Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-06-02T09:50:24.498Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Burrowed Phacops rana from the Moscow Formation of New York

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2016

Paul D. Zell*
Affiliation:
835 South Sparks Street, State College, Pennsylvania 16801

Extract

The trilobite Phacops rana has previously been documented in two life positions: horizontally outstretched and enrolled (Hall and Clarke, 1888). A specimen of Phacops rana was recovered in an unusual life position from the Windom Member of the Moscow Formation (Figure 1). It was collected from a borrow pit along Castle Hill Road, 1 km east of Earlville in Chenango County, New York. The trilobite appears to have burrowed tail first into the substrate, with only part of the cephalon and one or two thoracic segments exposed above the sediment surface. The orientation of the eyes indicate that the visual field was horizontal. The thorax angled into the substrate at an angle of approximately 50° from the horizontal, with the pygidium tilted dorsally relative to the thorax. Compaction effects appear to be slight. Because the specimen was found in situ, no doubt exists as to its orientation with respect to bedding. It is also evident from bedding plane surfaces that this trilobite had burrowed, and was not simply draped over an uneven substrate, as it intersects three bedding planes. There is no evidence of any object over which it could have been draped. No burrow trace, lining, or scratch marks are preserved. No other specimens of Phacops in this position have been reported.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergström, J. 1969. Remarks on the appendages of trilobites. Lethaia, 2:395414.Google Scholar
Bergström, J. 1972. Appendage morphology of the trilobite Cryptolithus and its implications. Lethaia, 5:8594.Google Scholar
Bergström, J. 1976. Lower Palaeozoic trace fossils from eastern Newfoundland. Canadian Journal of Earth Science, 13:16131633.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E. 1977. Entombment of a trilobite within a closed brachiopod shell. Journal of Paleontology, 51:10411045.Google Scholar
Clarkson, E. N. K. 1966. The life attitude of the Silurian trilobite Phacops musheni Salter, 1864. Scottish Journal of Geology, 2:7683.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N. 1971. Patterns of cephalic musculature in the Phacopina (Trilobita) and their significance. Journal of Paleontology, 45:5267.Google Scholar
Hall, J., and Clarke, J. M. 1888. Descriptions of the trilobites and other Crustacea of the Oriskany, Upper Helderberg, Hamilton, Portage, Chemung and Catskill Groups. New York State Geological Survey, Paleontology, 7, 236 p.Google Scholar
Miller, J. 1976. The sensory fields and life mode of Phacops rana (Green, 1932) (Trilobita). Transactions, Royal Society of Edinburgh, 69:337367.Google Scholar
Schmalfuss, H. 1981. Structure, patterns and function of cuticular terrace lines in trilobites. Lethaia, 14:331341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seilacher, A. 1962. Form und Funktion des Trilobiten-Daktylus, p. 218227. In Rabien, A. (ed.), H. Schmidt Festband. Paläontologische Zeitschrift.Google Scholar
St⊘rmer, L. 1939. Studies on trilobite morphology, Part I. The thoracic appendages and their phylogenetic significance, Norsk geologisk tidsskrift, 19:143273.Google Scholar
Stürmer, W., and Bergström, J. 1973. New discoveries on trilobites by X-rays. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 47:104141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westrop, S. R. 1983. The life habits of the Ordovician illaenine trilobite Bumastoides. Lethaia, 16:1524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar