Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T20:44:09.760Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Understanding the Judicial Role in Addressing Gender Bias: A View from the Eighth Circuit Federal Court System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Kimberly A. Lonsway ,
Leslie V. Freeman ,
Lilia M. Cortina ,
Vicki J. Magley  and
Louise F. Fitzgerald
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The role of trial judges in the litigation process is frequently debated. Are judges to be dispassionate adjudicators, disengaged referees in a sport in which attorneys compete? Or are they charged with a more active role in promoting the substance, form, and process of justice? In the present paper, we explore the judicial role in addressing gender bias in federal litigation, using data gathered for the Eighth Circuit Gender Fairness Task Force. The federal judges of this circuit were surveyed about their experiences, observations, and opinions of gender-biased conduct. Results indicated that although judges viewed judicial intervention as an appropriate response to gender bias, they had little personal experience with intervention in such a situation. Fur thermore, when specific hypothetical scenarios were presented, they generally agreed that the described conduct was inappropriate but offered little consensus regarding the best course of action for an attorney or judge confronted with such behavior. The Eighth Circuit data thus provide the basis for expanded understanding of the conduct at issue, the options for action in response, and the persistent discrepancy in viewpoints on gender bias and the judicial role.

Type
Symposium: Eighth Circuit Gender Fairness Study
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , Spring 2002 , pp. 205 - 234
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2002 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of Steve Landsman, Shari Diamond, and the anonymous reviewers. The majority of work was conducted while the first author held a postdoctoral research fellowship at the American Bar Foundation.

References

American Bar Association. 1972. Model Code of Judicial Conduct. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
American Bar Association. 1990. Model Code of Judicial Conduct. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
Burger, Warren E. 1971. The Necessity for Civility. 52 F. R. D. 211.Google Scholar
Cortina, Lilia M., Lonsway, Kimberly A., Magley, Vicki J., Freeman, Leslie V., Collinsworth, Linda L., Hunter, Mary K., and Fitzgerald, Louise F. 2002. What's Gender Got To Do with It? Incivility in the Federal Courts. Law & Social Inquiry 27(2): 235–270.Google Scholar
D. C. Circuit Task Force on Gender, Race and Ethnic Bias. 1996. Draft Final Report of the Special Committee on Gender to the D. C. Circuit Task Force on Gender, Race and Ethnic Bias. Georgetown Law Journal 85: 1651.Google Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., and Chaiken, Shelley. 1993. The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, Texas: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Eighth Circuit Gender Fairness Task Force. 1997. Final Report of the Eighth Circuit Gender Fairness Task Force. Creighton Law Review 31: 9–182.Google Scholar
Ellerin, Betty Weinburg, Lester, Betty J., McConnell, Judith, Porada, Elizabeth A., Wahl, Rosalie E., and Wilker, Norma J. 1991. Gender Bias in the Courts: The Judge's Role. Women's Rights Law Reporter 12: 239–53.Google Scholar
Enoch, Craig. 1994. Incivility in the Legal System? Maybe It's the Rules. Southern Methodist Law Review 47: 199–233.Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan T. 1993. Controlling Other People: The Impact of Power on Stereotyping. American Psychologist 48: 621–28.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Louise F., Cortina, Lilia M., Lonsway, Kimberly A., Hunter Williams, Jill, Day Langhout, Regina, Hammond, Amanda J., Magley, Vicki J., Waldo, Craig R., Buchanan, NiCole, and Ramos, Alexandra. 1997a. Final Report of the Eighth Circuit Gender Fairness Task Force Attorney Survey. Technical report submitted to the Eighth Circuit Gender Fairness Task Force.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Louise F., Lonsway, Kimberly A., Cortina, Lilia M., Hammond, Amanda J., Day Langhout, Regina, Hunter Williams, Jill, Magley, Vicki J., and Xiao, Me. 1997b. Final Report of the Eighth Circuit Gender Fairness Task Force Judge Survey. Technical report submitted to the Eighth Circuit Gender Fairness Task Force.Google Scholar
Flannery, Harold J. 1989. Gender Bias in the Courtroom and Judicial Intervention. Boston Bar Journal, July-August, 21–22.Google Scholar
Frankel, Marvin E. 1975. The Search for Truth: An Umpireal View. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 123: 1031–59.Google Scholar
Gerber, R. J. 1987. Victory vs. Truth: The Adversary System and Its Ethics. Arizona State Law Journal 19: 3–25.Google Scholar
Haines, Paul Lowell. 1990. Restraining the Overly Zealous Advocate: Time for Judicial Intervention. Indiana Law Journal 65: 445–69.Google Scholar
Honeywell, Mark G. 1994. How to Be on the Offensive without Being Offensive. Trial, June, 86–88.Google Scholar
Jackson, Vicki C. 1997. What Judges Can Learn from Gender Bias Task Force Studies. Judicature 81: 15–21, 38–39.Google Scholar
Judicial Conference of the United States. 1995. Long Range Plan for the Federal Courts. Washington, D. C.: Committee on Long Range Planning.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Lawrence W. 1994. When the Court Compounds the Problem: How to Cope with Bias from the Bench. Family Advocate 7: 60–63.Google Scholar
Landsman, Maury S. 1997. Bias, Discrimination and Ethics: Constraints on Judges and Lawyers. Presentation at the Eighth Circuit Judicial Conference, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Levine, Jennifer A. 1988. Preventing Gender Bias in the Courts: A Question of Judicial Ethics. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 1: 775–95.Google Scholar
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Gender Bias Study Committee. 1989, 1990. Report of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Gender Bias Study Committee. Suffolk University Law Review 23: 576; New England Law Review 24: 745.Google Scholar
McMurry, Kelly. 1996. Lawyer Incivility: War Games or Bad Manners Trial, October, 10–12.Google Scholar
Miller, Arthur R. 1984. The Adversary System: Dinosaur or Phoenix. Minnesota Law Review 69: 1–37.Google Scholar
Minnesota Supreme Court Task Force for Gender in the Courts. 1989. Final Report. William Mitchell Law Review 15: 825–948.Google Scholar
Missouri Task Force on Gender and Justice. 1993. Final Report. Missouri Law Review 58: 485–716.Google Scholar
New York Task Force on Women in the Courts. 1987. Final Report. Fordham Urban Law Journal 15: 11–198.Google Scholar
Ninth Circuit Gender Bias Task Force. 1994. The Effects of Gender in the Federal Courts: The Final Report of the Ninth Circuit Gender Bias Task Force. Southern California Law Review 67: 745–1106.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Sandra Day. 1994. The Quality of Justice. Southern California Law Review 67: 759–61.Google Scholar
Padavic, Irene, and Orcutt, James D. 1997. Perceptions of Sexual Harassment in the Florida Legal System: A Comparison of Dominance and Spillover Explanations. Gender and Society 11: 682–98.Google Scholar
Resnik, Judith. 1982. Managerial Judges. Harvard Law Review 96: 374–448.Google Scholar
Resnik, Judith. 1996. Asking about Gender in the Courts. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 20: 952–90.Google Scholar
Ring, Leonard M. 1993. The Incivility Crisis. Trial, August, 78–84.Google Scholar
Round, Deborah Ruble. 1988. Gender Bias in the Judicial System. Southern California Law Review 61: 2193–2220.Google Scholar
Schafran, Lynn Hecht. 1985. Educating the Judiciary about Gender Bias: The National Judicial Education Program to Promote Equality for Women and Men in the Courts and the New Jersey Supreme Court Task Force on Women in the Courts. Women's Rights Law Reporter 9: 109–24.Google Scholar
Schafran, Lynn Hecht. 1989. Gender Bias in the Courts: An Emerging Focus for Judicial Reform. Arizona State Law Journal 21: 237–73.Google Scholar
Schafran, Lynn Hecht. 1990. The Obligation to Intervene: New Direction from the American Bar Association Code of Judicial Conduct. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 4: 53–79.Google Scholar
Schafran, Lynn Hecht, and Wikler, Norma J. 2001. Gender Fairness in the Courts: Action in the New Millennium. New York: National Judicial Education Program (for the State Justice Institute).Google Scholar
Second Circuit Task Force on Gender, Racial, and Ethnic Fairness in the Courts. 1997. Report of the Second Circuit Task Force on Gender, Racial, and Ethnic Fairness in the Courts. Annual Survey of American Law 9.Google Scholar
Seventh Federal Judicial Circuit Committee on Civility. 1992. Final Report of the Committee on Civility of the Seventh Federal Judicial Circuit.Google Scholar
Tinkham, T. 1990. Incivility Revisited. Bench and Bar of Minnesota, August, 5.Google Scholar