Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T19:44:29.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ADAM SMITH AND THE WEALTH-WORSHIPPING SPECTATOR — ERRATUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2023

Yiftah Elazar Open the ORCID record for Yiftah Elazar [Opens in a new window]
Yiftah Elazar*
Affiliation:
Senior Lecturer, Department of Political Science, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
*
Email: yiftah.elazar@mail.huji.ac.il
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Erratum
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , First View , pp. 1
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The History of Economics Society

When this article was published in the Journal of the History of Economic Thought, it contained an error in the line:

The desire for material self-improvement takes several distinct forms. One is avarice or greed. Smith demonstrates the distinction between avarice and greed through…

This should have been as follows:

The desire for material self-improvement takes several distinct forms. One is avarice or greed. Smith demonstrates the distinction between avarice and ambition through…

The publisher apologises for this error.

COMPETING INTERESTS

The author declares no competing interests exist.

References

REFERENCE

Elazar, Y. (2023). ADAM SMITH AND THE WEALTH-WORSHIPPING SPECTATOR. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 45(2), 278–297. doi:10.1017/S1053837221000614CrossRefGoogle Scholar