Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T18:33:07.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of two sequential Pacific hurricanes on sub-rubble cryptic corals: the possible role of cryptic organisms in maintenance of coral reef communities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

David R. Kobluk  and
Mary A. Lysenko
David R. Kobluk
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, J. Tuzo Wilson Research Laboratories, Erindale Campus, University of Toronto, Mississauga, Ontario L5L 1C6, Canada
Mary A. Lysenko
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, J. Tuzo Wilson Research Laboratories, Erindale Campus, University of Toronto, Mississauga, Ontario L5L 1C6, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The hermatypic scleractinian cryptic coral biota living under mobile rubble in the reef flat and back reef zones of a Fijian fringing reef was surveyed in detail in August of 1984; only 138 days later the reef was struck by the first of two sequential hurricanes (57 days apart). The same sample areas were re-studied in August 1985, thereby providing the first detailed census of pre- and post-hurricane cryptic reef coral populations, and allowing an assessment of hurricane impact on these populations.

The 61 cryptic species (60 corals and Millepora) show 88 percent commonality with the intertidal and shallow subtidal reef surface coral population (68 species), and therefore are a good representation of the surface biota.

A major effect of the hurricanes was a reduction of almost 50 percent in the number of boulders sheltering cryptic coral. However, among boulders that retained coral through the storms, there was only a 5 percent reduction in the mean number of corals per boulder, signifying that damage to the surviving population was minor. The composition of the surviving cryptic coral population is essentially unchanged from its pre-hurricane state (there are differences in absolute abundances), and the relative importance of the species does not show marked change in most cases. Coral morphologies show little change in their absolute and relative percent abundances after the hurricanes. In contrast to what is normally seen in reef surface habitats, therefore, coral colony form did not appear to be an important determinant in survivability for those living under boulders; primary selection by the storms seems to have been on boulder form rather than cryptic coral form.

Cryptic sub-rubble coral populations may function as a preserve for elements of the pre-hurricane reef surface community. For example, delicately-branching forms that are commonly devastated in reef surface habitats during hurricanes may, in some cases, be preserved in great numbers under boulders or in other cryptic habitats. This provides a “recruitment pool” that can greatly accelerate their recovery and re-establishment on the post-hurricane reef surface, and dampen the potentially severe community dislocations arising from intense competition for space in “instantaneous” new reef substrate.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 61 , Issue 4 , July 1987 , pp. 663 - 675
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baines, G. B. K., and McLean, R. F. 1976. Sequential studies of hurricane deposit evolution at Funafuti Atoll. Marine Geology, 21:M1–M8.Google Scholar
Ball, M. H., Shinn, E. A., and Stockman, K. W. 1967. The geologic effects of Hurricane Donna in south Florida. Journal of Geology, 75:583–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, J. 1980. The Recovery Process in Damaged Ecosystems. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 167 p.Google Scholar
Choi, D. R., and Ginsburg, R. N. 1983. Distribution of coelobites (cavity-dwellers) in coral rubble across the Florida reef tract. Coral Reefs, 2:165–172.Google Scholar
Dinesen, Z. D. 1982. Regional variation in shade-dwelling coral assemblages of the Great Barrier Reef Province. Marine Ecology Progress series, 7:117–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinesen, Z. D. 1983. Shade-dwelling corals of the Great Barrier Reef. Marine Ecology Progress series, 10:173–185.Google Scholar
Goreau, T. F. 1959. The coral reefs of Jamaica. 1. Species composition and zonation. Ecology, 40:67–90.Google Scholar
Hartman, W. D., and Goreau, T. F. 1970. Jamaican coralline sponges: their morphology, ecology, and fossil relatives. Symposium of the Zoological Society of London, 25:205–243.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. B. C. 1977. Competition on marine hard substrata: the adaptive significance of solitary and colonial strategies. American Naturalist, 111:743–767.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. B. C., and Winston, J. E. 1982. Ecology of cryptic coral reef communities. 1. Distribution and abundance of major groups of encrusting organisms. Journal of Experimental Marine Ecology, 57:135–147.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. B. C., Goreau, T. F., and Hartman, W. D. 1971. Recent brachiopod-coralline sponge communities and their paleoecological significance. Science, 173:623–625.Google Scholar
Jaubert, J. V., and Vasseur, P. 1974. Light measurements: duration aspect and the distribution of benthic organisms in an Indian Ocean coral reef (Tulear, Madagascar). Proceedings of the Second International Coral Reef Symposium, Brisbane, 2:127–142.Google Scholar
Kobluk, D. R., and Lysenko, M. A. 1984. Carbonate rocks and coral reefs, Bonaire, Netherlands Antilles. Guidebook, Fieldtrip No. 13, Geological Association of Canada and Mineralogical Association of Canada Annual Meeting, London, Ontario, 67 p.Google Scholar
Logan, A. 1981. Sessile invertebrate coelobite communities from shallow reef tunnels, Grand Cayman, B.W.I. Proceedings of the Fourth International Coral Reef Symposium, Manila, 2:735–744.Google Scholar
Logan, A., Mathers, S. M., and Thomas, M. L. H. 1984. Sessile invertebrate coelobite communities from reefs of Bermuda: species composition and distribution. Coral Reefs, 2:205–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKee, E. D. 1959. Storm sediments on a Pacific Atoll. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 29:354–364.Google Scholar
McLean, R. F. 1974. Morphology of hurricane banks at Funafuti Atoll, Ellice Islands, p. 269–277. In Proceedings of the International Geographical Union Regional Conference and 8th New Zealand Geographical Conference.Google Scholar
Stephenson, W., Endean, R., and Bennett, I. 1958. An ecological survey of the marine fauna of Low Isles, Queensland. Australian Journal of Freshwater Research, 9:261–318.Google Scholar
Stoddart, D. R. 1962. A short account on catastrophic storm effects on the British Honduras reefs and cays. Nature, 196:512–515.Google Scholar
Vasseur, P. 1974. The overhangs, tunnels and dark reef galleries of Tulear (Madagascar) and their sessile invertebrate communities. Proceedings of the Second International Coral Reef Symposium, 2:143–159.Google Scholar
Vasseur, P. 1977. Cryptic sessile communities in various coral formations on reef flats in the vicinity of Tulear (Madagascar). Proceedings of the Third International Coral Reef Symposium, Miami, 1:95–100.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. A. 1985. Disturbance and ecologic succession in an Upper Ordovician cobble-dwelling hardground fauna. Science, 228:575–577.Google Scholar
Woodley, J. D., et al. 1981. Hurricane Allen's impact on Jamaican coral reefs. Science, 214:749–755.Google Scholar