Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T10:42:17.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The presumed Synziphosuran Bunodella horrida Matthew, 1889 (Silurian; Cunningham Creek Formation, New Brunswick, Canada) is a eurypterid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Randall F. Miller  and
O. Erik Tetlie
Randall F. Miller
Affiliation:
Steinhammer Palaeontology Laboratory, New Brunswick Museum, Saint John, New Brunswick E2K 1E5, Canada,
O. Erik Tetlie
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, PO Box 208109, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8109,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The enigmatic Silurian fossil Bunodella horrida Matthew, 1889 was originally described as a crustacean (Matthew, 1889). B. horrida was later included with the pseudoniscid synziphosurines by Størmer (1955) in the Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Bunodella Matthew, 1889 was subsequently dismissed as a merostome in later treatments (Eldredge, 1974; Anderson and Selden, 1997). However, the type and only known specimen (Fig. 1), housed in the New Brunswick Museum (NBMG), has not been re-studied since Matthew's initial description. Reexamination of this fossil has led us to interpret it as the partial coxa of a pterygotid eurypterid swimming leg. The coxa is likely to belong to Acutiramus Ruedemann, 1935 rather than any other pterygotid, but it cannot be further separated from other species in the genus and is left as Acutiramus sp. A more precise assignment must await more diagnostic material (e.g., chelicerae). The genus Bunodella Matthew, 1889 is therefore deemed invalid and its usage discontinued. Bunodella Pfeffer, 1889 was also established as a genus of a modern hexacoralline anemone based on a single species, B. georgiana Pfeffer, 1889, but has since been reassigned to the genus Parantheopsis McMurrich, 1904 by Carlgren (1949) along with several other species of anenome.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 81 , Issue 3 , May 2007 , pp. 588 - 590
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agassiz, J. L. R. 1839. Fishes of the Upper Ludlov rock, p. 605–607. In Murchison, R. I. (ed.), The Silurian System, Founded on Geological Researches in the Counties of Salop, Hereford, Radnor, Montgomery, Caermarthen, Brecon, Pembroke, Monmouth, Gloucester, Worcester and Stafford: With Descriptions of the Coal-Field and Overlying Formations. John Murray, London.Google Scholar
Agassiz, J. L. R. 1844-45. Monographie des poisons fossils des Vieux Grès Rouges ou Système Devonian (Old Red Sandstone) des Isles Britanniques et de Russie. Jent and Grassmann, Neuchâtel, 171 p.Google Scholar
Anderson, L. I., and Selden, P. A. 1997. Opisthosomal fusion and phylogeny of Palaeozoic Xiphosura. Lethaia, 30:19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlgren, O. 1949. A Survey of the Ptychodactiaria, Corallimorpharia and Actiniaria. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakadamiens Handlingar, series 4, 1:1–121.Google Scholar
Churchill-Dickson, L. 2004. A Late Silurian (Pridolian) age for the Eastport Formation, Maine: A review of the fossil, stratigraphic and radiometric-age data. Atlantic Geology, 40:189–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, J. M., and Ruedemann, R. 1912. The Eurypterida of New York. New York State Museum Memoir, 14:1–439.Google Scholar
Copeland, M. J. 1957. A redescription of Ceratiocaris pusilla Matthew. Journal of Paleontology, 31:600–602.Google Scholar
Currie, L. D. 1927. On Cyamocephalus, a new synxiphosurine from the Upper Silurian of Lesmahagow, Lanarkshire. Geological Magazine, 64:153–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denison, R. H. 1956. A review of the habitat of the earliest vertebrates. Fieldiana, Geology, 11:359–457.Google Scholar
Dunlop, J. A., Braddy, S. J., and Tetlie, O. E. 2002. The Early Devonian eurypterid Grossopterus overathi (Gross, 1933) from Overath, Germany. Mitteilungen aus dem Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, Geowissenschaftliche Reihe, 5:93–104.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N. 1974. Revision of the suborder Synziphosurina (Chelicerata, Merostomata), with remarks on merostome phylogeny. American Museum Novitates Number 2543, 41 p.Google Scholar
Gross, W. 1967. Uber Thelodontier-Schuppen. Palaeontographica, 127A:1–64.Google Scholar
Grote, A. R., and Pitt, W. H. 1875. On a new species of Eusarcus and Pterygotus from The Waterlime Group at Buffalo. Bulletin of the Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences, 3:17–20.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. C. 1999. Bedrock geology of the Long Reach area, Kings County, southern New Brunswick (parts of NTS 21 G/08f, g and h). Abstracts 1999: 24th Annual Review of Activities. New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources and Energy, Minerals and Energy Division, IC 99-3.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. C. 2000. Bedrock geology of the Loch Alva-Nerepis area (parts of NTS 21 G/08c, d, e, f), of southern New Brunswick. New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources and Energy, Minerals and Energy Division, pl. 2000–18.Google Scholar
Matthew, G. F. 1889. On some remarkable organisms of the Silurian and Devonian rocks in southern New Brunswick. Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, 6(4):49–62.Google Scholar
Matthew, G. F. 1907. A new genus and a new species of Silurian fish. Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, 3rd series, 1(4):7–11.Google Scholar
McLeod, M. J., Johnson, S. C., and Ruitenberg, A. A. 1994. Geological map of southwestern New Brunswick. New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources and Energy, Mineral Resources Map, NR-5.Google Scholar
McMurrich, J. P. 1904. The Actiniae of the Plate Collection. Zoologische Jahrbücher, 6 (Supplement):215–306.Google Scholar
Miller, R. F. 1996. Note on Pterygotus anglicus Agassiz (Eurypterida: Devonian) from the Campbellton Formation, New Brunswick. Atlantic Geology, 32:95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieszkowski, J. 1859. Der Eurypterus remipes aus den obersilurischen Schichten der Insel Oesel. Archiv für die Naturkunde Liv-, Ehst und Kurlands, 2:299–344.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, G. 1889. Zur Fauna von Süd-Georgien. Jahrbuch der Hamburgischen Wissenschaftlichen Anstalten, 6:39–55.Google Scholar
Plotnick, R. E. 1999. Habitat of Llandoverian-Lochkovian eurypterids, p. 106–131. In Boucot, A. J. and Lawson, J. (eds.), Paleocommunities: A Case Study from the Silurian and Lower Devonian. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruedemann, R. 1935. A review of the eurypterid rami of the genus Pterygotus with descriptions of two new Devonian species. Annals of the Carnegie Museum, 24:69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, J. D. 1957. The habitat of early vertebrates. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 32:156–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, L. S. 1954. A new species of eurypterid from the Devonian of Gaspé. Annual Report of the National Museum of Canada, Bulletin, 132:83–91.Google Scholar
Salter, J. W. 1856. On some new Crustacea from the uppermost Silurian rocks. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, London 12:26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, J. W. 1859. On some new species of Eurypterus; with notes on the distribution of the species. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, London, 15:229–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stetson, H. C. 1928. A new American Thelodus. American Journal of Science, 16:221–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Størmer, L. 1955. Merostomata, p. P4–P41. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. P. Arthropoda 2. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Turner, S. 1986. Thelodus macintoshi Stetson 1928, the largest known thelodont (Agnatha: Thelodonti). Brevoria, 486:1–18.Google Scholar
Waterston, C. D. 1964. Observations on pterygotid eurypterids. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 66:9–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, I. E. 1958. Original environment of the Craniates, p. 212–234. In Westoll, T. S. (ed.), Studies on Fossil Vertebrates. University of London (Athlone Press).Google Scholar