Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T12:16:01.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Redescription, paleogeography, and experimental paleoecology of the Silurian phyllocarid Gonatocaris

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2020

Joseph H. Collette Open the ORCID record for Joseph H. Collette [Opens in a new window]  and
Roy E. Plotnick Open the ORCID record for Roy E. Plotnick [Opens in a new window]
Joseph H. Collette
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, Minot State University, 500 University Ave West, Minot, North Dakota, 58707, USA
Roy E. Plotnick
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 845 W. Taylor St., Chicago, IL60607, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Gonatocaris decora (Clarke, 1901) is an unusual, highly ornamented Silurian phyllocarid from the Pittsford Shale Member of the Vernon Formation, Salina Group of New York, that has been allied with Emmelezoe in the past due to the possession of an ‘optic tubercle.’ The systematic positions of Gonatocaris and Emmelezoe have been difficult to assess due to the lack of complete remains, attributions based on spurious characters, and missing and unfigured specimens. Relatively recent collections of Gonatocaris decora, along with a relocation of the original type material of Emmelezoe, have allowed a reexamination of all relevant genera and a more robust systematic placement for G. decora. Characters of generic importance for Gonatocaris include a greatly elongated abdomen; an acute angle of the ventral carapace margin separating distinct anteroventral and posteroventral margins from each other; and distinctive, multiscale horizontal ridge-like ornament of the carapace valves. Growth was found to be isometric. Experimental work done using a model of the scale-like ornament and multiple grain sizes of substrate indicates that cuticle ornament may have served to increase friction between the animal and a fine sand substrate, although resistance to predation is the currently favored hypothesis. Because Gonatocaris species are currently known only from the eastern margin of Laurentia and northern South China, it is likely that this genus was nektonic. Accumulations of similarly sized carapaces and other disarticulated sclerites in shallow-water settings may indicate spawning events following molting en masse.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 94 , Issue 5 , September 2020 , pp. 906 - 921
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © 2020, The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldridge, R.J., and Schönlaub, H.P., 1989, Conodonts, in Holland, C.H., and Bassett, M.G. eds., A Global Standard for the Silurian System: Cardiff, National Museum of Wales, p. 274–279.Google Scholar
Bassler, R.S., 1915, Bibliographic Index of American Ordovician and Silurian Fossils: United States National Museum, Bulletin 92, 718 p.Google Scholar
Benson, R.H., 1981, Form, function, and architecture of ostracode shells: Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, v. 9, p. 59–80.Google Scholar
Bergström, J., Briggs, D.E., Dahl, E., Rolfe, W.D.I., and Stürmer, W., 1987, Nahecaris stuertzi, a phyllocarid crustacean from the Lower Devonian Hunsrück Slate: Paläontologische Zeitschrift, v. 61, p. 273–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucot, A.J., 1975, Evolution and extinction rate controls: Amsterdam, Elsevier, 427 p.Google Scholar
Branson, E.B., and Mehl, M.G., 1933, Conodonts from the Bainbridge Formation (Silurian) of Missouri: University of Missouri Studies, v. 8, p. 39–52.Google Scholar
Broda, K., Collette, J.H., and Budil, P., 2018, Phyllocarid crustaceans from the Late Devonian of the Kowala quarry (Holy Cross Mountains, central Poland): Papers in Palaeontology, v. 4, p. 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brünnich, M.T., 1772, Zoologiae fundamenta praelectionibus academicis accomodata: Grunde i Dyrelaeren. Fridericus Christianus Pelt., Hafniae, Lipsiae.Google Scholar
Caron, J.B., and Vannier, J., 2016, Waptia and the diversification of brood care in early arthropods: Current Biology, v. 26, p. 69–74.Google ScholarPubMed
Chen, Z., Männik, P., and Fan, J., 2017, Llandovery (Silurian) conodont provincialism: an update based on quantitative analysis: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 485, p. 661–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chlupáč, I., 1963, Phyllocarid crustaceans from the Silurian and Devonian of Czechoslovakia: Palaeontology, v. 6, p. 97–118.Google Scholar
Ciurca, S.J. Jr., 1980, Geographic distribution of the Eurypterus pittsfordensis eurypterid fauna, Pittsford Shale, Upper Silurian of Western New York State: Proceedings of the Rochester Academy of Science, v. 13, p. 148.Google Scholar
Ciurca, S.J. Jr., 1990, Eurypterid biofacies of the Silurian–Devonian evaporite sequence: Niagara peninsula, Ontario, Canada and New York: New York State Geological Association 62nd Annual Meeting, Fredonia, New York. 1990.Google Scholar
Ciurca, S.J. Jr., 2010, Eurypterids Illustrated: The Search for Prehistoric Sea Scorpions: Rochester, New York, PaleoResearch, 30 p.Google Scholar
Ciurca, S.J. Jr., and Tetlie, O.E., 2007, Pterygotids (Chelicerata; Eurypterida) from the Silurian Vernon Formation of New York: Journal of Paleontology, v. 81, p. 725–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, J.M., 1901, Notes on Paleozoic Crustaceans: 2, Phyllocarida from the black shales at the base of the Salina beds in western New York. 3, Some Devonic Phyllocarida from New York: New York State Museum 54th Report of the Regents, 1900, v. 1, p. 92–97.Google Scholar
Clarke, J.M., 1903, Report of the State Paleontologist, 1902: New York State Museum Bulletin, no. 69, p. 851–891.Google Scholar
Clarke, J.M., 1907, The Eurypterus shales of the Shawangunk Mountains in eastern New York: New York State Museum, Bulletin 107, p. 295–310.Google Scholar
Clarke, J.M., and Ruedemann, R., 1903, Catalog of type specimens of Paleozoic fossils in New York State Museum: New York State Museum, Bulletin 65, p. 1–847.Google Scholar
Clarke, J.M., and Ruedemann, R., 1912, The Eurypterida of New York: New York State Museum Memoir, no. 14, 439 p.Google Scholar
Clayton, D.A., 1990, Crustacean allometric growth—a case for caution: Crustaceana, v. 58, p. 270–290.Google Scholar
Cocks, L.R.M., and Torsvik, T.H., 2002, Earth geography from 500 to 400 million years ago: a faunal and palaeomagnetic review: Journal of the Geological Society, v. 159, p. 631–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collette, J.H., and Hagadorn, J.W., 2010, Early evolution of phyllocarid arthropods: phylogeny and systematics of Cambrian–Devonian archaeostracans: Journal of Paleontology, v. 84, p. 795–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collette, J.H., and Rudkin, D.M., 2010, Phyllocarid crustaceans from the Silurian Eramosa Lagerstatte (Ontario, Canada): taxonomy and functional morphology: Journal of Paleontology, v. 84, p. 118–127.Google Scholar
Daley, A.C., and Drage, H.B., 2016, The fossil record of ecdysis, and trends in the moulting behaviour of trilobites: Arthropod Structure and Development, v. 45, no. 2, p. 71–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Etheridge, R., Woodard, H., and Jones, T.R., 1886, Third Report of the Committee, consisting of Mr. R. Etheridge, Dr. H. Woodward, and Professor T. Rupert Jones (Secretary), on the fossil phyllopoda of the Palaeozoic rocks, in Report of the Fifty-fifth Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science; Held at Aberdeen in September 1885: London, John Murray, p. 326–361.Google Scholar
Etheridge, R., Woodard, H., and Jones, T.R., 1887, Fourth report of the committee, consisting of Mr. R. Etheridge, Dr. H. Woodward, and Professor T. Rupert Jones (Secretary), on the fossil phyllopoda of the Palaeozoic rocks, in Report of the Fifty-sixth Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science; Held at Birmingham in September 1886: London, John Murray, p. 229–234.Google Scholar
Gnoli, M., and Serventi, P., 2005, New evidences of Silurian phyllocarid crustaceans from SW Sardinia: Bollettino della Societa Paleontologica Italiana, v. 44, p. 255–262.Google Scholar
Gourvennec, R., 1994, A new phyllocarid from the Algerian Sahara: Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Palaontologie. Monatshefte, v. 4, p. 231–238.Google Scholar
Grabau, A.W., and Shimer, H.W., 1910, North American Index Fossils: Invertebrates. 2: New York, A.S. Seiler, 909 p.Google Scholar
Gürich, G., 1929, Silesicaris von Leipe und die Phyllocariden überhaupt: Mitteilungen aus dem minerlogisch-geologischen Staatsinstitut in Hamburg, v. 11, p. 21–90.Google Scholar
Han, Z., Yang, Z., Tong, Y., and Jing, X., 2015, New paleomagnetic results from Late Ordovician rocks of the Yangtze Block, South China, and their paleogeographic implications: Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, v. 120, p. 4759–4772.Google Scholar
Hartnoll, R.G., and Bryant, A.D., 1990, Size–frequency distributions in decapod Crustacea—the quick, the dead, and the cast-offs: Journal of Crustacean Biology, v. 10, p. 14–19.Google Scholar
Jones, T.R., 1858, Notes on the Palaeozoic bivalved Entomostraca; No. 4, Some North American species: Annals and Magazine of Natural History, ser. 3, v. 1, no. 4, p. 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, T.R., 1886, VI. On Palaeozoic Phyllopoda: Geological Magazine (Decade III), v. 3, p. 456–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, E.N., and Heubusch, C.A., 1962, Some Eurypterida from the Ordovician and Silurian of New York: Journal of Paleontology, v. 36, p. 211–221.Google Scholar
Kluessendorf, J., 1994, Predictability of Silurian Fossil-Konservat-Lagerstatten in North America: Lethaia, v. 27, p. 337–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leutze, W.P., 1959, Stratigraphy and paleontology of the Salina group in Central New York [Ph.D. thesis]: Columbus, Ohio State University, 462 p.Google Scholar
Lister, T.R., 1970, The acritarchs and chitinozoa from the Wenlock and Ludlow Series of the Ludlow and Millichope areas, Shrosphire: Part I: Palaeontographical Society Monographs, no. 528, p. 1–100.Google Scholar
Luque, J., et al. , 2019, Exceptional preservation of mid-Cretaceous marine arthropods and the evolution of novel forms via heterochrony: Science Advances, v. 5, eaav3875.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, F., 1989, Acritachs, in Holland, C.H., and Bassett, M.G., eds., A Global Standard for the Silurian System: Cardiff, National Musuem of Wales, p. 207–215.Google Scholar
M'Coy, F., 1849, On the classification of some British fossil Crustacea, with notices of new forms in the University of Cambridge: Annals and Magazine of Natural History, ser. 2, p. 412–414.Google Scholar
Miller, M.A., Brett, C.E., and Kleffner, M.A., 1989, Ludlow age acritarchs and spores from the Pittsford Shale, New York: Palynology, v. 13, p. 285.Google Scholar
Murchison, R.I., 1859, On the succession of the older rocks in the northernmost counties of Scotland; with some observations on the Orkney and Shetland Islands: Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, v. 15, p. 262–418.Google Scholar
Nelson, K., 1991, Scheduling of reproduction in relation to molting and growth in malacostracan crustaceans: Crustacean Issues, v. 7, p. 77–113.Google Scholar
Opdyke, N.D., Huang, K., Xu, G., Zhang, W.Y., and Kent, D.V., 1987, Paleomagnetic results from the Silurian of the Yangtze paraplatform: Tectonophysics, v. 139, p. 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
P'an, K., 1962, A new Silurian fish from Nanking, China: Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, v. 10, p. 402–409.Google Scholar
Packard, A.S. Jr., 1879, The Nebaliad Crustacea as types of a new order: American Naturalist, v. 13, p. 128.Google Scholar
Plotnick, R.E., 1999, Habitat of Llandoverian–Lochkovian eurypterids, in Boucot, A.J., and Lawson, J., eds., Paleocommunities: A Case Study from the Silurian and Lower Devonian: Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 106–131.Google Scholar
Plotnick, R.E., and Bauer, J., 2014, Crinoids aweigh: experimental biomechanics of Ancyrocrinus holdfasts, in Hembree, D., Platt, B., and Smith, J., eds., Experimental Approaches to Understanding Fossil Organisms. Topics in Geobiology, Volume 41: Dordrecht, Springer, p. 3–20.Google Scholar
Poschmann, M., Bergmann, A., and Kühl, G., 2018, Appendages, functional morphology and possible sexual dimorphism in a new ceratiocaridid (Malacostraca, Phyllocarida) from the Early Devonian Hunsrück Slate (south-western Germany): Papers in Palaeontology, v. 4, p. 277–292.Google Scholar
Racheboeuf, P., 1994, Silurian and Devonian phyllocarid crustaceans from the Massif Armoricain, NW France: Revue de Paléobiologie, v. 13, p. 281–305.Google Scholar
Racheboeuf, P.R., Crasqauin, S., and Brussa, F., 2009, South American Ordovician phyllocarids (Crustacea, Malacostraca): Bulletin of Geosciences, v. 84, p. 377–408.Google Scholar
Rolfe, W.D.I, 1962, Grosser morphology of the Scottish Silurian Phyllocarid Crustacean, Ceratiocaris papilio Salter in Murchison: Journal of Paleontology, v. 36, p. 912–932.Google Scholar
Rolfe, W.D.I., 1963, Morphology of the telson in Ceratiocaris? Cornwallisensis (Crustacea: Phyllocarida) from Czechoslovakia: Journal of Paleontology, v. 37, p. 486–488.Google Scholar
Rolfe, W.D.I., 1969, Phyllocarida, in Moore, R.C., ed., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part R, Arthropoda 4, Volume 1: Boulder, Colorado, and Lawtence, Kansas, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, p. R296–R331.Google Scholar
Rolfe, W.D.I., and Burnaby, P.T., 1961, A preliminary study of the Silurian ceratiocaridids (Crustacea; Phyllocarida) of Lesmahagow, Scotland: Breviora, v. 149, p. 1–9.Google Scholar
Ruedemann, R., 1916a, Note on the habitat of the eurypterids: New York State Museum Bulletin, no. 189, p. 113–115.Google Scholar
Ruedemann, R., 1916b, Account of some new or little-known species of fossils, mostly from the Paleozoic rocks of New York: New York State Museum Bulletin, no. 198, p. 7–112.Google Scholar
Ruedemann, R., 1920, A recurrent Pittsford (Salina) Fauna: New York State Museum, Bulletin 219–220, p. 205–222.Google Scholar
Ruedemann, R., 1925, Some Silurian (Ontarian) faunas of New York: New York State Museum, Bulletin 265, 134 p.Google Scholar
Salter, J.W., 1860, On new fossil Crustacea from the Silurian rocks: Annals and Magazine of Natural History, v. 3, p. 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarle, C.J., 1903, A new eurypterid fauna from the base of the Salina of western New York: Report of the State Paleontologist 1902, p. 1080–1198.Google Scholar
Savazzi, E., 1985, Functional morphology of the cuticular terraces in burrowing terrestrial brachyuran decapods: Lethaia, v. 18, p. 147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, F., 1883, Die Crustaceenfauna der Eurypterenschichten von Rootzikiill auf Oesel: Memoires l'Academie lmperiale des Sciences de St.-Petersbourg, ser. VII, no. 31, p. 28–88.Google Scholar
Schuchert, C., 1943, Stratigraphy of the eastern and central United States, in Schuchert, C., Historical Geology of North America, Volume 2: New York, Wiley, 1013 p.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A., 1972, Divaricate patterns in pelecypod shells: Lethaia, v. 5, p. 325–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shu, D., Vannier, J., Luo, H., Chen, L., Zhang, X., and Hu, S., 1999, Anatomy and lifestyle of Kunmingella (Arthropoda, Bradoriida) from the Chengjiang fossil Lagerstätte (lower Cambrian; Southwest China): Lethaia, v. 32, p. 279–298.Google Scholar
Siveter, D.J., Siveter, D.J., Sutton, M.D., and Briggs, D.E., 2007, Brood care in a Silurian ostracod: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, v. 274, p. 465–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R.D.K., 1988, Evolutionary convergence of bivalved shells: a comparative analysis of constructional constraints on their morphology: American Zoologist, v. 28, p. 267–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torsvik, T.H., and Cocks, L.R.M., 2013, New global palaeogeographical reconstructions for the early Palaeozoic and their generation: Geological Society London Memoirs 38, p. 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umbaugh, S.E., 2005, Computer imaging: digital image analysis and processing: Boca Raton, Florida, CRC Press, 661 p.Google Scholar
Vannier, J., and Chen, J. Y., 2005, Early Cambrian food chain: new evidence from fossil aggregates in the Maotianshan Shale Biota, SW China: PALAIOS, v. 20, p. 3–26.Google Scholar
Vannier, J., Boissy, P., and Racheboeuf, P.R., 1997, Locomotion in Nebalia bipes: a possible model for Palaeozoic phyllocarid crustaceans: Lethaia, v. 30, p. 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vannier, J., Racheboeuf, P., Brussa, E., Williams, M., Rushton, A.W.A., Servais, T.H., and Siveter, D.J., 2003, Cosmopolitan arthropod zooplankton in the Ordovician seas: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 79, p. 1–19.Google Scholar
Vetter, E.W., 1996, Life-history patterns of two Southern California Nebalia species (Crustacea: Leptostraca): the failure of form to predict function: Marine Biology, v. 127, p. 131–141.Google Scholar
Vrazo, M.B., Brett, C.E., and Ciurca, J.S.J., 2017, Paleoecological and stratigraphic controls on eurypterid Lagerstätten: a model for preservation in the mid-Paleozoic: Paleobiology, v. 43, p. 383–406.Google Scholar
Whitfield, R.P., 1896, Notice and description of new species and a new genus of Phyllocaridae: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 8, p. 301–303.Google Scholar
Zong, R.-W., Liu, Q., Wei, F., and Gong, Y.-M., 2017, Fentou Biota: a Llandovery (Silurian) shallow-water exceptionally preserved biota from Wuhan, central China: The Journal of Geology, v. 125, p. 469–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar