No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Fossil argonauts (Mollusca: Cephalopoda: Octopodida) from Late Miocene Siltstones of the Los Angeles Basin, California
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 May 2016
Abstract
Fossilized argonaut egg cases have been recovered from marine siltstones of the late Miocene exposed around margins of the Los Angeles Basin, California. Low radial ribs on the thin, keelless, planispirally coiled egg cases suggest referring them to Mizuhobaris lepta new species. Occurrence of these egg cases in fine-grained Monterey Formation sediments with mesopelagic fish fossils, nannofossils, and Foraminifera indicate deposition in middle-to-upper bathyal depths. Argonaut egg cases have been described from Tertiary strata in Japan, New Zealand, Sumatra, and Europe, but this is the first report of fossilized argonaut egg cases from the Western Hemisphere.
Secretion of egg cases by argonauts probably developed during the Paleogene as a solution to problems of spawning encountered by octopi as they acquired an epipelagic, open-ocean habitat. Shape and sculpture of the egg cases represent responses to hydrodynamics rather than an inheritance from or copying of ectocochliate cephalopods. The cases may provide the eggs with protection from ultraviolet radiation present in the argonauts' near-surface habitat.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Paleontological Society
References
Adams, H., and Adams, A.. 1853–1858. The Genera of Recent Mollusca arranged according to their Organization. John Van Voorst, London, Vol. 1, 484 p., Vol. 2, 661 p., Vol. 3, 138 pls. (Dating of parts, Vol. 2, p. 661)Google Scholar
Bandel, K., and Dullo, W.-C.. 1984. Zur Schalenstruktur fossiler und rezenter Argonauta–Gehäuse (Octopoda, Cephalopoda). Naturhistorische Geshellschaft Nürnberg, Natur und Mensch, Jahresmitteilung, 1984:33–38.Google Scholar
Banner, F. T., and Blow, W. H.. 1959. The classification and stratigraphical distribution of the Globigerinacea. Palæontology, 2:1–27.Google Scholar
Bellardi, L. 1873. I Mollusci del terreni tertziarii del Piemonte e della Liguria, Parte 1: Cephalopoda, Pteropoda, Heteropoda, Gasteropoda (Muricidae e Tritonidae). Memorie della Reale Accademia delle Scienze di Torino (reprint), 264 p.Google Scholar
Bello, G., and Rizzi, E.. 1990. Comportamento di tre femmine de Argonauta argo in acquario (Cephalopoda: Argonautidae). Atti della Societa Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano, 131:450–452.Google Scholar
Berggren, W. A., Kent, D. V., Swisher, C. C. III, and Aubry, M.-P.. 1995. A revised Cenozoic geochronology and chronostratigraphy, p. 129–212. In Berggren, W. A., Kent, D. V., Aubry, M.-P., and Hardenbol, J. (eds.), Geochronology, Time Scales, and Global Stratigraphic Correlation. SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology) Special Publication, 54.Google Scholar
Berry, S. S. 1912. Cephalopods of western North America. Bureau of Fisheries Bulletin, 30:267–336.Google Scholar
Blainville, H. M. Ducrotay de. 1818. Conchyliologie, p. 168–225. In Cuvier, F. (ed.), Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles, dans lequel on traite méthodiquement des differens êtres de la nature… suive d'une biographie des plus célèbres naturelistes, 10. F. G. Levrault, Paris.Google Scholar
Blake, G. H. 1991. Review of the Neogene biostratigraphy and stratigraphy of the Los Angeles Basin and implications for basin evolution, p. 135–184. In Biddle, K. T. (ed.), Active Margin Basins. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir, 52.Google Scholar
Blow, W. H. 1959. Age, correlation, and biostratigraphy of the Upper Tocuyo (Sal Lorenzo) and Pozón formations, eastern Falcón, Venezuela. Bulletins of American Palæontology, 39(178):67–251, pls. 6–191.Google Scholar
Boletzky, S. V. 1983. Laboratory observations on a female Argonauta argo (Mollusca: Cephalopoda). Rapport et Proces-Verbaux des Reunions de la Commission Internationale pour l'Exploration Scientifique de la Mer Mediterranée, 28:289–290.Google Scholar
Boletzky, S. V. 1993. The arm crown in cephalopod development and evolution: a discussion of morphological and behavioral homologies. American Malacological Bulletin, 10:61–69.Google Scholar
Bonaparte, C. L. 1834–1841. Iconografia della Fauna Italica, per le quattro classi degli animali vertebrati. Tome III, Pesci, Fascicles 68–138, Tip. Salviucci, Roma, n.p.Google Scholar
Bronn, H. G. 1838. Lethaea Geognostica, oder Abbildungen und beschreibungen der für die gebirgs-formationen beszeichneidater versleineruger, 2. E. Schweizerbart, Stuttgart, p. 769–1346.Google Scholar
Cantraine, F. J. 1841. Malacologie Méditerranéenne et littorale, ou description des mollusques qui vivent dans la Méditerranée ou sur le continent de l'Italie, ainsi que des coquilles qui se trouvent dans les terrains Tertiaires italiens, avec des observations sur leur anatomie, leurs mœurs, leur analogie et leur gisement. Académie Royale des Sciences Brussels, Nouveaux Mémoires, 13, 173 p., 6 pls.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1848. Fossil shells from Tertiary deposits on Columbia River, near Astoria. American Journal of Science, series 2, 5:432–433, 14 figs.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1854. Monograph of the genus Argonauta, Linné, with description of five new species. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia Journal, 2:331–333, pl. 34.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G. 1797. Tableau élémentaire de l'histoire naturelle des animaux. Paris, xvi + 710 p.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1871. Descriptions of sixty new forms of mollusks from the west coast of North America and the north Pacific Ocean, with notes on others already described. American Journal of Conchology, 7:93–160, pls. 13–16.Google Scholar
delle Chiaie, S. 1823–1831. Memoirie sulla storia e notomia degli Animali senze vertebre del Regno di Napoli. Della stamperia della Sociéta tipografica, Napoli, 4 volumes and atlas.Google Scholar
Dibblee, T. W. Jr. 1995. Tectonic and depositional environment of the middle and upper Cenozoic sequences of the coastal southern California regions, p. 212–245. In Fritsche, A. E. (ed.), Cenozoic Paleogeography of the Western United States–II, Pacific Section. SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology), Book75.Google Scholar
Dickinson, W. R., and Butler, R. F.. 1998. Coastal and Baja California paleomagnetism reconsidered. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 110:1268–1280.Google Scholar
Dorf, E. 1930. Pliocene floras of California. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication, 412(1):1–108.Google Scholar
Feldman, R. M. 2003. Decapod crustaceans from the Puente Formation (late middle to early late Miocene), California: A possible mass death. Southern California Academy of Sciences Bulletin, 102:107–118.Google Scholar
Fleming, C. A. 1945. Some New Zealand Tertiary Cephalopods. Royal Society of New Zealand Transactions, 74:411–418, pls. 60–62.Google Scholar
Fukuda, Y., Obata, I., Tanabe, K., and Hirano, H.. 1979. Microstructure of the shell of Argonauta argo (Linné) (Cephalopoda). Gakujutsu Kenkyu, School of Education, Waseda University, Series in Biology and Geology, 28:45–52, pls. 1–3. (In Japanese with English abstract and figure captions)Google Scholar
Gabb, W. M. 1866–1869. Cretaceous and Tertiary fossils. California Geological Survey, Palæontology 2, 299 p., 36 pls. (1866, p. 1–38; 1869, p. 39–299, 36 pls.)Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1849. Catalogue of the Mollusca in the collection of the British Museum, Pt. I: Cephalopoda Antepedia. British Museum (Natural History), London, 164 p.Google Scholar
Heeger, T., Piatkowski, U., and Möller, H.. 1992. Predation on jellyfish by the cephalopod Argonauta argo. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 88:293–296.Google Scholar
Hewitt, R. A., and Westermann, G. E. G.. 2003. Recurrences of hypotheses about ammonites and Argonauta. Journal of Paleontology, 77:792–795.Google Scholar
Hilber, V. 1915. Der alteste bekannte und erste Miozäne Argonauta. Mitteilungen des naturwissenschaftlichen Verein, 51:107–110, 1 pl.Google Scholar
Hochberg, F. G., Nixon, M., and Toll, R. B.. 1992. Octopoda, p. 213–279. In Sweeney, M. J., Roper, C. F. E., Mangold, K. M., Clarke, M. R., and Boletzky, S. V. (eds.), “Larval” and Juvenile Cephalopods: A Manual For Their Identification. Smithonian Contributions to Zoology, Number 513.Google Scholar
Holland, C. N. 1988. The paper nautilus. New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Memoir, 44:109–114.Google Scholar
Jacobs, D. K., and Chamberlain, J. A. Jr. 1996. Buoyancy and hydrodynamics in ammonoids, p. 169–224. In Landman, N. H., Tanabe, K., and Davis, R. A. (eds.), Ammonoid Paleobiology. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. E., and Snook, H. J.. 1927. Seashore Animals of the Pacific Coast. Dover Publications, New York, 659 p.Google Scholar
Kaseno, Y. 1955. Neogene Argonautinae from Kahoku-gun, Ishikawa Prefecture, Japan. Kanazawa University, Science Reports, 3:339–344, pl. 1.Google Scholar
Keen, A. M. 1971 [withMcLean], J. H.. Seashells of Tropical West America (second edition). Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 1064 p., 22 pls.Google Scholar
Kling, S. A. 1978. Radiolaria, p. 203–244. In Haq, B. U. and Boersma, A. (eds.), Introduction to Marine Micropaleontology. Elsevier Press, New York.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T. 1954a. A new Paleogene paracenoceratoid from northern Kyushu in Japan. Japanese Journal of Geology and Geography Transactions, 24:181–184, pl. 32.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T. 1954b. Izumonauta, a new genus of the Argonautinae, with a note on their rare but gregarious fossil occurrence. Japanese Journal of Geology and Geography Transactions, 25:21–34, pls. 3, 4.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T. 1956. A paleo-meteorological interpretation to the occurrence of the Argonautinae in province Kaga, central Japan. Japanese Journal of Geology and Geography Transactions, 27:93–104, pl. 6.Google Scholar
Laube, G. C. 1869. Über Ammonites aon Münster und dessen Verwandte. Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse (Abteil 1), 59:7–16.Google Scholar
Leach, W. E. 1817. Synopsis of the orders, families and genera of the Class Cephalopoda, p. 137–141. In Leach, W. E. and Nodder, R. P., The Zoological Miscellany: Being descriptions of new or interesting animals, 3(30).Google Scholar
Lewy, Z. 1996. Octopods: Nude ammonoids that survived the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary mass extinction. Geology, 24:627–630, 8 figs.Google Scholar
Lewy, Z. 2002. The function of the ammonite fluted septal margins. Journal of Paleontology, 76:63–69.Google Scholar
Lewy, Z. 2003. Reply to Checa and Hewitt and Westermann. Journal of Paleontology, 77:796–798.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, J. 1786. A Catalogue of the Portland Museum, lately the property of the Duchess of Portland, deceased; which will be sold at auction, by Mr. Skinner and Co. on Monday the 24th of April, 1786. Skinner, London, 194 p.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae. Editio decima, reformata, Regnum Animale. Vol. 1. Laurentii Salvii, Holmiae, 824 p.Google Scholar
Lorois, E. L. 1852. Description d'une nouvelle espèce du genre Argonaute. Révue et Magasin de Zoologie, série 2, 4:9–10, pl. 1.Google Scholar
Maltzan, H. von. 1881. Description de deux espèces nouvelles. Journal de Conchyliologie, 29:162–163.Google Scholar
Martens, E. von. 1867. On the species of Argonauta. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 20:103–106.Google Scholar
Martin, K. 1929. Ein neues Argonautiden Geschlecht von Sumatra. Leidsche geologische å Mededeelingen, 3:221–226, pl. 39.Google Scholar
Monks, N., and Palmer, P.. 2002. Ammonites. Smithsonian Institution Press in association with The Natural History Museum, London, 159 p.Google Scholar
Naef, A. 1923. Cephalopoda (systematics). Fauna and Flora of the Bay of Naples, Monograph 35, 1:293–913, pls. 1–17. (1972, translation of Der Cephalopoden Systematik, from German, Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
Nesis, K. N. 1977. The biology of paper nautili, Argonauta boettgeri and A. hians (Cephalopoda, Octopoda), in the western Pacific and the seas of the East Indian Archipelago. Akademiia Nauk SSSR, Moskva, Institut Okeanologii, Zoologicheskiy Zhurnal, 56:1004–1014. (In Russian, translated by M. J. Grygier)Google Scholar
Neumayr, M. 1875. Über Kreide Ammonitiden. Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse (Abteil 1), 71:639–693.Google Scholar
Noda, H., Ogasawara, K., and Nomura, R.. 1986. Systematic and paleobiogeographic studies on the Japanese Miocene argonautid ”Nautilus” izumoensis. University of Tsukuba, Institute of Geoscience, Science Reports, Section B, Geological Sciences, 7:15–42, pls. 5–12.Google Scholar
Norman, M. D. 2000. Cephalopods: A World Guide. ConchBooks, Hackenheim, Germany, 320 p.Google Scholar
Okubo, M. 1975. Miocene cephalopods in the San'in district, west Japan. Shimane University, Memoirs of the Faculty of Literature and Science, Natural Sciences, 8:85–89. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
Okutani, T., and Kawaguchi, T.. 1983. A mass occurrence of Argonauta argo (Cephalopoda: Octopoda) along the coast of Shimane Prefecture, western Japan Sea. Venus, The Japanese Journal of Malacology, 41:281–290.Google Scholar
Owen, R. 1839. On the paper Nautilus (Argonauta argo). Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London for 1839, Pt. 7, p. 35–48.Google Scholar
Paulcke, W. 1907. Die Cephalopoden der overn Kreide Süpatagoniens. Berichte der Naturforschenden Gesellshaft zu Freiburg im Breisgau, 15(1906):167–248, figs. 1–30, pls. 10–19.Google Scholar
Power, J. 1856. Observations physiques sur la Poulpe de l'Argonauta argo, commencées en 1832 et terminés en 1843, &c. Charles le Mourges Frères, Paris, 30 p.Google Scholar
Rafinesque, C. S. 1814. Classe Malacosia—Le Mollusques, p. 28–30. In Précis des découvertes et travaux somiologiques de Mr. C. S. Rafinesque-Schmaltz, entre 1800 et 1814. Ou Choix raisonné de ses principales découvertes en Zoologie et en Botanique, pour servir d'introduction à ses ouvrages futures. Royal Typographie militaire, aux dépens de l'auteur, Palermo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rang, C. P. S. A. L. 1829. Manuel de l'histoire naturelle des mollusques et de leurs coquilles, ayant pour base de classification celle de M. le Baron Cuvier. Roret, Paris, iv + 390 p., 8 pls.Google Scholar
Rang, P. K. S. L. 1837. Documents pour servir à l'histoire naturelle des Céphalopodes cryptobranches. Guerin's Magazin de Zoologie, Mollusques, classe V, 7:1–77.Google Scholar
Revelle, R., and Fairbridge, R.. 1957. Carbonates and carbon dioxide, p. 239–295. In Hedgepeth, J. W. (ed.), Treatise on Marine Ecology and Paleoecology. Geological Society of America Memoir, 67, Vol. 1, Ecology.Google Scholar
Reyment, R. A. 1958. Some factors in the distribution of fossil cephalopods. University of Stockholm, Stockholm Contributions in Geology, 1:97–184.Google Scholar
Reyment, R. A. 1973. Factors in the distribution of fossil cephalopods, Pt. 3: Experiments with exact models of certain shell types. Uppsala Universitet, Geological Institutions Bulletin, n. s., 4:7–41.Google Scholar
Riccardi, A. C. 1983. Scaphitids from the Upper Campanian–Lower Maastrichtian Bearpaw Formation of the western interior of Canada. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin, 354:1–102, figs. 1–62, pls. 1–26.Google Scholar
Stadum, C. J., and Saul, L. R.. 2000. Argonauts of the late Miocene, Los Angeles Basin, southern California. Western Society of Malacologists Annual Report for 1999, 32:47–50.Google Scholar
Steenstrup, J. 1859. Prof. Stp. gav en meddelelse om to nye Cephalopodslaegten Bolitaina og Haliphron. Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra den Naturhistoriske Forening i Kjøbenhavn, 1858:180–183.Google Scholar
Steinmann, G. 1888. Vorlaufige Mittheilung uber die Organisation der Ammoniten. Berichte der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft zu Freiburg im Breisgau, 4:113–129.Google Scholar
Tomida, S. 1983. Two new fossil Argonauta and firstly discovered Aturia coxi Miller from the late Tertiary of Boso Peninsula, Japan. Muzunamishi Fossil Museum Bulletin, 10:107–116, pls. 32–36.Google Scholar
Trego, K. D. 1993. Questionable species in the cephalopod genus Argonauta. The Veliger, 36:298, 1 fig.Google Scholar
Tryon, G. W. 1879. Manual of Conchology: Structural and Systematic, 1: Cephalopoda. Author, Philadelphia, 316 p.Google Scholar
Vecchione, M., Young, R. E., Donovan, D. T., and Rodhouse, P. G.. 1999. Reevaluation of coleoid cephalopod relationships based on modified arms in the Jurassic coleoid Mastigophora. Lethaia, 32:113–118.Google Scholar
Verrill, A. E. 1880. Notice of the remarkable marine fauna occupying the Outer Banks off the southern coast of New England. American Journal of Science, 20(41):390–403.Google Scholar
Verrill, A. E. 1881. The cephalopods of the north-eastern coast of America, Pt. II: The smaller cephalopods, including the “Squids” and the Octopi, with other allied forms. Connecticut Academy of Sciences Transactions, 5:259–446.Google Scholar
Yokoyama, M. 1913. On two new fossil Cephalopoda from the Tertiary of Izumo. Geological Society of Tokyo Journal, 20(243):1–3, pls. 1, 2.Google Scholar
Young, J. Z. 1959. Observations on Argonauta and especially its method of feeding. Zoological Society of London Proceedings, 133:471–479.Google Scholar
Zinsmeister, W. J. 1998. Discovery of fish mortality horizon at the K/T Boundary on Seymour Island: Re-evaluation of events at the end of the Cretaceous. Journal of Paleontology, 72:556–571.Google Scholar
Zittel, K. A. von. 1884. Cephalopoda, p. 329–522. In von Zittell, K. A. (ed.), Handbuch der Palaeontologie, Band 1, Abteil 2, Lief 3. Oldenbourg, Munich.Google Scholar