No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
But a ‘Stage-Play’: A Counter-Reformation View of the Marian Church
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 November 2020
Abstract
This essay studies Robert Persons's understanding of the reforms of Mary i of England within the continental discursive context in which he worked. By describing his critiques of Marian reforms together with similar reformist discourses in France and Spain, it is argued that his ideas represent a common Counter-Reformation polemical stance and a set of normal Catholic assumptions about the ‘political’ and institutional reforms necessary to combat heresy. Persons's thoughts about the ‘political’ reforms within a broader field of spiritual imperatives serve as a reminder that the Counter-Reformation was necessarily about politics despite scholarly emphasis on issues of theology and religious practice.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020
References
1 Bossy, John, The English Catholic community, 1570–1850, London 1975Google Scholar.
2 Haigh, Christopher, ‘The continuity of Catholicism in the English Reformation’, Past & Present 93 (Nov. 1981), 37–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ‘From monopoly to minority: Catholicism in early modern England’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society xxxi (1981), 129–47 at p. 147; and English Reformations: religion, politics, and society under the Tudors, Oxford 1993.
3 Dickens, A. G., The English Reformation, University Park, Pa 1989, 311Google Scholar.
4 Edwards, John, Mary I: England's Catholic queen, New Haven 2011, 226–65Google Scholar.
5 Mayer, Thomas, Reginald Pole: prince & prophet, Cambridge 2000, 297–301Google Scholar.
6 Loach, Jennifer, ‘Mary Tudor and the re-Catholisation of England’, History Today 44 (Nov. 1994), 16–22Google Scholar.
7 Duffy, Eamon, Fires of faith: Catholic England under Mary Tudor, New Haven 2009, 207Google Scholar.
8 Smith, Frederick E., ‘The origins of recusancy in Elizabethan England reconsidered’, HJ lx (2017), 301–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9 Ibid. 304.
10 Ibid. 332.
11 Ibid. 302.
12 Haigh, ‘From monopoly to minority’.
13 Duffy, Fires of faith, 9–10.
14 Houliston, Victor, ‘Her majesty, who is now in heaven: Mary Tudor and the Elizabethan Catholics’, in Doran, Susan and Freeman, Thomas S. (eds), Mary Tudor: old and new perspectives, Aldershot 2011, 37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
15 Carrafiello, Michael L., Robert Parsons and English Catholicism, 1580–1610, London 1998, 58Google Scholar.
16 Some of these themes appear in Houliston, ‘Her majesty’.
17 Sander, Nicholas, De origine ac progressu schismatis Anglicani, Rome 1586Google Scholar; Gee, Edward (ed.), The Jesuit's memorial for the intended reformation of England, London 1690Google Scholar (hereinafter cited as Persons, Memorial). The latter is the first printed edition of Persons's A memorial for the reformation of England, which survives in several manuscript copies. I have consulted the version at the Archivum Britannicum Societatis Iesu, London, ms 19/3/36: A memoriall for the reformation of Englande. See also Persons, Robert, ‘A storie of domesticall difficulties’, in Pollen, J. H. (ed.), Miscellanea II, London 1906, 48–185Google Scholar.
18 Persons and Allen were clearly behind the 1586 edition of Sander's history, but it is unclear how each contributed. Persons's hand can be seen on the margins of the only known manuscript of Sander's pre-print version. In it, specific mention of Allen's intervention (‘C:A’ in the text) is sporadic. See, for example, Archivum Venerabilis Collegii Anglorum de Urbe, Rome, liber 1388, fo. 50r. Victor Houliston, based on Persons's discussion in his manuscript Certamen ecclesiae Anglicanae, has emphasised William Allen's contribution: ‘The missionary position: Catholics writing the history of the English Reformation’, English Studies in Africa liv (2011), 16–30 at pp. 18–19. I tend to agree with Mark Rankin, who has been an inexhaustible student of Sander's history (in print and manuscript), that there is plenty more to discover about this book by looking in obscure places. His thoughts, as I understand them, were discussed in a paper, ‘The manuscript tradition and early scribal anthologizing of Nicholas Sander's Catholic history of the Reformation’, presented at a conference at the Huntington Library in November 2019. For more on authorship see Pollen, J. H., ‘Dr. Nicholas Sander’, EHR vi (1891), 36–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gasquet, A., ‘A treasure of the archives’, The Venerabile iii (1927), 114–20Google Scholar; Joseph Simons (ed.), Certamen ecclesiae Anglicanae, Assen 1965, 300–5; and Freddy C. Domínguez, ‘“We must fight with paper and pens”: Spanish Elizabethan polemics, 1985–1598’, unpubl. PhD diss. Princeton 2011.
19 The section on Mary can be found in Sander, De schismate Anglicano, 328–52.
20 Ibid. 334.
21 Ibid. 349.
22 Ibid. 350.
23 Ibid. 351.
24 Ibid. 334.
25 Ibid. 359.
26 Ibid. 350.
27 Persons, ‘Domesticall difficulties’, 54.
28 The detriment of this delay is alluded to elsewhere, including in Robert Persons, ‘Certaine notes of memory concerning the first entrance of ye Soc. of Jesus into England’, in Pollen, Miscellanea II, 189.
29 Persons, ‘Domesticall difficulties’, 57.
30 Ibid. 60.
31 Idem, Memorial, 13.
32 Ibid. 13–14.
33 Ibid. 20.
34 Ibid. 20–1.
35 Ibid.
36 Ibid. 49–50.
37 Ibid. 50.
38 Ibid. 52.
39 Ibid. 104.
40 Ibid. 238–40.
41 Ibid. 206.
42 Peter Lake with Questier, Michael, The AntiChrist's lewd hat: Protestants, papists and players in post-Reformation England, New Haven 2002, 281–314Google Scholar.
43 Duffy, Fires of faith, 11.
44 Edwards, Mary I, 99–102.
45 Mayer, Thomas F., ‘A test of wills: Cardinal Pole, Ignatius Loyola, and the Jesuits in England’, in McCoog, Thomas M. sj (ed.), The reckoned expense: Edmund Campion and the early English Jesuits, Rome 2007, 23–42Google Scholar.
46 Haigh, ‘From monopoly to minority’, 147.
47 Even at the level of higher cathedral clergy 49% were deprived or resigned, leaving 51%, meekly or aggressively, within the Elizabethan regime and subject to possible reproof by Persons and his allies: Frederick E. Smith, ‘The origins of recusancy in Elizabethan England reconsidered’, unpubl. MPhil diss. Cambridge 2015, 5.
48 Haigh, ‘From monopoly to minority’, 129.
49 Persons, ‘Domesticall difficulties’, 59.
50 Ibid. 60.
51 Questier, Michael, ‘What happened to English Catholicism after the English Reformation?’, History lxxxv (2000), 28–47 at pp. 46–7Google Scholar.
52 Dillon, Anne, The construction of martyrdom in the English Catholic community, 1535–1603, Aldershot 2002Google Scholar. More broadly, see Gregory, Brad S., Salvation at stake: Christian martyrdom in early modern Europe, Cambridge, Ma 1999Google Scholar. For the popularity of English martyrologies on the continent see McCoog, Thomas sj, ‘Construing martyrdom in the English Catholic community, 1582–1602’, in Shagan, Ethan H. (ed.), Catholics and the ‘Protestant nation’: religious politics and identity in early modern England, Manchester 2005, 95–127Google Scholar.
53 [Louis d'Orleans], Avertissement des Catholiques Anglois aux François Catholiques, n.p. 1586.
54 Antonio de Herrera (ed.), Advertencia que los Catolicos de Inglaterra escrivieron a los Catolicos de Francia, Zaragoza 1592; Félix de Guzman (ed.), Advertencia que dan los Catolicos Ingleses, a los Catolicos de Francia del peligro que están de perder la religion, si admiten a la Corona príncipe herege, Madrid 1592. On these see Penzi, Marco, ‘Loys Dorléans and the Catholiques Anglois: a common Catholic history between violence, martyrdom and cultural networks’, Culture & History Digital Journal vi (2017)Google Scholar.
55 D'Orleans, Avertissement, 13.
56 Ibid. 17.
57 Valérian, François, Un Prête anglais contre Henri IV: archéologie d'une haine religieuse, Paris 2011Google Scholar.
58 De iusta reipub. Christianae in rrges [sic] impios et haereticos authoritate, Paris 1590; Rossaeo, G. Guilelmo, De iusta reipub. Christianae in reges impios et haereticaos authoritate, Antwerp 1592Google Scholar. Reference will be made to the 1592 edition, which Persons seems to have read. On Persons's use of this book see Ruiz, Jose M., ‘Robert Persons, sj (1546–1610) y su obra más polémica: “A conference about the next succession to the crowne of Ingland”’, ES: Revista de filologia inglesa vii (1977), 117–217Google Scholar.
59 De iusta authoritate, 124–5
60 Ibid. 138.
61 Ibid, 128–9.
62 Ruiz, ‘Robert Persons, sj (1546–1610) y su obra más polémica’.
63 Persons, Memorial, 219; Ribadeneyra, Tratado de la religion y virtudes del principe christiano, Madrid 1595.
64 Ribadeneyra, Tratado, 38.
65 Ibid. 33.
66 Idem, Historia ecclesiastical del scisma de Inglaterra, Madrid 1588, 84r.
67 Domínguez, Freddy C., Radicals in exile: English Catholic books during the reign of Philip II, University Park, Pa 2020Google Scholar.
68 Braun, Harald, ‘Conscience, counsel and theocracy at the Spanish Habsburg court’, in Braun, Harald and Vance, Edward (eds), Contexts of conscience in early modern Europe, 1500–1700, London 2004, 56–66Google Scholar, and ‘Scholasticism and humanism in the political thought of Juan de Mariana’, unpubl. PhD diss. Oxford 2000. For the quotation see idem, Juan de Mariana and early modern Spanish political thought, Aldershot 2007, 146.
69 Quotations translated by the author from Luis Sánchez Agesta (ed.), La dignidad real y la educación del rey, Madrid 1981, 102–3. I have compared the Spanish with the original text: de Mariana, Juan, De rege et regis institutione libri III, Toledo 1599Google Scholar.
70 Agesta, Dignidad real, 101.
71 Ibid. 277.
72 Duffy, Fires of faith, 207.
73 For a sense of the breadth of her work see Walsham, Alexandra, Catholic Reformation in Protestant Britain, Aldershot 2014Google Scholar. On the Counter-Reformation in particular see chapter xi.
74 Robert Persons to Claudio Acquaviva, Marchena, 12 May 1594, Archivum Romanum Societatis Iesu, Rome, Hisp. 136, fo. 318.
75 The best treatment of this and related terms remains O'Malley, John W., Trent and all that: renaming Catholicism in the early modern era, Cambridge, Ma 2000Google Scholar.
76 Laven, Mary, ‘Introduction’, in Bamji, Alexander, Janssen, Geert H. and Laven, Mary (eds), The Ashgate companion to the Counter-Reformation, Aldershot 2013, 1–14 at p. 11Google Scholar.
77 This is a somewhat obvious point with very important implications for any history of global Christianity of the period. My thanks to Adrian Masters and Jorge Cañizares-Esguerra for a stimulating discussion on this topic during a lively colloquium at the University of Texas-Austin.
78 Bireley, Robert sj, Religion and politics in the age of the Counter-Reformation: Emperor Ferdinand II, William Lamormaini, S.J., and the formation of imperial policy, Chapel Hill, NC 1981Google Scholar.