Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T11:16:38.853Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A partial rostrum of the sawfish Pristis lathami Galeotti, 1837, from the Eocene of South Carolina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

David J. Cicimurri
David J. Cicimurri*
Affiliation:
Bob Campbell Geology Museum, Clemson University, 103 Garden Trail, Clemson, South Carolina 29634,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Sawfishes of the family Pristidae comprise a group of rays having dorsoventrally flattened, sharklike bodies and elongated rostra bearing a row of teeth on each side. Some species may attain total body lengths (TL) of 7 m or more (Compagno and Last, 1999). Unlike the similarly-shaped sawsharks of the family Pristiophoridae, the number of rostral teeth and their proportions are established in utero and maintained into adulthood (Slaughter and Springer, 1968; Miller, 1974), and if a tooth is lost the alveolus remains empty. In addition, the gills are located on the underside of the body and there are no rostral barbels (Tricas et al., 1997; Compagno and Last, 1999). Recent Pristidae consists of five to seven species (depending on synonymy) within two genera, Pristis (Linck, 1790) and Anoxypristis (White and Moy-Thomas, 1941).

Type
Paleontological Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 81 , Issue 3 , May 2007 , pp. 597 - 601
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agassiz, L. 1833-44. Reserches sur les Poissons Fossiles. Neuchâtel, 1420 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, T. B. 1999. The Shark Almanac. Lyons Press, New York, 274 p.Google Scholar
Arambourg, C. 1952. Les vertébrés fossiles des Gisements de Phosphates (Maroc-Algérie-Tunisie). Service Géolique Maroc, Notes et Mémoires, 92, 372 p.Google Scholar
Banks, R. S. 1977. Stratigraphy of the Eocene Santee Limestone in three quarries of the Coastal Plain of South Carolina. Geologic Notes, South Carolina Geological Survey, 21(3):85–149.Google Scholar
Berggren, W. W., Kent, D. V., Swisher, C. C. III, and Aubry, M.-P. 1995. A revised Cenozoic geochronology and chronostratigraphy, p. 129–212. In Berggren, W. W., Kent, D. V., Aubry, M.-P., and Harbenol, J. (eds.), Geochronology, Time Scales and Global Stratigraphic Correlation. Society for Sedimentary Geology Special Publication, 54:12–95.Google Scholar
Bonaparte, C. L. 1838. Selachorum tabula analytica. Nuovi Annali della Scienza Naturali, Bologna, p. 195–214.Google Scholar
Cappetta, H. 1980. Modification du statut générique de quelques espèces de sélaciens crétacés et tertiares. Palaeovertebrata, 10(1):29–42.Google Scholar
Cappetta, H. 1987. Chondrichthyes II: Mesozoic and Cenozoic Elasmobranchii. Volume 3B. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, 193 p.Google Scholar
Carvalho, M. R. de. 1996. Higher-level elasmobranch phylogeny, basal squaleans, and paraphyly, p. 5–111. In Stiassny, M. L. J., Parenti, L. R., and Johnson, G. D. (eds.), Interrelationships of Fishes. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Carvalho, M. R. de, and Maisey, J. G. 1996. Phylogenetic relationships of the Late Jurassic shark Protospinax Woodward 1919 (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii), p. 9–46. In Arratia, G. and Voil, G. (eds.), Mesozoic Fishes—Systematics and Paleoecology. Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, Munich.Google Scholar
Case, G. R. 1994. Fossil fish remains from the Late Paleocene Tuscahoma and Early Eocene Bashi formations of Meridian, Lauderdale County, Mississippi. Palaeontographica Abteilung A, 230:97–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Case, G. R., and Borodin, P. D. 2000a. A middle Eocene selachian fauna from the Castle Hayne Limestone Formation of Duplin County, North Carolina. Münchner Geowissenschaft Abhandlung A, 39:17–32.Google Scholar
Case, G. R., and Borodin, P. D. 2000b. Late Eocene selachians from the Irwinton Sand Member of the Barnwell Formation (Jacksonian), WKA mines, Gordon, Wilkinson County, Georgia. Münchner Geowissenschaft Abhandlung A, 39:5–16.Google Scholar
Case, G. R., and Cappetta, H. 1990. The Eocene selachian fauna from the Fayum Depression in Egypt. Palaeontographica Abteilung A, 212:1–30.Google Scholar
Casier, E. M. 1949. Contributions a l'étude des poissions fossiles de la Belgique. VIII. Les Pristidé éocèes. Bulletin Musee Histoire, Naturelle Belgique, 25(10), 52 p.Google Scholar
Compagno, L. J. V., and Last, P. R. 1999. Pristidae. Sawfishes, p. 1410–1417. In Carpenter, K. E. and Niem, V. (eds.), FAO Identification Guide for Fishery Purposes. The Living Marine Resources of the Western Central Pacific. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.Google Scholar
Dames, W. 1883. Uber eine tertiäre Wirbeltierfauna von der westlichen Insel des Birket el Qurûn im Fajum (Ägypten). Sitzungsberichte-Bayerische Denkschriften der Kaiserlichen Preussag Akademie der Wissenschaften, 4:129–153.Google Scholar
Dixon, F. 1850. The Geology and Fossils of the Tertiary and Cretaceous Formations of Sussex. London, 422 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, L. E., Bybell, L. M., Gohn, G. S., and Frederiksen, N. O. 1997. Paleontology and physical stratigraphy of the USGS—Pregnall Nox. 1 core (DOR-208), Dorchester County, South Carolina422. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report, 97-145, 35 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, L. E., Gohn, G. S., Bybell, L. M., Chirico, P. G., Christopher, R. A., Frederiksen, N. O., Prowell, D. C., Self-Trail, J. M., and Weems, R. E. 2000. Supplement to the preliminary stratigraphic database for subsurface sediments of Dorchester County, South Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report, 00-049-B, 29 p.Google Scholar
Engel, H. 1909. Die zähne am rostrum der Pristiden. Zoologie Jahrbuch, 29:51–100.Google Scholar
Farmer, C. H. 2004. Sharks of South Carolina. South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Marine Resources Division, Charleston, 144 p.Google Scholar
Fowler, H. W. 1911. A description of the fossil fish remains of the Cretaceous, Eocene, and Miocene formations of New Jersey. Geological Survey of New Jersey Bulletin, 4, 182 p.Google Scholar
Fraas, E. 1907. Säge von Propristis Schweinfurthi Dames aus dem oberen Eocän von Ägypten. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie und Paläontologie, 1907(1), 6 p.Google Scholar
Galeotti, H. 1837. Mémoire sur la constitution géognostique de la Brabant. Mémoire de l'Academie des Sciences de la Belgique 4, 12(3), 193 p., 4 pl.Google Scholar
Geisler, J. H., Sanders, A. T., and Luo, Z.-X. 2005. A new protocetid whale (Cetacea: Archaeoceti) from the Late Middle Eocene of South Carolina. American Museum Novitates, 3480, 65 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gervais, P. 1852. Zoologie et Paléontologie Françaises II. Poissons Fossiles. Paris.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. 1880. A Manual of the Anatomy of Vertebrated Animals. D. Appleton, New York, 431 p.Google Scholar
Kemp, D., Kemp, L., and Ward, D. 1990. An Illustrated Guide to the British Middle Eocene Vertebrates. Privately published, London, 59 p.Google Scholar
Kent, B. W. 1999. Sharks from the Fisher/Sullivan Site, p. 11–38. In Weems, B. and Grimsely, G. (eds.), Early Eocene Vertebrates and Plants from the Fisher/Sullivan Site (Nanjemoy Formation) Stafford County, Virginia. Virginia Bureau of Mineral Resources Publication, 152.Google Scholar
Kirkland, J. I., and Aguillón-Martínez, M. C. 2002. Schizorhiza: A unique sawfish paradigm from the Difunta Group, Coahuila, Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, 19(1):16–24.Google Scholar
Kriwet, J. 2004. The systematic position of the Cretaceous sclerorhynchid sawfishes (Elasmobranchii, Pristiorajea), p. 57–73. In Arratia, G. and Tintori, A. (eds.), Mesozoic Fishes 3—Systematics, Paleoenvironments, and Biodiversity. Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, Munich.Google Scholar
Latham, J. 1794. An essay on the various species of sawfish. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, 2:273–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leriche, M. 1905. Les poissons tertiaires de la Belgique, II. Les poissons éocènes. Mémoires du Musée Royal d'Histoire Naturelle de Belgique, 11(3):49–228.Google Scholar
Leriche, M. 1942. Contribution a l'étude des faunes ichthyologiques marines des terrains Tertiaires de la plaine côtière Atlantique et du centre des Etats-Unis. Mémoires de la Société Géologique de France, Mémoire, 20(45):5–110.Google Scholar
Linck, H. F. 1790. Versuch einer Eintheilung der Fische nach den Zähnen. Magazin für das Neueste aus der Physik und Naturgeschichte, 4:28–38.Google Scholar
Manning, E. M., and Standhardt, B. R. 1986. Late Eocene sharks and rays of Montgomery Landing, Louisiana, p. 133–161. In Schiebout, J. A. and van den Bold, W. (eds.), Montgomery Landing Site, Marine Eocene (Jackson) of Central Louisiana. Symposium Proceedings, Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.Google Scholar
Miller, W. A. 1974. Observations on the developing rostrum and rostral teeth of sawfish: Pristis perotteti and P. cuspidatus. Copeia, 1974(2):311–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, W. A. 1995. Rostral and dental development in sawfish (Pristis perotteti). Journal of Aquaculture and Aquatic Sciences, 8:98–107.Google Scholar
Müller, A. 1999. Ichthyofauna aus dem atlantischen Tertiär der USA. Leipziger Geowissenschaft, Leipzig, 9/10, 360 p.Google Scholar
Murray, G. E. 1961. Geology of the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains of North America. Harper and Row, New York, 692 p.Google Scholar
Parmley, D., and Cicimurri, D. J. 2003. Late Eocene sharks of the Hardre Mine Local Fauna of Wilkinson County, Georgia. Georgia Journal of Science, 61(3):153–179.Google Scholar
Schwartz, F. J. 2003. Bilateral asymmetry in the rostrum of the small-tooth sawfish, Pristis pectinata (Pristiformes: Family Pristidae). Journal of the North Carolina Academy of Science, 119(2):41–47.Google Scholar
Shellis, R. P., and Berkovitz, B. K. B. 1980. Dentine structure in the rostral teeth of the sawfish Pristis (Elasmobranchii). Archives of Oral Biology, 25:339–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shirai, S. 1996. Phylogenetic interrelationships of Neoselachians (Chondrichthyes: Euselachii), p. 9–34. In Stiassny, M. L. J., Parenti, L. R., and Johnson, G. D. (eds.), Interrelationships of Fishes. Academic Press, San Diego.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, B. H., and Springer, S. 1968. Replacement of rostral teeth in sawfishes and sawsharks. Copeia, 1968(3):499–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strömer, E. 1905. Die Fischreste des mittleren und oberen Eocäns von Ägypten. I Teil: Die Selachier, A. Myliobatiden und Pristiden. Beiträge Palaeontologie und Geologie Oesterreich-Ungarn, 18:37–56.Google Scholar
Thorson, T. B. 1973. Sexual dimorphism in number of rostral teeth of the sawfish, Pristis perotteti: Müller and Henle, 1841. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 102:612–614.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurmond, J. T., and Jones, D. E. 1981. Fossil Vertebrates of Alabama. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, 244 p.Google Scholar
Timmerman, J., and Chandler, R. 1995. Cretaceous and Paleogene Fossils of North Carolina, A Field Guide. North Carolina Fossil Club, Durham, 70 p.Google Scholar
Tricas, T. C., Deacon, K., Last, P., Mccosker, J. E., Walker, T. L., and Taylor, L. 1997. Sharks and Rays. Time Life Publishing, Indiana, 288 p.Google Scholar
Ward, D. J., and Wiest, R. L. 1990. A checklist of Paleocene and Eocene sharks and rays (Chondrichthyes) from the Pamunkey Group, Maryland and Virginia, USA. Tertiary Research, 12(2):81–88.Google Scholar
Westgate, J. W. 1984. Lower vertebrates from the Late Eocene Crow Creek local fauna, St. Francis County, Arkansas. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 4:536–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westgate, J. W. 2001. Paleoecology and biostratigraphy of marginal marine Gulf Coast Eocene vertebrate localities, p. 263–297. In Gunnell, G. (ed.), Eocene Biodiversity: Unusual Occurrences and Rarely Sampled Habitats. Lluwer Academic/Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, E. I. 1956. The Eocene fishes of Alabama. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 36(156):122–152.Google Scholar
White, E. I., and Moy-Thomas, J. A. 1941. Notes on the nomenclature of fossil fishes. Pt. III. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 7(11):395–400.Google Scholar