No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Catalogue of fossil genera of Mactridae (Mollusca: Bivalvia)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 July 2023
Abstract
All genera based on fossil type species belonging to the family Mactridae are alphabetically listed in this work. The oldest records of the Mactridae come from Cretaceous deposits of North America. However, this group of bivalves has been worldwide recorded from the Paleogene and Neogene. An emended diagnosis for each genus is herein provided. In addition to that, type species, type localities, and occurrences are included. For each genus, a remarks section includes the most recent published taxonomic opinions. Nevertheless, in some cases, new taxonomic decisions based on morphological analysis of types have been taken. Genera based on extant type species are excluded from this work. Forty-five genera are listed herein and type material has been reproduced wherever possible. Ionesimactra nom. nov. is proposed as a replacement name for Caspimactra Ionesi (non Caspimactra Ali-Zade and Kabakova). This work constitutes the basis for future revisions related to fossil taxa of the family Mactridae from different regions.
UUID: https://zoobank.org/ccc72130-4ea2-44a9-add9-51cfce58f2d5
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Paleontological Society
References
Al-Abbasi, M.W., 2011, On some Bivalvia from Fat'ha Formation (M. Miocene) at Sheikhan Anticline, North Iraq: Tikrit Journal of Pure Science, v. 16, p. 250–256.Google Scholar
Ali-Zade, A.A. [with contributions by Kabakova], 1969, Aktschagyl of Azerbajdzhan: Trudy Azerbajdzhan Nauchno-issled Instituta Dobychi Nefti, Nauka, Leningrad, v. 65, p. 1–271.Google Scholar
Andrussow, N.I., 1902a, Materialy k poznaniju Prikaspijskogo neogena. Akchagyl'skie plasty [Beiträge zur Kenntniss des Kaspischen Neogen. Die Aktschagylschichten]: Trudy Geologicheskogo Komiteta [Mémoires du Comité Géologique], v. 15(4), p. 1–153.Google Scholar
Andrussow, N.I., 1902b, Die südrussische Ablagerungen. Theil 3. Sarmatische Stufe: Zapiski Imperatorskogo S.-Pereburgskogo mineralogicheskogo obshchestva [Verhandlungen der Russisch-kaiserlichen Mineralogischen Gesellschaft zu St. Petersburg] (ser. 2), v. 39, p. 338–495.Google Scholar
Andrussow, N.I., 1905, Maeotische Stufe: Verhandlungen der Russisch-Kaiserlichen Mineralogischen Gesellschaft zu St. Petersburg, v. 2, p. 289–451.Google Scholar
Ayoub-Hannaa, W.S., Bengtson, P., Fürsich, F.T., and Andrade, E.J., 2019, Cenomanian–Turonian (Cretaceous) heterodont bivalves from the Sergipe Basin, Brazil: Revue de Paléobiologie, 38, p. 151–228.Google Scholar
Belokrys, L.S., 1964, On the evolution of Sarmatian mactrids in the Borisvensk Bay: International Geology Review, v. 6, p. 1827–1846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beu, A.G., 1966, The molluscan genera Lutraria, Resania and Zenatia in New Zealand: Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand (Zoology), v. 8(7), p. 63–91.Google Scholar
Beu, A.G., 1968, A note on Resania elongata Beu and Zenatia cretacea (Woods): New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, v. 11, p. 126–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beu, A.G. 2004, Marine Mollusca of oxygen isotope stages of the last 2 million years in New Zealand. Part 1: revised generic positions and recognition of warm-water and cool-water migrants: Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, v. 34, p. 111–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beu, A.G., 2006, Marine Mollusca of oxygen isotope stages of the last 2 million years in New Zealand. Part 2: biostratigraphically useful and new Pliocene to Recent bivalves: Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, v. 36, p. 151–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beu, A.G., 2009, Before the ice: biogeography of Antarctic Paleogene molluscan faunas: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 284, p. 191–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhm, J., 1929, Eozäne und miozäne Versteinerungen aus Angola: Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft, v. 81, p. 451–457.Google Scholar
Brown, T., 1827, Illustrations of the Conchology of Great Britain and Ireland. With the Description and Localities of all the Species, Marine, Land and Freshwater. Drawn and Coloured from Nature: Edinburgh and London, W.H. Lizars and D. Lizars, 9 p.Google Scholar
Campbell, L.D., and Otvos, E.G., 1992, Neogene Bivalve Rangia (Miorangia) johnsoni; taxonomy, depositional facies and stratigraphic range: Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology, v. 25, p. 157–168.Google Scholar
Carter, J.G., Campbell, D.C., Altaba, C.R., Anderson, L.C., Araujo, R., et al., 2011, A synoptical classification of the Bivalvia (Mollusca): Paleontological Contributions, v. 4, p. 1–47, https://doi.org/10.17161/PC.1808.8287.Google Scholar
Chavan, A., 1946, L'evolution des faunes marines des Mollusques dans le Nord-Ouest de l'Europe, de la fin du Crétacé a celle de l’Éocéne: Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, v. 5, p. 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chavan, A., 1969, Superfamily Lucinacea, in Cox, L.R., et al., eds., Part N [Bivalvia], Mollusca 6, v. 1 and 2, in Moore, R.C., ed., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology: Lawrence, Kansas, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, p. N491–N517.Google Scholar
Clark, B.L., and Durham, J.W., 1946, Eocene faunas from the Department of Bolivar, Colombia: Memoir of the Geological Society of America, v. 16, p. 1–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, T.A., 1830, Containing descriptions of twenty-nine new species of fossil shells, noticed in the preceding paper: Journal of the Academy of Natural Science of Philadelphia, v. 6 (appendix), p. 217–229.Google Scholar
Conrad, T.A., 1832, Shells of the Tertiary Formations of North America: “Volume 1” issued in 4 parts, No. 2, Philadelphia, Judah Dobson, p. 21–28.Google Scholar
Conrad, T.A., 1857, Descriptions of three new genera; twenty-three new species [of] middle Tertiary fossils from California, and one from Texas: Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, v. 8 [for 1856], p. 312–316.Google Scholar
Conrad, T.A., 1869, Notes on Recent and fossil shells, with descriptions of new genera: American Journal of Conchology, v. 4, p. 246–249.Google Scholar
Cosel, R.v., and Gofas, S., 2019, Marine Bivalves of Tropical West Africa: from Rio de Oro to Southern Angola: Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Faune et Flora tropicales, volume 48, Paris, IRD, Marseille, 1104 p.Google Scholar
Cossmann, A.É.M., 1886, Catalogue [“illustré” added in this position in some but not all titles for parts] des coquilles fossiles de l'Éocène des environs de Paris: Annales de la Société Royale Malacologique de Belgique (Published in 10 parts), Premier fascicule, v. 21, p. 17–186.Google Scholar
Cossmann, A.É.M., 1908, Pélécypodes du Montien de Belgique: Mémoires du Musée Royal d'Histoire Naturelle de Belgique, v. 5(19), p. 1–76.Google Scholar
Cossmann, A.É.M., 1913, Catalogue [“illustré” added in this position in some but not all titles for parts] des coquilles fossiles de l'Éocène des environs de Paris: Annales de la Société Royale Malacologique de Belgique (Published in 10 parts), Appendice N° 5, p. 19–238.Google Scholar
Cossmann, A.É.M., and Peyrot, A., 1909, Conchologie Néogénique de l'Aquitaine. Pélécypodes: Actes de la Société Linnéenne de Bordeaux, v. 63, p. 233–293.Google Scholar
Cox, L.R., 1947, The lamellibranch family Cyprinidae in the lower oolites of England: Journal of Molluscan Studies, v. 27, p. 141–184.Google Scholar
Cox, L.R., 1969, General features of Bivalvia, in Moore, R.C., ed. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. N, Mollusca 6: Bivalvia: Lawrence, Kansas, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas, p 2–129.Google Scholar
d'Orbigny, A., 1844, Paléontologie du Voyage de M. Hommaire de Hell, in Hommaire de Hell. Les steppes de la mer Caspienne, le Caucase, la Crimée et la Russie méridionale. Voyage Pittoresque, Historique et Scientifique: Paris, P. Bertrand, Tome 3, p. 419–491.Google Scholar
d'Orbigny, A., 1850–1852, Prodrome de Paléontologie Stratigraphique Universelle des Animaux and Mollusques et Rayonnés: Faisant Suite au Cours Élémentaire de Paléontologie et de Geologie Stratigraphiques: Paris, Victor Masson, v. 1, 394 p., v. 2, 428 p., v. 3, 189 p.Google Scholar
Dall, W.H., 1894, Monograph of the genus Gnathodon Gray (Rangia, Desmoulins): Proceedings of the United States National Museum, v. 17, p. 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dall, W.H., 1898, Contributions to the Tertiary fauna of Florida, with especial reference to the Miocene silex-beds of Tampa and the Pliocene beds of the Caloosahatchie River, including in many cases a complete revision of the generic groups treated and of their American Tertiary Species. Part IV. 1. Prionodesmacea: Nucula to Julia. 2. Teleodesmacea: Teredo to Ervilia: Wagner Free Institute of Science of Philadelphia, Transactions, v. 3, p. 571–947.Google Scholar
Danukalova, G.A., 1996, Bivalve Molluscs and Akchagyl stratigraphy: Transactions of the Palaeontological Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, v. 265, 132 p.Google Scholar
Davitashvili, L.S., 1932, Fossils of the Sarmatian beds, in Archangelsky, A.D., and Davitashvili, L.S., eds., Rukovodyashchiye Iskopayemyye Neftyenosnykh Rayonov Krymsko-Kavkazskoy Oblasti, V: Trudy Gosudarstvennogo Issledovatel'skogo Neftyanogo Instituta, p. 1–77.Google Scholar
Desmoulins, C., 1832, IV Description d'un genre nouveau de coquille bivalve: Actes de la Société Linnéenne de Bordeaux, v. 5, p. 48–58.Google Scholar
DeVries, T.J., 2019, Early Paleogene brackish-water molluscs from the Caballas Formation of the East Pisco Basin (southern Peru): Journal of Natural History, v. 53, p. 1533–1584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eames, F.E., 1957, Eocene Mollusca from Nigeria: a revision: Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology, v. 3, p. 23–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichwald, K.E.I.v., 1830, Naturhistorische Skizze von Lithauen, Volhynien und Podolien in Geognostisch-Mineralogischer, Botanischer und Zoölogischer Hinsicht: Wilna [Vilnius, Lithuania], Joseph Zawadski, 256 p.Google Scholar
Eichwald, K.E.I.v., 1840 [1841, 1842], Fauna Caspio–Caucasiae Nonnullis Observationibus Novis [Some new observations of Caspian–Caucasian Faunas]: Nouveaux Mémoires de la Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou, v. 7, p. 1–290.Google Scholar
Finlay, H.J., 1927, New specific names for Austral Mollusca: Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute, v. 57, p. 488–533.Google Scholar
Finlay, H.J., 1928, The Recent Mollusca of the Chatham Islands: Transactions of the New Zealand Institute, v. 59, p. 232–286.Google Scholar
Fischer, P., 1880–1887, Manuel de Conchyliologie et de Paleontologie Conchyliologique ou Historie Naturelle des Mollusques Vivants et Fossiles: Paris, Savy, 1369 p.Google Scholar
Gabb, W.M., 1864, Description of the Cretaceous fossils. California Geological Survey, Paleontology, v. 1, p. 57–243.Google Scholar
Gabb, W.M., 1866, Palaeontology of California: Geological Survey of California, Palaeontology, Cretaceous and Tertiary Fossils, v. 2, p. 1–38.Google Scholar
Gabb, W.M., 1869, Paleontology of California: Geological Survey of California, Paleontology, Cretaceous and Tertiary Fossils, v. 2, p. 39–299.Google Scholar
Gardner, J.A., 1940, New Rangia from Upper Miocene of western Gulf Province: Bulletin of the America Association of Petroleum Geologists, v. 24, p. 476–477.Google Scholar
Gardner, J.A., 1943, Mollusca from the Miocene and Lower Pliocene of Virginia and North Carolina, Part I, Pelecypoda; with a summary of the stratigraphy by W. C. Mansfield: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, v. 199, p. 1–178.Google Scholar
Garvie, C.L., 1996, The molluscan macrofauna of the Reklaw Formation, Marquez Member (Eocene: lower Claibornian), in Texas: Bulletins of American Paleontology, v. 111, p. 1–177.Google Scholar
Garvie, C.L., 2013, The molluscan macrofauna of the Seguin Formation (upper Paleocene) in central Texas: Bulletins of American Paleontology, v. 384, p. 1–129.Google Scholar
Gill, E.D., and Darragh, T.A., 1963, Evolution of the Zenatiinae (Mactridae: Lamellibranchiata): Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, v. 77, p. 177–190.Google Scholar
Gould, A.A., 1850, Descriptions of new species of shells from the United States Exploring Expedition: Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History, v. 3, p. 151–156, 169–172, 214–218, 252–256, 275–278, 292–296, 309–312, 343–348.Google Scholar
Gould, A.A., 1852, in United States Exploring Expedition during the years 1838, 1839, 1840, 1841, 1842 under the command of Charles Wilkes. Volume 12. Mollusca and Shells, with an atlas of plates: Boston, Gould & Lincoln, 510 p.Google Scholar
Gray, J.E., 1840, Synopsis of the Contents of the British Museum: Shells of Molluscous Animals, Eastern Zoological Gallery: London, G. Woodfall & Son, p. 89–156.Google Scholar
Gray, J.E., 1853, A revision of the genera of some of the families of Conchifera or bivalve shells: Annals and Magazine of Natural History, ser. 2, v. 11, p. 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habe, T., 1977, Systematics of Mollusca in Japan. Bivalvia and Scaphopoda: Tokyo, Hokuryukan, p. 1–372.Google Scholar
Habe, T., 1981, Bivalvia, in Kuroda, T., and Habe, T., 1981, A Catalogue of Molluscs of Wakayama Prefecture, the Province of Kii. I. Bivalvia, Scaphopoda, and Cephalopoda. Based on the Kuroda Manuscript and Supervised by Tadashige Habe, D. Sc. Edited by The Editorial Committee of “A Catalogue of Molluscs of Wakayama Prefecture” at the Seto Marine Biological Laboratory, Yasuo Koyama, Torao Yamamoto, Yorisaburo Toki, and Hiroshi Minato, with Collaboration of Takasi Tokioka, D. Sc.: Publications of the Seto Marine Biological Laboratory, Special Publication Series, v. 7, p. 25–223.Google Scholar
Huber, M., 2010, Compendium of Bivalves. A Full-Color Guide to 3,300 of the World's Marine Bivalves. A Status on Bivalvia after 250 Years of Research: Hackenheim, Germany: ConchBooks, p. 1–901.Google Scholar
Huber, M., 2015, Compendium of Bivalves 2. A Full-Color Guide to the Remaining Seven Families. A Systematic Listing of 8500 Bivalve Species and 10500 Synonyms. Harxheim, Germany, ConchBooks, p. 1–907.Google Scholar
Hutton, F.W., 1884, Descriptions of new Tertiary shells. Part I: Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New Zealand, v. 17, p. 313–332.Google Scholar
Iljina, L.B., Nevesskaja, L.A., and Paramonova, N.P., 1976, Regularities of mollusc development in the Neogene semimarine and brackish water basins of Eurasia: Trudy Paleontologischeskogo Instituta, v. 155, p. 1–288.Google Scholar
Ionesi, B., 1986, Considérations taxonomiques et phylogénétiques sur les mactres Sarmatiennes: Analele Ştiinţifice ale Universităţii, “Al. I. Cuza” Iaşi, Sectiunea II b Geologie–Geographie, v. 32, p. 25–30.Google Scholar
Ionesi, B., and Tabara, D., 2004, Faune de mollusques de la Formation de Scheia (plate-forme Moldave): Acta Paleontologica Romaniae, v. 4, p. 163–174.Google Scholar
Iredale, T., 1930, More notes on the marine Mollusca of New South Wales: Records of the Australian Museum, v. 17, p. 384–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauhri, A.K., Tiwari, R.P., and Lyngdoh, B.C., 2004, Early Miocene larger foraminifera (Operculina) from the Baghmara Formation (Garo Group), Garo Hills, Meghalaya, India: Revue de Paleobiologie, Geneve, v. 23, p. 227–237.Google Scholar
Keen, A.M., 1969a, Superfamily Mactracea Lamarck, 1809, in Cox, L.R., Newell, N.D., Boyd, D.W., Branson, C.C., Casey, R., Chavan, A., et al., eds., Part N [Bivalvia], Mollusca 6, Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology: Lawrence, Kansas, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, p. N595–N610.Google Scholar
Keen, A.M., 1969b, Superfamily Tellinacea de Blainville, 1814, in Cox, L.R., Newell, N.D., Boyd, D.W., Branson, C.C., Casey, R., Chavan, A., et al., eds., Part N [Bivalvia], Mollusca 6, Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology: Lawrence, Kansas, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, p. N613–N639.Google Scholar
Kolesnikov, V.P., 1925, Mactridae russkogo miotsena [Mactridae of the Russian Miocene]. Izvestiya Geologicheskogo Komiteta, v. 44, p. 885–900.Google Scholar
Kolesnikov, V.P., 1935, Sarmatskie molliuski [Sarmatian Molluscs]: Paleontologija SSSR [Paleontology of the USSR], v. 10, p. 44–63.Google Scholar
Kolesnikov, V.P., 1940, Verkhniy Miotsen, in Arkhangel'skij, A.D., ed., Stratigrafiya SSSR, Neogen SSSR [The Upper Miocene Stratigraphy of the USSR): Leningrad, Izdatel'stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR, p. 229–330.Google Scholar
Korobkov, I.A., 1954, Spravochnik i Metodicheskoe Rukovodstvo po Tretichnym Molljuskam. Plastinchatozhabernye [Handbook and Systematic Guide to the Tertiary Mollusca. Lamellibranchiata]: Leningrad, Gostoptekhizdat, 444 p.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J.B.P.A.d.M., 1805, Suite des mémoires sur les fossiles des environs de Paris: Annales du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle, v. 6, p. 117–126, 214–226, 335–345, 407–415.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J.B.P.A.d.M., 1809, Philosophie Zoologique, ou exposition des considérations relative à l'Histoire naturelle des animaux; à la diversité de leur organisation et des facultés qu'ils en obtiennent; aux causes physiques qui maintiennent en eux la vie et donnent lieu aux mouvements qui'ils exécutent; enfin, á celles qui produisent, les unes le sentiment, et les autres l'intelligence de ceux qui eu sont doués: Paris, Chez Dentu [et] L'Auteur, v. 1, 428 p.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J.B.P.A.d.M., 1818, Histoire Naturelle des Animaux sans Vertèbres, Présentant les Caractères Généraux et Particuliers de ces Animaux, leur Distribution, leurs Classes, leurs Familles, leurs Genres, et la Citation des principales Espèces qui s'y Rapportent; Précédée d'une Introduction Offrant la Détermination des Caractères Essentiels de l'Animal, sa Distinction du Végétal et des Autres Corps Naturels; enfin, l'Exposition des Principes Fondamentaux de la Zoologie: Paris, Verdière, v. 5, 612 p.Google Scholar
Lamy, E., 1906, Lamellibranches recuellis par l'Expedition Antarctique Française du Dr. Charcot: Bulletin du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, v. 12, p. 44–52.Google Scholar
Laskarew, V.D., 1903, Fauna buglovskikh sloyev Volyni: Trudy Geologicheskogo Komiteta, n. ser., v. 5, p. 1–148.Google Scholar
Laskarew, V.D., 1914, Obshchaja geologicheskaja karta Evropejskoj Rossii. List 17-j [Carte géologique générale de la Russie de l'Europe. Feuille 17]: Trudy Geologicheskogo Komiteta [Memoirs of the Geological Committee], new ser., v. 77, p. 1–710.Google Scholar
Le Renard, J., and Pacaud, J.M., 1995, Révision des Mollusques Paléogénes du Bassin de Paris. II—Liste des Références primaries des espécies: Cossmanniana, v. 3, p. 65–132.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C., 1767, Systema Naturæ per Regna Tria Naturæ, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis (editio duodecima reformata ed. Vol. 1): Holmiæ [Stockholm], Laurentii Salvii, 532 p.Google Scholar
Lyngdoh, B.C., Tiwari, R., and Kachhara, R., 1999, Miocene molluscan biostratigraphy of the Garo Hills, Meghalaya, India: Journal of the Palaeontological Society of India, v. 44, p. 55–67.Google Scholar
Macarovici, N., 1935, Les Mactres sarmatiques de ĺest et du sud-est de la Roumanie: Analele Ştiinţifice ale Universităţii, “Al. I. Cuza” Iaşi, Sectiunea II b Geologie–Geographie, v. 21, p. 1–4.Google Scholar
Macarovici, N., 1940, Recherches géologiques et paléontologiques dans la Bessarabie méridionale (Roumanie): Annales Scientifiques de l'Université de Jassy, v. 36, p. 177–422.Google Scholar
Macarovici, N., 1969, Considerations critiques sur les especes de Mactra du Sarmatien de la Roumania: Annals Scientifiques de l'Université de Iasi, Ser. 2b, Geologie, v. 15, p. 97–103.Google Scholar
Marlière, R., 1954, Partie 1. La stratigraphie. Chapitre 13. Le Paléocène: Annales de la Société Géologique de Belgique, Publications Spéciales, Prodrome d'une Description Géologique de la Belgique, 1954, p. 445–449.Google Scholar
Marshall, B.A., and Spencer, H.G., 2013, Comments on some taxonomic changes affecting marine Bivalvia of the New Zealand region recently introduced in Huber's Compendium of bivalves, with some additional taxonomic changes: Molluscan Research, v. 33, p. 40–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marwick, J., 1948, Lower Pliocene Mollusca from Otahuhu, Auckland: Paleontological Bulletin of New Zealand Geological Survey, v. 16, p. 1–38.Google Scholar
Marwick, J., 1952, Mactrona, a new name for Mactrula Marwick, preoccupied: Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, v. 29, p. 83.Google Scholar
Maury, C.J., 1925, A further contribution to the paleontology of Trinidad (Miocene horizons): Bulletins of American Paleontology, v. 10, p. 153–402.Google Scholar
Maury, C.J. 1928, Trinitasia, a new molluscan genus from South America: Science, v. 67, p. 318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer-Eymar, K.D.W., 1853, Verzeichniss der in der marinen Molasse der Schweizerisch-schwäbischen Hochfläche enthaltenen fossilen Mollusken: Mittheilungen der Naturforschende Gesellschaft in Bern aus dem Jahre, 1853, p. 73–112.Google Scholar
Mayer-Eymar, K.D.W., 1857, Description de coquilles fossiles des terrains Tertiaires du midi de la Russie: Journal de Conchyliologie, v. 6, p. 57–60.Google Scholar
Mayer-Eymar, K.D.W., 1864, Description de Coquilles nouvelles des etages superieurs des Terrains Tertiaires: Journal de Conchyliologie, v. 12, p. 160–168, 350–361.Google Scholar
MolluscaBase, , eds., 2022, MolluscaBase. https://www.molluscabase.org (accessed November 24, 2022), https://doi.org/10.14284/448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, E.J., 2003, Tertiary marine pelecypods of California and Baja California: Crassatellidae through Pharidae: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 1228(F), p.1–107.Google Scholar
Mörch, O.A.L., 1853, Catalogus Conchyliorum, quae Reliquit D. Alphonso d'Aguirra and Gadea, Comes de Yoldi: Regis Danie Cubiculariorum Princeps, Ordinis Dannebrogici in Prima Classe and Ordinis Caroli Tertii Eques. Part 2, Acephala, Annulata, Cirripedia, Echinodermata: Hafniae [Copenhagen], Ludovici Kleini, 74 p.Google Scholar
Nagao, T., and Otatume, K., 1938, Molluscan fossils of the Hakobuti Sandstone of Hokkaido. Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido Imperial University, v. 4, p. 31–56.Google Scholar
Nevesskaja, L.A., Scarlato, O.A., Starobogatov, Y.I., and Eberzin, A.G., 1971, New ideas on the systematics of bivalved mollusks: Paleontological Journal, v, 5, p. 141–155.Google Scholar
Nevesskaja, L.A., Gontsharova, I.A., Ilyina, L.B., Paramonova, N.P., Popov, S.V., Bogdanovich, A.K., Gabunia, L.K., and Nosovsky, M.F., 1984, Regional stratigraphic scale of the eastern Paratethys Neogene: Soviet Geology, v. 9, p. 37–49.Google Scholar
Nevesskaja, L.A., Goncharova, I.A., Paramonova, N.P., Popov, S.V., Babak, E.V. Bagdasarian, K.G., and Voronina, A.A., 1993, Opredelitel' Miotsenovykh Dvustvorchatykh Molluskov Yugo-Zapadnoy Evrazii [Handbook of Miocene Bivalves of South-west Eurasia.] Rossiiskaja Akademija Nauk: Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta [Transactions of the Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences], v. 247, p. 1–412.Google Scholar
Nevesskaja, L.A., Paramonova, N.P., and Babak, E.V., 1997, Atlas of the Pliocene bivalve molluscs of southwestern Eurasia: Trudy Paleontological Institute, Akademia Nauka, v. 269, p. 1–267.Google Scholar
Nevesskaja, L.A., Popov, S.V., Goncharova, I.A., Guzhov, A.V., Janin, B.T., Plubotko, I.V., Biakov, A.S., and Gavrilova, V.A., 2013, Phanerozoic Bivalvia of Russia and surrounding countries: Transactions of the Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, v. 294, p. 1–524.Google Scholar
Newton, R.B., 1922, Eocene Mollusca from Nigeria: Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Nigeria, v. 3, p. 1–136.Google Scholar
Nomura, S., and Zinbo, N., 1934, Marine Mollusca from the “Ryukyu Limestone” of Kikai-Zima, Ryukyu Group: Tohoku [Imperial] University: Science Reports 2, Geology, v. 16, p. 109–164.Google Scholar
Oliver, W.R.B., 1915, The Mollusca of the Kermadec Islands: Transactions of the New Zealand Institute, v. 47, 509–568.Google Scholar
Olsson, A.A., 1944, Contributions to the paleontology of Northern Peru. Part VII. The Cretaceous of the Paita region: Bulletins of American Paleontology, v. 28, p. 159–304.Google Scholar
Packard, E.L., 1916, Mesozoic and Cenozoic Mactrinae of the Pacific Coast of North America: California University Publications, Department of Geology Bulletin, v. 9, p. 261–360.Google Scholar
Papp, A., 1974, Die Molluskenfauna der Sarmatischen Schichtengruppe, in Papp, A., Marinescu, F., and Seneš, J., eds., M5 Sarmatien Chronostratigraphie und Neostratotypen, v. 4, 318–427.Google Scholar
Paramonova, N.P., 1978, O rodovom i podrodovom sostave neogenovykh Mactridae ponto-kaspijskoj chasti Vostochnogo Paratetisa [About generic and subgeneric composition of the Neogene Mactridae from the Pontian and Caspian part of the Eastern Paratethys], in Nevesskaja, L.A., ed., Tezisy Vtorogo Vsesojuznogo Simpozoiuma po Morfologii, Sisteme, Filogenii i Ekogenezu Dvustvorchatykh Molljuskov [Abstracts of the Second All-Union Symposium on Morphology, System, Phylogeny, and Ecogenesis of Bivalved Molluscs]: Tiraspol'skij Gosudarstvennyj Pedagogicheskij Institut [Tiraspol State Pedagogical Institute], Tiraspol, p. 38–40.Google Scholar
Pavlov, A.P., 1925, Dépôts Néogènes et Quaternaires de l'Europe méridionale et orientale. Stratigraphie comparée des couches d'eau douce: Mémoires de la Section Géologique de la Société des Amis des Sciences Naturelles, d'Anthopologie et d'Ethnographie, v. 5, p. 1–215.Google Scholar
Philippi, R.A., 1844, Mactra: Abbildungen Und Beschreibungen Neuer Oder Wenig Gekannter Conchylien, v. 1, p. 165–167.Google Scholar
Pilsbry, H.A., 1904, New Japanese marine Mollusca: Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, v. 56, p. 550–561.Google Scholar
Quoy, J.R.C., and Gaimard, J.P., 1832–1835, Voyage de la corvette l'Astrolabe: exécuté par ordre du roi, pendant les années 1826–1827–1828–1829, sous le commandement de M. J. Dumont d'Urville, Zoologie: Paris, J. Tastu, v. 1, p., 1–264 [1832]; v. 2, p. 1–321 [1832]; v. 2, p. 321–686 [1833]; v. 3, p. 1–366 [1834]; v. 3, p. 367–954 [1835].Google Scholar
Reeve, L.A., 1854, Monograph of the genus Mactra, in Reeve, L.A., ed., Conchologia Iconica; or, Illustrations of the Shells of Molluscous Animals: London, L.A. Reeve, v. 8, 21 pls.Google Scholar
Rémond, A., 1863, Description of two new species of bivalve shells, from the Tertiaries of Contra Costa County: Proceedings of the California Academy of Natural Sciences, v. 3, p. 13.Google Scholar
Richards, H.G., 1968, Catalogue of invertebrate fossil types at the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. Department of Geology, Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Special Publication, v. 8, p. 1–222.Google Scholar
Risso, A., 1826, Histoire Naturelle des Principales Productions de l'Europe Méridionale et Particulièrement de Celles des Environs de Nice et des Alpes Maritimes. Mollusques. Annélides: Paris, Strasbourg, Levrault, v. 4, p. 1–439.Google Scholar
Rostovtseva, Y.V., 2009, Middle Sarmatian facies of the Taman trough: Lithology and Mineral Resources, v. 44, p. 367–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacco, F., 1901, Parte 29. Donacidae, Psammobiidae, Solenidae, Mesodesmidae, Mactridae, Cardiidae, Myidae, Corbulidae, Glycymeridae, Gastrochaenidae, Pholadidae, Teredinidae, Cryptodontidae, Ungulinidae, Lucinidae, Tellinidae, Scrobiculariidae, Cuspidariidae, Solenomyidae, Pandoridae, Verticordiidae, Lyonsiidae, Ceromyidae, Arcomyidae, Anatinidae, Poromyidae, Pholadomyidae e Clavagellidae, in Bellardi, L., and Sacco, F., 1872–1904, I Molluschi dei Terreni Terziarii del Piemonte e della Liguria: Torino, Italy, Carlo Clausen, 216 p.Google Scholar
Saul, L.R., 1973, Evidence for the origin of the Mactridae (Bivalvia) in the Cretaceous: University of California Publications in Geological Sciences, v. 97, p. 1–59.Google Scholar
Saul, L.R., 1974, Described or figured West Coast species of Cymbophora: Journal of Paleontology, v. 48, p. 1068–1095.Google Scholar
Sidorova, N.P., 1959a, On the phylogenetic interrelationships of the Mangyshlak and Ustyurt Sarmatian mactrids: Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, v. 124, p. 671–673.Google Scholar
Sidorova, N.P., 1959b, Novyye sarmatskiye maktridy Manglyshlaka i Ustyurta [New Sarmatian mactrids of Mangyshlak and Ustyurt]: Materialy k Osnovam Paleontologii, Issue 3, p. 61–70.Google Scholar
Sidorova, N.P., 1960a, Contribution to the systematics of Sarmatian mactrids: Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal [Paleontological Journal], v. 2, p. 85–96.Google Scholar
Sidorova, N.P., 1960b, The evolution of the hinge in Sarmatian Mactrids: Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal [Paleontological Journal], v. 3, p. 7–14.Google Scholar
Signorelli, J.H., 2019, The Superfamily Mactroidea (Mollusca: Bivalvia) in American Waters, An Illustrated Catalogue of Recent Species. Cham, Switzerland, Springer International Publishing, 151 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Signorelli, J.H., and Carter, J.G., 2016, The Anatinellidae and Kymatoxinae: a reassessment of their affinities within the superfamily Mactroidea (Mollusca, Bivalvia): American Malacological Bulletin, v. 33, p. 204–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simionescu, J., and Barbu, I., 1940, Le faune Sarmatienne de Roumanie: Memoriile Institutului Geological României, v. 3, p. 1–194.Google Scholar
Smith, E.A., 1884, Mollusca, in Report on the Zoological Collections Made in the Indo-Pacific Ocean During the Voyage of H. M. S. Alert 1881–2. Part I. The Collections from Melanesia; Part II. Collections from the western Indian Ocean: London, Taylor & Francis, p. 34–116; 487–508.Google Scholar
Sowerby I, G.B., 1825, A Catalogue of the Shells Contained in the Collection of the Late Earl of Tankerville: Arranged According to the Lamarckian Conchological System: Together with an Appendix, Containing Descriptions of Many New Species: London, E. J. Stirling, 92 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spengler, L., 1802, Beskrivelse over det toskallede conchylie-slaegt Mactra: Skrivter af Naturhistorie–Selskabet, v. 5, p. 92–128.Google Scholar
Starobogatov, Y.I., 1970, Fauna Molljuskov i Zoogeograficheskoe Rajonirovanie Kontinental'nykh Vodojomov Zemnogo Shara [The Molluscan Fauna and Zoogeographical Zoning of the Continental Water Bodies of the World]: Leningrad, Nauka, 372 p.Google Scholar
Steklov, A.A., 1960, About new genus of upper Sarmatian mactrids: Proceedings of Trudy Vsesojuznogo Aerogeologisheskogo Tresta, v. 6, p. 88–91.Google Scholar
Stenzel, H.B., Krause, E.K., and Twining, J.T., 1957, Pelecypoda from the type locality of the Stone City Beds (middle Eocene) of Texas: The University of Texas, Publication 5704, p. 1–237.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L.W., 1941, The larger invertebrate fossils of the Navarro Group of Texas (exclusive of corals and crustaceans and exclusive of the fauna of the Escondido Formation): Publication of The University of Texas [Austin], v. 4101, p. 1–641.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L.W., 1952, Larger invertebrate fossils of the Woodbine Formation (Cenomanian) of Texas: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, v. 242, 226 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, R.B., 1930, Gabb's California Cretaceous and Tertiary type lamellibranchs: Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Special Publication, v. 3, p. 1–314.Google Scholar
Stilwell, J., and Zinsmeister, W.J., 1992, Molluscan systematics and biostratigraphy. Lower Tertiary La Meseta Formation, Seymour Island, Antarctic Peninsula: Antarctic Research Series, v. 55, p. 1–185.Google Scholar
Tate, R., 1879, Zoologica et palaeontologica miscelanea, chiefly relating to South Australia: Transactions of the Philosophical Society of Adelaide, v. 1878–1879, p. 129–140.Google Scholar
Tiwari, R.P., and Kachhara, R.P., 2003, Molluscan biostratigraphy of the Tertiary sediments of Mizoram, India: Journal of the Paleontological Society of India, v. 48, p. 65–88.Google Scholar
Tomlin, M.A., 1931, Some preoccupied generic names: Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, v. 19, p. 174–175.Google Scholar
Toula, F., 1892, Geologische Untersuchungen im östlichen Balkan und in anderen Theilen von Bulgarien und Ostrumelien 2: Denkschriften der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, v. 59, p. 409–478.Google Scholar
Tscheltzov, Y.G., 1964, The phenomenon of convergence in Akschagylian mactrids and cardiids: Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal [Paleontological Journal], v. 1964, p. 72–77.Google Scholar
Tscheltzov, Y.G., 1967, Some new species of Akschagylian mactrid: Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal [Paleontological Journal], v. 1967, p. 51–56.Google Scholar
Turton, W., 1822, Conchylia Insularum Britannicarum. The Shells of the British Islands Systematically Arranged: Leicester, UK, M. A. Nattali, Covent-Garden, and Combe and Son, 277 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentich-Scott, P., Coan, E.V., and Zelaya, D., 2020, Bivalve Seashells of Western South America Marine Bivalve Mollusks from Punta Aguja, Perú to Isla Chiloé, Chile: Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History Monographs, 8. Studies in Biodiversity, 6, 593 p.Google Scholar
Vokes, H., 1946, Contribution to the paleontology of the Lebanon Mountains, reports of Lebanon. Part 3. The pelecypod fauna of the Olive locality (Aptian) at Abeih: Bulletin of American Museum of Natural History, v. 87, p. 143–215.Google Scholar
Vokes, H., 1980, Genera of the Bivalvia: a systematic and bibliographic catalogue (revised and updated): Ithaca, NY, Paleontological Research Institute, 307 p.Google Scholar
Ward, L.W., 1992, Biostratigraphy of the Miocene, middle Atlantic Coastal Plain of North America: Memoir of the Virginia Museum of Natural History, v. 2, p. 1–159.Google Scholar
Woodring, W.P., 1982, Geology and paleontology of Canal Zone and adjoining parts of Panama. Description of Tertiary mollusks (pelecypods: Propeamussiidae to Cuspidariidae; additions to families covered in P306-E; additions to gastropods; cephalopods): U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, v. 306-F, p. 541–759.Google Scholar
Woods, H., 1907., A monograph of the Cretaceous Lamellibranchia of England: volume 2, part 4: Cyprinidæ, Isocardiidæ, Lucinidæ, Corbidæ, Uncardiidæ, Tellinidæ, Mactridæ, and Veneridæ: Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society, Publication, 293 (part of v. 61), p. 133–180.Google Scholar
Zhizhchenko, B., 1934. Miotsenovye mollyuski Vostochnogo Predkavkazhja [Miocene molluscs from Eastern Ciscaucasia]: Trudy Neftyanogo Geologo-Razvedochnogo Instituta, ser. A (Proceedings of the Petroleum Geological Exploration Institute, Serie A), Issue 38, p. 1–982.Google Scholar