Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T10:10:04.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lower Permian Polyplacophora (Mollusca) from Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

R. D. Hoare  and
Nora Sabattini
R. D. Hoare
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio 43403
Nora Sabattini
Affiliation:
Museo de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque s/n, 1900 La Plata, Argentina
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Several polyplacophoran plates are preserved as external molds in the Lower Permian Rio Genoa Formation, Chubut Province, Argentina. These are the first reported Permian polyplacophorans from South America. The new genus and species Asketochiton chubutensis is described based on this material.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 74 , Issue 2 , March 2000 , pp. 189 - 191
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batten, R. L. 1972. Permian gastropods and chitons from Perak, Malaysia. American Museum of Natural History Bulletin, 147:10.Google Scholar
Bergenhayn, J. R. M. 1955. Die fossilen schwedischen Loricaten nebst einer vorlaüfigen Revision des Systems der ganzen Klasse Loricata. Lunds University Årsskrift, new series, (2) 51(8), 41 p.; Kongliga Fysiografiska Sallskapets Handlingar, new series, 66:1-41.Google Scholar
Blainville, H. M. D. de. 1816. Prodrome d'une nouvelle distribution systématique du règne animal. Société Philomathique, Paris, Nouveau Bolletin, p. 105–124.Google Scholar
Cuneo, R., and Sabattini, N. 1987. Flora y fauna de la base de Formaciòn Rio Genoa en la localidad Ferraroti, Pérmico inferior de Chubut, Argentina. IV Congreso Latinoamericano de Paleontologia, Bolivia, 1:283–298.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1882. On the genera of chitons. U.S. National Museum Proceedings, 4:279–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geinitz, H. B. 1861. Dyas oder die Zechsteinformation und das Rothliegende, Volume 1, Die Animalischen Ueberreste der Dyas. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, 130 p.Google Scholar
Girty, G. H. 1908. The Guadalupian fauna. U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper, 58, 651 p.Google Scholar
Gobbott, D. J., and Hutchison, C. S. 1973. Geology of the Malay Peninsula. Wiley and Sons, New York, 438 p.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1847. On the genera of the family Chitonidae. Zoological Society of London Proceedings, p. 63–70.Google Scholar
Hoare, R. D., and Smith, A. G. 1984. Permian Polyplacophora (Mollusca) from West Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 58:82–103.Google Scholar
Howse, R. 1848. A catalogue of the fossils of the Permian System of the counties of Northumberland and Durham, drawn up at the request of the Tyneside Naturalist's Field Club. Transactions of the Tyneside Naturalist's Field Club, 1:219–264.Google Scholar
Howse, R. 1858. Notes on the Permian System of Northumberland and Durham; being a supplement of the catalogue of fossils of the Permian System of these counties. Transactions of the Tyneside Naturalist's Field Club, 3:235–285.Google Scholar
Iredale, T., and Basset Hull, A. F. 1926. A Monograph of the Australian Loricates, VIII, Appendix B, Paleoloricata. Australian Zoology, 4:324–328.Google Scholar
King, W. 1844. The genus Chiton found in the Magnesian Limestone of Durham. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 14:381–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, W. 1846. On a Magnesian-Limestone species of Chiton . Charles-worth's London Journal of Geology, 1:10–12.Google Scholar
King, W. 1848. A Catalogue of the Organic Remains of the Permian Rocks of Northumberland and Durham. William King, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, 16 p.Google Scholar
King, W. 1850. A monograph of the Permian fossils of England. Palaeontographical Society Monograph, 258 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkby, J. W. 1858. On some Permian fossils from Durham. Transactions of the Tyneside Naturalist's Field Club, 3:286–294.Google Scholar
Kirkby, J. W. 1859. On the Permian Chitonidae. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 15:607–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkby, J. W., and Young, J. 1867. Notes on some remains of Chiton and Chitonellus from the Carboniferous strata of Yorkshire and the west of Scotland. Geological Magazine, 4:340–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilsbry, H. A. 1892. Monograph of the Polyplacophora. Manual of Conchology, Volume 14, 350 p.Google Scholar
Plas, L. P. Jr. 1972. Upper Wolfcampian (?) Mollusca from the Arrow Canyon Range, Clark County, Nevada. Journal of Paleontology, 46:249–260.Google Scholar
Smith, A. G. 1976. Two new Permian chitons from West Texas. The Veliger, 18:281–288.Google Scholar
Thiele, J. 1910. Revision des Systems der Chitonen. Zoologica, 22:1–132.Google Scholar
Yochelson, E. L. 1971. The Permian nautiloid mandible Rhynchoteuthis kaibabensis reinterpreted as a polyplacophoran. Journal of Paleontology, 45:130–133.Google Scholar