Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T14:42:46.752Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Late Paleozoic evolution of the Caenogastropoda: Larval shell morphology and implications for the Permian/Triassic mass extinction event

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Alexander Nützel  and
Pan Hua-Zhang
Alexander Nützel
Affiliation:
Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Institut für Paläontologie, Loewenichstr. 28, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany,
Pan Hua-Zhang
Affiliation:
Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Academia Sinica, Nanjing, People's Republic of China 210008
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Representatives of several genera of late Paleozoic Caenogastropoda have been studied based on exceptionally well-preserved material from the latest Permian of south China, the Pennsylvanian of the United States, and the Early Carboniferous of Australia. This material has well-preserved protoconchs which are relatively rare in Paleozoic gastropods. The morphology of the protoconch and especially that of planktotrophic larval shells gives crucial taxonomic and phylogenetic information. It helps to recognize convergence, which is common in Gastropoda. The larval shell morphology of the following taxa is discussed and illustrated: Platyzona (Goniasmatidae), Erwinispira n. gen. (Erwinispirinae n. subfam.), Propupaspira (Propupaspiridae), Soleniscus (Soleniscidae), Meekospiridae, and Chlorozyga (Imoglobidae). The new species Meekospira? solenisiciforma is described. The main diagnostic feature of the order Procaenogastropoda, a fluent protoconch/teleoconch transition, probably represents a preservational artifact. An abrupt transition indicating metamorphosis can be shown for several genera which have been assigned to the Procaenogastropoda. Therefore, the monophyly of the Procaenogastropoda is questioned, and the taxon is refuted. While the caenogastropods of latest Permian gastropod faunas are dominated by typical late Paleozoic genera and families, the Early Triassic is characterized by an almost complete faunal turnover of caenogastropod genera.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 79 , Issue 6 , November 2005 , pp. 1175 - 1188
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, A. 1861. On some new genera and species of Mollusca from the north of China and Japan. Annals and Magazine of the of Natural History, series 3, 8:239–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archiac D', E. J. A., and De Verneuil, E. P. 1841. Note sur le genre Murchisonia. Bulletin de la Société géologique de France, 12:154–160.Google Scholar
Bandel, K. 1982. Morphologie und Bildung der frühontogenetischen Gehäuse bei conchiferen Mollusken. Facies, 7:1–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandel, K. 2002. Reevaluation and classification of Carboniferous and Permian Gastropoda belonging to the Caenogastropoda and their relation. Mitteilungen aus dem Geologisch-Paläontologischen Institut der Universität Hamburg, 86:81–188.Google Scholar
Bandel, K., Nützel, A., and Yancey, T. E. 2002. Larval shells and shell microstructures of exceptionally well-preserved Late Carboniferous gastropods from the Buckhorn Asphalt deposit (Oklahoma, USA). Senckenbergiana Letheae, 82:639–690.Google Scholar
Batten, R. L. 1972. Permian gastropods and chitons from Perak, Malaysia, Pt. 2, Chitons, bellerophontids, euomphalids and pleurotomarians. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 147:1–44.Google Scholar
Batten, R. L. 1985. Permian gastropods from Perak, Malaysia, Pt. 3, The murchisoniids, cerithiids, loxonematids, and subulitids. American Museum Novitates, 2829:1–40.Google Scholar
Batten, R. L., and Stokes, W. L. 1986. Early Triassic gastropods from the Sinbad Member of the Moenkopi Formation, San Rafael Swell, Utah. American Museum Novitates, 2864:1–33.Google Scholar
Bouchet, P., and Rocroi, J.-P. (eds.). 2005. A nomenclator and classification of gastropod family-group names. With classification by J. Frýda, B. Hausdorf, W. Ponder, A. Valdes and A. Warén. Malacologia, 47(1–2):1–368.Google Scholar
Bouchet, P., and Warén, A. 1986. Revision of the northeast Atlantic bathyal and abyssal Aclididae, Eulimidae, Epitonidae (Mollusca, Gastropoda). Bollettino Malacologico Supplemento, 2:300–576.Google Scholar
Cox, L. R. 1960. Gastropoda. General characteristics of Gastropoda. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Pt. I. Mollusca, 1:I85–I169. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Defrance, J. L. M. 1826. Conchyliologie et Malacologie, p. 1–36. In Levrault, F. G. (ed.), Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles, 10. Normant, Paris.Google Scholar
Donald, J. 1889. Descriptions of new species of Carboniferous gastropods. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 45:619–625.Google Scholar
Frýda, J. 1999. Higher classification of Paleozoic gastropods inferred from their early shell ontogeny. Journal of the Czech Geological Society, 44:137–154.Google Scholar
Frýda, J. 2001. Discovery of a larval shell in Middle Paleozoic subulitoidean gastropods with description of two new species from the early Devonian of Bohemia. Bulletin of the Czech Geological Survey, 76:29–38.Google Scholar
Frýda, J., and Bandel, K. 1997. New Early Devonian gastropods from the Plectonotus (Boucotonotus)–Palaeozygopleura community in the Prague Basin (Bohemia). Mitteilungen aus dem Geologisch-Paläontologischen Institut der Universität Hamburg, 80:1–57.Google Scholar
Frýda, J., and Blodgett, R. B. 2004. New Emisian (late Early Devonian) gastropods from Limestone Mountain, Medfra B-4 Quadrangle, west-central Alaska (Farewell terrane), and their palaeobiogeographic affinities and evolutionary significance. Journal of Paleontology, 78:111–132.Google Scholar
Frýda, J., and Manda, S. 1997. A gastropod faunule from the Monograptus uniformis graptolite biozone (Early Lochkovian, Early Devonian) in Bohemia. Mitteilungen aus dem Geologisch-Paläontologischen Institut der Universität Hamburg, 80:59–121.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1858. Description of new species of fossils from the Carboniferous Limestones of Indiana and Illinois. Transactions of the Albany Institute, 4:1–37.Google Scholar
Horný, R. 1992. New Lower Devonian Gastropoda and Tergomya (Mollusca) of Bohemia. Casopis Národního Muzea, 159:99–110.Google Scholar
Houbrick, R. S. 1992. Monograph of the Genus Cerithium Bruguière in the Indo-Pacific (Cerithiidae: Prosobranchia). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 510:1–211.Google Scholar
Houbrick, R. S. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships and generic review of the Bittiinae (Prosobranchia: Cerithioidea). Malacologia, 35:261–313.Google Scholar
Knight, J. B. 1930. The gastropods of the St. Louis, Missouri, Pennsylvanian outlier: The Pseudozygopleurinae. Journal of Paleontology, 4:1–89.Google Scholar
Knight, J. B. 1931. The gastropods of the St. Louis, Missouri, Pennsylvanian outlier: The Subulitidae. Journal of Paleontology, 5:177–229.Google Scholar
Knight, J. B. 1936. Notes on Paleozoic Gastropoda. Journal of Paleontology, 10:1–15.Google Scholar
Knight, J. B. 1941. Paleozoic gastropod genotypes. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 32, 510 p.Google Scholar
Knight, J. B. 1945. Some new genera of Paleozoic Gastropoda. Journal of Paleontology, 19:573–587.Google Scholar
Knight, J. B. 1956. New families of Gastropoda. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 46:41–42.Google Scholar
Knight, J. B., Cox, L. R., Keen, A. M., Batten, R. L., Yochelson, E. L., and Robertson, R., 1960. Systematic descriptions. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Pt. I. Mollusca 1:I169–I310. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Koninck, L. G. de. 1881. Faune du calcaire carbonifère de la Belgique, 3e partie, Gastéropodes. Annales du Musée Royal d'Histoire Naturelle de Belgique, serie Paleontologie, 6:1–170.Google Scholar
Koken, E. 1889. Ueber die Entwicklung der Gastropoden vom Cambrium bis zur Trias. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie, 6:440–463.Google Scholar
Koken, E. 1896. Die Gastropoden der Trias um Hallstatt. Jahrbuch der kaiserlich-königlichen geologischen Reichsanstalt, 46:37–126.Google Scholar
Kues, B. S., and Batten, R. L. 2001. Middle Pennsylvanian gastropods from the Flechado Formation, north-central New Mexico. Journal of Paleontology, 75, Supplement to 1:1–95.Google Scholar
Laseron, C. F. 1956. The families Rissonoidae and Rissoidae (Mollusca) from the Solanderian and Dampierian zoogeographical provinces. Australian Journal of Marine & Freshwater Research, 7:384–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, D. R., and Ponder, W. F. 2001. The influence of classification on the evolutionary interpretation of structure–a re-evaluation of the evolution of the pallial cavity. Organisms, Diversity and Evolution, 1:273–299.Google Scholar
Mazaev, A. V. 2002. Some murchisoniid gastropods from the Middle and Upper Carboniferous part of Russian Plate. Ruthenica, 12:89–106.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Worthen, A. H. 1861. Descriptions of new Carboniferous fossils from Illinois and other western states. Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of Philadelphia, 1860:447–472.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Worthen, A. H. 1862. Descriptions of new Palaeozoic fossils from Illinois and Iowa. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 13:128–148.Google Scholar
Münster, G. V. 1841. Pages 25–152. In Wissmann, H. L., v. Münister, G., and Braun, K. F., Beiträge zur Geognosie und Petrefacten-Kunde des Südöstlichen Tirols vorzüglich der Schichten von St. Cassian, Heft 4. Buchner, Bayreuth.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D., Chronic, J., and Roberts, T. G. 1949 (1953). Upper Palaeozoic of Peru. The Geological Society of America Memoir, 58:1–276.Google Scholar
Nützel, A. 1998. Über die Stammesgeschichte der Ptenoglossa (Gastropoda). Berliner Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, Reihe E, 26:1–229.Google Scholar
Nützel, A., and Bandel, K. 2000. Goniasmidae and Orthonemidae: Two new families of the Palaeozoic Caenogastropoda (Mollusca, Gastropoda). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 9:557–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nützel, A., and Cook, A. G. 2002. Chlorozyga, a new caenogastropod genus from the Early Carboniferous of Australia. Alcheringa, 26:151–157.Google Scholar
Nützel, A., and Erwin, D. H. 2002. Battenizyga, a new early Triassic gastropod genus with a discussion on the gastropod evolution at the Permian/Triassic boundary. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 76:21–26.Google Scholar
Nützel, A., and Mapes, R. H. 2001. Larval and juvenile gastropods from a Mississippian black shale: Paleoecology, and implications for the evolution of the Gastropoda. Lethaia, 34:143–162.Google Scholar
Nützel, A., Erwin, D. H., and Mapes, R. H. 2000. Identity and phylogeny of the late Paleozoic Subulitoidea (Gastropoda). Journal of Paleontology, 74:575–598.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nützel, A., Hua-Zhang, Pan, and Erwin, D. H. 2002. New taxa and some taxonomic changes of a latest Permian gastropod fauna from South China. Documenta Naturae, 145:1–10.Google Scholar
Pan, H.-Z., and Erwin, D. H. 1994. Gastropod diversity patterns in South China during the Chihsia–Ladinian and their mass extinction, p. 249–262. In Yugan, Jin, Utting, J., and Warlaw, B. R. (eds.), Permian Stratigraphy, Environments and Resources. Volume 1. Palaeontology and Stratigraphy. Palaeoworld No. 4. Nanjing University Press, Nanjing.Google Scholar
Pan, H.-Z., and Erwin, D. H. 2002. Gastropods from the Permian of Guanxi and Yunnan Provinces, south China. Paleontological Society Memoir 56, Journal of Paleontology, 76, Supplement to No. 1, 49 p.Google Scholar
Ponder, W. F. 1991. The anatomy of Diala, with an assessment of its taxonomic position (Mollusca: Cerithioidea), p. 499–519. In Wells, F. E., Walker, D. I., Kirkmanand, H., and Lethbridge, R. (eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Marine Biological Workshop: The Marine Flora and Fauna of Albany, Western Australia, Perth, 2.Google Scholar
Ponder, W. F. 1994. The anatomy and relationships of Finella and Scaliola (Caenogastropoda: Cerithioidea: Scaliolidae). The Malacofauna of Hong Kong and Southern China, 3:215–239.Google Scholar
Ponder, W. F., and de Keyzer, R. 1992. A revision of the genus Diala (Gastropoda: Cerithioidea: Dialidae). Invertebrate Taxonomy, 6:1019–1075.Google Scholar
Ponder, W. F., and Lindberg, D. R. 1997. Towards a phylogeny of gastropod molluscs: An analysis using morphological characters. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 119:83–265.Google Scholar
Sasaki, T. 1998. Comparative anatomy and phylogeny of the Recent Archaeogastropoda. The University Museum, The University of Tokyo Bulletin, 38:1–223.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 2002. A compendium of fossil marine animal genera, p. 1–563. In Jablonski, D. and Foote, M. (eds.), Bulletins of American Paleontology, 363.Google Scholar
Stevens, R. P. 1858. Description of new Carboniferous fossils from the Appalachian, Illinois, and Michigan coal fields. American Journal of Science, 25:258–265.Google Scholar
Strand, E. 1928. Miscellanea nomenclatorica zoological et palaeontologica I-II. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, 92A:30–75.Google Scholar
Thein, M. L., and Nitecki, M. H. 1974. Chesterian (Upper Mississippian) Gastropoda of the Illinois basin. Fieldiana, 34:1–238.Google Scholar
Tomlin, J. R., Le, B. 1930. Some preoccupied generic names. II. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 19:22–24.Google Scholar
Tomlin, J. R., Le, B. 1931. Some preoccupied generic names. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 19:174–175.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O., and Scofield, W. H. 1897. The Lower Silurian Gastropoda of Minnesota. Geological and Natural History Survey of Minnesota, 3:813–1081.Google Scholar
Weller, S. 1916. Description of a Ste. Genevieve limestone fauna from Monroe County, Illinois. Chicago University, Walker Museum Contributions, 1:239–265.Google Scholar
Wenz, W. 1938–1944. Gastropoda, Teil I. In Schindewolf, O. H. (ed.), Handbuch der Paläozoologie, 6. Borntraeger, Berlin.Google Scholar
White, C. A. 1881. Report upon the Carboniferous invertebrate fossils of New Mexico. Report upon United States geographical surveys west of the 100th Meridian [Wheeler Report]. 3 (supplement), appendix, p. 1–38.Google Scholar
Yoo, E. K. 1988. Early Carboniferous Mollusca from Gundy, Upper Hunter, New South Wales. Records of the Australian Museum, 40:233–264.Google Scholar
Yoo, E. K. 1994. Early Carboniferous Gastropoda from the Tamworth Belt, New South Wales, Australia. Records of the Australian Museum, 46:63–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar