Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T16:20:29.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Transaction Size on Off-the-Run Treasury Prices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

David F. Babbel
Affiliation:
babbel@wharton.upenn.edu, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 3641 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104;
Craig B. Merrill
Affiliation:
merrill@byu.edu, Marriott School of Management, Brigham Young University, 678 TNRB, Provo, UT 84604;
Mark F. Meyer
Affiliation:
m.meyer@econgroup.com, Princeton Economics Group Inc., 707 State Road, Suite 223, Princeton, NJ 08540;
Meiring de Villiers
Affiliation:
mdv@stanford.edu, Stanford University, Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford, CA 94305.

Abstract

This paper examines intra-day trading data from the inter-dealer broker market for U.S. Treasury securities and measures the degree of price pressure in the off-the-run Treasury market. As is well known, securities that would appear to be very close substitutes, i.e., on-the-run and off-the-run Treasury bonds, behave as if there is some degree of market segmentation. This is the first systematic study of the off-the-run Treasury note and bond market focused entirely on a price pressure effect using intra-day data. The paper analyzes price pressure through matched pairs of securities that differ only in liquidity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, F., and Postlewaite, A.. “Rational Expectations and the Measurement of a Stock's Elasticity of Demand.” Journal of Finance, 39 (1984), 11191125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babbel, D. F. “Duration and the Term Structure of Interest Rate Volatility.” In Innovations in Bond Portfolio Analysis: Duration and Immunization, Bierwag, G., Kaufman, G., and Toevs, A., eds. New York, NY: JAI Press (1983).Google Scholar
Babbel, D. F.Merrill, C.; and Panning, W.. “Default Risk and the Effective Duration of Bonds.” Financial Analysts Journal, 53 (1997), 3544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balduzzi, P.Elton, E.; and Green, T. C.. “Economic News and Bond Prices: Evidence from the U.S. Treasury Market.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 36 (2001), 523544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, B., and Loeffler, D.. “The ‘Dartboard’ Column: Second-Hand Information and Price Pressure.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 28 (1993), 273284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, B., and Odean, T.. “All that Glitters: The Effect of Attention and News on the Buying Behavior of Individual and Institutional Investors.” Working Paper, Univ. of California, Davis and Berkeley (2002).Google Scholar
Boni, L., and Leach, J. C.. “Expandable Limit-Order Markets.” Working Paper, Anderson School of Management, Univ. of New Mexico (2002a).Google Scholar
Boni, L., and Leach, J. C.Supply Contraction and Trading Protocol: An Examination of Recent Change in the U.S. Treasury Market.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 34 (2002b), 740762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, J. C.; Ingersoll, J. E. Jr; and Ross, S. A.. “An Intertemporal General Equilibrium Model of Asset Prices.” Econometrica, 53 (1985), 363384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dann, L.; Mayers, D.; and Raab, R.. “Trading Rules, Large Blocks and the Speed of Price Adjustment.” Journal of Financial Economics, 4 (1977), 322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffie, D. “Special Repo Rates.” Journal of Finance, 51 (1996), 493526.Google Scholar
Elton, E. J., and Green, T. C.. “Tax and Liquidity Effects in Pricing Government Bonds.” Journal of Finance, 33 (1998), 15331562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, M. J. “Measuring Treasury Market Liquidity.” Staff Report, Federal Reserve Bank of New York (2001a).Google Scholar
Fleming, M. J.. “Are Larger Treasury Issues More Liquid? Evidence from Bill Reopenings.” Staff Report, Federal Reserve Bank of New York (2001b).Google Scholar
Fleming, M. J., and Remolona, E. M.. “Price Formation and Liquidity in the U.S. Treasury Market: The Response to Public Information.” Journal of Finance, 54 (1999), 19011915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garbade, K.Fixed Income Analytics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press (1996).Google Scholar
Grossman, S. J., and Miller, M. H.. “Liquidity and Market Structure.” Journal of Finance, 43 (1988), 617633.Google Scholar
Harris, L., and Gurel, E.. “Price and Volume Effects Associated with Changes in the S&P 500 List: New Evidence of the Existence of Price Pressures.” Journal of Finance, 41 (1986), 815829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holthausen, R.; Leftwich, R.; and Mayers, D.. “The Effect of Large Block Transactions on Security Prices: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics, 19 (1987), 237267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, B., and Jordan, S.. “Salomon Brothers and the May 1991 Treasury Auction: Analysis of a Market Corner.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 25 (1996), 2540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, B., and Kuipers, D.. “Negative Option Values Are Possible: The Impact of Treasury Bond Futures on the Cash U.S. Treasury Market.” Journal of Financial Economics, 46 (1997), 67102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, J. V., and Mansi, S. A.. “How Well Do Constant-Maturity Treasuries Approximate the On The-Run Term Structure?Journal of Fixed Income, 10 (2000), 2534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaserer, C., and Deininger, C.. “Stock Price Effects Associated with Index Replacements in Germany.” 8th Symposium on Finance, Banking, and Insurance, Univ. Karlsruhe (TH), Germany (12 15–17, 1999).Google Scholar
Keim, D., and Madhavan, A.. “The Upstairs Market for Large-Block Transactions: Analysis and Measurement of Price Effects.” Review of Financial Studies, 9 (1996), 136.Google Scholar
Kraus, A., and Stoll, H.. “Price Impacts of Block Trading on the New York Stock Exchange.” Journal of Finance, 27 (1972), 569588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, B.Price Pressure: Evidence from the ‘Dartboard’ Column.” Journal of Business, 72 (1999), 119134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loderer, C.; Cooney, J.; and Van Drunen, L.. “The Price Elasticity of Demand for Common Stock.” Journal of Finance, 46 (1991), 621651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madhavan, A.Market Microstructure: A Survey.” Journal of Financial Markets, 3 (2000), 205258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikkelson, W., and Partch, M.. “Stock Price Effects and Costs of Secondary Distributions.” Journal of Financial Economics, 14 (1985), 165194.Google Scholar
Modigliani, F., and Sutch, R., “Innovations in Interest Rate Policy.” American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 56 (1966), 178197.Google Scholar
Nelson, C., and Siegel, A., “Parsimonious Modeling of Yield Curve.” Journal of Business, 60 (1987), 473489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, J., and Schaefer, S.. “The Dynamics of the Term Structure and Alternative Immunization Strategies.” In Innovations in Bond Portfolio Analysis: Duration and Immunization, Bierwag, G., Kaufman, G., and Toevs, A., eds. New York, NY: JAI Press (1983).Google Scholar
Ogden, J. “The End of Month as a Preferred Habitat: A Test of Operational Efficiency in the Money Market.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 22 (1987), 329343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Hara, M, Market Microstructure Theory. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell (1995).Google Scholar
Park, S., and Reinganum, M. R.. “The Puzzling Price Behavior of Treasury Bills that Mature at the Turn of Calendar Months.” Journal of Financial Economics, 16 (1986), 267283.Google Scholar
Poterba, J. M. “Tax Reform and the Market for Tax-exempt Debt.” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 19 (1989), 537562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholes, M. “The Market for Securities: Substitution Versus Price Pressure and the Effects of Information on Share Prices.” Journal of Business, 45 (1972), 179211.Google Scholar
Shleifer, A. “Do Demand Curves for Stocks Slope Down? Journal of Finance, 41 (1986), 579590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, D. “Segmentation in the Treasury Bill Market: Evidence from Cash Management Bills.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 26 (1991), 97108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, DFurther Evidence of Segmentation in the Treasury Bill Market.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 18 (1994a), 139151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, DMarkups, Quantity Risk, and Bidding Strategies at Treasury Coupon Auctions.” Journal of Financial Economics, 35 (1994b), 4362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar