Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T03:00:42.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Supreme Court Impacts in Public Health Law: 2022-2023

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2023

James G. Hodge Jr.
Affiliation:
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY, PHOENIX, AZ, USA
Leila Barraza
Affiliation:
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX, AZ, USA.
Jennifer L. Piatt
Affiliation:
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY, PHOENIX, AZ, USA
Erica N. White
Affiliation:
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY, PHOENIX, AZ, USA
Summer Ghaith
Affiliation:
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY, PHOENIX, AZ, USA
Samantha Hollinshead
Affiliation:
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY, PHOENIX, AZ, USA
Lauren Krumholz
Affiliation:
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY, PHOENIX, AZ, USA
Madisyn Puchebner
Affiliation:
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY, PHOENIX, AZ, USA
Emma Smith
Affiliation:
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY, PHOENIX, AZ, USA

Abstract

In another tumultuous term of the United States Supreme Court in 2022-2023 a series of critical cases implicate instant and forthcoming changes in multiple fronts that collectively shift the national public health law and policy environment.

Type
Columns: Public Health and the Law
Copyright
© 2023 The Author(s)

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

About This Column

James G. Hodge, Jr., J.D., LL.M., serves as the section editor for Public Health and the Law. He is the Peter Kiewit Foundation Professor of Law and Director, Center for Public Health Law and Policy, Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, Arizona State University (ASU).

References

Hodge, J.G. Jr. et al., “Supreme Court Impacts in Public Health Law: 2021-2022,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 50, no. 3 (2022): 608612, available at <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? abstract_id=4154457> (last visited July 12, 2023).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nat’l Fed’n of Indep. Bus. v. Occupational Safety & Health Admin., 142 S. Ct. 661 (2022).Google Scholar
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Org., 142 S. Ct. 2228 (2022).Google Scholar
West Virginia v. EPA, 142 S. Ct. 2587 (2022).Google Scholar
N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen, 142 S. Ct. 2111 (2022).Google Scholar
C.R. Wootson, Jr., “Biden Sharply Criticizes Supreme Court After Affirmative Action Case,” The Washington Post, June 29, 2023, available at <https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/06/29/ biden-blasts-supreme-court-affirmative-action/> (last visited July 12, 2023).+(last+visited+July+12,+2023).>Google Scholar
“Supreme Court,” Gallup, Sept. 2022, available at <https://news.gallup.com/poll/4732/supreme-court.aspx> (last visited July 12, 2023).+(last+visited+July+12,+2023).>Google Scholar
Students for Fair Admission, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard Coll., 600 U.S. ____ (2023).Google Scholar
N. Anderson and S. Svrluga, “Without Affirmative Action, How Will Colleges Seek Racial Diversity?” The Washington Post, July 1, 2023, available at <https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2023/07/01/affirmative-action-colleges-racial-diversity/> (last visited July 12, 2023).+(last+visited+July+12,+2023).>Google Scholar
Krisberg, K., “Changes to Race, Ethnicity Data Collection Will Impact Health,” The Nation’s Health 53, no. 4 (2023): 119, available at <http://www.thenationshealth.org/content/53/4/1.2> (last visited July 12, 2023).Google Scholar
M. A. Williams and L. O. Gostin, “Will There be a Supreme Assault on Public Health?” STAT, Oct. 3, 2022, available at <https://www.statnews.com/2022/10/03/will-there-be-a-supreme-court-assault-on-public-health/> (last visited July 12, 2023).+(last+visited+July+12,+2023).>Google Scholar
N. Totenberg, “Supreme Court Showdown for Google, Twitter and the Social Media World,” NPR, Feb. 21, 2023, available at <https://www.npr.org/2023/02/21/1157683233/supreme-court-google-twitter-section-230> (last visited July 12, 2023).+(last+visited+July+12,+2023).>Google Scholar
R. Barnes et al., “Supreme Court Considers if Google is Liable for Recommending ISIS Videos,” The Washington Post, Feb. 21, 2023, available at <https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/02/ 21/gonzalez-v-google-section-230-supreme-court/> (last visited July 12, 2023).+(last+visited+July+12,+2023).>Google Scholar
Twitter, Inc. v. Taamneh, 143 S. Ct. 1206 (2023).Google Scholar
Word of God Fellowship, Inc. v. Vimeo, Inc., 205 A.D.3d 23 (N.Y. Gen. Term 2022), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 746 (Jan. 23, 2023).Google Scholar
J. G. Hodge, Jr. et al., “Public Health Risks of Artificial Intelligence: Law & Policy Implications,” O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, July 6, 2023, available at <https://oneill.law.georgetown.edu/public-health-risks-of-artificial-intelligence-law-and-policy-implications/> (last visited July 12, 2023).+(last+visited+July+12,+2023).>Google Scholar
42 U.S.C. § 1396r (2021).Google Scholar
See Transcript of Oral Argument, Health and Hosp. Corp. v. Talevski, No. 21-806 (U.S. argued Nov. 8, 2022), available at <https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2022/21-806_d18f.pdf> (last visited July 12, 2023).+(last+visited+July+12,+2023).>Google Scholar
R. Rudowitz and L. Sobel, “What is at Stake for Medicaid in Supreme Court Case Health & Hospital Corp v. Talevski?” KFF, Oct. 28, 2022, available at <https://www.kff.org/policy-watch/what-is-at-stake-for-medicaid-in-supreme-court-case-health-hospital-corp-v-talevski/> (last visited July 12, 2023).+(last+visited+July+12,+2023).>Google Scholar
Virginia v. Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003).Google Scholar
A. Durkee, “Supreme Court Overturns Stalker’s Conviction in First Amendment Case Over ‘True Threats,’” Forbes, June 27, 2023, available at <https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2023/06/27/ supreme-court-sides-with-stalker-in-first-amendment-case/?sh=18c0ecf66534> (last visited July 12, 2023).+(last+visited+July+12,+2023).>Google Scholar
T. Lorenz, “Supreme Court’s Ruling on Online Harassment Outrages Victims, Advocates,” The Washington Post, June 29, 2023, available at <https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/06/29/ supreme-court-harassment-ruling-first-amendment/> (last visited July 12, 2023).+(last+visited+July+12,+2023).>Google Scholar
All. for Hippocratic Med. v. FDA, No. 22-CV-223-Z, 2023 WL 2825871 (N.D. Tex. Apr. 7, 2023).Google Scholar
Washington v. FDA, No. 23-CV-3026-TOR, 2023 WL 2825861 (E.D. Wash. Apr. 7, 2023).Google Scholar
All. For Hippocratic Med. V. FDA, No. 23-20362, 2023 WL 2913725 (5th Cir. Apr. 12, 2023).Google Scholar
Danco v. All. for Hippocratic Med., 143 S. Ct. 1075 (2023).Google Scholar
R.K. Jones et al., “Medication Abortion Now Accounts for More than Half of All US Abortions,” Guttmacher Institute, Feb. 24, 2022, available at <https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2022/02/ medication-abortion-now-accounts-more-half-all-us-abortions> (last visited July 12, 2023).+(last+visited+July+12,+2023).>Google Scholar
K. Lobosco, “Trump Allows Borrowers to Suspend Student Loan Payments for Two Months,” CNN Politics, March 20, 2020, available at < https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/20/politics/student-loan-payments-suspend-coronavirus/index.html> (last visited July 12, 2023).+(last+visited+July+12,+2023).>Google Scholar
White House, FACT SHEET: President Biden Announces Student Loan Relief for Most Borrowers Who Need It Most, Aug. 24, 2022, available at <https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/08/24/fact-sheet-president-biden-announces-student-loan-relief-for-borrowers-who-need-it-most/> (last visited July 12, 2023).+(last+visited+July+12,+2023).>Google Scholar
C. Eaton et al., Student Debt Cancellation Is Progressive: Correcting Empirical and Conceptual Errors, Roosevelt Institute 2021, available at <https://rooseveltinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/RI_StudentDebtCancellation_IssueBrief_202106.pdf> (last visited Sept. 11, 2023).CrossRef+(last+visited+Sept.+11,+2023).>Google Scholar
Biden v. Nebraska, 600 U.S. ____ (2023).Google Scholar
Sackett v. EPA, 598 U.S. ___.Google Scholar
Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, 601 U.S. ___ (2024).Google Scholar
Lukaszczyk v. Cook Cnty., 47 F.4th 587 (7th Cir. 2022), cert. denied sub nom., Troogstad v. City of Chicago, 143 S. Ct. 734 (Jan. 17, 2023).Google Scholar
Groff v. DeJoy, 600 U.S. ____ (2023).Google Scholar
42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e (2018).Google Scholar
303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, 600 U.S. ____ (2023).Google Scholar
Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Comm., 584 U.S. ____, 138 S. Ct. 1719 (2018).Google Scholar
303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, 600 U.S. ____ (2023).Google Scholar
52 U.S.C. § 10301 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen v. Milligan, 599 U.S. ____ (2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Health & Democracy Index,” Healthy Democracy Healthy People, available at <https://democracyindex.hdhp.us/> (last visited July 12, 2023).+(last+visited+July+12,+2023).>Google Scholar
“Treaty Between the United States of America and the Navajo Tribe of Indians,” Judicial Branch of the Navajo Nation, available at <https://courts.navajo-nsn.gov/Treaty1868.htm> (last visited July 12, 2023).+(last+visited+July+12,+2023).>Google Scholar
Arizona v. Navajo Nation, 599 U.S. ____ (2023).Google Scholar
M. Fletcher, “Supreme Court Rules 5-4 Against Navajo Nation in Water Rights Dispute,” SCOTUSblog, June 22, 2023, available at <https://www.scotusblog.com/2023/06/supreme-court-rules-5-4-against-navajo-nation-in-water-rights-dispute/> (last visited July 12, 2023).+(last+visited+July+12,+2023).>Google Scholar
J. Meiners, “As the Supreme Court Debates a Navajo Water Rights Case, Climate Change Adds New Questions,” Arizona Republic, May 31, 2023, available at <https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/ arizona-environment/2023/05/31/climate-change-adds-questions-in-supreme-court-case-on-navajo-water/70269769007/> (last visited July 12, 2023).+(last+visited+July+12,+2023).>Google Scholar
Order Suspending Introduction of Certain Persons from Countries Where a Communicable Disease Exists, Ctrs. For Disease Control & Prevention, (Mar. 20, 2020), available at <https://www.cdc.gov/quarantine/pdf/CDC-Order-Prohibiting-Introduction-of-Persons_Final_3-20-20_3-p.pdf> (last visited July 12, 2023).+(last+visited+July+12,+2023).>Google Scholar
“Arizona v. Mayorkas,” SCOTUSblog, available at <https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/arizona-v-mayorkas/> (last visited July 12, 2023).+(last+visited+July+12,+2023).>Google Scholar
M. Ward, “DOJ Says End of Health Emergency Will Terminate Title 42 Policy and Moot Supreme Court Case,” Politico, Feb. 7, 2023, available at <https://www.politico.com/news/2023/02/07/justice-department-immigration-supreme-court-00081668> (last visited July 12, 2023).+(last+visited+July+12,+2023).>Google Scholar
United States v. Texas, 599 U.S. ____ (2023).Google Scholar
J. G. Hodge, Jr., “‘Out Like a Lion:’ Terminating the COVID-19 National Public Health Emergency,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 51, no. 2 441-445, available at <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4383405> (last visited July 12, 2023).+(last+visited+July+12,+2023).>Google Scholar