Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T14:20:22.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some disparid crinoids from the Upper Ordovician (Shermanian) Walcott-Rust quarry of New York

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

James C. Brower
James C. Brower*
Affiliation:
Heroy Geology Laboratory, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244-1070
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

locrinus trentonensis Walcott, 1883 is characterized by the widest food grooves and the largest covering plates of any of the Walcott-Rust Quarry crinoids, which indicates that the animal captured relatively large food particles with large and widely separated tubefeet. Although iocrinids are generally considered as primitive disparids, their anal sac is unique. the holdfasts of I. trentonensis consist of distal stem coils that are tightly wrapped around the columns of other crinoids. the relatively long column of Ectenocrinus simplex (Hall, 1847) was attached to a wide range of shelly substrates by a small irregular and somewhat lobate holdfast. Ectenocrinids ate much smaller food items that were collected by smaller and more tightly packed tubefeet. the ontogeny of E. simplex illustrates the differences between the food gathering systems of conspecific crinoids from shallow and deep water habitats. the calceocrinid Calceocrinus barrandii Walcott, 1883 lived with its long stem forming a runner along the seafloor. the crown was movably hinged to the basal circlet and the stem. Moderately wide food grooves were probably present.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 82 , Issue 1 , January 2008 , pp. 57 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ausich, W. I. 1980. A model for differentiation in lower Mississippian crinoid communities. Journal of Paleontology, 54:273–288.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I. 1996a. Crinoid plate circlet homologies. Journal of Paleontology, 70:955–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausich, W. I. 1996b. Phylum Echinodermata, p. 242–261. In Feldmann, R. M. and Hackathorn, M. (eds.), Fossils of Ohio. Ohio Geological Survey Bulletin, 70.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I. 1998a. Early phylogeny and subclass division of the Crinoidea (Phylum Echinodermata). Journal of Paleontology, 72:499–510.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I. 1998b. Phylogeny of Arenig to Caradoc crinoids (Phylum Echinodermata) and suprageneric classification of the Crinoidea. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, New Series, Number 9, 36 p.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S. 1915. Bibliographic index of American Ordovician and Silurian fossils. United States National Museum Bulletin, 92, 1,521 p.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S. and Moodey, M. W. 1943. Bibliographic and faunal index of Paleozoic pelmatozoan echinoderms. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 45, 734 p.Google Scholar
Bates, D. E. B. 1965. A new Ordovician crinoid from Dolgellau, north Wales. Palaeontology, 8:355–357.Google Scholar
Baumiller, T. K. 1993. Survivorship analysis of Paleozoic Crinoidea: effect of filter morphology on evolutionary rates. Paleobiology, 19:304–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumiller, T. K. 1997. Crinoid functional morphology, p. 45–68. In Waters, J. A. and Maples, C. G. (eds.), Geobiology of echinoderms, Paleontological Society Papers, 3.Google Scholar
Billings, E. 1857. New species of fossils from Silurian rocks of Canada. Canada Geological Survey Report of Progress 1853-1856, Report for the year 1856, p. 247–345.Google Scholar
Botting, J. P. 2003. Llanvirn (Middle Ordovician) echinoderms from Llandegley Rocks, central Wales. Palaeontology, 46:685–708.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E. 1999. Chapter 6, Middle Ordovician Trenton Group of New York, USA, p. 63–67. In Hess, H., Ausich, W. I., Brett, C. E., and Simms, M. J. (eds.), Fossil crinoids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, C. E., Whiteley, T. E., Allison, P. A., and Yochelson, E. L. 1999. The Walcott-Rust Quarry: Middle Ordovician trilobite Konservat-Lagerstätten. Journal of Paleontology, 73:288–305.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C. 1966. Functional morphology of Calceocrinidae, with description of some new species. Journal of Paleontology, 40:613–634.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C. 1973. Crinoids from the Girardeau Limestone (Ordovician). Palaeontographica Americana, 7:261–499.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C. 1978. Postlarval ontogeny of fossil crinoids, camerates, p. T244–T263. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, C. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. T, Echinodermata 2. The Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C. 1982. Phylogeny of primitive calceocrinids, p. 90–110. In Sprinkle, J. S. (ed.), Echinoderm Faunas from the Bromide Formation (Middle Ordovician) of Oklahoma. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Monograph 1.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C. 1987. The relations between allometry, phylogeny and functional morphology in some calceocrinid crinoids. Journal of Paleontology, 61:999–1032.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C. 1992a. Cupulocrinid crinoids from the Middle Ordovician (Galena Group, Dunleith Formation) of northern Iowa and southern Minnesota. Journal of Paleontology, 66:99–128.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C. 1992b. Hybocrinid and disparid crinoids from the Middle Ordovician (Galena Group, Dunleith Formation) of northern Iowa and southern Minnesota. Journal of Paleontology, 66:973–993.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C. 1994. Camerate crinoids from the Middle Ordovician (Galena Group, Dunleith Formation) of northern Iowa and southern Minnesota. Journal of Paleontology, 68:570–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brower, J. C. 1995. Eoparisocrinid crinoids from the Middle Ordovician (Galena Group, Dunleith Formation) of northern Iowa and southern Minnesota. Journal of Paleontology, 69:351–366.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C. 1997. Homocrinid crinoids from the Upper Ordovician of northern Iowa and southern Minnesota. Journal of Paleontology, 71:442–458.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C. 2005. The paleobiology and ontogeny of Cincinnaticrinus varibrachialus Warn and Strimple, 1977 from the Middle Ordovician (Shermanian) Walcott-Rust Quarry of New York. Journal of Paleontology, 79: 152–174.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brower, J. C. 2006. Ontogeny of the food-gathering system in Ordovician crinoids. Journal of Paleontology, 80:430–446.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C. 2007. The application of filtration theory to food gathering in Ordovician crinoids. Journal of Paleontology, 81:1284–1300.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C. and Kile, K. M. 1994. Paleoautecology and ontogeny of Cupulocrinus levorsoni Kolata, a Middle Ordovician crinoid from the Guttenberg Formation of Wisconsin, p. 25–44. In Landing, E. (ed.), Studies in Stratigraphy and Paleontology in Honor of Donald W. Fisher. New York State Museum Bulletin, 481.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C. and Strimple, H. L. 1983. Ordovician calceocrinids from northern Iowa and southern Minnesota. Journal of Paleontology, 57:1261–1281.Google Scholar
Davis, J. C. 1986. Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology (second edition). John Wiley & Sons, New York, 646 p.Google Scholar
Donovan, S. K. 1986. Pelmatozoan columnals from the Ordovician of the British Isles, Pt. 1, Palaeontographical Society of London, Monograph, 138(568): 1–68.Google Scholar
Donovan, S. K. and Gale, A. S. 1989. Iocrinus in the Ordovican of England and Wales. Palaeontology, 32:313–323.Google Scholar
Donovan, S. K. 1989. Pelmatozoan columnals from the Ordovician of the British Isles, Pt. 3, Palaeontographical Society of London Monograph, 142(580):69–114.Google Scholar
Donovan, S. K., Paul, C. R. C., and Lewis, D. N. 1996. Echinoderms, p. 202–267. In Harper, D. A. T. and Owen, A. W. (eds.), Fossils of the Upper Ordovician, Palaeontological Association (London), Field Guides to Fossils, Number 7.Google Scholar
Eckert, J. D. 1984. Early Llandovery crinoids and stelleroids from the Cateract Group (Lower Silurian) in southern Ontario, Canada. Royal Ontario Museum Life Sciences Contributions, 137, 82 p.Google Scholar
Eckert, J. D. and Brett, C. E. 2001. Early Silurian (Llandovery) crinoids from the Lower Clinton Group, western New York State. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 360, 88 p.Google Scholar
Guensburg, T. E. and Sprinkle, J. 2003. The oldest known crinoids (Early Ordovician, Utah) and a new crinoid plate homology system. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 364, 43 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1847. Palaeontology of New York, volume 1, containing descriptions of the organic remains of the lower division of the New-York system (equivalent of the Lower Silurian rocks of Europe). Natural History of New York, Pt. 6, D. Appleton & Company and Wiley & Putnam (New York); Gould, Kendall, & Lincoln (Boston); Charles van Benthuysen (Albany), 338 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1852. Palaeontology of New York, volume 2, containing descriptions of the organic remains of the lower middle division of the New-York system. Natural History of New York, Pt. 6, D. Appleton & Company and Wiley and Putnam (New York); Gould, Kendall, & Lincoln (Boston); Charles van Benthuysen (Albany), 362 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1860. Observations upon a new genus of Crinoidea: Cheirocrinus. Contributions to Palaeontology, 1858 & 1859, New York State Cabinet of Natural History, Annual Report, 13:121–124.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1866. Descriptions of some new species of Crinoidea and other fossils from the Lower Silurian strata of the age of the Hudson-River Group and Trenton Limestone. Privately printed and distributed, 17 p. (republished with the same title in 1872 in New York State Museum of Natural History, Annual Report, 24:205–224with figures added)Google Scholar
Holterhoff, P. E. 1997. Paleocommunity and evolutionary ecology of Paleozoic crinoids, p. 69–106. In Waters, J. A. and Maples, C. G. (eds.), Geobiology of Echinoderms, Paleontological Society Papers, 3.Google Scholar
Kammer, T. W. and Ausich, W. I. 1987. Aerosol suspension feeding and current velocities: distributional controls for late Osagian crinoids. Paleobiology, 13:379–395.Google Scholar
Kelly, S. M. 1978. Functional morphology and evolution of locrinus, an Ordovician disparid inadunate crinoid. Unpublished Masters thesis, University of Indiana, Bloomington, 77 p.Google Scholar
Kirk, E. 1914. Notes on the fossil crinoid genus Homocrinus Hall. United States National Museum Proceedings, 46:473–483.Google Scholar
Kolata, D. R. 1976. Crinoids from the Upper Ordovician Bighorn Formation of Wyoming. Journal of Paleontology, 50:445–453.Google Scholar
Lane, N. G. 1975. The anal sac of Aesiocrinus, a Pennsylvanian inadunate crinoid. Journal of Paleontology, 49:638–645.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. 1873. Fossils of the Cincinnati Group. Geological Survey of Ohio, Vol. 1. Pt. 2. (Palaeontology), 175 p.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. and Worthen, A. H. 1865. Descriptions of new species of Crinoidea, &c., from the Palaeozoic rocks of Illinois and some of the adjoining states. Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences Proceedings, 17: 143–155.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. and Worthen, A. H. 1868. Fossils of the Cincinnati Group. Illinois Geological Survey, 3:324–343.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. and Worthen, A. H. 1869. Descriptions of new Crinoidea and Echinodermata from the Carboniferous rocks of the western states, with a note on the genus Onychaster. Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences Proceedings, 21:67–83.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. L. 1979. Length and spacing of the tube feet in crinoids (Echinodermata) and their role in suspension feeding. Marine Biology, 51:361–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, D. L., Miller, A. I., Holland, S. M., and Dattilo, B. F. 2002. Crinoid distribution and feeding morphology through a depositional sequence: Kope and Fairview Formations, Upper Ordovician, Cincinnati Arch region. Journal of Paleontology, 76:725–732.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1889. North American Geology and Palaeontology. Western Methodist Book Concern, Cincinnati, Ohio, 664 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. 1962a. Revision of Calceocrinidae. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Echinodermata, Article 4, 40 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. 1962b. Ray structures of some inadunate crinoids. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Echinodermata, Article 5, 47 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. and Laudon, L. R. 1943. Evolution and classification of Paleozoic crinoids. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 46, 167 p.Google Scholar
Ramsbottom, W. H. C. 1961. A monograph on British Ordovician Crinoidea. Palaeontographical Society of London Monograph, 114(492): 1–37.Google Scholar
Rozhnov, S. V. 2002. Morphogenesis and evolution of crinoids and other pelmatozoan echinoderms in the Early Paleozoic. Paleontological Journal, 36(Supplementary Issue 6):S525–S674.Google Scholar
Simms, M. J. 1993. Reinterpretation of thecal plate homology and phylogeny in the class Crinoidea. Lethaia, 26:303–312.Google Scholar
Sneath, P. H. A. 1977. A method for testing the distinctness of clusters: a test of the disjunction of two clusters in euclidean space as measured by their overlap. Mathematical Geology, 9:123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springer, F. 1926. American Silurian crinoids. Smithsonian Institution Publication 2871, 239 p.Google Scholar
Titus, R. 1989. Clinal variation in the evolution of Ectenocrinus simplex. Journal of Paleontology, 63:81–91.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G. 1978. Skeletal morphology of fossil crinoids, p. T58–T216. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, C. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. T, Echinodermata 2. The Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O. 1886. Remarks upon the names Cheirocrinus and Calceocrinus, with descriptions of three new generic terms and one new species. Minnesota Natural History & Geological Survey, Annual Report, 14:104–113.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1884. Descriptions of new species of fossils from the Trenton Group of New York. Thirty-fifth Annual Report of the New York State Museum of Natural History, p.207–214(Advanced print, 15 October, 1883, p. 1-8).Google Scholar
Warn, J. M. and Strimple, H. L. 1977. The disparid inadunate superfamilies Homocrinacea and Cincinnaticrinacea (Echinodermata: Crinoidea), Ordovician-Silurian, North America. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 72:1–138.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. 1973. Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids, 1942-1968. Geological Society of America Memoir, 137, 341 p.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. 1988. Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids and coronate echinoderms, 1981-1985. Geological Society of America Microfilm Publication, 18, 235 p., 3 cards.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. 1993. Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids, 1986-1990. Geological Society of America Microfilm Publication, 25, 235 p., 3 cards.Google Scholar
Webster, G. 2006. Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids, coronates, and hemistreptocrinoids 1758-1999. Geological Society of America, Special Paper 363, online computer access (http://crinoid.gsajournals.org/crinoidmod).Google Scholar
Witzke, B. J. and Bunker, B. J. 1996. Relative sea-level changes during Middle Ordovician through Mississippian deposition in the Iowa area, North American craton, p. 307–330. In Witzke, B. J., Ludvigson, G. A., and Day, J. (eds.), Paleozoic Sequence Stratigraphy: Views from the North American Craton. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 306.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. E. 1946. Echinodermata of the Ottawa Formation of the Ottawa-St. Lawrence Lowland. Canada Geological Survey Bulletin, 4:1–61.Google Scholar