Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T15:54:28.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Narrow Way - Randall T. Schuh 2000. Biological Systematics: Principles and Applications. Cornell University Press, 256 p.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Mark Wilkinson
Mark Wilkinson*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 76 , Issue 6 , November 2002 , pp. 1113 - 1114
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chalmers, A. F. 1982. What is this Thing Called Science? (second edition). Open University Press, Millton Keynes.Google Scholar
De Queiroz, K., and Poe, S. 2001. Philosophy and phylogenetic inference: a comparison of likelihood and parsimony methods in the context of Karl Popper's writings on corroboration. Systematic Biology, 50:305–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, P. H., and Pagel, M. D. 1991. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Faith, D. P., and Trueman, J. W. H. 2001. Towards an inclusive philosophy for phylogenetic inference. Systematic Biology, 50:331–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farris, J. S., Kluge, A. G., and Carpenter, J. M. 2001. Popper and likelihood Versus “Popper∗”. Systematic Biology, 50:438–444.Google Scholar
Harré, R. 1985. The Philosophies of Science. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Kluge, A. G. 2001. Philosophical conjectures and their refutation. Systematic Biology, 50:322–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lundberg, J. G. 1972. Wagner networks and ancestors. Systematic Zoology, 21:398–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. 1974. Popper's qualitative theory of verisimilitude. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 25:178–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishler, B. D. 1999. Getting rid of species?, p. 307–315. In Wilson, R. (ed.), Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Newton-Smith, W. H. 1981. The Rationality of Science. Routledge & Keegan Paul, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nixon, K. C., and Carpenter, J. M. 1996. On consensus, collapsability and clade concordance. Cladistics, 12:305–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldroyd, D. 1986. The Arch of Knowledge. Methuen & Co., New York and London.Google Scholar
Ridley, M. 1986. Evolution and Classification: The Reformation of Cladism. Longman, London.Google Scholar
Tichy, P. 1974. On Popper's definition of verisimilitude. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 25:155–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, M. 1995. A comparison of two methods of character construction. Cladistics, 11:297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar