Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T14:08:11.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lower Ordovician faunas, stratigraphy, and sea-level history of the middle Beekmantown Group, northeastern New York

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Ed Landing  and
Stephen R. Westrop
Ed Landing
Affiliation:
New York State Museum, State Education Department, Albany, New York 12230,
Stephen R. Westrop
Affiliation:
Oklahoma Museum of Natural History and School of Geology and Geophysics, University of Oklahoma, Norman 73072,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Lower Ordovician middle Beekmantown Group is a very thin carbonate platform succession on the northern New York Promontory that thickens north into the Ottawa aulacogen near Montréal. The Tribes Hill Formation (Rossodus manitouensis Zone) records the earliest Ordovician (late Skullrockian, late early Tremadocian) eustatic high that submerged Laurentia, and produced the lowest Ordovician sequence along the New York Promontory. These dolostones are succeeded in the Beekmantown, New York, area by late Tulean?–Blackhillsian transgressive systems tract quartz arenites of the lower Fort Cassin Formation (Ward Member). The “Fort Ann Formation” (middle Stairsian, upper Tremadocian) of the southern Lake Champlain lowlands (=Theresa Formation sandstones in the Ottawa graben) is absent at Beekmantown, and moderate Stairsian (late Tremadocian) eustatic rise apparently did not inundate the Beekmantown area after Skullrockian–Stairsian boundary interval offlap. Highstand carbonates of the upper Fort Cassin Formation [Sciota Member = “Spellman Formation” and “Ogdensburg Member” of the “Beauharnois Formation” in the Montréal area; designations abandoned] at Beekmantown yield diverse conodonts seemingly characteristic of the Oepikodus communis–Fahraeusodus marathonensis Zone (new). However, associated trilobites, particularly Carolinites tasmanensis (Etheridge, 1919), show a correlation with the upper Trigonocerca typica (trilobite) Zone of the Utah and the overlying Reutterodus andinus (conodont) Zone. This abrupt early Blackhillsian lithofacies change features the appearance of chitinozoans and conodonts known from marginal successions, and records the Laignet Point highstand (new). This highstand is recognized across Laurentia on the west Newfoundland and southern Midcontinent platforms. It is recorded on the east Laurentian continental slope by lower Oepikodus evae Zone dysoxic black mudstone in the Taconian allochthons. Taxonomic re-evaluations include Ulrichodina Branson and Mehl, 1933, with its genotype species U. abnormalis (Branson and Mehl, 1933) emend., as the senior synonym of Colaptoconus Kennedy, 1994; Eucharodus Kennedy, 1980; and Glyptoconus Kennedy, 1980. Paraserratognathus An in An et al., 1983, emend. is the senior synonym of Wandelia Smith, 1991 and Stultodontus Ji and Barnes, 1994. Tropodus Kennedy, 1980 is the senior synonym of Chionoconus Smith, 1991. The trilobite fauna of the Sciota Member includes species of Isoteloides, Benthamaspis, Acidiphorus and Carolinites, of which I. fisheri is new.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 80 , Issue 5 , September 2006 , pp. 958 - 980
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adrain, J. M., Lee, D. C., Westrop, S. R., Chatterton, B. D. E., and Landing, E. 2003. Classification of the trilobite subfamilies Hystricurinae and Hintzecurinae subfam. nov., with new genera from the Lower Ordovician (Ibexian) of Idaho and Utah. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 41:55–105.Google Scholar
An, T. X., Fang, Zhang, Weida, Xiang, Yongqui, Zhang, Wenhao, Xu, Huijuan, Zhang, Debiao, Jiang, Changsheng, Yang, Liandi, Lin, Zhangtang, Cui, and Xinchan, Yang. 1983. The Conodonts of North China and the Adjacent Regions. Science Press, Beijing, 223 p. (In Chinese with English summary).Google Scholar
Angelin, N. P. 1851. Palaeontologia Scandinavica. Pars 1. Crustacea Formationis Transitionis. Fasc. 1. 24 p.Google Scholar
Bagnoli, G., Stouge, S., and Tongiorgi, M. 1988. Acritarchs and conodonts from the Cambro–Ordovician Furuhäll (Köpingsklint) section (Öland, Sweden). Bolletino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 25:145–158.Google Scholar
Barnes, C. R. 1984. Early Ordovician eustatic events in Canada, p. 51–64. In Bruton, D. L. (ed.), Aspects of the Ordovician System. Palaeontological Contributions of the University of Oslo, 295, 780 p.Google Scholar
Bernstein, L. 1992. A revised lithostratigraphy of the Lower-Middle Ordovician Beekmantown Group, St. Lawrence lowlands, Quebec and Ontario. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 29:2677–2694.Google Scholar
Billings, E. 1865. Palaeozoic fossils, containing descriptions and figures of new or little known species of organic remains from the Silurian rocks. The Canadian Naturalist, 1:169–394.Google Scholar
Bockelie, T. G. 1980. Early Ordovician Chitinozoa from Spitsbergen. Palynology, 4:1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyce, W. D. 1989. Early Ordovician trilobite faunas of the Boat Harbour and Catoche formations (St. George Group) in the Boat Harbour-Cape Norman area, Great Northern Peninsula, western Newfoundland. Newfoundland Department of Mines and Energy, Geological Survey Branch Report, 89–3, 169 p.Google Scholar
Boyce, W. D., and Stouge, S. 1997. Trilobite and conodont biostratigraphy of the St. George Group, Eddies Cove West area, western Newfoundland. Newfoundland Department of Mines and Energy, Geological Survey Report, 97–1:183–200.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, L. E. 1969. Conodonts from the Fort Peña Formation (Middle Ordovician), Marathon Basin, Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 43:1137–1169.Google Scholar
Brainerd, E., and Seely, H. M. 1890. The Calciferous Formation in the Champlain valley. American Museum of Natural History Bulletin, 3:1–23.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, L. F. 1976. Graptolites of the Lower Ordovician Pogonip Group (Lower Ordovician) of western Utah. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 166, 106 p.Google Scholar
Brand, U., and Rust, B. R. 1977. The age and upper boundary of the Nipean Formation in its type area near Ottawa, Ontario. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 14:2002–2006.Google Scholar
Branson, E. B., and Mehl, M. G. 1933. Conodonts from the Jefferson City (Lower Ordovician) of Missouri. University of Missouri Studies, 8:53–64.Google Scholar
Brett, K. D., and Westrop, S. R. 1996. Trilobites of the Lower Ordovician (Ibexian) Fort Cassin Formation, Champlain valley region, New York State and Vermont. Journal of Paleontology, 70:408–427.Google Scholar
Burmeister, H. 1843. Die Organization der Trilobiten aus Ihren Lebenden Verwandten Entwickelt; Nebst einer Systematichen Uebersicht Aller Zeither Beschriebenen Arten. Reimer, Berlin, 147 p.Google Scholar
Chadwick, G. H. 1919. The Paleozoic rocks of the Canton quadrangle. New York State Museum Bulletin, 217–218, 238 p.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. M., and Schuchert, C. 1899. The nomenclature of the New York series of geological formations. Science, 10 (n. s.):876,877.Google Scholar
Cleland, H. F. 1900. The Calciferous in the Mohawk valley. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 3:1–26.Google Scholar
Dean, W. T. 1989. Trilobites from the Survey Peak, Outram and Skoki formations (Upper Cambrian–Lower Ordovician) at Wilcox Pass, Jasper National Park, Alberta. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin, 389, 123 p.Google Scholar
Decker, C. E. 1936. Some tentative correlations on the basis of graptolites of Oklahoma and Arkansas. Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 29:301–311.Google Scholar
Decker, C. E. 1939. Progress report on the classification of the Timbered Hills and Arbuckle groups of rocks, Arbuckle and Wichita mountains, Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey Circular, 22, 62 p.Google Scholar
Desbiens, S., Bolton, T. E., and McCracken, A. D. 1996. Fauna of the lower Beauharnois Formation (Beekmantown Group, Lower Ordovician), Grand-Île, Quebec. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 33:1132–1153.Google Scholar
Dzik, J. 1976. Notes on the evolution of Ordovician conodonts. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 21:395–455.Google Scholar
Eichenberg, W. 1930. Conodonten aus dem Culm des Harzes. Paläontologisches Zeitschrift, 12:177–182.Google Scholar
Epstein, A. G., Epstein, J. B., and Harris, L. D. 1977. Conodont color alteration—an index to organic metamorphism. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 995, 27 p.Google Scholar
Etheridge, R. 1919. The Cambrian trilobites of Australia and Tasmania. Transactions of the Royal Society of Australia, 43:373–393.Google Scholar
Ethington, R. L. 1972. Lower Ordovician (Arenigian) conodonts from the Pogonip Group, central Nevada. Geologica et Palaeontologica, 1:17–28.Google Scholar
Ethington, R. L., and Brand, U. 1981. Oneotodus simplex (Furnish) and the genus Oneotodus (Conodonta). Journal of Paleontology, 55:239–247.Google Scholar
Ethington, R. L., and Clark, D. L. 1964. Conodonts from the El Paso Formation (Ordovician) of Texas and Arizona. Journal of Paleontology, 38:685–704.Google Scholar
Ethington, R. L., and Clark, D. L. 1971. Lower Ordovician conodonts in North America, p. 63–82. In Sweet, W. C. and Bergström, S. M. (eds.), Symposium on Conodont Biostratigraphy. Geological Society of America Memoir, 127, 499 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ethington, R. L., and Clark, D. L. 1981. Lower and Middle Ordovician conodonts from the Ibex area, western Millard County, Utah. Brigham Young University Geology Studies, 28, 155 p.Google Scholar
Ethington, R. L., and Repetski, J. E. 1984. Paleobiogeographic distribution of Early Ordovician conodonts in central and western United States. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 196:89–101.Google Scholar
Ethington, R. L., Engel, K. M., and Elliott, K. L. 1987. An abrupt change in conodont faunas in the Lower Ordovician of the Midcontinent Province, p. 111–127. In Aldridge, R. J. (ed.), Palaeobiology of Conodonts. British Micropalaeontological Society Series, 347 p.Google Scholar
Fisher, D. W. 1968. Geology of the Plattsburgh and Rouses Point quadrangles, New York and Vermont. New York State Museum Map and Chart Series, 10, 37 p.Google Scholar
Fisher, D. W. 1984. Bedrock geology of the Glens Falls-Whitehall region, New York. New York State Museum Map and Chart Series, 35, 65 p.Google Scholar
Fisher, D. W., Isachsen, Y. W., and Rickard, L. V. 1970. Geologic Map of New York State, 1970, Adirondack Sheet. New York State Museum Map and Chart Series, No. 15.Google Scholar
Flower, R. H. 1968. Fossils from the Fort Ann Formation. New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Memoir, 22:29–34.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1975. The Ordovician trilobites of Spitsbergen II. Asaphidae, Nileadae, Raphiophoridae and Telephinidae. Norsk Polarinstitutt Skrifter, 162, 207 p.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1979a. Early Ordovician trilobites from the Catoche Formation (St. George Group), western Newfoundland. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin, 321:61–114.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1979b. The Ordovician of Spitsbergen, and its relevance to the base of the Middle Ordovician in North America, p. 33–40. In Skehan, J. W. and Osberg, P. H. (eds.), The Caledonides in the U.S.A. Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1984. Global earlier Ordovician transgressions and regressions and their biological implications, p. 37–63. In Bruton, D. L. (ed.), Aspects of the Ordovician System. Palaeontological Contributions of the University of Oslo, 295.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1985. Pelagic trilobites as an example of deducing the life habits of extinct arthropods. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 76:219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortey, R. A., and Barnes, C. R. 1977. Early Ordovician conodont and trilobite communities of Spitsbergen: Influence on biogeography. Alcheringa, 1:297–309.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A., and Droser, M. L. 1999. Trilobites from the base of the type Whiterockian (Middle Ordovician) in Nevada. Journal of Paleontology, 73:202–218.Google Scholar
Furnish, W. M. 1938. Conodonts from the Prairie du Chien (Lower Ordovician) beds of the upper Mississippi valley. Journal of Paleontology, 12:318–340.Google Scholar
Globensky, Y. 1982a. Géologie de la région de Vaudreuil. Ministère de l'Énergie et des Ressources du Québec. Rapport Géologique, 199, 120 p.Google Scholar
Globensky, Y. 1982b. Géologie de la région de Lachute. Ministère de l'Énergie et des Ressources du Québec. MM85–02, 43 p.Google Scholar
Graves, R. W., and Ellison, S. P. Jr. 1941. Ordovician conodonts of the Marathon Basin, Texas. University of Missouri School of Mines and Metallurgy Bulletin, technical series, 14:1–26.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1858. Descriptions of Canadian graptolites. Geological Survey of Canada Report for 1857, p. 111–145.Google Scholar
Hintze, L. F. 1953. Lower Ordovician trilobites from western Utah and eastern Nevada. Utah Geological and Mineralogical Survey Bulletin, 48.Google Scholar
Hupé, P. 1953. Classification des trilobites. Annales de géologique du Maroc, 39:61–168.Google Scholar
Jell, P. A., and Stait, B. 1985. Revision of an early Arenig trilobite faunule from the Caroline Creek Sandstone near Latrobe, Tasmania. Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria, 46:35–54.Google Scholar
Ji, Z., and Barnes, C. R. 1994. Lower Ordovician conodonts of the St. George Group, Port au Port Peninsula, western Newfoundland, Canada. Palaeontographica Canadiana, 11, 149 p.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. J. 1980. A restudy of conodonts described by Branson and Mehl, 1933, from the Jefferson City Formation, Lower Ordovician, Missouri. Geologica et Palaeontologica, 14:47–76.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. J. 1994. Colaptoconus (Conodonta), a replacement name for Glyptoconus Kennedy, 1981 [sic, read 1980], non Glyptoconus von Moellendorff, 1894. Journal of Paleontology, 68:1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, I. 1977a. The Cambrian–Ordovician platformal rocks of the Northern Peninsula. Newfoundland Department of Mines and Energy, Mineral Development Division, Report of Activities for 1976, 77–1:27–34.Google Scholar
Knight, I. 1977b. The Cambro–Ordovician platformal rocks of the Northern Peninsula, Newfoundland. Newfoundland Department of Mines and Energy, Mineral Development Division, Report of Activities for 1976, 77–6:1–27.Google Scholar
Knight, I., and James, N. P. 1987. The stratigraphy of the Lower Ordovician St. George Group, western Newfoundland: The interaction between eustasy and tectonics. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 24:1927–1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, T. 1940. Lower Ordovician fossils from Caroline Creek, near Latrobe, Mersey River District, Tasmania. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, 1939:67–76.Google Scholar
Landing, E. 1976. Early Ordovician (Arengian) conodont and graptolite biostratigraphy of the Taconic allochthon, eastern New York. Journal of Paleontology, 50:614–646.Google Scholar
Landing, E. 1988. Cambrian–Ordovician boundary in North America: Revised Tremadocian correlations, unconformities, and “glacioeustasy,” p. 48–58, fig. 1. In Landing, E. (ed.), The Canadian Paleontology and Biostratigraphy Seminar Proceedings. New York State Museum Bulletin, 462, 157 p.Google Scholar
Landing, E. 2002. Early Paleozoic sea levels and climates: New evidence from the east Laurentian shelf and slope, p. C6-1–C6-22. In McLelland, J. and Karabinos, P. (eds.), Guidebook for Fieldtrips in New York and Vermont. New England Intercollegiate Geological Conference 94th Annual Meeting and New York State Geological Association 74th Annual Meeting, Lake George, New York.Google Scholar
Landing, E., and Barnes, C. R. 1981. Conodonts from the Cape Clay Formation (Lower Ordovician), southern Devon Island, Arctic Archipelago. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 18:1609–1628.Google Scholar
Landing, E., and Ludvigsen, R. 1984. Classification and conodont-based age of the Ordovician trilobite Ellsaspis (middle Arenigian, Ville Guay, Quebec). Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 21:1483–1490.Google Scholar
Landing, E., and Yochelson, E. L. 1992. Donald W. Fisher—State Paleontologist 1955–1982, p. 1–4. In Landing, E. (ed.), Studies in Stratigraphy and Paleontology in Honor of Donald W. Fisher. New York State Museum Bulletin, 481.Google Scholar
Landing, E., Barnes, C. R., and Stevens, R. K. 1986. Tempo of earliest Ordovician graptolite faunal succession: Conodont based correlations from the Tremadocian of Quebec. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 23:1928–1949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landing, E., Benus, A. P., and Whitney, P. R. 1992. Early and early Middle Ordovician continental slope deposition: Shale cycles and sandstones in the Quebec Reentrant and New York Promontory region. New York State Museum Bulletin, 474, 40 p.Google Scholar
Landing, E., Westrop, S. R., and Knox, L. A. 1996. Conodonts, stratigraphy, and relative sea-level changes of the Tribes Hill Formation (Lower Ordovician, east-central New York). Journal of Paleontology, 70:656–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landing, E., Westrop, S. R., and Van Aller Hernick, L. 2003. Uppermost Cambrian–Lower Ordovician faunas and Laurentian platform sequence stratigraphy, eastern New York and Vermont. Journal of Paleontology, 77:78–98.Google Scholar
Leggett, J. K. 1978. Eustasy and pelagic regimes in the Iapetus Ocean during the Ordovician and Silurian. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 71:163–169.Google Scholar
Lindström, M. 1954. Conodonts from the lowermost Ordovician strata of south-central Sweden. Geologiska Föringens i Stockholm Förhandlingar, 76:517–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindström, M. 1964. Conodonts. Elsevier, New York, 196 p.Google Scholar
Lindström, M. 1971. Lower Ordovician conodonts from Europe, p. 21–61. In Sweet, W. C. and Bergström, S. M. (eds.), Symposium on conodont biostratigraphy. Geological Society of America Memoir, 127.Google Scholar
Ludvigsen, R., and Westrop, S. R. 1983. Franconian trilobites of New York. New York State Museum Memoir, 23, 83 p.Google Scholar
Marek, L. 1952. Contributions to the stratigraphy and fauna of the uppermost part of the Kraluv Dvur Shales (Ashgillian). Sbornik Ustredniho Ùstavu Geologickeho, 28:1–84.Google Scholar
McCormick, T., and Fortey, R. A. 1999. The most widely distributed trilobite species: Ordovician Carolinites genacinaca . Journal of Paleontology, 73:202–218.Google Scholar
McCormick, T., and Fortey, R. A. 2002. The Ordovician trilobite Carolinites, a test case for microevolution in a macrofossil lineage. Palaeontology, 45:229–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, A. T. 2004. Ordovician sea level changes: A Baltoscandian perspective, p. 84–93. In Webby, B. D., Paris, F., Droser, M. L., and Percival, I. G. (eds.), The Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
North American Commission on Stratigraphic Nomenclature. 1983. North American Stratigraphic Code. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 67:841–875.Google Scholar
Pander, C. H. 1856. Monographie der Fossilen Fische des Silurischen Systems der Russisch-Baltischen Gouvernements. Akademie der Wissenschaften, St. Petersburg, 91 p.Google Scholar
Poulsen, C. 1937. On the Lower Ordovician faunas of East Greenland. Meddelelser om Grønland, 119:1–72.Google Scholar
Poulsen, C. 1946. Notes on Cambro–Ordovician fossils collected by the Oxford University Ellesmere Land Expedition 1934–5. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 102:299–337.Google Scholar
Raymond, P. 1910. Notes on Ordovician trilobites. II Asaphidae from the Beekmantown. Annals of the Carnegie Museum, 7:35–44.Google Scholar
Raymond, P. 1913. Ordovician of Montreal and Ottawa. 12th International Geological Congress, Montréal, Quebec. Guidebook 3, p. 137–162.Google Scholar
Raymond, P. E. 1925. Some trilobites of the lower Middle Ordovician of eastern North America. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 67:1–180.Google Scholar
Repetski, J. E. 1982. Conodonts from the El Paso Group (Lower Ordovician) of westernmost Texas and southern New Mexico. New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Memoir, 40, 121 p.Google Scholar
Ross, C. A., and Ross, J. R. P. 1995. North American Ordovician depositional sequences and correlations, p. 309–313. In Cooper, J. D., Droser, M. L., and Finney, S. C. (eds.), Ordovician Odyssey: Short papers for the Seventh International Symposium on the Ordovician System. Society for Economic Paleontology and Mineralogy, Pacific Section, Fullerton, California.Google Scholar
Ross, R. J. Jr. 1951. Stratigraphy of the Garden City Formation in Northeastern Utah, and Its Trilobite Faunas. Peabody Museum of Natural History Bulletin, 6, 161 p.Google Scholar
Ross, R. J. Jr., Hintze, L. F., Ethington, R. L., Miller, J. F., Taylor, M. E., and Repetski, J. E. 1997. The Ibexian, lowermost series in the North American Ordovician, p. 1–50. In Taylor, M. E. (ed.), Early Paleozoic Biochronology of the Great Basin, western United States. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 1579-A.Google Scholar
Ross, R. J., Jr., and 27 Others. 1982. The Ordovician System in the United States. International Union of Geological Scientists Publication, 12, 73 p.Google Scholar
Salad Hersi, O., Lavoie, D., and Nowlan, G. S. 2003. Reappraisal of the Beekmantown Group sedimentology and stratigraphy, Montréal, southwestern Quebec: Implications for understanding the depositional evolution of the Lower-Middle Ordovician Laurentian passive of eastern Canada. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 40:149–176.Google Scholar
Salad Hersi, O., Lavoie, D., Mohamed, A. H., and Nowlan, G. S. 2002. Subaerial unconformity at the Potsdam–Beekmantown contact in the Quebec Reentrant: Regional significance for the Laurentian continental margin history. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 50:419–440.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, A., and M'coy, F. 1851. A Synopsis of the Classification of the British Palaeozoic Fossils by the Rev. Adam Sedgwick with a Detailed Systematic Description of the British Palaeozoic Fossils by Frederick M'Coy, 1. Cambridge University Press, 184 p.Google Scholar
Serpagli, E. 1974. Lower Ordovician conodonts from Precordilleran Argentina (Province of San Juan). Bolletino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 13:17–98.Google Scholar
Smith, M. P. 1991. Early Ordovician conodonts of East and North Greenland. Meddelelser on Grønland, 26, 81 p.Google Scholar
Stouge, S. 1982. Preliminary conodont biostratigraphy and correlation of Lower to Middle Ordovician carbonates of the St. George Group, Great Northern Peninsula, Newfoundland. Mineral Development Division, Department of Mines and Energy, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador Report, 82–3, 59 p.Google Scholar
Stouge, S., and Bagnoli, G. 1988. Early Ordovician conodonts from Cow Head Peninsula, western Newfoundland. Palaeontographica Italica, 75:89–179.Google Scholar
Twenhofel, W. H., Cloud, P. E. Jr., Cooper, B. N., Cooper, G. A., Cumings, E. R., Cullison, J. S., Dunbar, C. O., Kay, M., Liberty, B. A., McFarlan, A. C., Rodgers, J., Whittington, H. B., Wilson, A. E., and Wilson, C. W. Jr. 1954. Correlation of the Ordovician formations of North America. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 65:247–298.Google Scholar
Van Wamel, W. A. 1974. Conodont biostratigraphy of the Upper Cambrian and Lower Ordovician of north-western Öland, southeastern Sweden. Utrecht Micropaleontological Bulletin, 10, 126 p.Google Scholar
Walch, J. E. I. 1771. Die Naturgeschichte der Versteinerungen, zur Erläuterung der Knorrischen Sammlung von Merkwürdigkeiten der Natur. Dritter Theil, Paul Jonathan Felstecker, Nürnberg, 235 p.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1886. Second contribution to the studies on the Cambrian fauna of North America. Bulletin of the United States Geological Survey, 30:1–369.Google Scholar
Webby, B. D., Cooper, R. A., Bergström, S. M., and Paris, F. 2004. Stratigraphic framework and time slices, p. 41–48. In Webby, B. D., Paris, F., Droser, M. L., and Percival, I. G. (eds.), The Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Westrop, S. R., Knox, L. A., and Landing, E. 1993. Lower Ordovician (Ibexian) trilobites from the Tribes Hill Formation, central Mohawk Valley, New York State. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 30:1618–1633.Google Scholar
Whitfield, R. P. 1886. Notice of geological investigations on the fauna of the rocks at Fort Cassin, Vermont, with descriptions of a few new species. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 1(8):293–343.Google Scholar
Whitfield, R. P. 1889. Observations on some imperfectly known fossils from the Calciferous sandrock of Lake Champlain and description of several new forms. American Museum of Natural History Bulletin, 2:41–63.Google Scholar
Whitfield, R. P. 1897. Descriptions of new species of Silurian fossils from near Fort Cassin and elsewhere on Lake Champlain. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 9(11):177–184.Google Scholar
Williams, H. 1978. Tectonic lithofacies map of the Appalachian orogen. Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Map 1.Google Scholar
Wilmarth, M. G. 1938. Lexicon of geologic names of the United States (including Alaska). U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, 896, 2, 396 p.Google Scholar