Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T05:47:39.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

97 Evaluation of Video and Telephone-Based Administration of the Uniform Data Set Version 3 (UDS v3.0) Teleneuropsychological Measures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2023

Theresa F. Gierzynski*
Affiliation:
Michigan Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Allyson Gregoire
Affiliation:
Michigan Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Jonathan M. Reader
Affiliation:
Michigan Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Rebecca Pantis
Affiliation:
Michigan Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Stephen Campbell
Affiliation:
Michigan Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Arijit Bhaumik
Affiliation:
Michigan Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Annalise Rahman-Filipiak
Affiliation:
Michigan Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Judith Heidebrink
Affiliation:
Michigan Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Bruno Giordani
Affiliation:
Michigan Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Henry Paulson
Affiliation:
Michigan Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Benjamin M. Hampstead
Affiliation:
Michigan Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
*
Correspondence: Theresa F. Gierzynski Michigan Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 USA gierzyns@med.umich.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

Telecommunication-assisted neuropsychological assessment (teleNP) has become more widespread, particularly in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, comparatively few studies have evaluated in-home teleNP testing and none, to our knowledge, have evaluated the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center’s (NACC) Uniform Data Set version 3 tele-adapted test battery (UDS v3.0 t-cog). The current study compares in-home teleNP administration of the UDS v3.0, acquired while in-person activities were suspended due to COVID-19, with a prior in-person UDS v3.0 evaluation.

Participants and Methods:

210 participants from the Michigan Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center’s longitudinal study of memory and aging completed both an in-person UDS v3.0 and a subsequent teleNP UDS v3.0 evaluation. The teleNP UDS v3.0 was administered either via video conference (n = 131), telephone (n = 75), or hybrid format (n = 4) with approximately 16 months between evaluations (mean = 484.7 days; SD = 122.4 days; range = 320-986 days). The following clinical phenotypes were represented at the initial assessment period (i.e., the most recent in-person UDS v3.0 evaluation prior to the teleNP UDS v3.0): cognitively healthy (n = 138), mild cognitive impairment (MCI; n = 60), dementia (n = 11), and impaired not MCI (n = 1). Tests included both the in-person and teleNP UDS v3.0 measures, as well as the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) and Letter “C” Fluency.

Results:

We calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with raw scores from each time point for the entire sample. Sub-analyses were conducted for each phenotype among participants with an unchanged consensus research diagnosis: cognitively healthy (n = 122), MCI (n = 47), or cognitively impaired (i.e., MCI, dementia, and impaired not MCI) (n = 66). Test-retest reliability across modalities and clinical phenotypes was, in general, moderate. The poorest agreement was associated with the Trail Making Test (TMT) - A (ICC = 0.00; r = 0.027), TMT - B (ICC = 0.26; r = 0.44), and Number Span Backward (ICC = 0.49). The HVLT-R demonstrated moderate reliability overall (ICC = 0.51-0.68) but had notably weak reliability for cognitively healthy participants (ICC = 0.12-0.36). The most favorable reliability was observed in Craft Story 21 Recall - Delayed (ICC = 0.77), Letter Fluency (C, F, and L) (ICC = 0.74), Multilingual Naming Test (MINT) (ICC = 0.75), and Benson Complex Figure – Delayed (ICC = 0.79).

Conclusions:

Even after accounting for the inherent limitations of this study (e.g., significant lapse of time between testing intervals), our findings suggest that the UDS v3.0 teleNP battery shows only modest relationships with its in-person counterpart. Particular caution should be used when interpreting measures showing questionable reliability, though we encourage further investigation of remote vs. in-person testing under more controlled conditions.

Type
Poster Session 05: Neuroimaging | Neurophysiology | Neurostimulation | Technology | Cross Cultural | Multiculturalism | Career Development
Copyright
Copyright © INS. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2023