Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-18T12:55:29.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optimising the acceleration due to gravity on a planet's surface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Michael Jewess
Michael Jewess*
Affiliation:
The Long Barn, Townsend, Harwell OX11 0DX, e-mail:michaeljewesstiitiscali.co.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Earth (more precisely, the ‘geoid’ thereof) is known to approximate closely to a slightly oblate spheroid whose unique axis coincides with the Earth's axis of rotation [1,2]. (By ‘spheroid’ is meant is an ellipsoid of revolution, i.e. one with two semi-axes equal; a slightly oblate one has these two semi-axes slightly longer than the unique one.) To the nearest km, the diameter of the ‘geoid’ pole-to-pole is 43 km less than the equatorial diameter of 12756 km. There is a reduction of practical significance (0.527%) in the acceleration of free fall" at sea level between the poles and the equator, and therefore in the weight of objects. Of this, 0.345% derives directly from the rotation of the Earth; the balance of 0.182% results from the purely gravitational effect of the Earth's deviation from sphericity.

Type
Articles
Information
The Mathematical Gazette , Volume 94 , Issue 530 , July 2010 , pp. 203 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © The Mathematical Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Cook, A. H., Gravity and the Earth, Wykeham Publications (1969).Google Scholar
2. Cook, A. H., Physics of the Earth and planets, MacMillan (1973).Google Scholar
3. Newton, Isaac, The Principia: mathematical principles of natural philosophy, translated by Cohen, I. Bernard and Whitman, Anne, University of California Press (pbk. 1999), Book 1, Proposition 91, Corollary 2 (pp. 616-617) and Book 3, Propositions 18-20 (pp. 821-832).Google Scholar
4. Courant, R. and Robbins, H., revision by Stewart, I., What is mathematics? (2nd edn.), Oxford University Press (1996), pp.379–385.Google Scholar
5. Stephenson, G., Mathematical methods for science students (2nd edn.), Longmans (1973), Chapter 25.Google Scholar
6. Arfken, G. B. and Weber, H. J., Mathematical methods for physicists (6th edn.), Academic Press (2005), Chapter 17.Google Scholar
7. Young, H. D., Friedman, R. A. and (contributing author) Ford, A. L., Sears and Zemansky's university physics (12th edn.) Vol. 1, Addison Wesley (2008), pp. 400–403.Google Scholar
8. Råde, L. and Westergren, B., Mathematics handbook for science and engineering (4th edn.), Springer Verlag (1999), indefinite integrals nos 170 and 171, p. 160.Google Scholar