Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T21:14:25.395Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The electrical conductivity of extracts from soils of various types, and its use in detecting infertility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

W. R. G. Atkins
W. R. G. Atkins
Affiliation:
Marine Biological Laboratory, Plymouth.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The electrical conductivity of aqueous extracts of soils, in the proportion of one of soil to five of water, varies according to the time of extraction. In the more fertile soils extraction for three to four hours gives less than half as great a conductivity as is given in 4 to 11 days.

2. In peat the maximum value is reached almost at once, the extract having a high conductivity. The maximum value is also reached quickly in certain infertile soils, which give an extract of very low conductivity, closely similar to that of the purest upland streams.

3. A high electrical conductivity in the extract may only indicate the presence of an excess of salts, and does not necessarily indicate a good soil. It seems, however, that a rapid increase in conductivity as extraction is prolonged indicates increased solubility, partly through bacterial action and may be considered as a useful indication of fertility. A low conductivity, which remains low on continued extraction, denotes a soil so insoluble as to be unfertile.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , April 1924 , pp. 198 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1924

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atkins, W. R. G. (1923). The hydrogen ion concentration of the soil in relation to the flower colour of Hydrangea hortensis W., and the availability of iron. Sci. Proc. Roy. Dublin Soc. 17, 201–10, and Notes, School of Botany Trin. Coll. Dubl. 3, No. 4, 224–33.Google Scholar
Beam, W. and Freak, G. A. (1914). An improvement in the electrical method of determining salt in soil. Cairo Scientific Journ. 8, 130.Google Scholar
Carpenter, K. (1922). Freshwater fauna of Aberystwyth area in relation to lead pollution. Rep. Brit. Assoc. 373.Google Scholar
Hoagland, D. R., Martin, J. C. and Stewart, G. R. (1920). Relation of the soil solution to the soil extract. Journ. Agric. Res. 20, 381–95.Google Scholar
Joseph, A. F. (1921). Report of the Government Chemist of the Sudan.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. (1915). Changes in soils brought about by heating. Sci. Proc. Roy. Dublin Soc. 14, 513–20, and Notes, School of Botany, Trin. Coll. Dubl. 2, 311–18.Google Scholar