Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T09:53:15.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What does the WMS–III tell us about memory changes with normal aging?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2003

Haaland Kathleen Y. ,
Price Larry  and
Larue Asenath
Haaland Kathleen Y.*
Affiliation:
Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico University of New Mexico School of Medicine
Price Larry
Affiliation:
Southwest Texas State University
Larue Asenath
Affiliation:
University of New Mexico School of Medicine
*
Reprint requests to: Kathleen Y. Haaland, Ph.D., Psychology Service (116B), Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 1501 San Pedro SE, Albuquerque, NM 87108. E-mail: khaaland@unm.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The standardization sample from the WMS–III (N = 1250), which varied in age from 16 to 89, was used to determine whether encoding, retrieval, or storage of verbal and spatial information was most affected by normal aging. Immediate and delayed recall and recognition of Logical Memory and Visual Reproduction were examined. Immediate verbal and spatial recall significantly deteriorated with increasing age, and the age-associated deterioration in delayed recall and recognition was largely explained by poorer immediate memory. These findings, in concert with the smaller aging effects for percent retention after a delay, suggest that the aging effect is due to deterioration in encoding more than retrieval or storage of new information. While Visual Reproduction deteriorated more rapidly with age than Logical Memory, the pattern of performance decrements as a function of age were comparable across both tests. Decreases in performance were first seen in the fifth decade with gradual deterioration until the eighth decade when there was another precipitous drop. These results suggest that functions that are more dependent on the frontal lobes are more vulnerable to aging than those that are more dependent on the temporal lobes. (JINS, 2003, 9, 89–96.)

Keywords

AgingMemoryWMS–IIIEncodingRetrievalStorage
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , January 2003 , pp. 89 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abikoff, H., Alvir, J., Hong, G., Sukoff, R., Orazio, J., Solomon, S., & Saravay, S. (1986). Logical memory subtest of the Wechsler Memory Scale: Age and educational norms and alternate-form reliability of two scoring systems. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology, 9, 435–448.Google Scholar
Chelune, G., Bornstein, R., & Prifitera, A. (1990). The Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised. Current status and applications. In P. Reynolds, J. Rosen, & G. Chelune (Eds.), Advances in psychological assessment (7th ed., pp. 65–99). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
Craik, F.I., Anderson, K.D., Kerr, S., & Li, K. (1995). Memory changes in normal ageing. In A. Baddeley, B.A. Wilson, & F.N. Watts (Eds.), Handbook of memory disorders (pp. 211–241). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Craik, F.I. & McDowd, J.M. (1987). Age differences in recall and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 13, 474–479.Google Scholar
Cullum, C.M., Butters, N., Troster, A., & Salmon, D. (1990). Normal aging and forgetting rates on the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 5, 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fastenau, P., Denburg, N., & Abeles, N. (1996). Age differences in retrieval: Further support for the resource-reduction hypothesis. Psychology and Aging, 11, 140–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabrieli, J.D. (1996). Memory systems analyses of mnemonic disorders in aging and age-related diseases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science (USA), 93, 13534–13540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabrieli, J.D.E., Stebbins, G.T., Singh, J., & Williamham, D.B. (1997). Intact mirror-tracing and impaired rotary-pursuit learning in patients with Huntington's disease. Neuropsychology, 11, 272–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golomb, J., de Leon, M.J., Kluger, A., George, A.E., Tarshish, C., & Ferris, S.H. (1993). Hippocampal atrophy in normal aging. An association with recent memory impairment. Archives of Neurology, 50, 967–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grady, C.L., McIntosh, A.R., Horwitz, B., Maisog, J.M., Ungerleider, L.G., Mentis, M.J., Pietrini, P., Schapiro, M.B., & Haxby, J.V. (1995). Age-related reductions in human recognition memory due to impaired encoding. Science, 269, 218–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haaland, K.Y., Linn, R.T., Hunt, W.C., & Goodwin, J.W. (1983). A normative study of Russella's revision of the Wechsler Memory Scale in a healthy elderly population. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 878–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulicka, I. (1966). Age differences in Wechsler Memory Scale scores. Journal of Psychology, 109, 135–145.Google Scholar
Ivnik, R.J., Smith, G.E., Tangalos, E.G., Petersen, R.C., Kokmen, E., & Kurland, L.T. (1991). Wechsler Memory Scale: IQ dependent norms for persons aged 65–97 years. Psychological Assessment, 3, 156–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, L., Myerson, J., Joerding, J.A., & Hale, S. (2000). Converging evidence that visuospatial cognition is more age-sensitive than verbal cognition. Psychology & Aging, 15, 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, W., Miezen, F., McDermott, K., Buckner, R.L., Raichle, M.E., Cohen, N.J., Ollinger, J.M., Akbudak, E., Conturo, T.E., Snyder, A.Z., & Petersen, S.E. (1998). Hemispheric specialization in human dorsal frontal cortex and medial temporal lobe for verbal and nonverbal memory encoding. Neuron, 20, 927–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcopulos, B.A., McLain, C.A., & Guiliani, A.J. (1997). Cognitive impairment or inadequate norms? A study of healthy, rural, older adults with limited education. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 11, 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moscovitch, M. & Winocur, G. (1992). The neuropsychology of memory and aging. In F.I. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (pp. 315–372). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Petersen, R.C., Jack, C.R., Xu, Y.C., Waring, S.C., O'Brien, P.C., Smith, G.E., Ivnik, R.J., Tangalos, E.G., Boeve, B.F., & Kokmen, E. (2000). Memory and MRI-based hippocampal volumes in aging and AD. Neurology, 54, 581–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prifitera, A. & Ledbetter, M. (1992). Normative delayed recall rates based on the Weschler Memory Scale-Revised standardization sample. Ref Type: Unpublished WorkGoogle Scholar
Prull, M.W., Gabrieli, J.D.E., & Bunge, S. (2000). Age-related changes in memory: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. In F.I. Craik & T.A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 91–153). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Raz, N., Gunning, F.M., Head, D., Dupuis, J.H., McQuain, J., Briggs, S.D., Loken, W.J., Thornton, A.E., & Acker, J.D. (1997). Selective aging of the human cerebral cortex observed in vivo: Differential vulnerability of the prefrontal gray matter. Cerebral Cortex, 7, 268–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, E.W. (1975). A multiple scoring method for the assessment of complex memory functions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 800–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rybarczyk, B.D., Hart, R.P., & Harkins, S.W. (1987). Age and forgetting rate with pictorial stimuli. Psychology and Aging, 2, 404–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schacter, D.L., Curran, T., Reiman, E.M., Chen, K., Bandy, D.J., & Frost, J.T. (1999). Medial temporal lobe activation during episodic encoding and retrieval: A PET study. Hippocampus, 9, 575–581.3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spreen, O. & Strauss, M.E. (1998). A compendium of neuropsychological tests (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Squire, L. & Zola-Morgan, S. (1991). The medical temporal lobe memory system. Science, 253, 1380–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, C.E. & Squire, L.R. (2000). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activity in the hippocampal region during recognition memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 7776–7781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tröster, A.I., Butters, N., Salmon, D.P., Cullum, C.M., Jacobs, D., Brandt, J., & White, R.F. (1993). The diagnostic utility of savings scores: Differentiating Alzheimer's and Huntington's diseases with Logical Memory and Visual Reproduction tests. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 15, 773–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1945). A standardized memory scale for clinical use. Journal of Psychology, 19, 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1987). Wechsler Memory Scale Revised. New York.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–III. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Welsh, K., Butters, N., Hughes, J., Mohs, R., & Heyman, A. (1991). Detection of abnormal memory decline in mild cases of Alzheimer's disease using CERAD neuropsychological measures. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 48, 278–281.Google Scholar
Zola-Morgan, S., Squire, L.R., & Amaral, D.G. (1986). Human amnesia and the medial temporal region: enduring memory impairment following a bilateral lesion limited to field CA1 of the hippocampus. Journal of Neuroscience, 6, 2950–2967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar