Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T15:22:22.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Panorpoid (Insecta: Mecoptera) from the Lower Eocene of Patagonia, Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Julián F. Petrulevičius*
Affiliation:
División Paleozoología Invertebrados, Museo de La Plata - Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque s/n, La Plata (1900), and CONICET, Argentina. Current address: Entomologie, CNRS UMR 7205, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 45, rue de Buffon, Paris 75005, France,

Extract

The order Mecoptera is represented on all continents, albeit with an uneven distribution. Mecoptera includes about 34 families (Labandeira, 1994, p. 34), only four of them, until now, represented in South America: Permochoristidae Tillyard, 1917 (†) (Pinto, 1972); Bittacidae Handlirsch, 1906 [and stem-group “Neorthophlebinae” (†)] (Petrulevičius, 2001a, 2003, 2007); Nannochoristidae Tillyard, 1917; and Eomeropidae Cockerell, 1909. The two latter families have a present relict distribution in southern South America but without fossil record, obviously an artifact due to few studies of fossil insects in the subcontinent. The diversity of recent Bittacidae is high in South America with respect to other continents. Thirty-five percent of recent genera of Bittacidae come from South America, and 80% of these genera are endemic (extracted from Penny, 1997). Bittacidae is well represented in the fossil record, with species from the Jurassic of Patagonia (Petrulevičius, 2007), Lower Cretaceous of Brazil (Petrulevičius and Martins-Neto, 2001), to the late Paleocene of Argentina (Petrulevičius, 1998, 1999, 2001b, 2003). This contribution reports a specimen belonging to the Panorpoidea, a group with no recent species in South America and very few species in the entire Southern Hemisphere.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carpenter, F. M. 1931. Revision of the Neartic Mecoptera. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 70:69101.Google Scholar
Cockerell, T. D. A. 1909. Descriptions of Tertiary insects, VI. American Journal of Science, 27:381387.Google Scholar
Fidalgo, P. and Smith, D. R. 1987. A fossil Siricidae (Hymenoptera) from Argentina. Entomological News, 98:6366.Google Scholar
Fleck, G. and Nel, A. 2003. Revision of the Mesozoic family Aeschnidiidae (Odonata: Anisoptera). Zoologica, 153:180 p.Google Scholar
Gerstaecker, A. 1863. Arthropoden. In Carus, J. V. and Gerstaecker, C. E. (eds.), Handbuch der Zoologie, 2. Engelmann, Leipzig, 642 p.Google Scholar
Handlirsch, A. 1906–1908. Die fossilen Insecten und die Phylogenie der rezenten Formen. Wilhelm von Engelmann, Leipzig, 1430 p.Google Scholar
Handlirsch, A. 1920. Geschichte, Literatur, Technik, Palaontologie, Phylogenie, Systematik der Insekten, p. 1202. In Schroder, Ch. (ed.), Handbuch der Entomologie, 3. Fischer, Jena.Google Scholar
Kukalová-Peck, J. 1991. Fossil history and the evolution of hexapod structures, p. 141179. In Naumann, I. D. (ed.), The insects of Australia, a textbook for students and research workers, 1 [Second edition]. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Kukalová-Peck, J. and Lawrence, J. 2004. Relationships among coleopteran suborders and mayor endoneopteran lineages: Evidences from hind wing characters. European Journal of Entomology, 101:95144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labandeira, C. C. 1994. A Compendium of Fossil Insect Families. Milwaukee Public Museum Contributions in Biology and Geology, 88:171.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1804–1805. Histoire Naturelle, générale et particulière, des crustacés et des insects, 13, 458 p., 14, 432 p.Google Scholar
Linnælus, C. 1758. Systema naturæ per regna tria naturæ, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Tomus I. Editio decima, reformata. Laurentius Salvius: Holmiae. 824 p.Google Scholar
Martynova, O. A. 1948. Materialy po ehvolyutsii Mecoptera [Data on the evolution of the Mecoptera]. Trudy Paleontologiceskogo Instituta Akademii nauk SSSR, 14:176. (In Russian) Google Scholar
McLachlan, R. 1875. A sketch of our present knowledge of the neuropterous fauna of Japan (excluding Odonata and Trichoptera). Transaction of the Entomological Society of London, 1875.Google Scholar
Novokschonov, V. G. 1997. Early evolution of Scorpionflies (Insecta Panorpida). Nauka, Moscu, 140 p. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Novokschonov, V. G. 2002. Mecoptera, p. 194198. In Rasnitsyn, A. P. and Quicke, D. L. J. (eds.), History of insects. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Packard, A. S. 1886. A new arrangement of the orders of insects. The American Naturalist, 20:808.Google Scholar
Penny, N. D. 1997. World checklist of Extant Mecoptera Species. California Academy of Sciences. http://calacademy.org/research/entomology/Entomology_Resources/mecoptera/index.htm Google Scholar
Petrulevičius, J. F. 1998. First hanging fly fossil from South America. International Paleoentomological Conference Abstracts, Paleontological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow. 34 p.Google Scholar
Petrulevičius, J. F. 1999. A Bittacid (Insecta, Mecoptera) from Maíz Gordo Formation, late Paleocene, northwestern Argentina. Actas XIV Congreso Geológico Argentino, 1:367368.Google Scholar
Petrulevičius, J. F. 2001a. Cenozoic insects from Argentina. Biogeographical aspects. Proceedings of the First International Meeting on Paleoarthropodology, special issue of Acta Geologica Leopoldensia, 24:137144.Google Scholar
Petrulevičius, J. F. 2001b. Insectos del Paleógeno del Noroeste de la Argentina. Sistemática, tafonomía y paleosinecología. Unpublished , , La Plata, 229 p.Google Scholar
Petrulevičius, J. F. 2003. Phylogenetic and biogeographical remarks on Thyridates (Mecoptera: Bittacidae), with the first fossil record of the taxon. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia 46 (suppl. Fossil insects; special issue of the II International Congress on Palaeoentomology):257265.Google Scholar
Petrulevičius, J. F. 2007. A new species of Bittacidae sensu lato (Mecoptera) from the Callovian-Oxfordian: new Jurassic locality of insect body fossils from Patagonia, Argentina. Abstracts of the IV International Congress of Paleoentomology, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Diputación Foral de Álava, 275 p.Google Scholar
Petrulevičius, J. F. and Martins-Neto, R. G. 2001. A Bittacid from Santana Formation, Lower Cretaceous of Brazil. Legal and ethical remarks. Proceedings of the First International Meeting on Paleoarthropodology, Special Issue of Acta Geologica Leopoldensia, 24(52/54):125127.Google Scholar
Petrulevičius, J. F. and Nel, A. 2003. Frenguelliidae, a new family of dragonflies from the earliest Eocene of Argentina (Insecta: Odonata). Phylogenetic relationships within Odonata. Journal of Natural History, 37(24):29092918.Google Scholar
Petrulevičius, J. F. and Nel, A. 2004. A new damselfly family from the late Paleocene of Argentina (Insecta: Odonata: Zygoptera). Palaeontology, 47(1):109116.Google Scholar
Petrulevičius, J. F. and Nel, A. 2005. Austroperilestidae, a new family of damselflies from the earliest Eocene of Argentina (Insecta: Odonata). Phylogenetic relationships within Odonata. Journal of Paleontology, 79(4):658662.Google Scholar
Petrulevičius, J. F. and Nel, A. 2007. Enigmatic and little known Odonata (Insecta) from the Paleogene of Patagonia and northwest Argentina. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (n. s.), 43(3):341347.Google Scholar
Pinto, I. D. 1972. Permian insects from the Paraná Basin, South Brazil. I – Mecoptera. Revista Brasileirade Geociências, 2:105116.Google Scholar
Riek, E. F. 1953. Fossil mecopteroid insects from the Upper Permian of New South Wales. Records of the Australian Museum, 23:5587.Google Scholar
Riek, E. F. 1967. Further evidence of Panorpidae in the Australian Tertiary. Journal of the Australian Entomological Society, 6:7172.Google Scholar
Swederus, N. S. 1787. Et nytt Genus och femtio nya Species af Insecter, beskrifne. Kongliga Vetenskaps Academiens Nya Handlingar, 8(7–9):181201.Google Scholar
Tillyard, R. J. 1917. Studies in Australian Mecoptera. No 1. The new family Nannochoristidae, with descriptions of a new genus and four new species: and an appendix descriptive of a new genus and species from New Zealand. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, 42:284301.Google Scholar
Tillyard, R. J. 1929. Permian Diptera from Warmer's Bay, N. S. W. Nature, 123:778779.Google Scholar
Tillyard, R. J. 1933. The panorpoid complex in the British Rhaetic and Liass. British Museum (Natural History), Fossil Insects, 3:179.Google Scholar
Weele, H. W. van der. 1909. Mecoptera and Planipennia of Insulinde. Notes from the Leyden Museum, 31:1100.Google Scholar
Wilf, P., Cúneo, N. R., Johnson, K. R., Hicks, J. F., Wing, S. L., and Obradovich, J. D. 2003. High Plant Diversity in Eocene South America: Evidence from Patagonia. Science (Reports), 300:122125.Google Scholar
Wilf, P., Labandeira, C. C., Johnson, K. R., and Cuneo, R. 2005. Richness of plant-insect associations in Eocene Patagonia: A legacy for South American biodiversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102:89448948.Google Scholar
Wilf, P., Johnson, K. R., Cúneo, N. R., Smith, E., Bradley, S., Singer, K., and Gandolfo, M. A. 2005. Eocene Plant Diversity at Laguna del Hunco and Río Pichileufú, Patagonia, Argentina. The American Naturalist, 165:634650.Google Scholar
Whitting, M. F. 2002. Mecoptera is paraphyletic: multiple genes and phylogeny of Mecoptera and Siphonaptera. Zoologica Scripta, 31:93104.Google Scholar
Willmann, R. 1987. The phylogenetic system of the Mecoptera. Systematic Entomology, 12:519524.Google Scholar
Willmann, R. 1989. Evolution und Phylogenetisches System der Mecoptera (Insecta: Holometabola). Abhandlungen der senckenbergischen naturforschenden Gesellschaft, 544:1153.Google Scholar