Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T08:54:32.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The use of lacquer (nitrocellulose) for the coating and preservation of fossil leaf compressions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

B. A. Lepage  and
J. F. Basinger
B. A. Lepage
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 0W0, Canada
J. F. Basinger
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 0W0, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cuticular features and details of fine venation are now widely relied upon in systematic and phylogenetic studies of fossil plants. Where fossil leaves are robust or adherent to the matrix, such features may be readily available, but should the remains be fragile and subject to damage or loss, it may be necessary to preserve their integrity immediately following recovery and during transport. Clays, shales, and fossil leaf compressions are particularly vulnerable to the drying environment; fossil specimens are commonly damaged or entirely lost due to spalling, cracking, and shrinking of the clays or due to exfoliation of the organic film caused by differential drying. In an attempt to eliminate these problems, a technique using a mixture of nitrocellulose lacquer and acetone to coat fossil leaf compressions was developed for use on freshly excavated specimens under a wide range of climatic conditions (subfreezing to warm, dry or wet) while in the field. Many other preservational techniques exist, but they are typically complex, expensive, time consuming, destructive, or were developed for use in a laboratory setting.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , January 1993 , pp. 128 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvin, K. L., and Boulter, M. C. 1974. A controlled method of comparative study for taxodiaceous leaf cuticles. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 69:277–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulter, M. C. 1971. Fine details of some fossil and recent conifer leaf cuticles, p. 211–235. In Heywood, V. H. (ed.), Scanning Electron Microscopy, Systematic and Evolutionary Applications. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Brunton, C. H. C., Besterman, T. P., and Cooper, J. A. 1985. Guidelines for the conservation of geological materials. Geological Society, Miscellaneous Paper 17, pages unnumbered.Google Scholar
Brushwell, W. 1982. Painting and Decorating Encyclopedia. The Goodheart-Willcox Co., South Holland, Illinois, 264 p.Google Scholar
Collinson, M. E. 1987. Special problems in the conservation of paleobotanical material. Geological Curator, 4:439–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilcher, D. L. 1974. Approaches to the identification of angiosperm leaf remains. The Botanical Review, 40:1–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plambeck, A. O., and Rudd, J. F. 1943. Lacquer–nitrocellulose, p. 497–569. In Mattiello, J. J. (ed.), Protective and Decorative Coatings, Volume 3. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Walther, H. 1964. Paläonbotanische untersuchunge im tertiär von Seifhennersdorf. Jahrbuch des Staatlichen Museums für Mineralogie und Geologie zu Dresden, 1964:1–131.Google Scholar