Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-06-01T08:04:25.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE ROLE OF RESOURCE MISALLOCATION IN CROSS-COUNTRY DIFFERENCES IN MANUFACTURING PRODUCTIVITY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2016

Robert Inklaar ,
Addisu A. Lashitew  and
Marcel P. Timmer
Robert Inklaar*
Affiliation:
Groningen Growth and Development Centre
Addisu A. Lashitew
Affiliation:
Rotterdam School of Management
Marcel P. Timmer
Affiliation:
Groningen Growth and Development Centre
*
Address correspondence to Robert Inklaar, Groningen Growth and Development Centre, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 800, 9700 AV Groningen, the Netherlands; e-mail: R.C.Inklaar@rug.nl.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Misallocation of resources across firms leads to lower aggregate productivity. In this paper, we provide new estimates of manufacturing productivity differences across countries and establish by how much they would be reduced if such misallocation were eliminated. Using World Bank survey data for formal manufacturing firms in 52 low- and middle-income countries, we show that manufacturing productivity would increase by an average of 62%, but productivity gaps relative to the United States would remain large. We also find that lower-income countries do not have more to gain from reducing misallocation, as efficiency of resource allocation is uncorrelated with income levels.

Keywords

ProductivityResource AllocationCross-Country Comparisons
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , April 2017 , pp. 733 - 756
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Footnotes

We would like to thank the editor and two anonymous referees for helpful comments and suggestions. We would also like to thank participants at a seminar at the University of Bielefeld and at the IARIW conference in Rotterdam, 2014, for helpful comments. Lashitew would like to thank the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) for financial support.

References

REFERENCES

Adamopoulos, Tasso and Restuccia, Diego (2014) The size distribution of farms and international productivity differences. American Economic Review 104 (6), 1667–1697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aghion, Philippe, Angeletos, George-Marios, Bannerjee, Abhijit, and Manova, Kalina (2010) Volatility and growth: Credit constraints and the composition of investment. Journal of Monetary Economics 57, 246–265.Google Scholar
Bartelsman, Eric, Haltiwanger, John, and Scarpetta, Stefano (2013) Cross-country differences in productivity: The role of allocation and selection. American Economic Review 103 (1), 305–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basu, Susanto and Fernald, John G. (2002) Aggregate productivity and aggregate technology. European Economic Review 46 (6), 963–991.Google Scholar
Broda, Christian and Weinstein, David E. (2006) Globalization and the gains from trade. Quarterly Journal of Economics 121 (2), 541–585.Google Scholar
Buera, Francisco J., Kaboski, Joseph P. and Shin, Yongseok (2011) Finance and development: A tale of two sectors. American Economic Review 101 (5), 1964–2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, Ariel and Gopinath, Gita (2014) International prices and exchange rates. In Gopinath, Gita, Helpman, Elhanan, and Rogoff, Kenneth (eds.), Handbook of International Economics, Vol. IV, pp. 391–451. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Caselli, Francesco (2005) Accounting for cross-country income differences. In Aghion, Philippe and Durlauf, Steven (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth, Vol. I, pp. 679–741. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Caves, Douglas W., Christensen, Laurits R., and Diewert, W. Erwin (1982) Multilateral comparisons of output, input and productivity using superlative index numbers. Economic Journal 92, 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vries, Gaaitzen (2014) Productivity in a distorted market: The case of Brazil's retail sector. Review of Income and Wealth 60 (3), 425–608.Google Scholar
Elsby, Michael W. L., Hobijn, Bart and Şahin, Ayşegül (2013) The decline of the U.S. labor share. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (Fall 2013), 1–51.Google Scholar
Feenstra, Robert C., Inklaar, Robert, and Timmer, Marcel P. (2015) The next generation of the Penn World Table. American Economic Review 105 (10), 3150–3182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feenstra, Robert C. and Romalis, John (2014) International prices and endogenous quality. Quarterly Journal of Economics 129 (2), 477–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, John G. and Neiman, Brent (2011) Growth accounting with misallocation: Or, doing less with more in Singapore. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 3 (2), 29–74.Google Scholar
Gollin, Douglas, Lagakos, David and Waugh, Michael E. (2014) The agricultural productivity gap. Quarterly Journal of Economics 129 (2), 939–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Robert E. and Jorgenson, Dale W. (1967) Tax policy and investment behavior. American Economic Review 57 (3), 391–414.Google Scholar
Herrendorf, Berthold and Valentinyi, Ákos (2012) Which sectors make poor countries so unproductive? Journal of the European Economic Association 10 (2), 323–341.Google Scholar
Hsieh, Chang-Tai and Klenow, Peter J. (2009) Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India. Quarterly Journal of Economics 124 (4), 1403–1448.Google Scholar
Hsieh, Chang-Tai and Klenow, Peter J. (2010) Development accounting. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 2 (1), 207–223.Google Scholar
ILO (2013) Women and Men in the Informal Economy: A Statistical Picture, 2nd ed. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
Inklaar, Robert (2010) The sensitivity of capital services measurement: Measure all assets and the cost of capital. Review of Income and Wealth 56 (2), 389–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inklaar, Robert and Timmer, Marcel P. (2014) The relative price of services. Review of Income and Wealth 60 (4), 727–746.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles I. (2011) Intermediate goods and weak links in the theory of economic development. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 3 (2), 1–28.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles I. (2013) Misallocation, economic growth, and input–output economics. In Acemoglu, Daron, Arellano, Manuel, and Dekel, Eddie (eds.), Advances in Economics and Econometrics, Tenth World Congress, Vol. II, pp. 419–458. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, Dale W. and Nishimizu, Mieko (1978) U.S. and Japanese economic growth, 1952–1974: An international comparison. Economic Journal 88, 707–726.Google Scholar
Melitz, Marc J. (2003) The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71 (6), 1695–1725.Google Scholar
Moll, Benjamin (2014) Productivity losses from financial frictions: Can self-financing undo capital misallocation? American Economic Review 104 (10), 3186–3221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muendler, Marc-Andreas (2004) Trade, Technology, and Productivity: A Study of Brazilian Manufacturers, 1986–1998. CESifo working paper 1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olley, G. Steven and Pakes, Ariel (1996) The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica 64 (6), 1263–1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Restuccia, Diego and Rogerson, Richard (2008) Policy distortions and aggregate productivity with heterogeneous plants. Review of Economic Dynamics 11 (4), 707–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Restuccia, Diego and Rogerson, Richard (2013) Misallocation and productivity. Review of Economic Dynamics 16 (1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, Dani (2013) Unconditional convergence in manufacturing. Quarterly Journal of Economics 128 (1), 165–204.Google Scholar
Sørensen, Anders and Schjerning, Bertel (2008) Productivity measurement in manufacturing and the expenditure approach. Review of International Economics 16 (2), 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syverson, Chad (2008) Markets: Ready-mixed concrete. Journal of Economic Perspectives 22 (1), 217–234.Google Scholar
Syverson, Chad (2011) What determines productivity? Journal of Economic Literature 49 (2), 326–365.Google Scholar
Valentinyi, Ákos and Herrendorf, Berthold (2008) Measuring factor income shares at the sector level. Review of Economic Dynamics 11 (4), 820–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Biesebroeck, Johannes (2009) Disaggregate productivity comparisons: Sectoral convergence in OECD countries. Journal of Productivity Analysis 32, 63–79.Google Scholar
Vollrath, Dietrich (2009) How important are dual economy effects for aggregate productivity? Journal of Development Economics 88 (2), 325–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Bank (2008) Global Purchasing Power Parities and Real Expenditures—2005 International Comparison Program. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank (2014), Doing Business 2014. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Inklaar supplementary material S1

Online Appendix

Download Inklaar supplementary material S1(PDF)
PDF 142.6 KB