Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T07:28:12.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Alternative Assessments of the Performance of the Yucca Mountain Candidate HLW Repository

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

J. H. Kessler
Affiliation:
EPRI, Inc., 3412 Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto CA 94304-1395 USA, ikessler@epri.com
R. K. MCGuire
Affiliation:
Risk Engineering, Inc., 4155 Darley Avenue, Suite A, Boulder CO 80303 USA
J. A. Vlasity
Affiliation:
Risk Engineering, Inc., 4155 Darley Avenue, Suite A, Boulder CO 80303 USA
R. A. Klos
Affiliation:
Aleksandria Sciences, 37, Coverdale Road, Sheffield, S7 2DD, United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

This paper summarizes some of the most recent total system performance assessment (TSPA) work supported by EPRI for the proposed repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. In Part I of the paper, (standard) TSPA analyses are presented. In Part II examples of two types of analyses that augment standard TSPAs are provided that suggest: (1) many components of the Yucca Mountain system contribute to overall hazard reduction; and (2) the biosphere dose conversions used, based on reasonably maximizing assumptions about future human behavior, provide a reasonable upper bound. These additional analyses should provide further confidence when considering more (standard) TSPA analyses.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Demonstration of a Risk-Based Approach to High-Level Waste Repository Evaluation, EPRI NP-7057, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, October 1990.Google Scholar
2. Demonstration of a Risk-Based Approach to High-Level Waste Repository Evaluation: Phase 2, EPRI TR-100384, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, May 1992.Google Scholar
3. Yucca Mountain Total System Performance Assessment, Phase 3, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, December 1996.Google Scholar
4. Alternative Approaches to Assessing the Performance and Suitability of Yucca Mountain for Spent Fuel Disposal, EPRI TR-108732, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto CA, 1998.Google Scholar
5. Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Wastes in a Proposed Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada; Proposed Rule, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 63, Federal Register, 64 (34), 86408679, 22 February 1999.Google Scholar
6. Biosphere Modelling and Dose Assessment for Yucca Mountain, EPRI TR-107190, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, December 1996.Google Scholar
7. Kessler, J., McGuire, R., and Vlasity, J., Allocating Performance Using a ‘Hazard Index’ Approach, Proceedings of the Eighth International High Level Radioactive Waste Management Conference, pp. 438440, Las Vegas NV, May 12-14, 1998.Google Scholar
8. The 1997‘Biosphere’ Food Consumption Survey Summary: Findings and Technical Documentation, TRW Safety Systems Inc., Las Vegas NV, USA, 1997.Google Scholar
9. Results from USDA's 1994-96 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals and 1994-96 Diet and Health Knowledge Survey, Data Tables, USDA, Food Surveys Research Group, Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Riverdale, Maryland 20737, USA, available at http://www.barc.usda.gov/bhnrc/foodsurvey/home/htm, 1997.Google Scholar