Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T00:49:35.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Host selection by larvae of a marine insect Halocladius variabilis: nutritional dependency or escape from predation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2012

Norah E. Brown ,
Sean C. Mitchell  and
David J. Garbary
Norah E. Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, St Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Nova Scotia, B2G 2W5, Canada
Sean C. Mitchell
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, St Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Nova Scotia, B2G 2W5, Canada
David J. Garbary*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, St Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Nova Scotia, B2G 2W5, Canada
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: D.J. Garbary, Department of Biology, St Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Nova Scotia, B2G 2W5, Canada email: dgarbary@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Larvae of the Holarctic marine chironomid, Halocladius variabilis (Staeger), have strong fidelity to the tuft-forming brown alga, Elachista fucicola (Velley) Areschoug, an abundant epiphyte on intertidal fucoids of the North Atlantic. We show that larvae are sufficiently motile to select an algal host in a Petri dish within 3–4 cm, and that larvae show differential behaviour with respect to host selection in the presence or absence of a predator. In the absence of predators 53% of larvae found an algal host within 1 hour; however, after 24 hours, there was no significant difference in host selection. When an isopod predator (Idotea sp.) was present, more larvae found a host within 1 hour (81%) and Elachista was chosen over three of the four other hosts. Furthermore, when larvae were present in Elachista, predator (Carcinus maenus) success was significantly reduced relative to two other algal hosts. The adaptive significance of Elachista as a refuge from predation was confirmed by experiments demonstrating that larval growth with other algal hosts was greater than with Elachista. These experiments suggest that microhabitat selection by larvae of H. variabilis reveals important tradeoffs for growth and predator avoidance.

Keywords

algal/insect symbiosisChironomidaeElachista fucicolaHalocladius variabilishost selectionmarine insects
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 93 , Issue 5 , August 2013 , pp. 1373 - 1379
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alford, J.B. and Beckett, D.C. (2007) Selective adaptation by four darter (Percidae) species on larval chironomids (Diptera) from a Mississippi stream. Environmental Biology of Fishes 78, 353–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archambault, P., Snelgrove, P.V.R., Fisher, J.A.D., Gagnon, J-M., Garbary, D.J., Harvey, M., Kenchington, E.L., Lesage, V., Levesque, M., Lovejoy, C., Mackas, D.L., McKindsey, C.W., Nelson, J.R., Pepin, P., Piché, L. and Poulin, M. (2010) From sea to sea: Canada's three oceans of biodiversity. PLoS ONE 5, 1–26. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bond, J.G., Arredondo-Jimenez, J.I., Rodriguez, H., Quiroz-Martinez, H. and Williams, T. (2005) Oviposition habitat selection for a predator refuge and food source in a mosquito. Ecological Entomology 30, 225–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, N.E. and Garbary, D.J. (2010) Halocladius variabilis (Diptera: Chironomidae) in Scotland. British Journal of Entomology and Natural History 23, 229–234.Google Scholar
Brawley, S.H. (1992) Mesoherbivores. In John, D.M., Hawkins, S.J. and Price, J.H. (eds) Plant–animal interactions in the marine benthos. Oxford: Systematics Association Special Volume No. 46, pp. 235–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, S.P. (1982) Littoral and benthic investigations of the west coast of Ireland—XIII. The biology of Gobiusculus flavescens (Fabricius) on the Connemara coast. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 81, 63–87.Google Scholar
Deckert, R. and Garbary, D.J. (2005) Ascophyllum and its symbionts. VIII. Interactions among Ascophyllum nodosum (Phaeophyceae), Mycophycias ascophylli (Ascomycetes) and Elachista fucicola (Phaeophyceae). Algae 20, 363–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, J.E. and Hay, M.E. (1991) Food and shelter as determinants of food choice by an herbivorous marine amphipod. Ecology 72, 1286–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etam, A. and Blaustein, L. (2004) Oviposition habitat selection by mosquitoes in response to predator (Notonecta maculata) density. Physiological Entomology 29, 188–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garbary, D.J. (1976) Life-forms of algae and their distribution. Botanica Marina 19, 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garbary, D.J. and Brown, N.E. (in press) Halocladius variabilis (Staeger, 1839) (Chironomidae, Insecta) from the rocky intertidal zone of Galway Bay. Irish Naturalists' Journal.Google Scholar
Garbary, D.J. and Deckert, R. (2001) Three part harmony—Ascophyllum and its symbionts. In Seckback, J. (ed.) Symbiosis: processes and model systems. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, pp. 309–321.Google Scholar
Garbary, D.J., Jamieson, M.M., Fraser, M.M., Ferguson, C.A. and Cranston, P.S. (2005) Ascophyllum (Phaeophyceae) and its symbionts. IX. A novel symbiosis between Halocladius variabilis (Chironomidae, Insecta) and Elachista fucicola (Elachistacae, Phaeophyceae) from marine rocky shores of Nova Scotia. Symbiosis 40, 61–68.Google Scholar
Garbary, D.J., Jamieson, M.M. and Taylor, B.R. (2009) Population ecology of the marine insect Halocladius variabilis (Diptera: Chironomidae) in the rocky intertidal zone of Nova Scotia. Marine Ecology Progress Series 376, 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garbary, D.J., Lining, T. and Burke, J. (1991) The Ascophyllum, Polysiphonia, Mycosphaerella symbiosis. II. Aspects of the ecology and symbiosis of Polysiphonia in Nova Scotia. Botanica Marina 34, 391–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garbary, D.J. and MacDonald, K.A. (1995) The Ascophyllum, Polysiphonia, Mycosphaerella symbiosis. 4. Mutualism in the Ascophyllum–Mycosphaerella interaction. Botanica Marina 38, 221–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gollety, C., Riera, P. and Davoult, D. (2010) Complexity of the food web structure of the Ascophyllum nodosum zone evidenced by a δC13 and δN15 study. Journal of Sea Research 64, 304–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashimoto, H. (1976) Non-biting midges of marine habitats (Diptera: Chironomidae). In Cheng, L. (ed.) Marine insects. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland Publishing Company, pp. 377–414.Google Scholar
Hay, M.E., Duffy, J.E. and Fenical, W. (1990) Host-plant specialization decreases predation on a marine amphipod: an herbivore in plant's clothing. Ecology 71, 733–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmlund, M.B., Petersen, C.H. and Hay, M.E. (1990) Does algal morphology affect amphipod susceptibility to fish predation? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 139, 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howson, C.M. and Picton, B.E. (1999) The species directory of the marine fauna and flora of the British Isles and surrounding seas. CD-ROM edition. Belfast and Ross-on-Wye: Ulster Museum and The Marine Conservation Society.Google Scholar
James-Pirri, M.J., Raposa, K.B. and Catena, J.G. (2001) Diet composition of mummichogs, Fundulus heteroclitus, from restoring and unrestricted regions of a New England (USA) salt marsh. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 53, 205–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasley-Rasher, R.S., Rasher, D.B., Marion, Z.H., Taylor, R.B. and Hay, M.E. (2011) Predation constrains host choice for a marine mesograzer. Marine Ecology Progress Series 434, 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinton, J.S. (2001) Marine biology: function, biodiversity, ecology. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Longtin, C.M. and Scrosati, R.A. (2009) Role of surface wounds and brown algal epiphytes in the colonization of Ascophyllum nodosum (Phaeophyceae) fronds by Vertebrata lanosa (Rhodophyta). Journal of Phycology 45, 535–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louca, V., Lucas, M.C., Green, C., Majambere, S., Fillinger, U. and Lindsay, S.W. (2009) Role of fish as predators of mosquito larvae on the floodplain of the Gambia river. Journal of Medical Entomology 46, 546–556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neumann, D. (1976) Adaptation of chironomids to intertidal environments. Annual Review of Entomology 21, 387–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, B.K. and Resh, V.H. (1992) Influence of Myriophyllum aquaticum cover on Anopheles mosquito abundance, oviposition, and larval microhabitat. Oecologia 90, 474–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robles, C.D. and Cubit, J. (1981) Influence of biotic factors in an upper intertidal community: dipteran larvae grazing on algae. Ecology 62, 1536–1547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silberbush, A., Markman, S., Lewinsohn, E., Bar, E., Cohen, J.E. and Blaustein, L. (2010) Predator-released hydrocarbons repel oviposition by a mosquito. Ecology Letters 13, 1129–1138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skelhorn, J., Rowland, H.M., Delf, J., Speed, M.P. and Ruxton, G.D. (2011) Density-dependent predation influences the evolution and behavior of masquerading prey. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108, 6532–6536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tarakhovskaya, E.R. and Garbary, D.J. (2009) Halocladius variabilis (Diptera: Chironomidae): a marine insect symbiotic with seaweeds from the White Sea, Russia. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 89, 1381–1385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toxopeus, J., Kozera, C.J., O'Leary, S.J.B. and Garbary, D.J. (2011) A reclassification of Mycophycias ascophylli (Ascomycota) based on nuclear large ribosomal subunit DNA sequences. Botanica Marina 54, 325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D.D. and Williams, N.E. (1998) Aquatic insects in an estuarine environment: densities, distribution and salinity tolerance. Freshwater Biology 39, 411–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, H., Deckert, R.J. and Garbary, D.J. (2008) Ascophyllum and its symbionts. X. Ultrastructure of the interaction between A. nodosum (Phaeophyceae) and Mycophycias ascophylli (Ascomycetes). Botany 86, 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zar, J.H. (1998) Biostatistical analysis. 3rd edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar