Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T17:02:45.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new fossil evaniid wasp from Eocene Baltic amber, with highly modified compound eyes unique within the Hymenoptera

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2017

John T. Jennings ,
David D. O’Carroll ,
Priya ,
Lars Krogmann  and
Andrew D. Austin
John T. Jennings
Affiliation:
Australian Centre for Evolutionary Biology and Biodiversity, and School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia 〈john.jennings@adelaide.edu.au〉; 〈andy.austin@adelaide.edu.au〉; 〈priya@adelaide.edu.au〉
David D. O’Carroll
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Lund, Sölvegatan 35, S-22362 Lund, Sweden 〈david.ocarroll@biol.lu.se〉
Priya
Affiliation:
Australian Centre for Evolutionary Biology and Biodiversity, and School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia 〈john.jennings@adelaide.edu.au〉; 〈andy.austin@adelaide.edu.au〉; 〈priya@adelaide.edu.au〉
Lars Krogmann
Affiliation:
State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Entomology, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany 〈lars.krogmann@smns-bw.de〉
Andrew D. Austin*
Affiliation:
Australian Centre for Evolutionary Biology and Biodiversity, and School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia 〈john.jennings@adelaide.edu.au〉; 〈andy.austin@adelaide.edu.au〉; 〈priya@adelaide.edu.au〉
*
*Corresponding author
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Evaniid wasps develop as solitary egg predators within the oothecae of cockroaches. Fossil evaniids are relatively common compared with most other parasitoid Hymenoptera, undoubtedly due to their searching for host cockroaches on tree trunks and thus an increased chance of being trapped in tree resin. The genus Parevania Kieffer, 1907 is widely distributed through the Old World and is also known from a small number of rather unremarkable fossil taxa. Here we add to this extinct fauna Parevania oculiseparata Jennings, Krogmann, and Austin new species from Baltic Eocene amber, a species that has highly modified compound eyes that are unique among the Hymenoptera, and possibly among insects as a whole. Parevania oculiseparata n. sp. possesses a prominent acute ridge extending across the entire dorso-ventral elongation of the eye surface. Modifications to the regular curved surface of the eyes are extremely rare among Hymenoptera and previously were only known from two species of Inostemma Haliday, 1833 (Platygastridae s. s.) and the three known species of Isomerala Shipp, 1894 (Eucharitidae). In describing this unusual fossil evaniid species, we also analyze the optical consequences of the eye surface discontinuity, and discuss different types of compound eye modifications that occur in other Hymenoptera and other insects.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 92 , Issue 2 , March 2018 , pp. 189 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © 2017, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abe, J., Kamimura, Y., Kondo, N., and Shimada, M., 2003, Extremely female-biased sex ratio and lethal male-male combat in a parasitoid wasp, Melittobia australica (Eulophidae): Behavioral Ecology, v. 14, p. 34–39.Google Scholar
Austin, A.D., 1984, New species of Platygastridae (Hymenoptera) from India which parasitize pests of mango, particularly Procontarinia spp. (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae): Bulletin of Entomological Research, v. 74, p. 549–557.Google Scholar
Bradley, J.C., 1905, Notes on Evaniidae (Hym): Zeitschrift für Systematische Hymenopterologie und Dipterologie, v. 1, p. 26–27.Google Scholar
Bradley, J.C., 1908, The Evaniidae, ensign flies, an archaic family of Hymenoptera: Transactions of the American Entomological Society, v. 34, p. 101–194.Google Scholar
Brues, C.T., 1933, The parasitic Hymenoptera of the Baltic amber, Part 1: Bernstein Forschungen, v. 3, p. 4–178.Google Scholar
Deans, A.R., 2002, Papatuka alamunyiga Deans, a new genus and species of apterous ensign wasp (Hymenoptera: Evaniidae) from Kenya: Zootaxa, v. 95, p. 1–8.Google Scholar
Deans, A.R., 2005, Annotated catalog of the world’s ensign wasp species (Hymenoptera: Evaniidae): Contributions of the American Entomological Institute, v. 34, p. 1–164.Google Scholar
Deans, A.R., and Huben, M., 2003, Annotated key to the ensign wasp (Hymenoptera: Evaniidae) genera of the world, with descriptions of three new genera: Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, v. 105, p. 859–875.Google Scholar
Deans, A.R., Gillespie, J.J., and Yoder, M.J., 2006, An evaluation of ensign wasp classification (Hymenoptera: Evaniidae) based on molecular data and insights from ribosomal RNA secondary structure: Systematic Entomology, v. 31, p. 517–528.Google Scholar
Deans, A.R., Yoder, M.J., and Dole, K., 2013, Evanioidea Online—catalog of information about evanioid wasps (Hymenoptera). [http://evanioidea.info] (Accessed 1 March 2015).Google Scholar
Engel, S.M., Huang., D., Alqarni, A.S., and Cao, C., 2016, A remarkable evanioid wasp in mid-Cretaceous amber from northern Myanmar (Hymenoptera: Evanioidea): Cretaceous Research, v. 60, p. 121–127.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J.C., 1804, Systema Piezatorum: secundum ordines, genera, species, adiectis synonymis, locis, observationibus, descriptionibus: Brunsvigae, Carolum Reichard, 480 p.Google Scholar
Fischer, S., Meyer-Rochow, V.B., and Müller, C.H.G., 2013, Compound eye miniaturization in Lepidoptera: a comparative morphological analysis: Acta Zoologica, v. 95, p. 438–464.Google Scholar
Girault, A.A., 1920, New serphidoid, cynipoid and chalcidoid Hymenoptera: Proceedings of the United States National Museum, v. 58, p. 177–216.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Bellido, P.T., Wardill, T.J., and Juusola, M., 2011, Compound eyes and retinal information processing in miniature dipteran species match their specific ecological demands: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 108, p. 4224–4229.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, D., 1987, Phylogenetics and taxonomy of Zygothrica (Diptera: Drosophilidae): Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 186, p. 103–268.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, D., and Fenster, G., 1989, Evolution of extreme sexual dimorphisms: structural and behavioral convergence among broad-headed male qDrosophilidae (Diptera): American Museum Novitates, v. 2939, p. 1–25.Google Scholar
Halliday, A.H., 1833, An essay on the classification of the parasitic Hymenoptera of Britain, which correspond to the Ichneumones minuti of Linneaus: Entomological Magazine, v. 1, p. 259–276.Google Scholar
Heraty, J M., 2005, A revision of the genus Isomerala (Hymenoptera: Eucharitidae): Acta Societatis Zoologicae Bohemicae, v. 69, p. 137–145.Google Scholar
Horridge, G.A., 1978, The separation of visual axes in apposition compound eyes: Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, v. 285, p. 1–59.Google Scholar
Jennings, J.T., Krogmann, L., and Mew, S.L., 2012, Hyptia deansi sp. nov., the first record of Evaniidae (Hymenoptera) from Mexican amber: Zootaxa, v. 3349, p. 63–68.Google Scholar
Jennings, J.T., Krogmann, L., and Mew, S.L., 2013a, Cretevania bechlyi sp. nov., from Cretaceous Burmese amber (Hymenoptera: Evaniidae): Zootaxa, v. 3609, p. 91–95.Google Scholar
Jennings, J.T., Krogmann, L., and Priya, 2013b, Happy birthday Willi Hennig!—Hyptia hennigi sp. nov. (Hymenoptera: Evaniidae), a fossil ensign wasp from Eocene Baltic amber: Zootaxa, v. 3731, p. 395–398.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J.J., 1903, Zwei neue Hymenopteren (1 Cynipide ind 1 Ichneumonide) und Bemerkungen über einige Evaniiden: Zeitschrift für Systematische Hymenopterologie und Dipterologie, v. 3, p. 110–111.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J J., 1907, Beschreibung neuer im Naturhistorischen Museum zu Hamburg aufbewahrter Proctotrypiden und Evaniiden: Berliner Entomologische Zeitschrift, v. 51, p. 258–278.Google Scholar
Land, M.F., 1981, Optics and vision in invertebrates, in H. Autrum, ed., Handbook of Sensory Physiology, v. Vol. VII/6B: Berlin, Springer, p. 472–592.Google Scholar
Land, M.F., 1985, The morphology and optics of spider eyes, in F.G. Barth, ed., Neurobiology of Arachnids: Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, p. 53–78.Google Scholar
Latreille, P.A., 1802, Histoire Naturelle, Générale et Particulière des Crustacés et des Insectes. Ouvrage faisant suite à l’histoire naturelle générale et particulière, composée par Leclerc de Buffon, et rédigée par C.S. Sonnini, membre de plusiers sociétés savants, Tome troisième: Paris, France, Dufart, 467 p.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C., 1758, Systema Naturae per Regna Tria Naturae: Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, cum Characteribus, Differentiis, Synonymis, Locis, 10th ed., Stockholm, Laurentius Salvius, 824 p.Google Scholar
Nel, A., Waller, A., Hodebert, G., and De Ploëg, G., 2002, An ensign-fly in the lowermost Eocene amber from the Paris basin (Hymenoptera: Evaniidae): Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (N.S.), v. 38, p. 263–269.Google Scholar
O’Hanlon, J.C., and Norma-Rashid, D.Li.Y., 2013, Coloration and morphology of the orchid mantis Hymenopus coronatus (Mantodea: Hymenopodidae): Journal of Orthoptera Research, v. 22, p. 35–44.Google Scholar
Peréz-de la Fuente, R., Peñalver, E., and Ortega-Blanco, J., 2012, A new species of the diverse Cretaceous genus Cretevania Rasnitsyn, 1975 (Hymenoptera: Evaniidae) from Spanish amber: Zootaxa, v. 3514, p. 70–78.Google Scholar
Sawoniewicz, J., and Kupryjanowicz, J., 2003, Evaniella eocenica sp. nov. from the Baltic amber (Hymenoptera: Evaniidae): Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia (Suppl.), v. 46, p. 267–270.Google Scholar
Shipp, J.W., 1894, A new classification of the genus Thoracantha Latreille: The Entomologist, v. 27, p. 188–190.Google Scholar
Stavenga, D.G., 2003, Angular and spectral sensitivity of fly photoreceptors. II. Dependence on facet lens F-number and rhabdomere type in Drosophila : Journal of Comparative Physiology A, v. 189, p. 189–202.Google Scholar
Stein, P., 1903, in Becker, T., Aegyptische Dpiteren (Fortsetzung und Schluss): Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin, v. 2, pt. 3, p. 67–195.Google Scholar
Szwedo, J., and Sontag, E., 2009, The traps of the ‘amber trap’. Amber-trapped insects trap scientists with enigmas: Denisia, zugleich Kataloge der oberösterreichischen Landesmuseen 26, Neue Serie, v. 86, p. 155–169.Google Scholar
van Hateren, J.H., Hardie, R.C., Rudolph, A., Laughlin, S.B., and Stavenga, D.G., 1989, The bright zone, a specialized dorsal eye region in the male blowfly Chrysomyia megacephala : Journal of Comparative Physiology A, v. 164, p. 297–308.Google Scholar
Wheeler, M.R., 1968, Some remarkable new species of Neotropical Drosophilidae: University of Texas Publications, v. 6818, p. 431–442.Google Scholar
Wiedemann, C.R.W., 1830, Achias Dipterorum genus a Fabricio conditum; illustratum novisque speciebus auctum et conventui physicorum germanorum oblatum: Kiliae [=Kiel], C.F. Mohr, p. 1–16.Google Scholar
Wipfler, B., Wieland, F., Decarlo, F., and Hörnschemeyer, T., 2012, Cephalic morphology of Hymenopus coronatus (Insecta: Mantodea) and its phylogenetic implications: Arthropod Structure and Development, v. 41, p. 87–100.Google Scholar
Zeil, J., 1983, Sexual dimorphism in the visual system of flies: The compound eyes and neural superposition in Bibionidae (Diptera): Journal of Comparative Physiology A, v. 150, p. 379–393.Google Scholar