Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-29T09:57:49.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of soil tillage system on the nitrogen uptake, grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of spring barley in a cool Atlantic climate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2014

J. BRENNAN ,
P. D. FORRISTAL ,
T. McCABE  and
R. HACKETT
J. BRENNAN
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary Medicine, NUI Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland Teagasc CELUP, Crops Research, Oak Park, Carlow, Co. Carlow, Ireland
P. D. FORRISTAL*
Affiliation:
Teagasc CELUP, Crops Research, Oak Park, Carlow, Co. Carlow, Ireland
T. McCABE
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary Medicine, NUI Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
R. HACKETT
Affiliation:
Teagasc CELUP, Crops Research, Oak Park, Carlow, Co. Carlow, Ireland
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: dermot.forristal@teagasc.ie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Field experiments were conducted between 2009 and 2011 in Ireland to compare the effects of soil tillage systems on the grain yield, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and nitrogen (N) uptake patterns of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) in a cool Atlantic climate. The four tillage treatments comprised conventional tillage in spring (CT), reduced tillage in autumn (RT A), reduced tillage in spring (RT S) and reduced tillage in autumn and spring (RT A+S). Each tillage system was evaluated with five levels of fertilizer N (0, 75, 105, 135 and 165 kg N/ha). Grain yield varied between years but CT had a significantly higher mean yield over the three years than the RT systems. There was no significant difference between the three RT systems. Tillage system had no significant effect on the grain yield response to fertilizer N. As a result of the higher yields achieved, the CT system had a higher NUE than the RT systems at all N rates. There was no significant difference in NUE between the three RT systems. Conventional tillage had significantly higher nitrogen uptake efficiency (NUpE) than RT A and a significantly higher nitrogen utilization efficiency (NUtE) than all three RT systems. Crop N uptake followed a similar pattern each year. Large amounts of N were accumulated during the vegetative growth stages while N was lost after anthesis. Increased N rates had a positive effect on N uptake in the early growth stages but tended to promote N loss later in the season. The CT system had the highest N uptake in the initial growth stages but its rate of uptake diminished at a faster rate than the RT systems as the season progressed. Tillage system had an inconsistent effect on crop N content during the later growth stages. On the basis of these results it is concluded that the use of non-inversion tillage systems for spring barley establishment in a cool oceanic climate remains challenging and in certain conditions may result in a reduction in NUE and lower and more variable grain yields than conventional plough-based systems.

Type
Crops and Soils Research Papers
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 153 , Issue 5 , July 2015 , pp. 862 - 875
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Børresen, T. (1999). The effect of straw management and reduced tillage on soil properties and crop yields of spring-sown cereals on two loam soils in Norway. Soil and Tillage Research 51, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braim, M. A., Chaney, K. & Hodgson, D. R. (1992). Effects of simplified cultivation on the growth and yield of spring barley on a sandy loam soil. 1. Shoot growth and grain yield; response to nitrogen. Soil and Tillage Research 22, 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, E. (1979). Chemical Analysis of Agricultural Materials. Dublin: An Foras Taluntais.Google Scholar
Cannell, R. Q. (1985). Reduced tillage in north-west Europe - a review. Soil and Tillage Research 5, 129–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamen, W. C. T. (2000). The impact of tillage practices on the soil and wider environment, with particular regard to arable cropping in England. Advances in GeoEcology 32, 370–383.Google Scholar
Chia, A. J. (1982). Yield and yield components of four spring barley cultivars under three tillage systems. Agronomy Journal 74, 597–600.Google Scholar
CSO (2010). Area, Yield and Production of Crops. Cork, Ireland: Central Statistics Office.Google Scholar
Daigger, L. A., Sander, D. H. & Peterson, G. A. (1976). Nitrogen content of winter wheat during growth and maturation. Agronomy Journal 68, 815–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, D. B. & Finney, J. B. (2002). Reduced Cultivations for Cereals: Research, Development and Advisory Needs under Changing Economic Circumstances. Research Review No. 48. London: Home-Grown Cereals Authority.Google Scholar
Doran, J. W. (1980). Soil microbial and biochemical changes associated with reduced tillage. Soil Science Society of America 44, 765–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumas, J. B. A. (1831). Procédés de l'analyse organique. Annales de Chimie et de Physique 47, 198–205.Google Scholar
Forristal, P. D. & Murphy, K. (2009). Can we reduce costs and increase profits with Min Till? In Proceedings of the National Tillage Conference 2009, Carlow, Ireland, pp. 48–67. Carlow, Ireland: Teagasc.Google Scholar
Fortune, T., Kennedy, T., Mitchell, B., Dunne, B., Murphy, K., Connery, J. & Grace, J. (2005). Reduced cultivations - update from Oak Park experiments. In Proceedings of the National Tillage Conference 2005, Carlow, Ireland, pp. 18–34. Carlow, Ireland: Teagasc.Google Scholar
Francis, G. S. & Knight, T. L. (1993). Long-term effects of conventional and no-tillage on selected soil properties and crop yields in Canterbury, New Zealand. Soil and Tillage Research 26, 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giacomini, S., Recous, S., Mary, B. & Aita, C. (2007). Simulating the effects of N availability, straw particle size and location in soil on C and N mineralization. Plant and Soil 301, 289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, E. M., Munkolm, L. J. & Olesen, J. E. (2011). N-utilization in non-inversion tillage systems. Soil and Tillage Research 113, 55–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, D. R., Proud, J. R. & Browne, S. (1977). Cultivation systems for spring barley with special reference to direct drilling. The Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88, 631–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, J. M. (2004). The environmental consequences of adopting conservation tillage in Europe: reviewing the evidence. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 103, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, T. C., Hipp, B. W., Graff, P. S. & Marshall, D. S. (1993). Nitrogen nutrition of rainfed winter wheat in no-till Sorghum and wheat residues. Agronomy Journal 85, 886–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limon-Ortega, A., Govaerts, B. & Sayre, K. D. (2008). Straw management, crop rotation, and nitrogen source effect on wheat grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency. European Journal of Agronomy 29, 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez-Bellido, R. J. & Lopez-Bellido, L. (2001). Efficiency of nitrogen in wheat under Mediterranean conditions: effect of tillage, crop rotation and N fertilization. Field Crops Research 71, 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machado, S., Petrie, S., Rhinhart, K. & Qu, A. (2007). Long-term continuous cropping in the Pacific Northwest: tillage and fertilizer effects on winter wheat, spring wheat, and spring barley production. Soil and Tillage Research 94, 473–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malhi, S. S. & Lemke, R. (2007). Tillage, crop residue and N fertilizer effects on crop yield, nutrient uptake, soil quality and nitrous oxide gas emissions in a second 4-yr rotation cycle. Soil and Tillage Research 96, 269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConkey, B. G., Curtin, D., Campbell, C. A., Brandt, S. A. & Selles, F. (2002). Crop and soil nitrogen status of tilled and no-tillage systems in semiarid regions of Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 82, 489–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masle, J. & Passioura, J. B. (1987). The effect of soil strength on the growth of young wheat plants. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 14, 643–656.Google Scholar
Moll, R. H., Kamprath, E. J. & Jackson, W. A. (1982). Analysis and Interpretation of factors which contribute to efficiency of nitrogen utilization. Agronomy Journal 74, 562–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muurinen, S., Kleemola, J. & Peltonen-Sainio, P. (2007). Accumulation and translocation of nitrogen in spring cereal cultivars differing in nitrogen use efficiency. Agronomy Journal 99, 441–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyborg, M. & Malhi, S. S. (1989). Effect of zero and conventional tillage on barley yield and nitrate nitrogen content, moisture and temperature of soil in north-central Alberta. Soil and Tillage Research 15, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olk, D. C. (2008). Organic forms of soil nitrogen. In Nitrogen in Agricultural Systems (Eds Schepers, J. S. & Raun, W. R.), pp. 57–100. Agronomy Monograph 49. Madison, WI, USA: ASA-CSSA-SSSA.Google Scholar
Papakosta, D. K. & Gagianas, A. A. (1991). Nitrogen and dry matter accumulation, remobilization and losses from Mediterranean wheat during grain filling. Agronomy Journal 83, 864–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, R. W., Murray, D. A., Harding, S. A., Baird, D. B. & Soutar, D. M. (2010). Genstat for Windows (13th edition). Hemel Hempsted, UK: VSN International Ltd.Google Scholar
Power, J. F. & Peterson, G. A. (1998). Nitrogen transformations, utilization, and conservation as affected by fallow tillage method. Soil and Tillage Research 49, 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, K. J. (1999). Impact of ploughless soil tillage on yield and soil quality: a Scandinavian review. Soil and Tillage Research 53, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raun, W. R. & Johnson, G. V. (1999). Improving nitrogen use efficiency for cereal production. Agronomy Journal 91, 357–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, H. (2006). Recent yield results and trends over time with conservation tillage on morainic loam soil in southeast Norway. Acta Agriculturae Scandanavica, Section B: Soil and Plant Science 56, 117–128.Google Scholar
Riley, H. C. F. (1998). Soil mineral-N and N-fertilizer requirements of spring cereals in two long-term tillage trials on loam soil in southeast Norway. Soil and Tillage Research 48, 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, H. C. F., Bleken, M. A., Abrahamsen, S., Bergjord, A. K. & Bakken, A. K. (2005). Effects of alternative tillage systems on soil quality and yield of spring cereals on silty clay loam and sandy loam soils in the cool, wet climate of central Norway. Soil and Tillage Research 80, 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, H., Børresen, T. & Lindemark, P. O. (2009). Recent yield results and trends over time with conservation tillage on clay loam and silt clay loam and silt loam soils in southeast Norway. Acta Agriculturae Scandanavica, Section B: Soil and Plant Science 59, 362–372.Google Scholar
SAS (2011). SAS for Windows version 9.3. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Semenov, M. A., Jamieson, P. D. & Martre, P. (2007). Deconvoluting nitrogen use efficiency in wheat: a simulation study. European Journal of Agronomy 26, 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, T., Javurek, M., Mikanova, O. & Vach, M. (2009). The influence of tillage systems on soil organic matter and soil hydrophobicity. Soil and Tillage Research 105, 44–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sip, V., Ruzek, P., Chrpova, J., Vavera, R. & Kusa, H. (2009). The effect of tillage practice, input level and environment on the grain yield of winter wheat in the Czech Republic. Field Crops Research 113, 131–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soane, B. D., Ball, B. C., Arvidsson, J., Basch, G., Moreno, F. & Roger-Estrade, J. (2012). No-till in northern, western and south-western Europe: a review of problems and opportunities for crop production and the environment. Soil and Tillage Research 118, 66–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylvester-Bradley, R. & Kindred, D. R. (2009). Analysing nitrogen responses of cereals to prioritize routes to the improvement of nitrogen use efficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany 60, 1939–1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, I. K. & Christensen, B. T. (2007). Fertilizer 15N recovery in cereal crops and soil under shallow tillage. Soil and Tillage Research 97, 117–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Den Bossche, A., De Bolle, S., De Neve, S. & Hofman, G. (2008). Effect of tillage intensity on N mineralization of different crop residues in a temperate climate. Soil and Tillage Research 103, 316–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, A. & Froment, M. A. (2003). Barley Quality and Grain Size Homogeneity for Malting. Project Report No. 320. London: Home-Grown Cereals Authority.Google Scholar
Wade, A., Spink, J. H. & Orson, J. (2006). The Effect of Cultivation Method on Optimum Plant Population in Winter Wheat. Project report No. 405. London: Home-Grown Cereals Authority.Google Scholar
Young, I. M., Montagu, K., Conroy, J. & Bengough, A. G. (1997). Mechanical impedance of root growth directly reduces leaf elongation rates of cereals. New Phytologist 135, 613–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T. & Konzak, C. F. (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar