsistencies. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 41, 193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hultsch, D., Hertzog, C., Dixon, R. and Davidson, H. (1988). Memory Self-Knowledge and self-efficacy in the aged. In Howe, M. L. and Brainerd, C. J. (eds.), Cognitive Development in Adulthood: Progress in Cognitive Development Research (pp. 6592). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Intons-Peterson, M. J. and Fournier, J. (1986). External and internal memory aids: when and how often do we use them? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julayanont, P. et al. (2015). The montreal cognitive assessment—basic: a screening tool for mild cognitive impairment in illiterate and low-educated elderly adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 63, 25502554. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13820 Google Scholar
Kahana, M. J. and Wingfield, A. (2000). A functional relation between learning and organization in free recall. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 516521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kinsella, G. J. et al. (2016). Strategies for improving memory: a randomized trial of memory groups for older people, including those with mild cognitive impairment. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 49, 3143.Google Scholar
Kliegel, M. and Altgassen, M. (2006). Interindividual differences in learning performance: the effects of age, intelligence, and strategic task approach. Educational Gerontology, 32, 111124.Google Scholar
Kolb, B. and Whishaw, I. Q. (2009). Fundamentals of Human Neuropsychology. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Leirer, V. O., Morrow, D. G., Sheikh, J. I. and Pariante, G. M. (1990). Memory skills elders want to improve. Experimental Aging Research, 16, 155158. doi: 10.1080/07340669008251544 Google Scholar
Lemaire, P. and Bherer, L. (2005). Psychologie Du vieillissement, Une Perspective Cognitive. Paris: DeBoeck Université.Google Scholar
Lezak, M. (1995). Neuropsychological Assessment, 3rd edn (pp. 544–546), New York, NY : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McFarland, C. P. and Glisky, E. L. (2011). Implementation intentions and prospective memory among older adults: an investigation of the role of frontal lobe function. Neuropsychology, Development, and Cognition, 18, 633652. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2011.613449 Google Scholar
Montejo, P., Montenegro, M., Fernández, M. A. and Maestú, F. (2011). Subjective memory complaints in the elderly: prevalence and influence of temporal orientation, depression and quality of life in a population-based study in the city of Madrid. Aging & Mental Health, 15, 8596. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2010.501062 Google Scholar
Mormino, E. C. et al. (2009). Episodic memory loss is related to hippocampal-mediated β-amyloid deposition in elderly subjects. Brain, 132, 13101323. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn320 Google Scholar
Nasreddine, Z. S. et al. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53, 695699. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x Google Scholar
Paquette, C., Beaulieu, N. and Lavoie, V. (2009). La mémoire Guide Des Meilleures Pratiques en Réadaptation Cognitive (pp. 7996). Québec, Canada: Presses de l'Université du Québec.Google Scholar
Perfect, T. J. and Lindsay, D. S. (2013). The SAGE Handbook of Applied Memory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Piguet, O. et al. (2002). Normal aging and executive functions in “old-old” community dwellers: poor performance is not an inevitable outcome. International Psychogeriatrics, 14, 139159.Google Scholar
Reese, C. M. and Cherry, K. E. (2004). Practical memory concerns in adulthood. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 59, 235253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reuter-Lorenz, P. A. and Cappell, K. A. (2008). Neurocognitive aging and the compensation hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 177182. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00570.x Google Scholar
Saczynski, J. S., Rebok, G. W., Whitfield, K. E. and Plude, D. L. (2007). Spontaneous production and use of mnemonic strategies in older adults. Experimental Aging Research, 33, 273294. doi: 10.1080/03610730701318899 Google Scholar
Salat, D. et al. (2005). Age-related changes in prefrontal white matter measured by diffusion tensor imaging. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1064, 3749.Google Scholar
Schinka, J. A., Mcbride, A., Vanderploeg, R. D., Tennyson, K., Borenstein, A. R. and Mortimer, J. A. (2005). Florida cognitive activities scale: initial development and validation. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 11, 108116. doi: doi:10.1017/S1355617705050125 Google Scholar
Schmitter-Edgecombe, M., Woo, E. and Greeley, D. R. (2009). Characterizing multiple memory deficits and their relation to everyday functioning in individuals with mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychology, 23, 168177. doi: 10.1037/a0014186 Google Scholar
Seron, X. and Van der Linden, M. (2000). Traité de Neuropsychologie Clinique: Volume 2. Marseilles, France: SOLAL.Google Scholar
Sohlberg, M. K. M. and Mateer, C. A. (2001). Cognitive Rehabilitation: An Integrative Neuropsychological Approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Souchay, C. and Isingrini, M. (2000). Métamémoire et vieillissement: relations avec les fonctions frontales et la vitesse de traitement. In Syssau, Brouillet et (ed.), Le Vieillissement Cognitif Normal, vers un Modèle Explicatif du Vieillissement (pp. 7489). Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgique: DeBoeck Université.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. (2016). Population of Québec, by Age Group and Sex, 2001–2016. Montreal: Government of Canada.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. L., Mills, K. M., King, A. C., Haskell, W. L., Gillis, D. and Ritter, P. L. (2001). CHAMPS physical activity questionnaire for older adults: outcomes for interventions. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 33, 11261141.Google Scholar
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643.Google Scholar
Taconnat, L. (2008). Vieillissement, Stratégies Mnésiques et Métamémoire La Personne âgée: Psychologie du Vieillissement. (pp. 161174). Rosny-sous-Bois: Bréal.Google Scholar
Tocze, C., Bouazzaoui, B. and Taconnat, L. (2012). Vieillissement et mémoire: rôle de la flexibilité cognitive dans l'utilisation de stratégies mnésiques adaptées et dans le rappel Créativité, motivation et vieillissement . In Les Sciences Cognitives en Débat. (pp. 179197). Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Tournier, I., Mathey, S. and Postal, V. (2012). The association between routinization and cognitive resources in later life. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 74, 143161.Google Scholar
Troyer, A. K. (2001). Improving memory knowledge, satisfaction, and functioning via an education and intervention program for older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 8, 256268. doi: 10.1076/anec.8.4.256.5642 Google Scholar
Troyer, A. K., Murphy, K. J., Anderson, N. D., Moscovitch, M. and Craik, F. I. M. (2007). Changing everyday memory behaviour in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a randomised controlled trial. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 18, 6588. doi: 10.1080/09602010701409684 Google Scholar
Vanier, M. and Lemyse, C. (1994). Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test (version française). Montreal, QC: Centre de recherche Institut de réadaptation de Montréal.Google Scholar
Verghese, J. et al. (2003). Leisure activities and the risk of dementia in the elderly. New England Journal of Medicine, 348, 25082516. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa022252 Google Scholar
Verhaeghen, P., Geraerts, N. and Marcoen, A. (2000). Memory complaints, coping, and well-being in old age: a systemic approach. The Gerontologist, 40, 540548. doi: 10.1093/geront/40.5.540 Google Scholar
Wilson, B., Cockburn, J., Baddeley, A. and Hiorns, R. (1989). The development and validation of a test battery for detecting and monitoring everyday memory problems. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 11, 855870. doi: 10.1080/01688638908400940 Google Scholar
Wilson, R., Hebert, L., Scherr, P., Barnes, L., De Leon, C. and Evans, D. (2009). Educational attainment and cognitive decline in old age. Neurology, 72, 460465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, L., Truong, L., Fuss, S. and Bislimovic, S. (2012). The effects of ageing and divided attention on the self-reference effect in emotional memory: spontaneous or effortful mnemonic benefits? Memory, 20, 596607. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2012.690040 Google Scholar