Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-30T04:16:45.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Theoretical study on regular reflection of shock wave–boundary layer interactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2020

Longsheng Xue Open the ORCID record for Longsheng Xue [Opens in a new window] ,
Ferry F. J. Schrijer ,
Bas W. van Oudheusden ,
Chengpeng Wang Open the ORCID record for Chengpeng Wang [Opens in a new window] ,
Zhiwei Shi  and
Keming Cheng
Longsheng Xue
Affiliation:
College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Yudao Street 29, Nanjing, Jiangsu210016, PR China Key Laboratory of Unsteady Aerodynamics and Flow Control, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Yudao Street 29, Nanjing, Jiangsu210016, PR China Aerospace Engineering Department, Delft University of Technology, Kluyverweg 1, 2629HSDelft, The Netherlands
Ferry F. J. Schrijer
Affiliation:
Aerospace Engineering Department, Delft University of Technology, Kluyverweg 1, 2629HSDelft, The Netherlands
Bas W. van Oudheusden
Affiliation:
Aerospace Engineering Department, Delft University of Technology, Kluyverweg 1, 2629HSDelft, The Netherlands
Chengpeng Wang*
Affiliation:
College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Yudao Street 29, Nanjing, Jiangsu210016, PR China Key Laboratory of Unsteady Aerodynamics and Flow Control, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Yudao Street 29, Nanjing, Jiangsu210016, PR China
Zhiwei Shi
Affiliation:
College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Yudao Street 29, Nanjing, Jiangsu210016, PR China Key Laboratory of Unsteady Aerodynamics and Flow Control, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Yudao Street 29, Nanjing, Jiangsu210016, PR China
Keming Cheng
Affiliation:
College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Yudao Street 29, Nanjing, Jiangsu210016, PR China Key Laboratory of Unsteady Aerodynamics and Flow Control, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Yudao Street 29, Nanjing, Jiangsu210016, PR China
*
†Email address for correspondence: wangcp@nuaa.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper the configurations of shock wave–boundary layer interactions (SWBLI) are studied theoretically and experimentally in Mach number 2 and 2.5 flows on test models with various wedge angles ranging from $9^\circ$ to $21^\circ$. The proposed theoretical method couples the free interaction theory (FIT) with the minimum entropy production (MEP) principle to predict the appearance of separation shock, resulting in convex, straight and concave separation shock waves according to different solution combinations, which agree well with current experiments. Additionally, several influences on SWBLI are studied experimentally, in which the parameters related to theoretical solutions are found mostly determining the flow configuration, and SWBLI is much more sensitive to incident shock strength than incoming flow properties. Separation could be suppressed by incident shock when the MEP solution is smaller than the FIT, while it could be intensified when the MEP solution is larger than FIT; by contrast, the effects of separation position and model mounting height could be very weak.

JFM classification

Boundary Layers: Boundary layer separation Compressible Flows: Shock waves Aerodynamics: High-speed flow
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 899 , 25 September 2020 , A30
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Babinsky, H. & Harvey, J. K. 2011 Shock Wave-Boundary-layer Interactions. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, D. R., Kuehn, D. M. & Larson, H. K. 1958 Investigation of separated flows in supersonic and subsonic streams with emphasis on the effect of transition. NACA Tech. Rep. 1356.Google Scholar
Chpoun, A., Passerel, D., Li, H. & Ben-Dor, G. 1995 Reconsideration of oblique shock wave reflections in steady flows. Part 1. Experimental investigation. J. Fluid Mech. 301, 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'elery, J. & Bur, R. 2000 The physics of shock wave/boundary layer interaction control: last lessons learned. Tech. Rep. ECCOMAS, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
D'elery, J. & Marvin, J. G. 1986 Shock-wave boundary layer interactions. Tech. Rep. 280. AGARD.Google Scholar
Erdos, J. & Pallone, A. 1962 Shock-boundary layer interaction and flow separation. In Proceedings of the 1962 Heat Transfer and Fluid Mechanics Institute, vol. 15, pp. 239–254. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Giepman, R. H. M., Schrijer, F. F. J. & van Oudheusden, B. W. 2018 A parametric study of laminar and transitional oblique shock wave reflections. J. Fluid Mech. 844, 187–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, I. J. & Bruce, P. J. K. 2018 Confinement effects on regular-irregular transition in shock-wave-boundary-layer interactions. J. Fluid Mech. 853, 171–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakkinen, R. J., Greber, I., Trilling, L. & Abarbanel, S. S. 1959 The interaction of an oblique shock wave with a laminar boundary layer. NASA Tech. Rep. Memo 2-18-59W.Google Scholar
Li, H. & Ben-Dor, G. 1996 a Application of the principle of minimum entropy production to shock wave reflection. Part I. Steady flow. J. Appl. Phys. 80, 2027–2037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H. & Ben-Dor, G. 1996 b Application of the principle of minimum entropy production to shock wave reflection. Part II. Unsteady flow. J. Appl. Phys. 80, 2038–2048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matheis, J. & Hickel, S. 2015 On the transition between regular and irregular shock patterns of shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions. J. Fluid Mech. 776, 200–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Neumann, J. 1943 Oblique reflection of shocks. Tech. Rep. 12. Navy Department, Bureau of Ordnance, Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
von Neumann, J. 1945 Refraction, intersection and reflection of shock waves. Tech. Rep. 203. Navy Department, Bureau of Ordnance, Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
Tao, Y., Fan, X. Q. & Zhao, Y. L. 2014 Viscous effects of shock reflection hysteresis in steady supersonic flows. J. Fluid Mech. 759, 134–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C. P., Xue, L. S. & Cheng, K. M. 2018 Application of the minimum entropy production principle to shock reflection induced by separation. J. Fluid Mech. 857, 784–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xue, L. S., Wang, C. P. & Cheng, K. M. 2018 Dynamic characteristics of separation shock in an unstarted hypersonic inlet flow. AIAA J. 56, 2484–2490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar