Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T18:32:46.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paleocene decapod Crustacea from the Rancho Nuevo Formation (Parras Basin-Difunta Group), northeastern Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Francisco J. Vega ,
Torrey Nyborg ,
René H. B. Fraaye  and
Belinda Espinosa
Francisco J. Vega
Affiliation:
Institute de Geología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, México, Distrito Federal 04510,
Torrey Nyborg
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Biological Sciences, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California 92350,
René H. B. Fraaye
Affiliation:
Oertijdmuseum de Groene Poort, Bosscheweg 80, NL-5283 WB Boxtel, the Netherlands,
Belinda Espinosa
Affiliation:
Benemérita Escuela Normal de Coahuila, Calzada de los Maestros s/n, Zona Centro, Saltillo, Coahuila 25000,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nine species, including two new species of decapod crustaceans, are described from the Paleocene Rancho Nuevo Formation, collected from two localities of the Parras Basin, southeast Coahuila state, Mexico. The astacid Enoploclytia gardnerae (Rathbun, 1935) is represented by a pair of large chelae and one cephalothorax. An incomplete nephropid carapace is identified as Enoploclytia sp. Partial specimens of a callianassid and a pagurid are described. One partial carapace representing Linuparus wilcoxensis Rathbun, 1935 is described. A new raninid, Macroacaena venturai new species extends the genus into Mexico. Paraverrucoides alabamensis (Rathbun, 1935) is the most abundant species, followed by Tehuacana tehuacana Stenzel, 1944 and Viapinnixa perrilliatae new species. Taxonomic affinities of this assemblage confirm influence of the Mississippi Embayment, particularly from Paleocene stratigraphic units of Texas and Alabama.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 81 , Issue 6 , November 2007 , pp. 1432 - 1441
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcock, A. 1900. Materials for a carcinological fauna of India. Number 6, The Brachyura Catometopa or Grapsoidea. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, Volume 69. Pt. 2(3):280–456.Google Scholar
Aldrich, T. H. 1931. Description of a few Alabama Eocene species and remarks on varieties. Alabama Geological Survey Museum Paper, 12:1–21.Google Scholar
Bishop, G. A. 1978. Two new crabs, Sodakus tatankayotankaensis n. gen., n. sp., and Raninella oaheensis n. sp. (Custacea, Decapoda), from the Upper Cretaceous Pierre Shale of South Dakota. Journal of Paleontology, 52(3):608–617.Google Scholar
Collins, J. S. H. and Jakobsen, S. L. 1994. A synopsis of the biostratigraphic distribution of the crab genera (Crustacea, Decapoda) of the Danian (Paleocene) of Denmark and Sweden. Bulletin of the Mizunami Fossil Museum, 21:35–46.Google Scholar
Collins, J. S. H. and Morris, S. F. 1975. A new crab, Costacopluma concava, from the Upper Cretaceous of Nigeria. Palaeontology, 18(4):823–829.Google Scholar
Collins, J. S. H. and Rasmussen, H. W. 1992. Upper Cretaceous/Lower Tertiary decapod crustaceans from West Greenland. Grønlands Geologiske Undersøgelse Bulletin, 162:1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, J. S. H., Higgs, R., and Cortitula, B. 1994. A new crab, Costacopluma bifida (Crustacea, Decapoda) from the Paleocene of Venezuela. Bulletin of the Mizunami Fossil Museum, 21:29–34.Google Scholar
Cope, K. H., Utgaard, J. E., Masters, J. M., and Feldmann, R. M. 2005. The fauna of the Clayton Formation (Paleocene, Danian) of southern Illinois: A case of K/P survivorship and Danian recovery. Bulletin of the Mizunami Fossil Museum, 32:97–108.Google Scholar
Dana, J. D. 1851. On the classification of the Cancroidea. Silliman's American Journal of Science and Arts, series 2, 12:121–131.Google Scholar
Dana, J. D. 1852. Crustacea. United States Exploring Expedition During the Years 1838, 1839, 1840, 1841, 1842 Under the Command of Charles Wilkes, U.S.N., 13. C. Sherman, Philadelphia, 1,620 p.Google Scholar
De Haan, W. 1833-1850. Crustacea, p. i–xviii, i–xxxi, 2. In von Siebold, P. F. (ed.), Fauna Japonica Sive Description Animalium. Lugduni-Batavorum, Leiden.Google Scholar
Feldmann, R. M. and Martins-Neto, R. G. 1995. Costacopluma nordestiana n. sp. (Decapoda: Retroplumidae) from the Maria Farinha Formation (Paleocene) of Brazil. Journal of Paleontology, 69:610–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldmann, R. M., Casadío, S., Chirino-Gálvez, L., and Aguirre-Urreta, M. 1995. Fossil decapod crustaceans from the Jagüel and Roca formations (Maastrichtian–Danian) of the Neuquén Basin, Argentina. Paleontological Society Memoir, 42:1–22.Google Scholar
Feldmann, R. M., Rodríguez, M. F., Martínez, G. A., and Aguirre-Urreta, M. 1997. Costacopluma salamanca new species (Decapoda, Retroplumidae) from the Salamanca Formation (Danian) of Patagonia, Argentina. Journal of Paleontology, 71:125–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraaye, R. H. B. 1999. Late Cretaceous swimming crabs: Radiation, migration, competition, and extinction. Acta Geologica Polonica, 46(3-4):269–278.Google Scholar
Fraaye, R. H. B. 2003. Evolution of reef-associated decapod crustaceans through time, with particular reference to the Maastrichtian type area. Contributions to Zoology, 72:119–130.Google Scholar
Guinot, D. 1977. Propositions pour une nouvelle classification des Crustacés Décapodes Brachyoures. Compte Rendu Académie des Sciences Paris, serie D, 285:1049–1052.Google Scholar
Guinot, D. 1993. Donnés nouvelles sur les Raninoidea de Haan, 1841 (Crustacea Decapoda Brachyura Podotremata). Comptes Rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l'Académie des Sciences de Paris, series III, 316:1324–1331.Google Scholar
Hasseltine, G. H. 1968. Geology of the San Miguel syncline, Coahuila, Mexico. Unpublished , , 44 p.Google Scholar
Karasawa, H. and Kato, H. 2003. The family Goneplacidae MacLeay, 1838 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura): Systematics, phylogeny, and fossil records. Paleontological Research, 7:129–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klosterman, S., Sandy, M. R., Vega, F. J., Giles, K. A., Graf, K., Shelley, D., and Solé, J. 2007. New Paleocene Rhynchonellid Brachiopods from the Potrerillos Formation, northeast Mexico. Journal of Paleontology. 81(3):483–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1802-1803. Histoire Naturelle Générale et Particuliére des Crustacés et des Insectes. F. Dufart, Paris, 468 + 391 p.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1831. Cours d'Entomologie, ou de l'histoire naturelle des Crustacés, des Arachnides, des Myriapodes et des Insctes, etc. Annales I. Atlas, Roret, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Lawton, T. F., Shipley, K., Aschoff, J., Giles, K., and Vega, F. J. 2005. Basinward transport of Chicxulub ejecta by tsunami-induced backflow, La Popa basin, northeastern Mexico, and its implications for distribution of impact-related deposits flanking the Gulf of Mexico. Geology, 33:81–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macleay, W. S. 1838. On the brachyurous decapod Crustacea brought from the Cape by Dr. Smith, p. 53–71. In Illustrations of the Annulosa of South Africa. London.Google Scholar
Mantell, G. A. 1822. The Fossils of the South Downs; or Illustrations of the Geology of Sussex. Lupton Relfe, London, 327 p.Google Scholar
Mcbride, E. F., Weidie, A. E., Wolleben, J. A., and Laudon, R. C. 1974. Stratigraphy and structure of the Parras and La Popa basins, northeastern Mexico. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 84:1603–1622.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mccoy, F. 1849. On the classification of some British fossil Crustacea with notices of new forms in the University Collection at Cambridge. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 2, 4:161–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, G. E. 1961. Geology of the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Province of North America. Harper and Row, New York, 692 p.Google Scholar
Murray, G. E., Wolleben, J. A., and Boyd, D. R. 1959. Difunta strata of Tertiary age, Coahuila, Mexico. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 43:2493–2495.Google Scholar
Murray, G. E., Boyd, D. R., Wolleben, J. A., and Wilson, J. A. 1960. Late Cretaceous fossil locality, eastern Parras Basin, Coahuila, Mexico. Journal of Paleontology, 35:1338–1339.Google Scholar
Nyborg, T., Vega, F. J., and Filkorn, H. 2003. New Late Cretaceous and Early Tertiary decapod crustaceans from California, USA: Implications for the origination of taxa in the eastern North Pacific. Contributions to Zoology, 72(2): 165–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortmann, A. 1892. Die Dekapoden-Krebse des Strassburger Museums IV. Die Abteilungen Galatheidea und Paguridea. Zoologischen Jahrbücher, Abteilung für Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Tiere, 6:241–326.Google Scholar
Rathbun, M. J. 1917. New species of South Dakota Cretaceous crabs. United States National Museum, Proceedings, 52:385–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathbun, M. J. 1935. Fossil Crustacea from the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 2:1–160.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, C. E. 2003. Utility of proxy characters for classification of fossils: An example from the fossil Xanthoidea (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura). Journal of Paleontology, 77:1107–1128.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweitzer, C. E. and Feldmann, R. M. 2000. Differentiation of the fossil Hexapodidae Miers, 1886 (Decapoda: Brachyura) from similar forms. Journal of Paleontology, 75:330–345.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweitzer, C. E. and Feldmann, R. M. 2005. Decapod crustaceans, the K/P event, and Paleocene recovery, p. 17–53. In Koenemann, S. and Jenner, R. A. (eds.), Crustacea and Arthropod Relationships. Taylor and Francis, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweitzer, C. E., Feldmann, R. M., Fam, J., Hessin, W. A., Hetrick, S. W., Nyborg, T. G., and Ross, R. L. M. 2003. Cretaceous and Eocene decapod crustaceans from Southern Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada. NRC Research Press, Ottawa, Ontario, 66 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soegaard, K., Ye, H., Halik, N., Daniels, A. T., Arney, J., and Garrick, S. 2004. Stratigraphic evolution of latest Cretaceous to early Tertiary Difunta Foreland Basin in northeast Mexico: Influence of salt withdrawal on tectonically induced subsidence by the Sierra Madre Oriental Fold and Thrust Belt, In Bartolini, C., Buffler, R. T., and Blickwede, J. (eds.), The Circum-Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean: Hydrocarbon habitats, basin formation, and plate tectonics. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 79.Google Scholar
Stenzel, H. B. 1944. A new Paleogene catometope crab from Texas, Tehuacana tehuacana. Journal of Paleontology, 18:546–549.Google Scholar
Števčić, Z. 2005. The reclassification of brachyuran crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura). Natura Croatica, 14, Supplement 1:1–159.Google Scholar
Toulmin, L. D. 1977. Stratigraphic distribution of Paleocene and Eocene fossils in the Eastern Gulf Coast Region. Geological Survey of Alabama, Monograph, 13, 602 p.Google Scholar
Tucker, A. B. 1998. Systematics of the Raninidae (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura), with accounts of three new genera and two new species. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 111:320–371.Google Scholar
Van Straelen, V. 1924. Contributión à l'étude des crustacés décapodes dela période Jurassique. Memoires de l'Academie royale Belgique. Cl. Sciences, Pt. 4, series 2, 7:1–462.Google Scholar
Vega, F. J. and Feldmann, R. M. 1991. Fossil crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda) from the Maastrichtian Difunta Group, northeastern Mexico. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 60:163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vega, F. J. and Perrilliat, M. C. 1989. Una especie nueva del género Costacopluma (Arthtropoda: Decapoda) del Maastrichtiano de Nuevo León. México, Universidad Nacional Autónoma, Instituto de Geología, Revista, 8:84–87.Google Scholar
Vega, F. J. and Perrilliat, M. C. 1990. Moluscos del Maastrichtiano de la Sierra El Antrisco, Nuevo León. México, Universidad Nacional Autónoma, Instituto de Geología, Paleontología Mexicana, No. 55, 63 p.Google Scholar
Vega, F. J. and Perrilliat, M. C. 1995. On some Paleocene invertebrates from the Potrerillos Formation (Difunta Group) northeastern Mexico. Journal of Paleontology, 69:862–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vega, F. J., Feldmann, R. M., and Villalobos-Hiriart, J. L. 1995. Additions to the crustacean (Decapoda) fauna from the Potrerillos Formation (Late Cretaceous) in northeastern Mexico. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 64:39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vega, F. J., Perrilliat, M. C., and Mitre-Salazar, L. M. 1999. Paleocene ostreids from the Las Encinas Formation (Parras Basin: Difunta Group), northeastern Mexico; stratigraphic implications. Geological Society of America, Special Paper, 340:105–110.Google Scholar
Vega, F. J., Espinosa, B., Dávila, V., and Nyborg, T. 2003. Paleoecology and preservation styles of K/T decapod Crustacea from the Difunta Goup, northeastern México. Geological Society of America, Annual Meeting, Abstracts, 57. p.Google Scholar
Vega, F. J., Cosma, T., Coutiño, M. A., Feldmann, R. M., Nyborg, T. G., Schweitzer, C. E., and Waugh, D. A. 2001. New Middle Eocene decapods (Crustacea) from Chiapas, México. Journal of Paleontology, 75:929–946.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Siebold, P. H. 1824. De historiae naturalis in Japonia statu, nec non de augmento emolumentisque in decursu perscrutationum exspectandis dissertatio, cui accendunt Spicilegia Faunae Japonicae. Batavia, 16 p.Google Scholar
Weidie, A. E. and Murray, G. E. 1967. Geology of the Parras Basin and adjacent areas of northeastern Mexico. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 51:678–695.Google Scholar
White, A. 1847. Short descriptions of some new species of Crustacea in the collection of the British Museum. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 20(132):205–207.Google Scholar
Wolleben, J. A. 1977. Paleontology of the Difunta Group (Upper Cretaceous/Tertiary) in northern Mexico. Journal of Paleontology, 51:373–398.Google Scholar