Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T17:17:11.437Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Permian Brachiopods from Southern Thailand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2017

Richard E. Grant
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Rat Buri Limestone was sampled for silicified brachiopods at 7 localities along the southern peninsula of Thailand. From north to south these localities are: Ban Kao, Khao Phrik, Khao Tok Nam, Khao Chang, Phangnga, Ko Muk NE, and Ko Muk NW. This limestone forms steep monadnocks that project above the alluvium (or the sea at Muk Island), and lacks any clear stratigraphic succession. Fossils indicate that Permian limestones identified throughout Thailand as the Rat Buri range in age from Sakmarian through Kazanian. The brachiopods from the peninsular localities indicate a late Artinskian (Baigendzinian) age and are correlated with the lower Byro Group of Western Australia, the Bitauni fauna of Timor, the upper Amb Formation in the Salt Range of Pakistan, the Lower Permian in the Karakorum Range, and the Trogkofel Limestone of the Karawanken Range in Yugoslavia. Western Hemisphere correlations are with the Copacabana Group of Peru and Bolivia and, very tenuously, with the topmost Cathedral Mountain or the lower Road Canyon Formations in West Texas.

Analyses of life habits of the brachiopods indicate the following: Ban Kao lay nearest the Permian shore; the Rat Buri region was under shallow and fairly clear water, perhaps offshore from a reef; Phangnga was a muddy environment with many spiny and attached forms; Ko Muk was also fairly clear, and an especially favorable place for the growth of brachiopods. Sampling efficiency ranges from rather poor (Index .30) to very good (Index .75) with an overall index of .85 for the entire fauna. The Permian Index indicates that these faunas lived under tropical conditions, but the presence of certain genera suggests that seaways were open to Boreal regions.

The brachiopod fauna consists of 109 species and 81 genera, of which one family, 15 genera and 71 species are new; 78 of these genera are considered here. The new genera (with family position in parentheses) are: Nematocrania (Craniidae); Demonedys (Chonetidae); Stictozoster (Productellidae); Comuquia, Dyschrestia (Overtoniidae); Incisius (Incisiidae, new family); Caricula, Gratiosina (Marginiferidae); Bibatiola, Celebetes (Chonetellidae); Stereochia (Dictyoclostidae); Litocothia (Lyttoniidae); Goleomyxa (Atriboniidae); Cruricella (Ambocoeliidae); Tipispirifer (Cyrtospiriferidae).

Certain genera and species were selected for functional analyses. The lophophore of Incisius is interpreted as a filled-in schizolophe. The muscles of the Ambocoeliidae are reconstructed with a set of adjustor muscles designed to raise the shell to allow it to gape. Life position and muscle arrangement of Paralyttonia (and by analogy, Rigbyella) are reconstructed. The mode of growth and possible function of the stegidial plates of Tipispirifer are presented and, in the same vein, previous interpretations are the sequence of growth in the stegidium of the Devonian genus Sphenospira are criticized and analyzed. The cardinalia of Cleiothyridina are interpreted with regard to muscle attachment, and the apical perforation is compared to the cardinal process of other brachiopods. The lophophore of Chonetina is reconstructed as a ptycholophe whose direction of growth is determined by the position and configuration of the anderidia. Derbyia and other Orthotetacea are depicted as having attached to the substrate by byssus-like pedicular fibers, and thus were able to cling to loose sediment.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 50 , Issue S9: The Paleontological Society Memoir 9: Permian Brachiopods from Southern Thailand , May 1976 , pp. 1 - 261
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, John. 1968. The unusual brachial skeleton of Attenuatella convexa sp. nov. (Brachiopoda). Palaeontol. 11(5):783–792, Pl. 142.Google Scholar
Arthaber, G. von. 1900. Das Jungere Paläozoicum aus der Araxes-Enge bei Djulfa, p. 209–308, Pls. 8–12. In Frech, F. and von Arthaber, G. (eds.), Uber das Palaozoicum in Hocharmenien und Persien. Beit. Paläont. Geol. Osterreich-Ungarns Orient, 12(4).Google Scholar
Bamber, E. W., and Waterhouse, J. B. 1971. Carboniferous and Permian stratigraphy and paleontology, northern Yukon Territory, Canada. Bull. Can. Petrol. Geol. 19(1):29–250, 27 Pls.Google Scholar
Brabb, E. E., and Grant, R. E. 1971. Stratigraphy and paleontology of the revised type section for the Tahkandit Limestone (Permian) in East-Central Alaska. U. S. Geol. Surv., Prof. Pap. 703:26 p., 2 Pls.Google Scholar
Branson, C. C. 1948. Bibliographic index of Permian invertebrates. Geol. Soc. Amer., Mem. 26: vii + 1049 p.Google Scholar
Broili, F. 1915. Permische Brachiopoden der Insel Letti. In Molengraaff, G.A.F., De Geologie van het Eiland Letti. Dutch East Indies, Dienst Mijn., Jaarb. Mijnwezen 1914, 43(5):187–210, Pl. 21.Google Scholar
Broili, F. 1916. Die Permischen Brachiopoden von Timor. In Wanner, J. and Weber, F. (eds.), Erggebnisse der Expeditionen G.A.F. Molengraaff, VII: 104 p., 13 Pls. Google Scholar
Bromley, R. G., and Surlyk, Finn. 1972. Borings produced by brachiopod pedicles, fossil and recent. Lethaia, 6:349–365, 14 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronn, H. G. 1862. Die Klassen und Ordungen der Weichthier (Malacozoa). 3(1):518 p., 44 Pls. Leipzig and Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Brown, Thomas. 1849. Illustrations of the fossil conchology of Great Britain and Ireland, VII: 273 p. London.Google Scholar
Brunton, C. H. C. 1966. Silicified productoids from the Visean of County Fermanagh. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Bull. 12(5):173–243, 19 Pls.Google Scholar
Buch, L. von. 1835. Ueber Terebrateln. Königliche Acad. Wissenschaften, Berlin, 1833. 21–144, 3 Pls. Google Scholar
Buckman, S. S. 1906. Brachiopod nomenclature. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. London ser. 7. 18:321–327.Google Scholar
Campbell, K. S. W. 1959a. The type species of three Upper Palaeozoic punctate Spiriferoids. Palaeont. 1 (4):351–363, Pls. 58–60.Google Scholar
Campbell, K. S. W. 1959b. The Martiniopsis-like Spiriferids of the Queensland Permian. Palaeont. 1:333–350, Pls. 50–57.Google Scholar
Campbell, K. S. W. 1965. Australian Permian terebratuloids. Australian Bur. Min. Res., Geol., Geophys., Bull. 68:vi + 146 p., 17 Pls. Google Scholar
Chao, Y. T. 1927. Productidae of China, part 1: Producti. Geol. Sur. China, Palaeont. Sinica, ser. B, 5(2):244 p., 16 Pls.Google Scholar
Chao, Y. T. 1929. Carboniferous and Permian Spiriferids of China. Geol. Sur. China, Palaeont. Sinica, ser. B, 11(1):133 p., 6 Pls.Google Scholar
Chi-Thuan, Tran-thi. 1961. Les Brachiopodes Permiens du Pnom Tup. Univ. Saigon, Fac. Sci., Ann. 1961. 267–308, Pls. 1–8.Google Scholar
Chi-Thuan, Tran-thi. 1962. Les Brachiopodes Permiens de Cam-Lo. Univ. Saigon, Fac. Sci., Ann. 1962. 485–498, 2 Pls. Google Scholar
Coleman, P. J. 1957. Permian Productacea of Western Australia. Australian Bur. Min. Res., Geol., Geophy., Bull. 40:188 p., 21 Pls.Google Scholar
Coogan, A. H. 1958. Russian fusulinid genera. J. Paleont. 32(2):304–311. 2 figs. Google Scholar
Cooper, G. A. 1942. New genera of North American Brachiopods. Washington Acad. Sci. Jour. 32(8):228–235.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. A. 1954. Unusual Devonian Brachiopods. J. Paleont. 28(3):325–332, Pls. 36, 37 .Google Scholar
Cooper, G. A. 1956. New Pennsylvanian Brachiopods. J. Paleont. 30(3):520–530, Pl. 61.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. A., and Grant, R. E. 1962. Torynechus: New name for Permian Brachiopod Uncinuloides King. J. Paleont. 36(5):1128–1129.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. A. 1964. New Permian stratigraphic units in Glass Mountains, West Texas. Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 48(9):1581–1588.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. A. 1966. Permian rock units in Glass Mountains, West Texas. U. S. Geol. Sur. Bull. 1244-E: 9 p.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. A. 1969. New Permian Brachiopods from West Texas. Smithsonian Contr. Paleobiol. 1:20 p., 5 Pls.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. A. 1970. New name for Brachiopod homonym and citation of types. J. Paleont. 44(3):579.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. A. 1971. New age assignments in the stratigraphy of the Glass Mountains, western Texas, p. A30. In Cohee, G. V., Bates, R. G., and Wright, W. B. (eds.), Changes in Stratigraphic Nomenclature by the U. S. Geological Survey, 1970. U. S. Geol. Sur. Bull. 1354(A):32 p. Google Scholar
Cooper, G. A. 1973. Dating and correlating the Permian of the Glass Mountains in Texas. Bull. Canadian Petrol. Geol. 20(4):363–377.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. A. 1974. Permian brachiopods of West Texas, II. Smithson. Contrib. Paleobiology, 14:233–793, fig. 40, Pls. 24–191.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. A. 1975. Permian brachiopods of West Texas, III. Smithson. Contrib. Paleobiology, 19:794–1920, Pls. 192–502.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. A., and Muir-Wood, H. M. 1951. Brachiopod homonyms. Washington Acad. Sci. Jour. 41(6):195–196.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1839. Second annual report on the paleontological department of the survey. New York Assembly Doc. 275:57–66.Google Scholar
Cowen, Richard. 1968a. A new type of delthyrial cover in the Devonian Brachiopod Mucrospirifer . Paleont. 11 (2):317–327, Pls. 63–64.Google Scholar
Cowen, Richard. 1968b. Les Plaques Stegidiales du Brachiopode Jurassique Spiriferina . Société Geol. France, ser. 7, 10:516–518, Pl. 29b.Google Scholar
Cowen, Richard. 1969. Stegidial structures in Spiriferide Brachiopods. J. Paleont. 43(2):538–539, 1 fig.Google Scholar
Cox, E. T. 1858 [1857]. Paleontological report of the coal measures Mollusca. Geol. Sur. Kentucky. 3:555–576, 2 Pls.Google Scholar
Cutbill, J. L., and Challinor, A. 1965. Revision of the stratigraphical scheme for the Carboniferous and Permian rocks of Spitsbergen and Bjornoya. Geol. Mag. 102(5):418–439, Pl. 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czarniecki, Stanislaw. 1969. Sedimentary environment and stratigraphical position of the Treskelodden Beds (Vestspitsbergen). Prace Muzeum Ziemi, Krakow. 16:201–336, 16 Pls.Google Scholar
Davidson, T. 1862. On some Carboniferous Brachiopoda, collected in India by A. Fleming, M.D., and Purdon, W., Esq. Geol. Soc. London, Quart. Jour. 18:25–35, 2 Pls. Google Scholar
Derby, O. A. 1874. On the Carboniferous Brachiopoda of Itaitúba, Rio Tapajos, Prov. of Pará, Brazil. Cornell Univ. Sci. Bull. 1(2):63 p., 9 Pls.Google Scholar
Dickins, J. M. 1968. Correlation of the Permian of the Hunter Valley, New South Wales and the Bowen Basin, Queensland. Australia Bur. Min. Res., Geol., Geophy., Bull. 80(3):29–44.Google Scholar
Dickins, J. M. 1970. Correlation and subdivision of the Permian of western and eastern Australia. Australia Bur. Min. Res., Geol., Geophys., Bull. 116(2):17–27.Google Scholar
Diener, Carl. 1897. The Permocarboniferous fauna of Chitichun Number 1. Geol. Sur. India Mem., Palaeont. Indica, ser. 15. 1(3):105 p., 13 Pls.Google Scholar
Diener, Carl. 1899. Anthracolithic fossils of Kashmir and Spiti. Geol. Sur. India Mem., Palaeont. Indica, ser. 15. 1(2):95 p., 8 Pls.Google Scholar
Diener, Carl. 1903. Permian fossils of the central Himalayas. Geol. Sur. India Mem., Palaeont. Indica, ser. 15. 1(5):204 p., 10 Pls.Google Scholar
Diener, Carl. 1911. Anthracolithic fossils of the Shan States. Geol. Sur. India Mem., Palaeont. Indica, n.s. 3(4):74 p., 7 Pls.Google Scholar
Diener, Carl. 1915. The Anthracolithic fauna of Kashmir, Kanaur and Spiti. Geol. Sur. India Mem., Palaeont. Indica, n.s. 5(2):135 p., 11 Pls.Google Scholar
Douglass, R. C. 1970. Morphologic studies of fusulinids from the Lower Permian of West Pakistan. U. S. Geol. Sur. Prof. Pap. 643-G:11 p., 7 Pls. Google Scholar
Dunbar, C. O. 1933. Stratigraphic significance of the fusulinids of the Lower Productus Limestone of the Salt Range. Geol. Sur. India, Records. 66(4):405–413, Pl. 22.Google Scholar
Dunbar, C. O. 1955. Permian Brachiopod faunas from central east Greenland. Medellelser Grønland. 110(3):169 p., 32 Pls.Google Scholar
Dunbar, C. O., and Condra, G. E. 1932. Brachiopoda of the Pennsylvanian system in Nebraska. Nebr. Geol. Sur. Bull., 2nd ser. 5:377 p., 44 Pls. Google Scholar
Frederiks, Georg. 1916. Über einige Oberpaläozoische Brachiopoden von Eurasien. Comite Geol. Mem. 156:87 p., 5 Pls.Google Scholar
Frederiks, Georg. 1924a [1919]. Etudes paleontologiques, 2: Sur les Spiriferides du Carbonifere Superieur de l'Oural. Bull. Com. Geol. (Petrograd). 38(3): 279–324.Google Scholar
Frederiks, Georg. 1924b [1923]. Upper Paleozoic of the Ussuriland, I: Brachiopoda. Rec. Geol. Com. Russian Far East. 28:52 p.Google Scholar
Frederiks, Georg. 1925 [dated 1924]. Upper Paleozoicum of the Ussuriland, 2: Permian Brachiopoda of Cape Kalouzin. Materialy po Geologii i Poleznym Iskopaenym Dalnego Vostoka. 40:28 p.Google Scholar
Frederiks, Georg. 1928. Materiali dlia Klassificatssi Roda Productus Sow. Izvestia Geol. Komiteta. 46(7):773–792 (English summary).Google Scholar
Frederiks, Georg. 1933. Palaeontological Notes, 4: On some Upper Paleozoic Brachiopods of Eurasia. Cent. Geol. Prosp. Inst. USSR Mono. 2:24–33.Google Scholar
Furguson, Laing. 1969. Possible brood pouches and sexual dimorphism in the Productid Brachiopod Megousia Muir-Wood and Cooper. In Westermann, G. E. G. (ed.). Sexual Dimorphism in Fossil Metazoa and Taxonomic Implications. Inter. Paleont. Union, Symp. Prague, 1968: 37–51, 1 Pl. E. Sweitzerbart'sche, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Furnish, W. M. 1966. Ammonoids of the Upper Permian Cyclolobus-zone. Neues Jahr. Geol. Paläont. 125:265–296, Pls. 23–26.Google Scholar
Furnish, W. M., and Glenister, B. F. 1970. Permian Ammonoid Cyclolobus from the Salt Range, West Pakistan. In Kummel, Bernhard and Teichert, Curt (eds.). Stratigraphic Boundary Problems: Permian and Triassic of West Pakistan. Univ. Kansas Spec. Pub. 4:153–175, 4 Pls. Google Scholar
Gemmellaro, G. G. 1899. La fauna dei Calcari con Fusulina della Valle del Fuime Sosio nella Provincia de Palermo. Soc. Sci. Nat. Econ. Palermo Giorn. 22:95–214, Pls. 25–36.Google Scholar
George, T. N. 1931. Ambocoelia Hall and certain similar British Spiriferidae. Geol. Soc. London, Quart. Jour. 87:30–61, Pls. 3–5.Google Scholar
Girty, G. H. 1904. New Molluscan genera from the Carboniferous. Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus. 27 (1372):721–736, Pls. 45, 46.Google Scholar
Girty, G. H. 1909 [1908]. The Guadalupian Fauna. U. S. Geol. Sur. Prof. Pap. 58:627 p., 31 Pls.Google Scholar
Glaus, Martin. 1964. Trias und Oberperm im Zentralen Elburs (Persien). Eclo. Geol. Helvetiae. 57(2):497–508, 3 Pls.Google Scholar
Gobbett, D. J. 1964 [1963]. Carboniferous and Permian brachiopods of Svalbard. Norsk Polarinstitutt Skrifter. 127:201 p., 25 Pls.Google Scholar
Gobbett, D. J. 1968. The Permian System in Malaya. Geol. Soc. Malasia, Bull. 1:17–22.Google Scholar
Grabau, A. W. 1931. The Permian of Mongolia. Natural History of Central Asia. 4: 665 p., 53 Pls. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. New York.Google Scholar
Grabau, A. W. 1932. Studies for Students, ser. 1. Paleontology: The Brachiopoda. Nat. Univ. Peking, Sci. Quart. 3:75–112, 219–251.Google Scholar
Grabau, A. W. 1934. Early Permian fossils of China, I: Early Permian Brachiopods, Pelecypods and Gastropods of Kueichow. Geol. Surv. China, Palaeont. Sinica, ser. B. 8(3):168 p., 11 Pls.Google Scholar
Grabau, A. W. 1936. Early Permian Fossils of China, I: Fauna of the Maping Limestone of Kwangsi and Kueichow. Geol. Surv. China, Palaeont. Sinica, ser. B. 8(4): 441 p., 31 Pls. Google Scholar
Grant, R. E. 1963. Unusual attachment of a Permian Linoproductid Brachiopod. J. Paleont. 37(1): 134–140, Pl. 19.Google Scholar
Grant, R. E. 1965. The Brachiopod Superfamily Stenoscismatacea. Smithsonian Misc. Coll. 148(2):vi + 192 p., 24 Pls. Google Scholar
Grant, R. E. 1966a. A Permian Productoid Brachiopod: Life History. Science. 152(3722):660–662, 2 figs.Google Scholar
Grant, R. E. 1966b. Spine arrangement and life habits of the Productoid Brachiopod Waagenoconcha . J. Paleont. 40(5):1063–1069, Pls. 131, 132.Google Scholar
Grant, R. E. 1968. Structural adaptation in two Permian Brachiopod Genera, Salt Range, West Pakistan. J. Paleont. 42(1):1–32, Pls. 1–9.Google Scholar
Grant, R. E. 1970. Brachiopods from Permian-Triassic boundary beds and age of Chhidru Formation, West Pakistan. In Kummel, Bernhard and Teichert, Curt (eds.). Stratigraphic Boundary Problems: Permian and Triassic of West Pakistan. Univ. Kansas Spec. Pub. 4:117–151, 3 Pls. Google Scholar
Grant, R. E. 1971a. Taxonomy and autecology of two Arctic Rhynchonellid Brachiopods. Smithsonian Contr. Paleobiol. 3:313–335, 3 Pls.Google Scholar
Grant, R. E. 1971b. Brachiopods in the Permian reef environment of West Texas. North Amer. Paleont. Conv., 1969. J:1444–1481, 22 figs. Google Scholar
Grant, R. E. 1972. The lophophore and feeding mechanism of the Productidina (Brachiopoda). J. Paleont. 46(2):213–248, Pls. 1–9.Google Scholar
Grant, R. E., and Cooper, G. A. 1973. Brachiopods and Permian Correlations. Canadian Soc. Petrol. Geol. Mem. 2:572–595, 7 figs.Google Scholar
Gratsianova, R. T. 1967. Brakhiopodi i Stratigrafiya Nizhnego Devona Gornogo Altaya. Inst. Geol. Geof., Akad. Nauk SSSR, Sibirskoe Otdelenie. 160 p., 14 Pls. Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1840. Synopsis of the contents of the British Museum. 42nd ed. 370 p. London.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1848. On the arrangement of the Brachiopoda. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 2(2):435–440.Google Scholar
Greco, Benedetto. 1938. Revisione degli Strofomenidi Permiani del Sosio Conservati nel Museo di Geologia della R. Universita di Palermo (parte prima). Giorn. Sci. Nat. Econ. Palermo. 39(11): 46 p., 2 Pls. Google Scholar
de Gregorio, A. 1930. Sul Permiano di Sicilia (Fossili del Calcare con Fusulina di Palazzo Adriano non Descritti del Prof. G. Gemmellaro Conservati nel Mio Privato Gabinetto). Ann. Geol. Paleont. 52:18–32, Pls. 4–11.Google Scholar
Hall, James. 1867. Descriptions and figures of the fossil Brachiopoda of the Upper Helderberg, Hamilton, Portage, and Chemung groups. Nat. Hist. N.Y., pt. VI, Palaeont.: 4(I):428 p., 63 Pls., Geol. Surv. N. Y., Albany. Google Scholar
Hall, James, and Clarke, J. M. 1893 & 1894. An introduction to the study of the Genera of Palaeozoic Brachiopoda, Part II. New York Geol. Sur., Palaeont. 8(2):xvi + 392 p., Pls. 21–84. (Pp. 1–176 preprinted in 1893).Google Scholar
Hamada, Takashi. 1960. Some Permo-Carboniferous fossils from Thailand. Univ. Tokyo, Sci. Pap. College Gen. Educa. 10(2):337–361, 2 Pls.Google Scholar
Hamada, Takashi. 1969. Late Paleozoic Brachiopods from Red Beds in the Malayan Peninsula. In Kobayashi, T. (ed.), Geology and Paleontology of Southeast Asia. Cont. Geol. Paleont. SE Asia, LXIX. 6: 251–264, Pls. 25–26.Google Scholar
Hamlet, Beata. 1928. Permische Brachiopoden, Lamellibranchiaten und Gastropoden von Timor. Jaarboek von het Mijnwezen (Dutch East Indies). 56(2):115 p., 12 Pls.Google Scholar
Heritsch, Franz. 1938. Die Stratigraphische Stellung des Trogkofelkalkes. Neues Jahr. Min., Geol., Paläont., B. 79:63–186, Pls. 3–8.Google Scholar
Huang, T. K. 1932. Late Permian Brachiopods of Southwest China. Geol. Sur. China, Palaeont. Sinica, ser. B. 9(1):138 p., 9 Pls.Google Scholar
Huang, T. K. 1933. Late Permian Brachiopods of Southwest China, Part II. Geol. Sur. China, Palaeont. Sinica, ser. B. 9(2):172 p., 11 Pls.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H. 1869. An introduction to the classification of animals. 147 p. John Churchill & Sons. London.Google Scholar
Igo, Hisayoshi. 1964. Permian fossils from northern Pahang, Malaya. In Kobayashi, T. (ed.), Geology and Paleontology of Southeast Asia. 1: 191–207, Pl. 2.Google Scholar
Ivanova, E. A. 1951. New data on Productid systematics (Genus Kutorginella) . Akad. Nauk SSSR, Doklady. 77:329–331.Google Scholar
Kayser, Emanuel. 1883. Obercarbonische fauna von Loping. In von Richthofen, F. (ed.), China. 4:160–208, Pl. 21.Google Scholar
Keyserling, A. G. 1846. Geognostische Beobachtungen. In Keyserling, A. G. and von Kreusenstern, P. (eds.), Wissenschaftliche Beobachtungen auf einer Reise in das Petchora-Land im Jahre 1843. 151–336, 22 Pls. St. Petersburg. Carl Kray.Google Scholar
King, R. E. 1931. The geology of the Glass Mountains, Part 2: Faunal summary and correlation of the Permian formations with description of Brachiopoda. Univ. Texas Bull. 3042:245 p., 44 Pls.Google Scholar
King, R. H. 1938. New Chonetidae and Productidae from Pennsylvanian and Permian strata of north-central Texas. J. Paleont. 12(3):257–279, Pls. 36–39.Google Scholar
King, William. 1846. Remarks on certain Genera belonging to the Class Palliobranchiata. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 18:26–42.Google Scholar
King, William. 1850. A monograph of the Permian fossils of England. Palaeont. Soc. Mono. 3: xxxvii + 258 p., 29 Pls. Google Scholar
King, William. 1859. On Gwynia, Dielasma and Macandrevia, Three new genera. Proc. Dublin Zool. Botan. Assoc. 1 (3):256–262.Google Scholar
Kochirkevich, B. V. 1969. K Sistematike Nadcemeistva Stenoscismatacea Oelhert, 1887 (1883) (Brachiopoda). Iskopaemiya Fauna i Flora Dalnego Vostoka, I. Akad. Nauk SSSR. 7–16, 1 Pl. Google Scholar
Koken, E. F. R. 1889. Ueber die Entwickelung der Gastropoden vom Cambrium bis zur Trias. Neues Jahr. Min., Geol., Paläont. 6:305–484, Pls. 10–14.Google Scholar
Kozlowski, Roman. 1914. Les Brachiopodes du Carbonifere Superieur de Bolivie. Ann. Paleont. (Paris). 9:3–97, 11 Pls.Google Scholar
Krotov, P. 1885. Artinskische Étage—Geologischpaleontologische Monographic des Sandsteins von Artinsk [Artinskii Yarus—Geologo-Paleontologicheskaia Monografiya Artinskago Peschanika]. Obshchestva Estestvoispytatelei pri Imperatorskom Kazanskom Universitete, Trudy. 13(5):314 p., 4 Pls.Google Scholar
Krotov, P. 1888. Geologische Forschungen am Westlichen Ural-Abhange in den Gebieten von Tscherdyn und Solikamsk. Geologicheskie Issledovaniya na Zapadnom Sklone Solikamskogo i Cherdynskogo Urala. Comite Geol. Mem. 6(2):297–593, Pls. 1, 2.Google Scholar
Kühn, O. 1949. Lehrbuch der Paläozoologie. 326 p., 224 figs. Stuttgart. Google Scholar
Kulikov, M. V. 1970. Polevoi Atlas: Permskoi Fauni i Flori Severo-Vostoka SSSR. Severovostochnoe Ordena Trudovogo Krasnogo Znameii Geologicheskoe Upravlemie. Magadanskoe Knizhnoe Izdatelstvo. 407 p., 101 Pls. Google Scholar
Kummell, Bernhard, and Teichert, Curt. 1966. Relations between the Permian and Triassic Formations in the Salt Range and Trans-Indus Ranges, West Pakistan. Neues Jahr. Geol. Paläont. 125: 297–333, Pls. 27, 28.Google Scholar
Kummell, Bernhard 1970. Stratigraphy and paleontology of the Permian–Triassic boundary beds, Salt Range and Trans-Indus Ranges, West Pakistan. In Kummel, B. and Teichert, C. (eds.), Stratigraphic Boundary Problems: Permian and Triassic of West Pakistan. Univ. Kansas Spec. Pub. 4:1–110, 19 figs. Google Scholar
Kutorga, S. S. 1842. Beitrag zur Paläontologie Russlands. Verhandlungen der Russisch-Kaiserlichen Mineralogischen Gesellschaft zu St. Petersburg. 34 p., 6 Pls. Google Scholar
Léveillé, Charles. 1835. Apercu Geologique de quelques Localities tres riches en Coquilles sur les Frontieres de France et de Belgique. Soc. Geol. France Mem. 2:29–40, Pl. 2.Google Scholar
Likharev, B. K. 1934. O Nektorykh Novykh Rodakh Verkhnepaleozoyskikh Brakhiopod [On some new genera of Upper Paleonzoic Brachiopods]. Akad. Nauk SSSR, n.s., Doklady. 1(4):210–211.Google Scholar
Likharev, B. K. 1935. Bemerkungen über einige ober-Paläozosiche Brachiopoden. Zentral. Miner., Geol., Paläont., part B. 9:369–373.Google Scholar
Likharev, B. K. 1936a. The interior structure of Camarophoria King. Amer. J. Sci., ser. 5. 187(32):55–69, 6 figs.Google Scholar
Likharev, B. K. 1936b. Über einige Oberpaläozoische Gattungen der Terebratulacea aus Eurasien. Moscow Univ., Prob. Paleont. 1:263–273, 1 Pl.Google Scholar
Likharev, B. K. 1937. Permian Brachiopods of North Caucasus, Families: Chonetidae Hall and Clarke and Productidae Gray. Cent. Geol. Prosp. Inst. USSR Mono. 39(1):151 p., 13 Pls. Leningrad, Moscow.Google Scholar
Likharev, B. K. 1960. Semeistvo Chonetellidae Licharew, fam. nov., p. 226. In Sarycheva, T. G. (ed.), Osnovi Paleontologii: Mshanki, Brakhiopodi. Isdatelstvo Akad. Nauk SSSR. 343 p., 82 Pls. Moscow.Google Scholar
Likharev, B. K. 1962. Boundaries between divisions of the Permian in southern Europe and southern Asia. Amer. Geol. Inst., Internat. Geol. Review. 4(9):1008–1016. [Translated from Sovet. Geol. 3:56–68, 1961.] CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Likharev, B. K. 1965. Neskolko Zamechanii po Povodu Stati T. G. Sarycheva, Oldhaminoidnie Brakhiopodi is Permi Zakavkazya. Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal. 2:149–150.Google Scholar
Likharev, B. K., and Elinor, O. L. 1939. Materiali pozhananiyo Verkhnepaleozoiskikh fauni Novoi Zhemli, Brachiopoda. Paleontologiya Sovietskoi Arktiki, Arkticheskogo Nauchno-Issledovatelskogo Instituta. 127(4):245 p., 28 Pls.Google Scholar
Mansuy, H. 1908. Contribution a la Carte Geologique de l'Indochine. Paleontologie, Service Geologique de l'Indochine, Hanoi-Haiphong. 73 p., 18 Pls. Google Scholar
Mansuy, H. 1912a. Paleontologie: Part 2. In Deprat, J. and Mansuy, H. (eds.), Etude Geologique du Yun-Nan Oriental. Ser. Geol. l'Indochine Mem. 1(2): 146 p., 25 Pls. Google Scholar
Mansuy, H. 1912b. Contribution a la Geologie du Tonkin. Ser. Geol. l'Indochine Mem. 1 (4):53–82, Pls. 10–13.Google Scholar
Mansuy, H. 1913a. Faunes des Calcaires a Productus de l'Indochine, series I. Ser. Geol. l'Indochine Mem. 2(4):133 p., 13 Pls.Google Scholar
Mansuy, H. 1913b. Nouvelle Contribution a la Paleontologie de l'Indochine, part I: Contribution a l'Etude des Faunes Paleozoiques et Triasiques du Tonkin. Ser. Geol. l'Indochine Mem. 2(5):1–29, Pls. 1–5.Google Scholar
Mansuy, H. 1914. Faunes des Calcaires a Productus de l'Indochine, series II. Ser. Geol. l'Indochine Mem. 3(3):59 p., 7 Pls.Google Scholar
Marcou, Jules. 1858. Geology of North America, with two reports on the prairies of Arkansas and Texas, the Rocky Mountains of New Mexico, and the Sierra Nevada of California. 144 p. Zurich.Google Scholar
McCammon, H. M. 1969. The Food of Articulate Brachiopods. J. Paleont. 43(4):976–985.Google Scholar
McKee, E. D., Oriel, S. S., et al. 1967. Paleotectonic investigations of the Permian system in the United States. U. S. Geol. Sur. Prof. Pap. 515: xii + 271 p.Google Scholar
M'Coy, F. 1855. Systematic descriptions of the British Paleozoic fossils in the Geological Museum of the University of Cambridge. 3:407–661. London.Google Scholar
Menke, C. T. 1828. Synopsis methodica molluscorum generum omnium et specierum earum quae in Museo Menkeona adservantur. 91 p. Pyrmonti.Google Scholar
Merla, Giovanni. 1934. Fossili Anthracolitici del Caracorum. In Spedizione Italiana de Filippi nell'-Himalaia Caracorum e Turchestan Cinese (1913–1914), ser. 2. 5:101–319, Pls. 20–27. Bologna.Google Scholar
Muir-Wood, H. M. 1955. A History of the Classification of the Phylum Brachiopoda. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist). v + 124 p., 12 figs., London.Google Scholar
Muir-Wood, H. M. 1962. On the morphology and classification of the Brachiopod Suborder Chonetoidea. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.). vii + 132 p., 16 Pls. Google Scholar
Muir-Wood, H. M., and Cooper, G. A. 1960. Morphology, classification and life habits of the Productoidea (Brachiopoda). Geol. Soc. Amer. Mem. 81: xi + 447 p., 135 Pls. Google Scholar
Nakamura, Koji. 1972. Anidanthus and Megousia (Brachiopoda) from the Permian of Japan and Cambodia. Hokkaido Univ. Fac. Sci., Jour., ser. 4, 15(3–4):427–446, 2 Pls. Google Scholar
Nakamura, Koji, Kato, Makoto, and Choi, D. R. 1970. On Permundaria, a New Genus of the Brachiopod Family Linoproductidae. Hokkaido Univ. Fac. Sci., Jour., ser. 4, 14(3):293–299, Pl. 2.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D., Chronic, J., and Roberts, T. G. 1953. Upper Paleozoic of Peru. Geol. Soc. Amer. Mem. 58: vii + 276 p., 43 Pls.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D., Rigby, J. K., Fischer, A. G., Whiteman, A. J., Hickox, J. E., and Bradley, J. S. 1953. The Permian Reef Complex of the Guadalupe Mountain Region, Texas and New Mexico—A Study in Paleoecology, xix + 236 p., W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco.Google Scholar
Norwood, J. G., and Pratten, H. 1855. Notice of Fossils from the Carboniferous of the Western States, Belonging to the Genera Spirifer, Bellerophon, Pleurotomaria, Macrocheilus, Natica, and Loxonema, with Descriptions of Eight New Characteristic Species. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, Jour., ser. 2, 3(8):71–77, Pl. 9.Google Scholar
Oehlert, D. P. 1887. Brachiopodes. In Fischer, P. (ed.), Manuel de Conchyliologie. 11:1190–1334, figs. 892–1138.Google Scholar
Oehlert, D. P. 1890. Notes sur différentes groupes établis dans le genre Orthis et en particulier sur Rhipidomella Oehlert (= Rhipidomys Oehlert, olim). J. Conchiliologie, ser. 3, 30:366–374.Google Scholar
Öpik, A. A. 1934. Über Klitamboniten. Acta Commentationes, Tartu Univ. (Dorpat), ser. A, 26(3): 239 p., 12 Pls. Google Scholar
Orbigny, Alcide d'. 1842. Voyages dans l'Amérique méridionale. Paleont. 3:50–56, Pls. 3–5. Pitois-Levrault et Cie. Paris.Google Scholar
Paeckelmann, W. 1930. Die Brachiopoden des Deutschen Unterkarbons, I. Preussischen Geologischen Landesanstalt, Abhandlungen, n.s. 122: 236 p., Pls. 9–24.Google Scholar
Pajaud, Daniel. 1968. La néotenie chez Thécidées (Brachiopodes). Comptes Rendus l'Acad. Sci. Paris, ser. D, 267(2):156–159.Google Scholar
Pascoe, E. H. 1959. A manual of the geology of India and Burma (3rd ed.). 2:485–1343. Govt. India Press, Calcutta.Google Scholar
Pavlova, E. E. 1965. Revizhiya Roda Neophricodothyris (Otryad Spiriferida). Paleont. Zhurnal, 1965(2):133–137. Revision of the genus Neophricodothyris (order Spiriferida). Translation in Internat. Geol. Review 8(1):84–88, 4 figs.Google Scholar
Pitakpaivan, Kaset. 1965. The Fusulinacean Fossils of Thailand, part I. Fusulines of the Rat Buri Limestone of Thailand. Fac. Sci. Mem., Kyushu Univ., ser. D, 17(1):69 p., 6 Pls.Google Scholar
Prendergast, K. L. 1943. Permian Productinae and Strophalosiinae of Western Australia. Roy. Soc. West. Australia, Jour. 28:1–73, Pls. 1–6.Google Scholar
Ramsbottom, W. H. C. 1952. The Fauna of the Cefn Coed Marine Bands of the Coal Measures at Aberbaiden, near Tondu, Glamorgan. United Kingdom Geol. Sur. Bull. 4:8–32, Pls. 2, 3.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. C. 1927. Paleozoic and Mesozoic Fossils from Yun-nan. Geol. Sur. India Mem., Palaeont. Indica, 10(1):291 p., 20 Pls.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. C. 1931. New Fossils from the Productus Limestones of the Salt Range, with Notes on Other Species. Geol. Sur. India Mem., Palaeont. Indica, n.s., 17:56 p., 6 Pls.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. C. 1944. Brachiopoda and Mollusca from the Productus Limestones of the Salt Range. Geol. Sur. India Mem., Palaeont. Indica, n.s., 23(2): xiv + 678 p., 65 Pls. Google Scholar
Roemer, E. 1880. Ueber eine Kohlenkalk-Fauna der Westküste von Sumatra. Palaeontographica, 27:1–11, Pls. 1–3.Google Scholar
Ross, C. A. 1963. Standard Wolfcampanian Series (Permian), Glass Mountains, Texas. Geol. Soc. Amer. Mem. 88: viii + 205 p., 29 Pls. Google Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S. 1961. The Feeding Mechanism of the Permian Brachiopod Prorichthofenia . Palaeont. 3(4):450–471, Pls. 72–74.Google Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S. 1962. Filter-feeding Mechanisms in Some Brachiopods from New Zealand. Linnean Soc. London, Zool. 44(300):592–615.Google Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S. 1964. The Function of Zigzag Deflections in the Commissures of Fossil Brachiopoda. Palaeont. 7(1):135–171, Pls. 21–29.Google Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S. 1968. Some Analytic Methods in the Study of Ontogeny in Fossils with Accretionary Skeletons. In Paleobiological Aspects of Growth and Development, a Symposium. Paleont. Soc. Mem. 2, J. Paleont. 42:35–49 (supple. to pt. 5).Google Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S. 1970. Living and Fossil Brachiopods. 199 p., 99 figs. Hutchinson and Company. London.Google Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S., and Cowen, R. 1968 [dated 1967]. The Functional Morphology of Some Aberrant Strophomenide Brachiopods from the Permian of Sicily. Boll. Soc. Palaeont. Italiana, 6(2):113–176, Pls. 32–43.Google Scholar
Ruzhentsev, V. E., and Sarycheva, T. G. 1965. The development and change of marine organisms at the Paleozoic-Mesozoic boundary. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Paleont. Inst. Trudy, 108: 431 p., 58 Pls. Translation by D. A. Brown, 1968, Australian Nat. Univ. Pub. 17.Google Scholar
Rzhonsnitskaya, M. A. 1956. Systematization of Rhynchonellida [abstract]. 20th Cong. Geol. Intern., Mexico. Resumenes de los Trabajos Presentados. 125–126.Google Scholar
Sadlick, Walter. 1965. Anderidium, a new term for lateral septa of chonetids (Brachiopoda). J. Paleont. 39(1):157–159.Google Scholar
Sakagami, Sumio. 1963. Bryozoa from Pulae Jong, The Langkawi Islands, Northwest Malaya. Japanese J. Geol. Geogr. 34 (2–4):205–209, Pl. 12.Google Scholar
Sakagami, Sumio. 1966a. The Permian Bryozoan Fauna of Ko Muk, Peninsular Thailand, with the Description of the Cyclostomata. Contr. Geol. Palaeont. SE Asia, XXVII. Japanese J. Geol. Geogr. 37(2–4):141–155, Pl. 5.Google Scholar
Sakagami, Sumio. 1966b. The Cryptostomatous Bryozoa from Ko Muk, Peninsular Thailand. Contr. Geol. Palaeont. SE Asia, XXVIII. Japanese J. Geol. Geogr. 37(2–4):157–168, Pl. 6.Google Scholar
Sakagami, Sumio. 1968. Permian Bryozoa from Khao Phrik, near Rat Buri, Thailand. Contr. Geol. Palaeont. SE Asia, XLIII. In Kobayashi, T. (ed.), Geology and 'Palaeontology of Southeast Asia, 4:45–66, Pls. 9–12.Google Scholar
Sakagami, Sumio. 1969. Fusulinacean Fossils from Thailand, Part IV. On Some Permian Fusulinaceans from Peninsular Thailand. Contr. Geol. Palaeont. SE Asia, LXX. In T. Kobayashi (ed.), Geology and Palaeontology of Southeast Asia, 6:266–275, Pls. 27, 28.Google Scholar
Sakagami, Sumio. 1970a. Addition to the Permian Bryozoa from Ko Muk, Peninsular Thailand. Contr. Geol. Palaeont. SE Asia, LXXX. In Kobayashi, T. (ed.), Geology and Palaeontology of Southeast Asia, 8:43–68, Pls. 7–13.Google Scholar
Sakagami, Sumio. 1970b. On the Paleozoic Bryozoa of Japan and Thai-Malayan Districts. J. Paleont. 44(4):680–692, 2 figs.Google Scholar
Sartenaer, Paul. 1955. Considerations sur le Stegidium (Brachiopodes). Inst. Roy. Sci. Nat. Belgique, Bull. 31(79):1–12.Google Scholar
Sarycheva, T. G. (ed.). 1960. Osnovi Paleontologii: Mshanki, Brakhiopodi. Isdatelstvo Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow. 343 p., 82 Pls. Google Scholar
Sarycheva, T. G. 1968. Brakhiopodi Verkhnego Paleozoya Vostochnogo Kazakhstana. Trudy Paleont. Inst., Moscow. 121: 211 p., 33 Pls. Google Scholar
Sarycheva, T. G. 1971. O Produktidakh Rodov Kutorginella i Tubaria . Paleont. Zhurnal, 1971 (4):35–48, Pl. 5.Google Scholar
Sarycheva, T. G., and Grunt, T. A. 1969. Morphology and Classification of Productids of the Family Chonostegidae. Paleont. Zhurnal, 1969(3):70–84, Pl. 4.Google Scholar
Sarycheva, T. G., and Sokolskaya, A. N. 1952. Opredelital Paleozoiskikh Brakhiopod Podmoskovnoi Kotlovini [A Key to the Paleozoic Brachiopods of the Moscow Basin]. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Trudy Paleont. Inst. 38: 307 p., 71 Pls. Google Scholar
Schauroth, H. von. 1854. Ein Beitrag zur Paläontologie des Deutschen Zechsteingebirges. Deuts. Geol. Gesell., Zeitschrift 6(3):539–577, Pls. 20–22.Google Scholar
Schellwien, E. 1892. Die Fauna des Karnischen Fusulinenkalks, part I: Geologische Einleitung und Brachiopods. Palaeontographica 39: 56 p., 8 Pls. Google Scholar
Schellwien, E. 1900. Die Fauna der Trogkofelschichten in den Karnischen Alpen und den Karawanken, I: Die Brachiopoden. Abhandlungen des Kaiserlischköniglichen Geol. Reichsanst., Wien, 16(1):122 p., 15 Pls.Google Scholar
Schlotheim, E. F. von. 1816. Beitrage zur Naturgeschichte der Versteinerungen. In Geognostiche Hinsicht. Akad. Wissenschaften Munchen, Math.-Phys. Klasse, Denkschrift, 6:13–36.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Herta. 1937. Zur Morphogenie der Rhynchonelliden. Senckenbergiana, 19(1–2):22–60.Google Scholar
Schuchert, Charles. 1913. Brachiopoda. In von Zittel, D. A. (ed.), Textbook of Paleontology, I. (translated and edited by Eastman, C. R.), 2nd Ed: 355–420. MacMillan and Co. London.Google Scholar
Schuchert, Charles, and Cooper, G. A. 1932. Brachiopod Genera of the Suborders Orthoidea and Pentameroidea. Peabody Mus. Nat. Hist. Mem. 4(1): 270 p., Pls. A, 1–29.Google Scholar
Schuchert, Charles, and LeVene, C. M. 1929. Fossilium Catalogus. 1: Animalia, pt. 42: Brachiopoda. 140 p. W. Junk. Berlin.Google Scholar
Schumann, Dietrich. 1969. “Byssus”-artige Stielmuskel-Konvergenzen by articulaten Brachiopoden. Neues Jahrb. Geol., Paläont., Abh., 133(2):199–210, 6 figs., pls. 20–23.Google Scholar
Schwager, Conrad. 1887. Salt Range Fossils, Protozoa. Geol. Sur. India Mem., Palaeont. Indica, ser. 13, 1(7):983–990, Pls. 126–128.Google Scholar
Seidlitz, W. von. 1913. Misolia, eine neue Brachiopoden-Gattung aus den Athyridenkalken von Buru und Misol. Palaeontographica, 2(2):163–193, Pls. 12–14 (suppl. 4).Google Scholar
Sestini, N. F. 1965. Permian Fossils of the Upper Hunza Valley. Italian Exped. Karakorum (K2) und Hindu Kush, ser. 4, 135–148, Pl. 20. E. J. Brill. Leiden.Google Scholar
Shimizu, Daikichiro. 1963. Permian Brachiopod Fossils of the Maizuru Group found on the North of Okayama City, Japan. Univ. Kyoto, Mem. College Sci., ser. B, 30(2):69–80, Pls. 4, 5.Google Scholar
Shimizu, Daikichiro. 1966. Permian Brachiopod Fossils of Timor. Univ. Kyoto, Mem. College Sci., ser. B, 32(4):401–426, Pls. 15–18.Google Scholar
Skinner, J. W., and Wilde, G. L. 1965. Permian biostratigraphy and fusulinid faunas of the Shasta Lake area, Northern California. Univ. Kansas Paleont. Contr., 6:98 p., 65 Pls.Google Scholar
Sowerby, James. 1814. The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain, 1(1812–1815): vii + 234 p., Pls. 1–102.Google Scholar
Sowerby, James. 1823. The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain, 5(1823–1825):1–168, Pls. 407–503.Google Scholar
Stehli, F. G. 1954. Lower Leonardian Brachiopoda of the Sierra Diablo, Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. Bull., 105(3):263–358, Pls. 18–27.Google Scholar
Stehli, F. G. 1956. Notes on Oldhaminid Brachiopods. J. Paleont. 35(2):305–313, Pls. 41, 42.Google Scholar
Stehli, F. G. 1961. New genera of Upper Paleozoic terebratuloids. J. Paleont. 35(3):457–466, 8 text-figs., Pl. 62.Google Scholar
Stehli, F. G. 1970. A Test of the Earth's Magnetic Field during Permian Time. J. Geophy. Res., 75(17):3325–3342.Google Scholar
Stehli, F. G. 1971. Tethyan and Boreal Permian faunas and their significance. In Dutro, J. T. Jr. (ed.), Paleozoic Perspectives: A Paleontological Tribute to G. Arthur Cooper. Smithsonian Contr. Paleobiol., 3:337–345.Google Scholar
Stehli, F. G. 1973. Permian Brachiopods. In Hallam, A. (ed.), Atlas of Paleobiogeography. 143–149. Elsevier. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Stehli, F. G., and Grant, R. E. 1970. Permian brachiopods from Huehuetenango, Guatemala. Jour. Paleontology, 44(1):23–36, 3 figs., pls. 7–13.Google Scholar
Stehli, F. G., 1971. Permian Brachiopods from Axel Heiberg Island, Canada, and an index of sampling efficiency. J. Paleont., 45(3):502–521, Pls. 61–66.Google Scholar
Stepanov, D. L., Golshani, F., and Stöcklin, J. 1969. Upper Permian and Permian-Triassic boundary in north Iran. Geol. Sur. Iran, Rept. 12:72 p., 15 Pls.Google Scholar
Sturgeon, M. T., and Hoare, R. D. 1968. Pennsylvanian Brachiopods of Ohio. Ohio Dept. Nat. Res., Geol. Sur. Bull. 63:95 p., 22 Pls.Google Scholar
Taraz, Hushang. 1971. Uppermost Permian and Permo-Triassic Transition Beds in Central Iran. Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull., 55(8):1280–1294.Google Scholar
Teichert, Curt. 1966. Nomenclature and Correlation of the Permian “Productus Limestone”, Salt Range, West Pakistan. Geol. Sur. Pakistan, Records, 15(1):20 p.Google Scholar
Termier, Genevieve, Termier, Henri, and Pajaud, Daniel. 1967. Découverte d'une Thécidée dans le Permien du Texas. Comptes Rendus Séances l'Acad. Sci. (Paris), ser. D, 263:332–335.Google Scholar
Termier, Henri, and Termier, G. 1949. Sur la Classification des Brachiopodes. Soc. l'Hist. Nat. l'Afrique Nord, Bull. 40:51–63.Google Scholar
Termier, Henri, 1960 [1959]. Contribution a la Classification des Brachiopodes: le Lophophore des Collophides nov. ord. and Appendice: Les Oldhamides du Cambodge. Soc. Geol. France Bull., ser. 7, 1(3): 233–244, Pl. 3.Google Scholar
Termier, Henri, 1970. Les Productoidés du Djoulfien (Permien Superieur) dans la Tethys Orientale: Essai sur l'Agonie d'un Phylum. Annales Soc. Geol. Nord (Lille), 90(4):443–461, Pls. 29–31.Google Scholar
Thomas, G. A. 1958. The Permian Orthotetacea of Western Australia. Austr. Bur. Min. Res., Geol., Geophy. Bull., 39:158 p., 22 Pls.Google Scholar
Thomas, G. A. 1971. Carboniferous and Early Permian Brachiopods from Western and Northern Australia. Austr. Bur. Min. Res., Geol., Geophy. Bull., 56: vi + 276 p., 31 Pls. Google Scholar
Toriyama, Ryuzo. 1967. The Rat Buri Limestone of Thailand. Tokyo Geogr. Soc, J. Geogr. 76(4): 192–196.Google Scholar
Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. 1965. Brachiopoda, Part H. Moore, R. C. (ed.). Geol. Soc. Amer. and Univ. Kansas Press. 927 p., 746 figs. Google Scholar
Tschernyschew, T. N. 1902. Die obercarbonischen Brachiopoden des Ural und des Timan. Comite Geol. St. Petersbourg, Mem., 16(2):749 p., 63 Pls.Google Scholar
Tschernyschew, T. N. 1914. Die Fauna der oberpalaeozoischen Ablagerungen des Darvas. Comite Geol. St. Petersbourg, Mem., n.s., 104: 66 p., 10 Pls. Google Scholar
Ustritskii, V. I. 1960 [dated 1959]. Genus Lichareviella. In Ustritskii, V. I. and Chan, A.-C. (eds.), Stratigrafiya i Fauna Kamennougolnikh i Permskikh Otlozhenii Zapadnogo Kun-Linya. Ministerstvo Geol. Kir Nauchno-Issledovatelskii Geol. Inst., Pekin, p. 134.Google Scholar
Ustritskii, V. I., and Chernyak, G. E. 1963. Biostratigrafiya i brakhiopodi Verkhnego Paleozoya Taymira. Nauchno-Issledovatelskogo Inst. Geol. Arktiki, Trudy. 134:139 p., 47 Pls.Google Scholar
de Verneuil, E. 1845. Paleontologie: Mollusques, Brachiopodes. In Murchison, R. I., de Verneuil, E. and de Keyserling, A. (eds.), Geologie de la Russie d'Europe et des Montagnes de l'Oural, 2(3):17–395, 46 Pls. John Murray. Paris. Bertrand.Google Scholar
Waagen, W. H. 1882–1885. Salt Range Fossils, part 4: (2) Brachiopoda. Geol. Sur. India Mem., Palaeont. Indica, ser. 13, 1:329–770, Pls. 25–86. [(1):329–390, Pls. 25–28, December 1882; (2): 391–546, Pls. 29–49, August 1883; (3):547–610, Pls. 50–57, May 1884; (4):611–728, Pls. 58–81, December 1884; (5):729–770, Pls. 82–86, July 1885].Google Scholar
Waagen, W. H. 1891. Salt Range Fossils: Geological Results. Geol. Sur. India Mem., Palaeont. Indica, ser. 13. 4(2):89–242, 8 Pls.Google Scholar
Wang, Yü. 1955. New Genera of Brachiopods. Scientia Sinica, 4(2):327–357, 6 Pls.Google Scholar
Wang, Yü. 1956. New Species of Brachiopods, II. Scientia Sinica, 5(5):577–601, Pls. 6–10. Kraus Reprint Ltd., Nendeln-Neichtenstein, 1967. [First published in Chinese in Acta Paleont. Sinica, 4(3):385–405, 1956.] Google Scholar
Wanner, Johannes, and Sieverts, Hertha. 1935. Zur Kenntnis der Permischen Brachiopoden von Timor, 1: Lyttoniidae und ihre Biologische und Stammes-geschichtliche Bedeutung. Neues Jahr. Min., Geol., Paläont. 74(B):201–281, 4 Pls. Google Scholar
Waterhouse, J. B. 1959. Genus Leptalosia Dunbar and Condra. N.Z. Jour. Geol. Geophy. 2(2): 338–341.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, J. B. 1967. Proposal of Series and Stages for the Permian in New Zealand. Roy. Soc. N.Z., Trans. (Geol.), 5(6):161–180.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, J. B. 1970. Permian Brachiopod Retimarginifera n. gen. n. sp. from the Byro Group of Carnarvon Basin, Western Australia. Roy. Soc. Western Austr. Jour., 53(4):120–128, 2 figs.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, J. B. 1971. The Permian Brachiopod Genus Terrakea Booker, 1930. In Dutro, J. T. Jr. (ed.), Paleozoic Perspectives: A Paleontological Tribute to G. Arthur Cooper. Smithsonian Contr. Paleobiol., 3:347–361, 2 Pls.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, J. B. 1973. Permian Brachiopod Correlations for South-East Asia. Geol. Soc. Malaysia, Bull., 6: 187–210, 3 tab. Google Scholar
Waterhouse, J. B., and Piyasin, Sangat. 1970. Mid-Permian Brachiopods from Khao Phrik, Thailand. Paleontographica, 135(A):83–197, Pls. 14–32. Stuttgart. [Issued November 13, 1970.] Google Scholar
Waterhouse, J. B., and Shah, S. C. 1966. Costalosia, a New Strophalosiid Genus (Brachiopoda) from the Permian of South Asia. Roy. Soc. N.Z., Trans, 4(12):229–234, 2 Pls.Google Scholar
Westbroek, Pieter. 1968. Morphological observations with systematic implications on some Paleozoic Rhynchonellida from Europe, with special emphasis on the Uncinulidae. Leidse Geol. Mededlingen, 14:1–82, 14 Pls.Google Scholar
White, C. A. 1862. Description of New Species of Fossils from the Devonian and Carboniferous Rocks of the Mississippi Valley. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist, Proceed, 9:8–33.Google Scholar
White, C. A., and St. John, O. 1867. Descriptions of New Subcarboniferous Fossils, Collected upon the Geological Survey of Iowa, Together with a Notice of New Generic Characters Involved in Two Species of Brachiopoda. Chicago Acad. Sci, Trans, 1:115–127.Google Scholar
Williams, Alwyn. 1953. The Morphology and Classification of the Oldhaminid Brachiopods. Washington Acad. Sci, Jour, 43(9):279–287, 3 Pls.Google Scholar
Williams, Alwyn, et al. 1965. Brachiopoda. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, part H. 927 p., 746 figs. Geol. Soc. Amer. and Univ. Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Yanagida, Juichi. 1964. Permian Brachiopods from Central Thailand. Contr. Geol. Palaeont. SE Asia, IX, Fac. Sci. Mem, Kyushu Univ. 15(1):22 p., 3 Pls.Google Scholar
Yanagida, Juichi. 1967. Early Permian Brachiopods from North-central Thailand. Contr. Geol. Palaeont. SE Asia, XXXV. In Kobayashi, T. (ed.), Geol. and Palaeontology of Southeast Asia, 3:46–97, Pls. 11–23.Google Scholar
Yanagida, Juichi. 1970. Permian Brachiopods from Khao Phrik, near Rat Buri, Thailand. Contr. Geol. Palaeont. SE Asia, LXXXI. In Kobayashi, T. (ed.), Geology and Paleontology of Southeast Asia, 8:69–96, Pls. 14–16. [Dated Dec. 25, 1970; issued Jan. 30, 1971; according to personal communication from J. Yanagida, Aug. 24, 1971.] Google Scholar
Yochelson, E. L. 1956. Permian Gastropoda of the Southwestern United States, 1: Euomphalacea, Trochonematacea, Pseudophoracea, Anomphalacea, Craspedostomatacea, and Platyceratacea. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. Bull. 110(3):177–275, Pls. 9–24. [Note by A. L. Bowsher, The Effect of the Crinoid Host on the Variability of Permian Platyceratids, p. 261–263.] Google Scholar