Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T21:26:01.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development and assessment of the content validity of the professional good practices scale in nursing homes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2018

G. Pérez-Rojo ,
C. Noriega ,
C. Velasco  and
J. López
G. Pérez-Rojo*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Pedagogy, School of Medicine, Universidad San Pablo-CEU, CEU Universities, Madrid, Spain
C. Noriega
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Pedagogy, School of Medicine, Universidad San Pablo-CEU, CEU Universities, Madrid, Spain
C. Velasco
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Pedagogy, School of Medicine, Universidad San Pablo-CEU, CEU Universities, Madrid, Spain
J. López
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Pedagogy, School of Medicine, Universidad San Pablo-CEU, CEU Universities, Madrid, Spain
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Gema Pérez-Rojo, Departamento de Psicología y Pedagogía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad San Pablo-CEU, CEU Universities, Campus de Montepríncipe, Alcorcón, Madrid 28925, Spain. Phone: (+34) 913724700. Email: gema.perezrojo@ceu.es.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent approaches in the care of older people have led to a greater emphasis on good practices to prevent elder abuse. The instruments assessing good practices are very limited, and those focused on elder abuse have rarely considered subtle forms, especially in institutional settings. The aim of this study was to develop and assess the content validity of a good practices scale for professionals working in nursing homes. An extensive literature review of the tools assessing professionals’ good–bad practices towards older people was conducted. A preliminary scale based on Kayser-Jones’ (1990) [Old, Alone and Neglected: Care of the Aged in Scotland and the United States. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press] types of abuse was developed, including four subscales: Personalization, Humanization, Absence of Infantilization, and Absence of Victimization. Content validity was analyzed through a panel of eight experts. Rovinelli and Hambleton’s index of item-objective congruence was used to analyze the items’ inclusiveness in the assigned subscale to establish their representativeness. Items’ relevance and clarity were analyzed using the paired comparison method. The final version of the scale included 56 items, with appropriate levels of item objective-congruence, relevance, and clarity. This instrument will allow professionals to detect and develop awareness and intervention programs that aim to promote good practices in nursing homes.

Keywords

institutionselder abusegood treatmentperson-centered carehumanization
Type
Brief Report
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 31 , Issue 10: Issue Theme: Dementia and the Society , October 2019 , pp. 1517 - 1521
Copyright
© International Psychogeriatric Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Castle, N., Ferguson-Rome, J. C. and Teresi, J. A. (2015). Elder abuse in residential long-term care. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 20, 1–37. doi: 10.1177/0733464813492583.Google Scholar
Halek, M., Holle, D. and Bartholomeyczik, S. (2017). Development and evaluation of the content validity, practicability and feasibility of the innovative dementia-oriented assessment system for challenging behavior in residents with dementia. BMC Health Services Research, 17, 2–26. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2469-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsieh, H., Wang, J., Yen, M. and Liu, T. (2009). Educational support group in changing caregivers’ psychological elder abuse behaviour toward caring for institutionalized elders. Advanced in Health Sciences Education, 14, 377–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kayser-Jones, J. S. (1981). Old, Alone and Neglected: Care of the Aged in Scotland and the United States. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kusmaul, N., Bern-Klug, M. and Bonifas, R. (2017). Ethical issues in long-term care: a human rights perspective. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 2, 86–97. doi: 10.1007/s41134-017-0035-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd-Sherlock, P., Penhale, B. and Redondo, N. (2017). The admission of older people into residential care homes in Argentina: coercion and human rights abuse. The Gerontologist, 14, 1–9. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny014.Google Scholar
Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35, 382–385. doi: 10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martínez, T. (2010). Las buenas prácticas en la atención a las personas adultas en situación de dependencia (Good practices in dependent older people’s attention). Informes Portal Mayores, 98, 1–22.Google Scholar
McCormack, B., Roberts, T., Meyer, J., Morgan, D. and Boscart, T. (2012). Appreciating the ‘person’ in long-term care. International Journal of Older People Nursing, 7, 284–294. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-3743.2012.00342.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pérez-Rojo, G., Chulián, A., López, J., Noriega, C., Velasco, C. and Carretero, I. (2017). Elders’ abuse and good deals. Revista Clínica Contemporánea, 8, 1–14. doi: 10.5093/cc2017a3.Google Scholar
Phelan, A. (2015). Protecting care home residents from mistreatment and abuse. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 8, 215–223. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S70191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillemer, K., Burnes, D., Riffin, C. and Lachs, M. S. (2016). Elder abuse: global situation, risk factors, and prevention strategies. The Gerontologist, 56, 194–205. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, R. C. and Carlson, L. (2003). Indexes of item objective congruence for multidimensional tests. International Journal of Testing, 3, 163–171. doi: 10.1207/S15327574IJT0302_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J. J., Tseng, H. F. and Chen, K. M. (2007). Development and testing of screening indicators for psychological abuse of older people. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 21, 40–44. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2006.09.004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHO (2002). Missing Voices: Views of Older Persons on Elder Abuse. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
WHO (2016). Multisectoral action for a life course approach to healthy ageing: draft global strategy and plan of action on ageing and health. http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA69/A69_17-en.pdf?ua=1.Google Scholar
Yon, Y., Ramiro-Gonzalez, M., Mikton, C. R., Huber, M. and Sethi, D. (2018). The prevalence of elder abuse in institutional settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Public Health, 93. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cky093.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Pérez-Rojo et al. Supplementary Materials

Appendix A1

Download Pérez-Rojo et al. Supplementary Materials(File)
File 39.7 KB