Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T10:07:50.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phylogenetic Analysis of the Spiny Oryctocephalids (Trilobita, Corynexochida?, Oryctocephalidae), Cambrian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2015

Frederick A. Sundberg
Frederick A. Sundberg*
Affiliation:
Show Low High School, 500 E. Old Linden Rd., Show Low, AZ 85901, USA,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Phylogenetic analyses of the Cambrian spiny oryctocephalids support the elevation to familiar rank of Oryctocephalidae Beecher, 1897 and indicate that the family can be divided into two clades, here designated as the subfamilies Oryctocephalinae Beecher, 1897 and Lancastriinae Kobayashi, 1935. Curvoryctocephaliinae Zhao and Yuan in Yuan et al., 2002 is considered here a junior synonym of Lancastriinae. Oryctocephalinae have tapered or parallel sided glabella and is composed of species of Oryctocephalus Walcott, 1886. The subgenera Oryctocephalus (Oryctocephalus) and O. (Eoryctocephalus) Zhao and Yuan in Yuan et al., 2002 do not form separate clades and are here rejected.

The genera of the Lancastriinae have expanding glabellae. The subfamily is composed of a broad variety of genera that can be divided into three major subclades: Lancastria, Protoryctocephalus, and Oryctocephalites. The Lancastria subclade is composed of Lancastria Kobayashi, 1935, Changaspis Lee in Chien, 1961, and Goldfieldia Palmer, 1964 occurring at the base of the Lancastriinae. Goldfieldia and Lancastria form a sister group to Changaspis. The long branches in the phylograms indicated significant differences between these taxa; thus, the genus Goldfieldia is maintained. The Protoryctocephalus subclade is monogeneric and forms a sister group to the Oryctocephalites subclade. The Oryctocephalites subclade consists of several species of this genus and the more derived forms Metabalangia Qian and Yuan in Zhang et al., 1980 and Tonkinella Mansuy, 1916. Oryctocephaloides Yuan in Zhang et al., 1980 is considered a junior synonym of Oryctocephalites Resser, 1939. The subgenera Oryctocephalites (Oryctocephalites) and O. (Parachangaspis) Zhao and Yuan in Yuan et al., 2002 do not form separate clades. The later subgenus occurs in the basal portion of the Oryctocephalites subclade indicating that it is a paraphyletic taxon.

Opsiosoryctocephalus Sundberg, 1994, Oryctocephalops Lermontova, 1940, and Curvoryctocephalus Zhao and Yuan in Yuan et al., 2002 are not consistent in their placement within the phylogenetic analyses, although they always occur in the Lancastriinae. As a result they are not placed within a subclade within Lancastriinae.

The type species Goldfieldia pacifica Palmer, 1964 was based solely on cranidia. This species is redescribed using topotype material that includes cranidia, librigenae, hypostomes, thorax, and pygidia.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 88 , Issue 3 , May 2014 , pp. 556 - 587
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahn, S. Y., Babcock, L. E., and Hollingsworth, J. S. 2011. Revised stratigraphic nomenclature for parts of the Ediacaran–Cambrian Series 2 succession in the southern Great Basin, U.S.A. Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Palaentologists, 42:105–114.Google Scholar
Babcock, L. E., Peng, S.-C., Geyer, G., and Shergold, J. H. 2005. Changing perspectives on Cambrian chronostratigraphy and progress toward subdivision of the Cambrian System. Geosciences Journal, 9:101–106.Google Scholar
Beecher, C. E. 1897. Outline of a natural classification of the trilobites. American Journal of Science, Series 4, 3:89–106, 181–207.Google Scholar
Blaker, M. R. and Peel, J. S. 1997. Lower Cambrian trilobites from North Greenland. Meddelelser on Grønland Geoscience 35, 145 p.Google Scholar
Bordonaro, O. L. and Baldis, B. A. 1987. Tonkinella stephensis (Trilobita) en el Cámbrico Medio de la Sierra del Tontal, Precordillera de San Juan, Argentina, su importancia paleogeográfica. IV Congreso Latinoamericano de Paleontología, Bolivia, Memorias 1:5–15.Google Scholar
Chang, W.-T. 1963. A classification of the Cambrian trilobites from north and northeastern China, with description of new families and new genera. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 11:447–487.Google Scholar
Chappill, J. A. 1989. Quantitative characters in phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics, 5:217–234.Google Scholar
Chernysheva, N. E. 1952. On find of middle Cambrian trilobites in Yangud River basin (middle-Vitim Mountain region), p. 108–118, pl. 1. In Paleontology and Stratigraphy. Transactions of All-Union Scientific Research Geological Institute, Gosgeoltekhizdat, Leningrad. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Chernysheva, N. E. 1962. Kembriiskye trilobity Semeistva Oryctocephalidae. In Problemy Neftegazonosnosti Sovetskoi Arktiki: Paleontologiya i Biostratigrafiya 3. Trudy nauchno-issledovatel'skogo geologorazvedochnogo neftianogo Institutaa Arktiki, 127:3–52. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Chien, Y.-Y. 1961. Cambrian trilobites from Sandu and Duyun, southern Kweichow. Acta Palaeontologia Sinica, 9:110–139. (In Chinese) Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. 1902. Rectification de la nomenclature. Revista Critica Paleozoologie, 16:52.Google Scholar
Dalmatov, B. A. 1975. Trilobites, 181 p. In Yazmir, M. M., Dalmatov, B. A. and Yazmir, I. K. (eds.), Atlas of Paleozoic and Mesozoic Fauna and Flora of Buriyatskaya ASSR. Paleozoic. Moscow, Nedra. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Egorova, L. I., Hsiang, L. W., Lee, S. J., Nan, R. S., and Kuo, Z. M. 1963. Cambrian trilobite fauna from Guizhou and western Hunan. Bulletin of the Academy of Geology, Ministry of Geology, Series B: Stratigraphy and Palaeontology, 3:5–89. Chinese Industrial Press, Beijing. (In Chinese) Google Scholar
Farris, J. S. 1969. A successive approximations approach to character weighting. Systematic Zoology, 18:374–385.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1990. Ontogeny, hypostome attachment and trilobite classification. Palaeontology, 33:529–576.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1997. Classification, p. 289–302. In Kaesler, R. L. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part O, Arthropoda 1, Trilobita, Revised. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas, Boulder and Lawrence.Google Scholar
Fritz, W. H. 1971. Geological Setting of the Burgess Shale. Proceedings of the North American Paleontological Convention September 1969:1155–1170.Google Scholar
Fritz, W. H. 1972. Lower Cambrian trilobites from the Sekwi Formation type section, Mackenzie Mountains, northwestern Canada. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin 212, 90 p.Google Scholar
Gaines, R. R., Mering, J. A., Zhao, Y.-L., and Peng, J. 2011. Stratigraphic and microfacies analysis of the Kaili Formation, a candidate GSSP for the Cambrian Series 2–Series 3 boundary. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 311:171–183.Google Scholar
Geyer, G. and Peel, J. S. 2011. The Henson Gletscher Formation, North Greenland, and its bearing on the global Cambrian Series 2-Series 3 boundary. Bulletin of Geosciences, 86:465–534.Google Scholar
Goloboff, P. A. 1993. Estimating character weights during tree search. Cladistics, 9:83–91.Google Scholar
Goloboff, P. A., Mattoni, C. I., and Quinteros, A. S. 2006. Continuous characters analyzed as such. Cladistics, 22:589–601.Google Scholar
Harrington, H. J., Henningsmoen, G., Howell, B. F., Jaanusson, V., Lochman-Balk, C., Moore, R. C., Poulsen, Chr., Rasetti, F., Richter, E., Richter, R., Schmidt, H., Sdzuy, K., Struve, W., Størmer, S. L., Stubblefield, C. J., Tripp, R., Weller, J. M., and Whittington, H. B. 1959. Arthropoda 1. Part O. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Geological Society of America and Lawrence, Kansas, University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, 560 p.Google Scholar
Hopkins, M. J. and Webster, M. 2009. Ontogeny and geographic variation of a new species of the corynexochine trilobite Zacanthopsis (Dyeran, Cambrian). Journal of Paleontology, 83:524–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howley, R. A. and Jiang, G. 2010. The Cambrian Drumian carbon isotope excursion (DICE) in the Great Basin, western United States. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 296:138–150.Google Scholar
Howley, R. A., Rees, M. N., and Jiang, G.-Q. 2006. Significance of middle Cambrian mixed carbonate-siliciclastic units for global correlation: Southern Nevada, U.S.A. Palaeoworld, 15:360–366.Google Scholar
Hughes, N. C., Minelli, A., and Fusco, G. 2006. The ontogeny of trilobite segmentation: A comparative approach. Paleobiology, 32:602–627.Google Scholar
Hupé, P. 1955. Classification des trilobites. Annales de Paléontologie, 41:91–325.Google Scholar
International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. 1999. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, Fourth Edition. The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, http://www.nhm.ac.uk/hosted-sites/iczn/code/.Google Scholar
Jell, P. A. 1975. Australian middle Cambrian eodiscoids with a review of the superfamily. Palaeontographica, Abt. A, 150, 97 p., 29 pls.Google Scholar
Jell, P. A. and Hughes, N. C. 1997. Himalayan Cambrian Trilobites. Special Papers in Palaeontology, 58, 113 p.Google Scholar
Khalfin, L. L. (ed.). 1960. Biostratigraphya paleozoya Sayano-Altayskov gornoy oblasti. Tom 1. Trudy Sibirskogo nauchno-issledovatel'skogo instituta geologii, geofiziki i mineral'nogo syr'ya (SNIIGGiMS) 19, 497 p., Novosibisk. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Källersjö, M., Albert, V. A., and Farris, J. S. 1999. Homoplasy Increases Phylogenetic Structure. Cladistics, 15:91–93.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T. 1934. Middle Cambrian fossils from Kashmir. American Journal of Science, series 5, 27:295–302.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T. 1935. The Cambro–Ordovician formations and faunas of South Chosen. Paleontology, pt. III. Cambrian Faunas of South Chosen with special study on the Cambrian trilobite genera and families. Journal Faculty of Science Imperial University of Tokyo, 4:49–344.Google Scholar
Lermontova, E. V. 1940. Class Trilobita, p. 112–162. In Vologdin, A. (ed.), Atlas of the Leading Forms of the Fossil Faunas of the U.S.S.R. Volume I. Cambrian. State Editorial Office for Geological Literature, Moscow. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Liñán, E. and Gozalo, R. 1999. Nuevos trilobites del Cámbrico Inferior de Aragón, p. 255–261. In Gamez Vintaned, J. A. and Liñán, E. (eds.), 25 Años de Paleontología Aragonesa, Homenaje al Prof. Leandro Sequeiros. Zaragoza, Institución “Fernando el Católico.”Google Scholar
Liu, Y. 1982. Trilobita, p. 290–347, 882–897. In Palaeontological atlas of Hunan, part 2, stratigraphy and palaeontology, no.1. Geological Publishing House, Beijing. (In Chinese) Google Scholar
Lu, Y.-H., Chang, W.-T., Chien, Y.-Y., Chuy, C.-L., Lin, H.-L., Chow, T.-Y., Chien, Y., Zhang, S.-G., and Wu, H. 1974. Cambrian Trilobites, p. 82–107. In Handbook of the Stratigraphy and Paleontology in southwest China. Science Press, Beijing. (In Chinese) Google Scholar
Mansuy, H. 1916. Faunes cambriennes de l'Extrême-Orient méridional. Mémoires du Service Géologique de l'Indochine, 5:1–48.Google Scholar
McCollum, M. B. and McCollum, L. B. 2011. Depositional sequences in the Laurentian Delamaran Stage, Southern Great Basin, U.S.A., p. 154–173. In Hollingsworth, J. S., Sundberg, F. A., and Foster, J. R. (eds.), Cambrian Stratigraphy and Paleontology of Northern Arizona and Southern Nevada, The 16th Field Conference of the Cambrian Stage Subdivision Working Group, International Subcommission on Cambrian Stratigraphy Flagstaff, Arizona, and Southern Nevada, United States. Museum of Northern Arizona Bulletin, 67, Flagstaff, Arizona.Google Scholar
McNamara, K. J. 1986. The role of heterochrony in the evolution of Cambrian trilobites. Biological Reviews, 61:121–156.Google Scholar
McNamara, K. J., Feng, Y., and Zhou, Z. 2006. Ontongeny and heterochrony in the early Cambrian oryctocephalid trilobites Changaspis, Duyunaspis and Balangia from China. Palaeontology, 49:1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naimark, E., Shabanov, Y. Y., and Korovnikov, I. V. 2011. Cambrian trilobite Ovatoryctocara Tchernysheva, 1962 from Siberia. Bulletin of Geosciences, 86:405–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, A. R. 1964. An unusual lower Cambrian trilobite fauna from Nevada. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, 483-F, 13 p.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. 1968. Cambrian trilobites of east-central Alaska. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 559-B, 115 p., 15 pls.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. and Gatehouse, C. G. 1972. Early and middle Cambrian trilobites from Antarctica. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, 456D, 37 p., pls. 1–6.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. and Halley, R. B. 1979. Physical stratigraphy and trilobite biostratigraphy of the Carrara Formation (lower and middle Cambrian) in the southern Great Basin. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 1047, 131 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, A. R. and Repina, L. N. 1993. Through a glass darkly: Taxonomy, phylogeny and biostratigraphy of the Olenellina. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, New Series 3. University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 35 p.Google Scholar
Peng, S.-C., Hughes, N. C., Heim, N. A., Sell, B. K., Zhu, X.-J., Myrow, P. M., and Parcha, S. K. 2009. Cambrian trilobites from the Parahio and Zanskar valleys, Indian Himalaya. Journal of Paleontology, 83, supplement 6, 93 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, S.-C. and Babcock, L. E. 2011. Continuing progress on chronostratigraphic subdivision of the Cambrian System. Bulletin of Geosciences, 86:391–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poe, S. and Wiens, J. J. 2000. Character selection and the methodology of morphological phylogenetics, p. 20–36. In Wiens, J. J. (ed.), Phylogenetic Analysis of Morphological Data. Smithsonian Series in Comparative Evolutionary Biology, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Prendini, L. 2001. Species or supraspecific taxa as terminals in cladistic analysis? Groundplans versus exemplars revisited. Systematic Biology, 50:290–300.Google Scholar
Rasetti, F. 1951. Middle Cambrian stratigraphy and faunas of the Canadian Rocky Mountains. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 116(5), 277 p.Google Scholar
Rasetti, F. 1957. Additional fossils from the middle Cambrian Mt. Whyte Formation of the Canadian Rocky Mountains. Journal of Paleontology, 31:955–972.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. C. 1899. Woodwardian Museum Notes: A new trilobite from Mount Stephen, Field, B. C. Geological Magazine, New Series (Decade 4), 6:358–361.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. C. 1910. The Cambrian Fossils of Spiti. Palaeontologia Indica. The Geological Survey of India, Series 15, Vol. 7, Mem. 1, 70 p.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. C. 1934. Cambrian and Ordovician fossils from Kashmir. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India. Palaeontologa Indica, New Series, Vol. 21, No. 2, 38 p.Google Scholar
Resser, C. E. 1938 a. Middle Cambrian fossils from Pend Oreille Lake, Idaho. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 97(3), 12 p.Google Scholar
Resser, C. E. 1938 b. Fourth contribution to nomenclature of Cambrian fossils. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 97(10), 43 p.Google Scholar
Resser, C. E. 1939. The Ptarmigania Strata of the northern Wasatch Mountains. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 98, 72 p.Google Scholar
Robison, R. A. 1964. Late middle Cambrian faunas from western Utah. Journal of Paleontology, 38:510–566.Google Scholar
Robison, R. A. 1967. Ontogeny of Bathyuriscus fimbriatus and its bearing on affinities of corynexochid trilobites. Journal of Paleontology, 41:213–221.Google Scholar
Robison, R. A. and Babcock, L. E. 2011. Systematics, paleobiology, and taphonomy of some exceptionally preserved trilobites from Cambrian Lagerstätten of Utah. Paleontological Contributions 5, 47 p.Google Scholar
Rusconi, C. 1952. Fósiles cámbricos del Cerro Aspero, Mendoza. Revista del Museo Historia Natural de Mendoza, 6 (1–4):63–122, pls. 1–6.Google Scholar
Saito, K. 1934. Older Cambrian Trilobita and Conchostraca from north-western Korea. Japanese Journal of Geology and Geography, 11:211–237.Google Scholar
Shabanov, Y. Y., Korovnikov, I. V., Pereladov, V. S., Pak, K. L., and Fefelov, A. F. 2008 a. Kuonamka Formation section on Molodo River—a candidate for global stratotype of the lower boundary of the middle Cambrian (East of the Siberian Platform). Cambrian Sections of the Siberian Platform—a candidate for statotypes of subdivisions of the International Stratigraphical scheme (stratigraphy and paleontology), p. 59–70. In Materials for 13 International Field Conference of the Cambrian Stage Subdivision Working Group, Novosibirsk. Sb. RAS, Moscow, Novosibirsk. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Shabanov, Y. Y., Korovnikov, I. V., Pereladov, V. S., and Fefelov, A. F. 2008 b. The traditional lower–middle Cambrian boundary in the Kuonamka Formation of the Molodo River section (the southeastern slope of the Olenek Uplift of the Siberian Platform) proposed as a candidate for GSSP of the lower boundary of the middle Cambrian and its basal (Molodian) stage, defined by the FAD of Ovatoryctocara granulata , p. 8–59. In Rozanov, A. Y., Varlamov, A. I., Parkhaev, P. Y., and Pack, K. L. (eds.), The Cambrian System of the Siberian Platform, Part 2: North-east of the Siberian Platform. Moscow-Novosibirsk PIN RAS.Google Scholar
Shergold, J. H. 1969. Oryctocephalidae (Trilobita: Middle Cambrian) of Australia. Bulletin of the Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics, Australia, 104, 66 p.Google Scholar
Stewart, J. H. 1970. Upper Precambrian and lower Cambrian strata in the southern Great Basin, California and Nevada. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 620, 206 p.Google Scholar
Sundberg, F. A. 1991. Paleogeography of western Utah and eastern Nevada during the Ehmaniella Biochron (middle Cambrian), p. 387–399. In Cooper, J. D. and Stevens, C. (eds.), Paleozoic Paleogeography of the Western United States, II. Pacific Section, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists.Google Scholar
Sundberg, F. A. 1994. Corynexochida and Ptychopariida (Trilobita, Arthropoda) of the Ehmaniella Biozone (middle Cambrian), Utah and Nevada. Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History, Contributions in Science 446, 137 p.Google Scholar
Sundberg, F. A. 2000. Homeotic evolution in Cambrian trilobites. Paleobiology, 26:258–270.Google Scholar
Sundberg, F. A. 2004. Cladistic analysis of early–middle Cambrian kochaspid trilobites. Journal of Paleontology, 78:920–940.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundberg, F. A. 2005. The Topazan Stage, a new Laurentian Stage (Lincolnian Series—“middle” Cambrian). Journal of Paleontology, 79:63–71.Google Scholar
Sundberg, F. A. 2006. Taxonomic assignment of the Cambrian trilobite Tonkinella Mansuy, 1916 (Corynexochida), with a new species from California. Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists, 32:59–74.Google Scholar
Sundberg, F. A. 2008. Potential outgroup for the oryctocephalids, a cladistic analysis of Cambrian trilobite hypostomes, p. 381–387. In Gozalo, R. R. and García-Bellido, D. (eds.), Advances in Trilobite Research. Cuadernos del Museo Geominero, n° 9. Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, Madrid, 2008. Instituto Geológico y Minero de España.Google Scholar
Sundberg, F. A. 2011. Delamaran biostratigraphy and lithostratigraphy of Southern Nevada, p. 174–185. In Hollingsworth, J. S., Sundberg, F. A., and Foster, J. R. (eds.), Cambrian Stratigraphy and Paleontology of Northern Arizona and Southern Nevada, The 16th Field Conference of the Cambrian Stage Subdivision Working Group, International Subcommission on Cambrian Stratigraphy Flagstaff, Arizona, and Southern Nevada, United States. Museum of Northern Arizona Bulletin, 67, Flagstaff, Arizona.Google Scholar
Sundberg, F. A. and McCollum, L. B. 1997. Oryctocephalids (Corynexochida: Trilobita) of the lower–middle Cambrian boundary interval from California and Nevada. Journal of Paleontology, 71:1065–1090.Google Scholar
Sundberg, F. A. and McCollum, L. B. 2003 a. Trilobites of the lower middle Cambrian Poliella denticulata Biozone (new) of southeastern Nevada. Journal of Paleontology, 77:331–359.Google Scholar
Sundberg, F. A. and McCollum, L. B. 2003 b. Early to mid Cambrian trilobites of the outer shelf deposits of Nevada and California. Palaeontology, 42:945–986.Google Scholar
Sundberg, F. A., Zhao, Y.-L., Yuan, J.-L., and Lin, J.-P. 2011. Detailed trilobite biostratigraphy across the proposed GSSP for stage 5 (“middle Cambrian” boundary) at the Wuliu-Zengjianyan section, Guizhou, China. Bulletin of Geosciences, 86:423–464.Google Scholar
Suvorova, N. P. 1964. Trilobity Korineksokhoidy i istoricheskoe razvitie. Trudy paleontologicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR, 103:3–319. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Swinnerton, H. H. 1915. Suggestions for a revised classification of trilobites. Geological Magazine, new series, 2:407–496, 538–545.Google Scholar
Swofford, D. L. 2003. PAUP∗. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (∗and Other Methods). Version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1886. Second contribution to the studies on the Cambrian fauna of North America. Bulletin of the United States Geological Survey 30, 369 p.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1908. Cambrian trilobites. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 53 (2):13–52, pls. 1–6.Google Scholar
Walcott, C.D. 1912. Cambrian geology and paleontology, II. 8, The Sardinian Cambrian genus Olenopsis in America. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 57:239–249.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1916. Cambrian geology and paleontology III, no. 5, Cambrian trilobites. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 64 (5):303–456.Google Scholar
Webster, M. 2011 a. Upper Dyeran trilobite biostratigraphy and sequence stratigraphy in the Southern Great Basin, U.S.A., p. 121–154. In Hollingsworth, J. S., Sundberg, F. A., and Foster, J. R. (eds.), Cambrian Stratigraphy and Paleontology of Northern Arizona and Southern Nevada, The 16th Field Conference of the Cambrian Stage Subdivision Working Group, International Subcommission on Cambrian Stratigraphy Flagstaff, Arizona, and Southern Nevada, United States. Museum of Northern Arizona Bulletin, 67, Flagstaff, Arizona.Google Scholar
Webster, M. 2011 b. Stops 5A, 5B and 6C–Litho- and biostratigraphy of the Dyeran-Delamaran Boundary interval in the Pioche-Caliente region, Nevada, p. 203–215. In Hollingsworth, J. S., Sundberg, F. A., and Foster, J. R. (eds.), Cambrian Stratigraphy and Paleontology of Northern Arizona and Southern Nevada, The 16th Field Conference of the Cambrian Stage Subdivision Working Group, International Subcommission on Cambrian Stratigraphy Flagstaff, Arizona, and Southern Nevada, United States. Museum of Northern Arizona Bulletin, 67, Flagstaff, Arizona.Google Scholar
Webster, M. 2011 c. Stops 7A, 7B, and 7C, upper Dyeran litho- and biostratigraphy of the Split Mountain area, Nevada, p. 236–246. In Hollingsworth, J. S., Sundberg, F. A., and Foster, J. R. (eds.), Cambrian Stratigraphy and Paleontology of Northern Arizona and Southern Nevada, The 16th Field Conference of the Cambrian Stage Subdivision Working Group, International Subcommission on Cambrian Stratigraphy Flagstaff, Arizona, and Southern Nevada, United States. Museum of Northern Arizona Bulletin, 67, Flagstaff, Arizona.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1995. Oryctocephalid trilobites from the Cambrian of North America. Palaeontology, 38:543–562.Google Scholar
Yeates, D. K. 1995. Groundplans and exemplars: Paths to the tree of life. Cladistics, 11:343–357.Google Scholar
Yuan, J.-L., Zhao, Y.-L., and Li, Y., 2001 a. Biostratigraphy of oryctocephalid trilobites. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 40 (supplement), 143–156, pl. 1.Google Scholar
Yuan, J.-Y., Zhao, Y.-L., and Li, Y., 2001 b. Notes on the classification and phylogeny of oryctocephalids (Trilobita: Arthropoda). Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 40 (supplement), 214–226, pls. 1–2.Google Scholar
Yuan, J.-Y., Zhao, Y.-L., Li, Y., and Huang, Y.-H. 2002. Trilobite fauna of the Kaili Formation (uppermost lower Cambrian–lower middle Cambrian) from southeastern Guizhou, South China. Shanghai Science and Technology Press: Shanghai, 422 p., 68 pls. (In Chinese) Google Scholar
Yuan, J.-Y., Zhu, X.-J., Lin, J.-P., and Zhu, M.-Y. 2011. Tentative correlation of Cambrian Series 2 between South China and other continents. Bulletin of Geosciences, 86:397–404.Google Scholar
Zhang, Q.-Z. and Zhou, Z.-M. 1985. Early Cambrian trilobite fauna of Kunshan, Jiangsu. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 24:259–266.Google Scholar
Zhang, W.-T., Lu, Y.-H., Zhu, Z.-L., Qian, Y.-Y., Lin, H.-L., Zhou, Z.-Y., Zhang, S.-G., and Yuan, J.-L. 1980. Cambrian trilobite faunas of southwestern China. Palaeontologica Sinica 159, New Series, 497 p. (In Chinese) Google Scholar
Zhao, Y.-L., Ahlberg, P., and Zhou, Z. 1997. The Oryctocephalina in Kaili Formation, Guizhou. Journal of Guizhou University of Technology, 26:32–36.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y.-L., Yuan, J.-L., McCollum, L. B., Sundberg, F. A., Yang, R.-D., Guo, Q.-J., Zhu, L.-J., and Yang, X.-L. 2001. A potential GSSP for the lower and middle Cambrian boundary near Balang Village, Taijiang County, Guizhou Province, China. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 40 (supplement), p. 130–142.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y.-L., Zhu, M.-Y., Peng, J., Gaines, R. R., and Parsley, R. L. (eds.). 2012. Cryogenian–Ediacaran to Cambrian Stratigraphy and Paleontology of Guizhou, China. Journal of Guizhou University. Journal of Guizhou University, Natural Sciences, 29, supplement 1, 198 p.Google Scholar