Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T06:34:31.155Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Dynamic Vector-Formed Information Sharing Algorithm Based on Two-State Chi Square Detection in an Adaptive Federated Filter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2018

Jianxin Xu Open the ORCID record for Jianxin Xu [Opens in a new window] ,
Zhi Xiong ,
Jianye Liu  and
Rong Wang
Jianxin Xu*
Affiliation:
(Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, College of Automation Engineering, 211106, Nanjing, China)
Zhi Xiong
Affiliation:
(Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, College of Automation Engineering, 211106, Nanjing, China)
Jianye Liu
Affiliation:
(Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, College of Automation Engineering, 211106, Nanjing, China)
Rong Wang
Affiliation:
(Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, College of Automation Engineering, 211106, Nanjing, China)
*
(E-mail: xujianxin@nuaa.edu.cn)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The accuracy and fault tolerance of filters are directly affected by the filter architecture and algorithm, thus influencing navigation performance. The chi square detection used in the conventional reset federated filter is not sensitive to soft faults, and it is easy to cause the health subsystem to be polluted through information sharing. It is a challenge to design an adaptive reset federated filter to improve the performance of the navigation system. Therefore, taking the Strapdown Inertial Navigation System/Global Positioning System/Celestial Navigation System/Synthetic Aperture Radar (SINS/GPS/CNS/SAR) integrated navigation system as an example, an adaptive federated filter architecture for vector-formed information sharing without a fault isolation module is designed in this paper. The proposed method uses the two-state chi square detection algorithm to calculate the parameters corresponding to each state, making the state with higher accuracy obtain a greater information distribution coefficient. In addition, according to the value of vector-formed information sharing, an adaptive coefficient of measurement noise is designed. This improves the adaptability of the navigation system to soft faults. Simulation results show that the accuracy of the proposed algorithm has the same performance compared with the conventional method under normal circumstances. When the sensor has a soft fault, the adaptive federated filter algorithm proposed in this paper can adaptively adjust the distribution coefficients, eliminate the influence of the fault information and improve the precision of the navigation system. The approach described in this paper can be used in multi-sensor integrated navigation. It will have better performance in engineering applications.

Keywords

Integrated NavigationFederated FilterVector-formed Information SharingState Chi-Square Test
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 72 , Issue 1 , January 2019 , pp. 101 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ali, J. and Fang, J. (2005). SINS/ANS/GPS Integration Using Federated Kalman Filter Based on Optimized Information-Sharing Coefficients. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit. 6028–6040.Google Scholar
Carlson, N. A. (1990). Federated square root filter for decentralized parallel processors. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace & Electronic Systems, 26, 517–525.Google Scholar
Chang, G. (2014). Robust Kalman filtering based on Mahalanobis distance as outlier judging criterion. Journal of Geodesy, 88, 391–401.Google Scholar
Da, R. (1994). Failure detection of dynamical systems with the state chi-square test. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 17, 271–277.Google Scholar
Fokin, L., Shchipitsyn, A. and Shtessel, Y. (2015). Adaptive SINS/ANS/GNSS for Air-Launch Space Launcher: Algorithm Design and Performance Analysis. AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, 6760–6779.Google Scholar
Hide, C. and Hill, T. (2007). A multi-sensor navigation filter for high accuracy positioning in all environments. The Journal of Navigation, 60, 409–425.Google Scholar
Hu, Z., Zhang, Y. and Qiu, K. (2008). Robust information sharing scheme for federated filter based on fault probability. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 30, 1801–1804.Google Scholar
Hua, B., Chen, W., Kang, G. and Yang, J. (2013). Federal adaptive filtering of restraining consecutive outliers algorithm in multi-source information integrated navigation system. IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation, 16, 908–912.Google Scholar
Li, Z., Wang, J. and Gao, J. (2016). An enhanced GPS/INS integrated navigation system with GPS observation expansion. The Journal of Navigation, 69, 1041–1060.Google Scholar
Liu, R. and Liu, J. (2001). A new method of information sharing in federated filter. Journal of Chinese Inertial Technology, 9, 28–32.Google Scholar
Miller, RG. (1981). Simultaneous Statistical Inference. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Qin, Y. (2012). Kalman Filtering and the Principle of Integrated Navigation. Northwestern Polytechnical University Press Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Wang, Q., Cui, X., Li, Y. and Ye, F. (2017). Performance enhancement of a USV INS/CNS/DVL integration navigation system based on an adaptive information sharing factor federated filter. Sensors, 17, 1–26.Google Scholar
Wang, R., Liu, J., Xiong, Z. and Zhong, L. (2014). Adaptive fault-tolerant algorithm based on sequential probability mapping for integrated navigation. Control and Decision, 29, 1861–1865.Google Scholar
Xiong, Z., Chen, J., Wang, R. and Liu, J. (2013). A new dynamic vector formed information sharing algorithm in federated filter. Aerospace Science & Technology, 29, 37–46.Google Scholar
Yang, B., Peng, H., Zhang, Y. and Shan, B. (2010). Information fusion of integrated navigation based on self-adaptive filter. International Conference on Information Networking and Automation, 2, V2-1–V2-5.Google Scholar
Yang, C., Zhang, L. and Guo, J. (2016). Fault-tolerant integrated navigation algorithm using chi-square test with two state propagators and fuzzy adaptive filter. Control Theory and Applications, 33, 500–511.Google Scholar
Yang, Y., Song, L., and Xu, T. (2002). Robust estimator for correlated observations based on bifactor equivalent weights. Journal of Geodesy, 76, 353–358.Google Scholar
Zhang, K., Liu, H., Li, H. and Qian, S. (2013). SINS/GPS/CNS integrated navigation federal filtering algorithm. Journal of Chinese Inertial Technology, 21, 226–230.Google Scholar
Zhao, L. and Ban, J. (2014). Federated Filter Fault Detection Technology Research for Integrated Navigation. Journal of Telemetry Tracking & Command, 35, 9–13.Google Scholar
Zhong, L., Liu, J., Li, R. and Wang, R. (2017). Approach for Detecting Soft Faults in GPS/INS Integrated Navigation based on LS-SVM and AIME. The Journal of Navigation, 70, 561–579.Google Scholar
Zhu, Y., Cheng, X. and Wang, L. (2016). A Novel Fault Detection Method for an Integrated Navigation System using Gaussian Process Regression. The Journal of Navigation, 69, 905–919.Google Scholar