Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-29T06:50:46.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cooperation Versus Competition: How Do Helping Coworkers Affect Work–Family Conflict?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2023

Junting Lu Open the ORCID record for Junting Lu [Opens in a new window] ,
Zhe Zhang Open the ORCID record for Zhe Zhang [Opens in a new window]  and
Ming Jia
Junting Lu
Affiliation:
School of Management, Shandong University, Weihai, Shandong 264209, China
Zhe Zhang*
Affiliation:
School of Management, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710049, China
Ming Jia
Affiliation:
School of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710072, China
*
Corresponding author: Zhe Zhang (zhangzhe@mail.xjtu.edu.cn)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although studies pay increasing attention to how organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) affects work–family conflict, most research ignores the boundary conditions and underlying mechanisms of this relationship. Drawing on goal interdependence theory and conservation of resources theory, this research sees two types of goal interdependence as important boundary conditions of how helping behavior affects work–family conflict. We use a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods to test our theoretical model. Specifically, using two-wave survey data collected from 386 employees and 90 supervisors in a manufacturing company, our quantitative study shows that the interaction of helping behavior with cooperative goal interdependence is positively associated with work–goal progress, whereas its interaction with competitive goal interdependence is negatively associated with work–goal progress. In turn, work–goal progress is negatively associated with work–family conflict. The results further reveal that the indirect effect of helping behavior on work–family conflict via work–goal progress is positive and significant only when the level of competitive (cooperative) goal interdependence is high (low). We use 196 employees from the same organization to conduct our qualitative study, the results of which further substantiate and extend the findings from our quantitative study. Finally, we discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our findings.

摘要

摘要

尽管组织公民行为（OCB）如何影响工作-家庭冲突受到越来越多的关注，但大多数研究都忽视了这种关系的边界条件和潜在机制。根据目标互依理论和资源保存理论，本研究将两种类型的目标互依视为助人行为影响工作-家庭冲突的重要边界条件。我们采用定量和定性相结合的研究方法来检验我们的理论模型。定量研究的样本来自一家制造型企业，我们通过多时段问卷调查共收集 386 名员工和 90 名领导的配对数据。结果表明，助人行为与合作目标互依性的交互作用与工作-目标进展正相关；助人行为与竞争目标互依性的交互作用与工作-目标进展负相关；工作-目标进展与工作-家庭冲突呈负相关。此外，只有当竞争（合作）目标互依性水平较高（低）时，助人行为通过工作-目标进展对工作-家庭冲突的间接效应才是正向显著的。其后，我们用来自同一组织的 196 名员工为样本展开定性研究（访谈），进一步证实和扩展了我们定量研究的结果。

Keywords

goal interdependencehelping behaviorwork–family conflictwork–goal progress助人行为目标互依性工作-目标进展工作-家庭冲突。
Type
Article
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 19 , Issue 5 , October 2023 , pp. 957 - 980
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The International Association for Chinese Management Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aggarwal, A., & Singh, R. 2016. Exploring the nomological network of organizational citizenship behavior: A review of dimensions, antecedents and consequences. IUP Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(3): 16–39.Google Scholar
Allen, T. D. 2000. Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(3): 414–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, T. D., & Finkelstein, L. M. 2014. Work–family conflict among members of full-time dual-earner couples: An examination of family life stage, gender, and age. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19(3): 376–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alper, S., Tjosvold, D., & Law, K. S. 1998. Interdependence and controversy in group decision making: Antecedents to effective self-managing teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74(1): 33–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ambrose, M. L., Schminke, M., & Mayer, D. M. 2013. Trickle-down effects of supervisor perceptions of interactional justice: A moderated mediation approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(4): 678–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aw, S. S., Ilies, R., Li, X., Bakker, A. B., & Liu, X. Y. 2021. Work-related helping and family functioning: A work–home resources perspective. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94(1): 55–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachrach, D. G., Powell, B. C., Collins, B. J., & Richey, R. G. 2006. Effects of task interdependence on the relationship between helping behavior and group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6): 1396–1405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, T. E. 2005. Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8(3): 274–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beersma, B., Hollenbeck, J. R., Humphrey, S. E., Moon, H., Conlon, D. E., & Ilgen, D. R. 2003. Cooperation, competition, and team performance: Toward a contingency approach. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5): 572–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliese, P. D. 2000. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In Klein, K. J. & Kozlowski, S. W. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: 349–381. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. 2005. The personal costs of citizenship behavior: The relationship between individual initiative and role overload, job stress, and work–family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4): 740–748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolino, M. C., Harvey, J., & Bachrach, D. G. 2012. A self-regulation approach to understanding citizenship behavior in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(1): 126–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolino, M. C., Klotz, A. C., Turnley, W. H., & Harvey, J. 2013. Exploring the dark side of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(4): 542–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H., Gilstrap, J. B., & Suazo, M. M. 2010. Citizenship under pressure: What's a “good soldier” to do? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(6): 835–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brislin, R. W. 1980. Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In Triandis, H. C. & Berry, J. W. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: 389–444. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Brunstein, J. C. 1993. Personal goals and subjective well-being: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5): 1061–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byron, K. 2005. A meta-analytic review of work–family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67(2): 169–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Williams, L. J. 2000. Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of work–family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56(2): 249–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, P., Xu, Y., Sparrow, P., & Cooper, C. 2023. Compulsory citizenship behaviour and work–family conflict: A moderated mediation model. Current Psychology, 42(8): 6641–6652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deery, S., Rayton, B., Walsh, J., & Kinnie, N. 2017. The costs of exhibiting organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Management, 56(6): 1039–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, M. 1949. A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2(2): 129–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. 2007. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellington, J. K., Dierdorff, E. C., & Rubin, R. S. 2014. Decelerating the diminishing returns of citizenship on task performance: The role of social context and interpersonal skill. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4): 748–758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. 2007. Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: a new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2): 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, A. S., Koopman, J., Rosen, C. C., & Johnson, R. E. 2018. Helping others or helping oneself? An episodic examination of the behavioral consequences of helping at work. Personnel Psychology, 71(1): 85–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gladstein, D. L. 1984. Group in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4): 499–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gu, Y., & Wang, R. 2021. Job demands and work–family conflict in preschool teachers: The buffering effects of job resources and off-job recovery experiences. Current Psychology, 40(8): 3974–3985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halbesleben, J. R., Harvey, J., & Bolino, M. C. 2009. Too engaged? A conservation of resources view of the relationship between work engagement and work interference with family. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6): 1452–1465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hobfoll, S. E. 1988. The ecology of stress. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
Hobfoll, S. E. 1989. Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3): 513–524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hobfoll, S. E. 1998. Stress, culture, and community: The psychology and philosophy of stress. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobfoll, S. E. 2001. Conservation of resources: A rejoinder to the commentaries. Applied Psychology, 50(3): 419–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobfoll, S. E. 2011. Conservation of resource caravans and engaged settings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(1): 116–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J. P., & Westman, M. 2018. Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5: 103–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtschlag, C., Masuda, A. D., Reiche, B. S., & Morales, C. 2020. Why do millennials stay in their jobs? The roles of protean career orientation, goal progress and organizational career management. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 118: 103366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. 2005. New developments in social interdependence theory. Psychology Monographs, 131(4): 285–358.Google ScholarPubMed
Johnson, R. C., & Allen, T. D. 2013. Examining the links between employed mothers’ work characteristics, physical activity, and child health. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(1): 148–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koestner, R., Powers, T. A., Carbonneau, N., Milyavskaya, M., & Chua, S. N. 2012. Distinguishing autonomous and directive forms of goal support: Their effects on goal progress, relationship quality, and subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(12): 1609–1620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koopman, J., Lanaj, K., & Scott, B. A. 2016. Integrating the bright and dark sides of OCB: A daily investigation of the benefits and costs of helping others. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2): 414–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krannitz, M. A., Grandey, A. A., Liu, S., & Almeida, D. A. 2015. Workplace surface acting and marital partner discontent: Anxiety and exhaustion spillover mechanisms. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20(3): 314–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Latif, K., Tariq, H., Khan, A. K., Weng, Q. D., & Sarwar, N. 2020. Loaded with knowledge, yet green with envy: Leader–member exchange comparison and coworkers-directed knowledge hiding behavior. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(7): 1653–1680.Google Scholar
LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. 2008. Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4): 815–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, A., Shaffer, J. A., Wang, Z., & Huang, J. L. 2021. Work–family conflict, perceived control, and health, family, and wealth: A 20-year study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 127: 103562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, K. J., Ilies, R., Pluut, H., & Pan, S. Y. 2017. You are a helpful co-worker, but do you support your spouse? A resource-based work–family model of helping and support provision. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 138: 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, X. L., Lu, J. G., Zhang, H., & Cai, Y. 2021. Helping the organization but hurting yourself: How employees’ unethical pro-organizational behavior predicts work-to-life conflict. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 167: 88–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, R. A., Winkel, D. E., & Wayne, J. H. 2014. A longitudinal examination of role overload and work–family conflict: The mediating role of interdomain transitions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(1): 72–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, J. S., Kotrba, L. M., Mitchelson, J. K., Clark, M. A., & Baltes, B. B. 2011. Antecedents of work–family conflict: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(5): 689–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. 2012. Mplus user's guide, 7th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.Google Scholar
Nielsen, T. M., Bachrach, D. G., Sundstrom, E., & Halfhill, T. R. 2012. Utility of OCB: Organizational citizenship behavior and group performance in a resource allocation framework. Journal of Management, 38(2): 668–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piszczek, M. M., Martin, J. E., Pimputkar, A. S., & Laulié, L. 2021. What does schedule fit add to work–family research? The incremental effect of schedule fit on work–family conflict, schedule satisfaction, and turnover intentions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94(4): 866–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. 1990. Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(2): 107–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. 2010. A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15(3): 209–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, A. M., & DeShon, R. P. 2007. What to do? The effects of discrepancies, incentives, and time on dynamic goal prioritization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4): 928–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selig, J. P., & Preacher, K. J. 2008. Monte Carlo method for assessing mediation: An interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects. Available from URL: http://quantpsy.orgGoogle Scholar
Shockley, K. M., Shen, W., DeNunzio, M. M., Arvan, M. L., & Knudsen, E. A. 2017. Disentangling the relationship between gender and work–family conflict: An integration of theoretical perspectives using meta-analytic methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(12): 1601–1635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sundstrom, E., De Meuse, K. P., & Futrell, D. 1990. Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45(2): 120–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tjosvold, D. 1986. The dynamics of interdependence in organizations. Human Relations, 39(6): 517–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tjosvold, D. 1989. Interdependence and power between managers and employees: A study of the leader relationship. Journal of Management, 15(1): 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tjosvold, D., Tang, M., & West, M. 2004. Reflexivity for team innovation in China the contribution of goal interdependence. Group & Organization Management, 29(5): 540–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanberg, C. R., Zhu, J., & Van Hooft, E. A. 2010. The job search grind: Perceived progress, self-reactions, and self-regulation of search effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4): 788–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. 1988. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6): 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wattoo, M. A., Zhao, S., & Xi, M. 2018. Perceived organizational support and employee well-being: Testing the mediatory role of work–family facilitation and work–family conflict. Chinese Management Studies, 13(2): 87–96.Google Scholar
Weick, K. 1984. Small wins: Reflecting the scale of social problems. American Psychologist, 39(1): 40–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, K. J., & Alliger, G. M. 1994. Role stressors, mood spillover, and perceptions of work–family conflict in employed parents. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4): 837–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, A., Tjosvold, D., & Yu, Z. Y. 2005. Organizational partnerships in China: Self-interest, goal interdependence, and opportunism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4): 782–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yam, K. C., Klotz, A. C., He, W., & Reynolds, S. J. 2017. From good soldiers to psychologically entitled: Examining when and why citizenship behavior leads to deviance. Academy of Management Journal, 60(1): 373–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yi-Feng, N. C., Tjosvold, D., & Peiguan, W. 2008. Effects of relationship values and goal interdependence on guanxi between foreign managers and Chinese employees. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(10): 2440–2468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X. A., Liao, H., Li, N., & Colbert, A. E. 2020. Playing it safe for my family: Exploring the dual effects of family motivation on employee productivity and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 63(6): 1923–1950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar