No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Heronallenella boltovskoyi and Planulinoides srinivasani, new species of benthic foraminifera from the Indian Ocean
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 May 2016
Extract
Two new species of benthic foraminifera, Heronallenella boltovskoyi and Planulinoides srinivasani, are present at four Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) sites in the tropical Indian Ocean (Table 1 and Figure 1). Both species are rare, each constituting less than 1 percent of the assemblage (> 149 μm size fraction) in which it occurs. The former, belonging to a new genus, occurs in Pliocene to Holocene sediments of DSDP sites 219, 237, 238, and 253, whereas the latter is present in the late Pleistocene of sites 237 and 238. The stratigraphic placement of the samples is after Srinivasan and Singh (1989) for site 219 and after Gupta (1987) for sites 237, 238, and 253. The descriptions of the new taxa are given below; the suprageneric classification is taken from Loeblich and Tappan (1987).
- Type
- Taxonomic Notes
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Paleontological Society
References
Boltovskoy, E.
1978. Late Cenozoic benthonic foraminifera of the Ninetyeast Ridge (Indian Ocean). Marine Geology, 26:139–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, W. B., Parker, W. K., and Jones, T. R.
1862. Introduction to the Study of the Foraminifera. Ray Society, London, 319 p.Google Scholar
Chapman, F., and Parr, W. J.
1931. Notes on new and aberrant species of foraminifera. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, new series, 43:236–240.Google Scholar
Delage, Y., and Hérouard, E.
1896. Traité de Zoologie Concrète, Volume 1, La Cellule et les Protozoaires. Schleicher Frères, Paris, 584 p.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. K.
1987. Neogene deep water benthic foraminifera from the Northern Indian Ocean DSDP sites (Leg 22). Unpubl. , , Varanasi, 360 p.Google Scholar
Loeblich, A. R., and Tappan, H.
1964. Sarcodina, chiefly “Thecamoebians” and Foraminiferida, p. C1–C900. In
Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part C, Protista 2. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Loeblich, A. R., and Tappan, H.
1986. Some new and revised genera and families of hyaline calcareous Foraminiferida (Protozoa). Transactions of the American Microscopical Society, 105:239–265.Google Scholar
Loeblich, A. R., and Tappan, H.
1987. Foraminiferal Genera and their Classification. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, 2 vols., 970 p. + 847 pls.Google Scholar
Parker, W. K., and Jones, T. R.
1865. On some foraminifera from the North Atlantic and Arctic Oceans, including Davis Straits and Baffin's Bay. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 155:325–441.Google Scholar
Parr, W. J.
1941. A new genus, Planulinoides, and some species of foraminifera from South Australia. Mining and Geological Journal, 2:305.Google Scholar
Saidova, Kh. M.
1981. O sovremennom sostoyanii sistemy nadvidovykh taksonov Kaynozoyskikh bentonsnykh foraminifer. Insitut Okeanologii P. P. Shirshova, Akademiya Nauk S.S.S.R., Moscow, 73 p.Google Scholar
Sigal, J.
1952. Ordre des Foraminifèra, p. 133–301. In
Piveteau, J. (ed.), Traité de Paléontologie, Volume 1. Masson, Paris.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, M. S., and Singh, A. D.
1989. Neogene planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy and paleoceanography of DSDP Site 219 (Chagos-Laccadive Ridge), northern Indian Ocean. Unpubl. paper, XIII Indian Colloquium on Micropaleontology and Stratigraphy, January 23–25, 1989, Lucknow, India.Google Scholar